EV battery fire. Source MGUY, Fair Use, Low Resolution Image to Identify the Subject.

Hybrid Horror – You are 3x More Likely to Die in a Hybrid Vehicle than a Gasoline Vehicle

Essay by Eric Worrall

Recently released UK government stats suggest Hybrid vehicles are significantly more dangerous to vehicle occupants than gasoline vehicles.

Death rates in hybrids ‘three times higher than petrol cars’ as road safety experts call for inquiry

By GABRIEL MILLARD-CLOTHIER 

PUBLISHED: 10:33 AEDT, 28 December 2025 | UPDATED: 19:32 AEDT, 28 December 2025 

Road safety experts were calling for an inquiry on Saturday night as it was revealed motorists are three times more likely to die in hybrids than in petrol cars.

A total of 122 people died in hybrid car crashes last year, compared with 777 in accidents involving petrol cars, according to Department for Transport figures analysed by The Mail on Sunday.

But as hybrids are outnumbered by almost 20 to 1 on Britain’s roads by petrol models, that means hybrids are three times more likely to be involved in a fatal crash.

Experts believe the higher death rates could be explained by hybrids’ combination of petrol engines and batteries and electric motors, which can be harder to control and more prone to fires.

The cars’ batteries may also be to blame. They can be damaged by the heat of the engine, which burns at extremely hot temperatures, making them more liable to set ablaze.

Hybrids were found by a leading insurer of company cars, Tusker, to burst into flames at higher rates than others. Among their fleet of 30,000 cars, hybrid vehicles had an almost three times’ higher risk with 3,475 fires per 100,000​​​​.  

Read more: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15416671/Death-rates-hybrids-three-times-leading-road-safety-experts.html

If anyone has a link to the original report please post in comments.

It makes sense that hybrids are more dangerous than other vehicle categories. While gasoline fires are probably more likely than a battery vehicle fire, I strongly suspect EV fires are less survivable. That big battery is a mobile thermite bomb.

Mix the higher probability of a gasoline fire and hot engine components with a battery, and I suspect you are combining the worst of both worlds.

Since the report focussed on Britain, it is also possible local conditions in Britain contributed to this risk. Frequent wet weather with lots of loose road salt in winter, poorly maintained roads, a lack of undercover parking, and in winter extreme cycles from freezing cold to hot might all play a part.

I once survived a gasoline vehicle fire, it was nasty, but I had a good minute to escape the vehicle – I had time to pull over, safely get out of the vehicle through the passenger door, and stroll a hundred yards from the vehicle before the fire reached an intensity which would have been life threatening. After the fire was put out by the fire crew, I even managed to recover and salvage my plastic laptop computer. It was scorched and the battery was destroyed, but after a month of drying out it actually booted and survived enough for me to recover my files.

Battery fires are a little more spectacular. From MGUY;

Combine a gasoline fire with a battery fire, and you have a potential recipe for disaster.

And it might not even have to be a fire. Gasoline engine components frequently operate normally at temperatures above the ignition temperature of Lithium batteries, so even say a small leak in the exhaust system might be enough to cause a battery explosion.

There was a brief moment when I considered buying a hybrid. After Covid gasoline prices in Australia shot up, and hybrids started to look attractive. But let’s just say I’m going to defer that purchase decision.

5 2 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of
30 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scissor
December 30, 2025 6:04 am

Safe and effective.

strativarius
December 30, 2025 6:07 am

“You are 3x More Likely to Die in a Hybrid Vehicle than a Gasoline Vehicle”

Having a petrol engined vehicle, that’s me off the hook. But then, what about all the restrictions? The speed bumps (sleeping policemen), the chicanes, the speed limits…

Ridiculous”: London council introduces new speed limit – of just 10mph
Local resident Phil Cudlipp, 68, says he already struggles to ride his Harley-Davidson at 20mph, let alone 10mph, as it stalls.
Phil said: “I walk everywhere now – there’s nowhere to park my bike nine times out of ten.
https://discover.swns.com/2025/10/ridiculous-london-council-introduces-new-speed-limit-of-just-10mph/

The 15 minute city ideal is far from dead.

Reply to  strativarius
December 30, 2025 6:16 am

The 15 minute city ideal is far from dead.

I sure hope so

https://www.15minutecity.com/

worsethanfailure
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 30, 2025 6:51 am

Do feel free to take my place in one.

I lived in what was effectively a 15 minute city when I was in university. The range of tinned soups in the shop was pretty limited and you could forget about fresh produce. Too few potential customers within range.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 30, 2025 6:59 am

HAHAHA

As I understand it, the 15-Minute City aims to localise essential services and jobs within a short walk or cycle, but this “vision” overlooks several practical and social challenges:

Putting all services in every neighbourhood assumes everyone needs the same things and that businesses can survive everywhere. Smaller areas might not support specialised shops or services, so quality and choice could vary.

Although the goal is to build community, making areas too self-contained can isolate them. This reduces interaction between neighbourhoods and limits cultural exchange, which are important for creativity and social connection, and could lead to ghettos.

Modern economies depend on specialised jobs and central hubs. Expecting most work to be within 15 minutes ignores how complex job markets are and could restrict career opportunities especially for those in poorer areas.

Changing cities to fit this idea would cost a lot and take major planning. It could also pull money away from bigger sustainability projects, like improving public transport.

I’m repeating myself, but you really do need to think for yourself and not accept extreme left-wing propaganda at face value.

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 30, 2025 7:28 am

What, you think pointing to a 15-minute city propaganda site will actually change anyone’s mind? You think people here are so ignorant that they will rely on such a site to learn what a 15-minute city is?

You aren’t very good at this.

December 30, 2025 6:18 am

In the USA going back to the 1980s it was shown that small cars have a significantly higher mortality rate than full sized. I think that’s what you are seeing here. Hybrids tend to be very compact

Reply to  MIke McHenry
December 30, 2025 6:29 am

Another problem is that, especially in the US, cars are getting too big.

Young children three times more likely to be killed by SUV, new study finds

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 30, 2025 7:02 am

Isn’t that the same as blaming a knife or a gun for a murder?

Surely, it’s not the vehicles fault, and if so, an EV SUV, there are lots of them and much heavier than the ICE equivalent, are more likely to kill children?

Plus EVs are quieter and less likely to be heard by playing children.

Reply to  Redge
December 30, 2025 7:47 am

re: “Plus EVs are quieter and less likely to be heard by playing children.

Try bicycling too. I was bicycling on a side street and thought I was hearing things (it was windy, too) and turned out I had a car, an EV, off to my left and rear not-passing but following for a bit …

worsethanfailure
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 30, 2025 7:42 am

I can hardly wait to hear the whining about commercial vehicles killing children because they are getting smaller.

Kent Clizbe
December 30, 2025 6:18 am

Looking for a comparable US study. Hybrids are ubiquitous here. Never seen any indication that they are less safe, or more prone to fires.

Here’s the first study I found:

AN ANALYSIS OF HYBRID AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE CRASHES IN THE U.S.
https://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/esv/24th/files/24ESV-000210.PDF

They examined fatal crashes in the USA, from 1999-2013:
 
“Fires were rare in both hybrid and conventional vehicles. Fatal crashes involving fire constituted 2 .6% of hybrid cases and 4.4% of conventional vehicle cases. No cases of fire or electric shock injury for hybrids in NASS/CDS 1999-2013. Only 1 case of a hybrid fire was found in NASS/GES. The incidence of fire was lower for hybrids than conventional vehicles in all three databases.”

Fatal fires in hybrid cars were less likely than in conventional vehicles.

December 30, 2025 6:26 am

I think that we should differentiate between plugin and non-plugin hybrids in this discussion. They probably have very different fatality rates.

Sparta Nova 4
December 30, 2025 6:26 am

But wait, there’s more:

Urban pedestrians are up to three times more likely to be hit by electric car than petrol or diesel model, study finds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13445069/Urban-pedestrians-hit-electric-car-petrol-diesel.html

Electric cars really are ‘silent killers’: Pedestrians are TWICE as likely to be hit by battery-powered vehicles than petrol or diesel ones, study finds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-13443139/Electric-cars-Pedestrians-TWICE-likely-hit.html

Given I more often hear a car before I see it, those reports have a level of credibility.

Allen Pettee
December 30, 2025 6:36 am

I also wonder if the skill of the driver of a hybrid is a factor-perhaps the “granny” drivers of many (not all) hybrid vehicles have lower skills, making them less able to avoid accidents?

Reply to  Allen Pettee
December 30, 2025 7:43 am

Good point. There is also the flip side of the coin, as in the high-performance AMG GT 63 S E Performance, a plug-in hybrid powertrain AND the V8, giving 831 hp and 1,033 lb-ft of torque.

And why the downvotes – is there a downvotard running loose here?

December 30, 2025 6:46 am

‘Study’ was not controlled for a number of factors, which, ‘uncontrolled for’ yield fallacious stats or figures which can result in misconstruing cause and effect relationships.

MarkW
Reply to  _Jim
December 30, 2025 7:10 am

Such as?

Reply to  MarkW
December 30, 2025 7:12 am

Please, give more downvotes first.

(Any study not controlling for certain factors in particular for a consumer product as to “use”, for instance, is going to look lopsided as to results.)

…one death for every 20,000 diesel vehicles, and one death for every 25,000 petrol engines

Does this sound suspicious? Why would diesel be 25% more deadly than gas (5 per 100K diesel compared to 4 per 100K gas). Is it possible they may not be controlling for speed (highway vs in-town). What else aren’t they controlling for?

Reply to  MarkW
December 30, 2025 7:27 am

re: “Such as?

Lets look at this factor uncontrolled for – The choice by younger drivers preferring performance oriented hybrids, the results might be due to differences in drivers, not in the cars themselves.

Some hybrids tune the engine to be very efficient and let the engine and electric motor share the load. The Prius does this. Other hybrids are sports cars, use a high-torque gasoline engine, and add a high-torque electric motor in parallel. Some of these sports cars have batteries that will only take you 10 miles, but can power the car for an amazing acceleration when you punch the accelerator.

Here is one with 800 hp for speed to overcome wind resistance, and 1000 lb-ft of torque for acceleration. A normal car is about a quarter of those figures. “Things get positively bonkers with AMG GT 63 S E Performance, which adds a plug-in hybrid powertrain to the V8, resulting in a hardly believable 831 hp and 1,033 lb-ft.”

https://www.edmunds.com/car-news/2025-mercedes-benz-amg-gt-plug-in-hybrid-first-look.html

Neil Pryke
December 30, 2025 6:46 am

Die ? Of what ? Numbers, please,,!

Reply to  Neil Pryke
December 30, 2025 6:48 am

Fright. Government and NGO induced fright, And worry. Worry kills too …

MrGrimNasty
December 30, 2025 7:03 am

The origin of the story appears to be the Mail On Sunday’s own analysis of Department of Transport data.

Story tip. Where do you go when you’ve turned the alarm up to ten? Eleven of course; Scientists go hyper-hype!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15422243/Amazon-hypertropical-state-MILLIONS-years.html

Bruce Cobb
December 30, 2025 7:12 am

Oh well, at least you will have died helping to “save the planet”.

ResourceGuy
December 30, 2025 7:13 am

But hey, they got great MPG right until the death certificate was issued.

December 30, 2025 7:32 am

Good points!

“I once survived a gasoline vehicle fire, it was nasty, but I had a good minute to escape the vehicle…”

Me too – with my 15-year old daughter in the car, 1990 model, in winter. One possible cause was a piece of plastic road trash contacting the thermal reactor mounted forward on the transverse 4-cyl engine. I remember seeing a plastic bag on the road moments earlier, which I failed to evade. I first noticed the orange glow on the snowbank on the right side of the road. We stopped promptly and got out and away, but after a short distance I decided to go back and get the keys out of the car. The engine compartment and the front of the vehicle was toast, but the fire never made it to the fuel tank or interior seat cushions.

Live and learn.

antigtiff
December 30, 2025 7:35 am

Claims have been made that self driving vehicles have or will have less accidents than human drivers. Mazda has an experimental or it may be production vehicle that is EV drive only but has a small rotary engine to charge the battery if needed.

worsethanfailure
Reply to  antigtiff
December 30, 2025 7:48 am

Self-driving vehicles will be a boon to pedestrians because I will fearlessly step in front of them the moment it suits me to cross the road, just as I would stride confidently through a flock of sheep.

And of course what are they but very slow, low-flying cruise missiles? The terrorist possibilities are amusing.

December 30, 2025 7:49 am

Maybe those with any sort of EV or hybrid are just more arrogant and aggressive on the road. Probably not, but the psychological possibility is there. Maybe on average they’re wealthier than the rest of us and are in a big hurry to get places, being such important people. 🙂

Maybe they drink more or take more drugs- also unlikely, but once again, it may not just be about the machines.