By P Gosselin

Meteorologist Dr. Ryan Maue warns at X that if the winter of 1962-1963 happened again with today’s Europeean energy system, then “Germany won’t make it”. The country has “exceptional energy shortfalls.”
Image genrated by Grok AI
And, suddenly, the weather models are hinting at severe winter conditions across Europe for early January.
Maue’s claim leans on a paper titled: “On the Link Between Weather Regimes and Energy Shortfall During Winter for 28 European Countries,” published in Meteorological Applications (2025) by Emmanuel Rouges, Marlene Kretschmer, and Theodore G. Shepherd. The authors examine how specific atmospheric patterns affect the balance between energy demand and renewable energy production across Europe.
The study focuses on energy shortfall, defined as periods when electricity demand significantly exceeds renewable energy production (specifically wind and solar). It analyzes 28 European countries using a “fixed electricity system” model (based on current infrastructure) and historical weather data (reanalysis) to see how past weather would affect today’s grid.
The researchers found that the primary driver of shortfall varies by region. In cold-climate, low-windd capacity countries, a shortfall is primarily demand-driven (e.g., increased heating needs during cold snaps).
In warm climate, high wind capacity countries, a shortfall is primarily production-driven (e.g., periods of low wind speed or “Dunkelflaute”).
The study categorized winter weather into six specific “regimes.” Only a subset of these—primarily those involving atmospheric blocking (which brings cold, still air)—are responsible for the majority of high-shortfall days. These critical weather regimes often affect large portions of the continent simultaneously, meaning many European countries experience energy stress at the same time.
There is a high level of spatial correlation in energy shortfalls. If one country is experiencing a shortfall, its neighbors are highly likely to be in the same situation. This highlights a potential challenge for “sharing” energy across borders during extreme weather events, as many potential exporters might also be facing deficits.
The authors simulated what would happen if the 1962/1963 winter (the coldest of the 20th century in Europe) occurred with today’s energy system. They concluded that the persistent blocking conditions of that winter would lead to extreme and prolonged energy shortfalls across almost all of Europe, far exceeding the stress seen in more recent decades.
The paper emphasizes that as Europe transitions to renewable energy, understanding the meteorological drivers of shortfall is critical. It suggests that energy planners must account for the fact that extreme weather events can cause simultaneous, continent-wide energy crises that current interconnected grids may struggle to mitigate through simple cross-border trading.
Merry Christmas everyone, stay warm!
The Green Blob depends on faith based energy planning.
Backed up by total ignorance.
100% guaranteed, the cause would be “climate change”.
Yes, the very thing their green grid was designed to prevent. Oh the irony.
Since weather causes climate, it would be “climate change” especially now that the words climate and weather are used interchangeably.
Do you think that will be the German’s wake call?
Any day now.
Just ignore how the world turns to renewbles and electric cars. How the german grid got more stable as they added renewables. More and more european cities move to increase their share of sustainable mods of transport. People get cleaner air and better quality of life.
You just have to believe.
So you believe Santa is real !!
“To make something special, you just have to believe it’s special.”
Mr. Ping: Kung Fu Panda movie
Says the Belief-addled Climate Retard.
“You just have to believe” is a recurring theme across climate propaganda, often emphasizing faith, self-confidence, or spiritual conviction.
As is the case with all fact-free religions.
Merry Christmas
No, its not. But people on this site make it look like that. I’m not here to talk about climate change, though.
Merry Christmas to you as well!
You said “You just have to believe“, not me.
Belief is a religion not science.
Because people here still hope for the magical wake-up monent where the world stops moving towards renewables and starts building coal plants again. Despite all evidence showing otherwise.
So what else do you have left, if not faith?
It’s not hope, it’s reality.
The transition to so-called renewables continues on paper, but in practice governments are quietly re‑embracing fossil‑fuel realism because cheap, reliable energy still comes from coal, gas, nuclear and oil.
Keep your head in the sand as much as you like, reality bites.
“Keep your head in the sand as much as you like”
Bottoms up !! (:-))
To translate that: Data shows you are right, but believe me, in reality it is absolutly not true.
Global Electricity Mid-Year Insights 2025
https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/global-electricity-mid-year-insights-2025/
And regarding oil: ICE sales peaked somewhere in 2018. There won’t be much growth. EVs will remove more demand than the growth in the chemical industry will replace.
Global sales of combustion engine cars have peaked
https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/global-sales-of-combustion-engine-cars-have-peaked
So the data shows I’m correct, but still you want me to believe in your faith.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
From Ember, “We’re a global energy think tank that accelerates the clean energy transition with data and policy”
The latest IEA report explicitly notes that investors are reassessing risks and opportunities across all energy sources, not just clean energy – a sign that the transition is not as linear or inevitable as activists claim.
The fall from the peak of 2018 is due to COVID restrictions and the introduction of EV mandates, not consumer choice.
Seriously, you need to expand your knowledge base and stop lapping up left-wing propaganda.
“…From Ember, “We’re a global energy think tank that accelerates the clean energy transition with data and policy”…”
Consisting of a couple of AWFLs with no real world energy systems design or operating experience.
” in reality it is absolutly not true.”
I have yet to see you post anything that is based in reality.
Checking that article claiming global sales of IC cars have peaked, I’m reminded of my return to university for a second degree in September 1973. I was a bit early on campus and was able to attend a lecture by Dr. King Hubbert on Peak Oil, in which he presented a most convincing argument with equally convincing graphs, amazingly similar to the ones on that site, proving unquestionably that global production of oil had peaked and was going down never to return to its former rate. I hope your longevity is such that as I have, someday you can look back on what you read or heard 50 years past and check the beliefs you formed from them.
Hubbert was right about conventional oil production in the US, but failed to foresee the advances in unconventional oil production. Since oil makes for a great transportation fuel, the market can accommodate moderate price increases which make unconventional oil profitable.
The worst mistake the US made in energy policy was the price controls on oil and gas in the 1970’s. Allowing higher prices would have stimulated efforts at conservation and production.
So all you have is belief.
Major sales of EV in China, to replace smoky 2-stoke bikes.
ALL POWERED BY COAL-FIRED ELECTRICITY.
The transition ot Ruinables is going so well the big banks which were supposed to finance it are falling over themselves to get out..
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/01/08/and-then-there-were-none-jpmorgan-becomes-last-of-the-big-6-u-s-banks-to-quit-net-zero-banking-alliance/
When America stops moving in a certain direction, the rest of the world tends to follow.
“So what else do you have left, if not faith?”
Hope. Hope the insanity stops.
Hope is not a strategy.
Starts? China and others have been building coal plants at a furious pace. There would be no wind/solar/EV fantasy without coal. No one has ever made any of those limited items using wind and solar, and they never will. EVs will never mine and transport the materials needed for that wasteful endeavor.
Like Santa Claus, the “renewables” revolution is for children and the delusional.
Maybe you should update your knowledge on electric mining equipment.
Maybe you should understand the difference between niche applications and general use. It would also be good to understand the difference between voluntary use and force, intimidation, and coercion.
Like this one?
Great combination, massive land destroying open pits powered by massive land destroying low energy gatherers.
Starts building coal plants again?? The worldwide installed capacity of coal-fired generation was ~1060 GW in 2000 and ~2175 GW today. In 2024, the world retired 25 GW but added 44 GW.
Says the troll who still believes that people are voluntarily adopting renewable power and electric cars.
If it so certain that electric cars are the future, why are so many automakers cutting back on production of them?
China, India, Asia, Africa etc etc.. are already building large numbers of coal-fired power plants.
As shown below, wind and solar are a tiny afterthought when it comes to energy supply.
The evidence shows that wind and solar are a totally unsustainable and environmentally destructive intermittent and unreliable energy source.
Most of the world is building coal plants at an increasing rate at the moment. Not faith, just common sense.
However, unlike all religions there will be no resurrection, life after power death will be horrible, in essence it will be hell on Earth, is that what you really wish for?
“I’m not here to talk about climate change, though.”
We noticed.
You are here to inflate your ego (based on perceptions driven by your postings) and incite flame wars (again, perception).
Uses the most ludicrous and gormless comments ‘it’ can think of.
Totally ignoring any link to rationality or reality.
Either deliberate or ‘it’ really is that ignorant and brain-washed all at once..
The stability of the German grid has indeed increased as renewables were added, but that came through an enormous amount of hard work and consumer disruption/adaptation (including businesses fleeing Germany or closing). Had Germany instead had a grid supplied only by fossil fuels and nuclear, the same improvement could have been achieved with minimal effort, at lower cost, and with no consumer disruption. So your statement, although factually correct, was entirely misleading. But I suspect you knew that
More stable in what way? Not challenging you- as I don’t know- just curious.
If they have improved their ability to shed load quickly (IE controlled blackouts), then the grid as a whole could be considered more stable.
That’s a big “if”. Didn’t work in Spain.
I am advised by Grok that (in)stability is based on “the primary indicator used internationally: the System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI), which measures the average annual unplanned outage duration per customer (excluding major events like storms).“, and that the German grid stability has indeed increased overall – although it appears to be struggling a bit in recent years.
And in great cost.
What, like the Spanish grid..?
More and more people are getting violently assaulted on trains and train platforms. Cleaner air doesn’t mean much if you’re not breathing anymore. I’d rather not have this “quality of life” thanks.
To the idea that those that can’t afford electric cars have to run the gauntlet of public transport dangers to satisfy the whims of the green elite, I say No.
Believe? In Santa Claus who together with his little helpers will deliver these miracles when reality intrudes?
You have to believe that the necessary technological breakthroughs will occur in the next couple years and become mainstream instantly. That’s all.
“You just have to believe.”
That is exactly the basis of religion.
Clap as hard as you can, but Tinkerbell still freezes.
You have to click your heels together and clap.
People get cleaner air and better quality of life.
If you havent’t frozen to death I suppose.
Quality of life in Western Society is derived from a large use of fossil fuels and their products.
Without fossil fuels, the world would be a much harder place, lifespan would be far less, food would be scarce, sanitation would not exist, long distance travel would be impossible.
Back to the horse and buggy.
Even total Lusers rely totally on fossil fuels and their products to even exist.
Is there anything that you believe that is actually true?
Absent government mandates and subsidies, both renewable power and electric cars would never exist.
I prefer facts to belief, thank you.
World energy.. The only thing about wind and solar is the amount of yapping.
There is LOW quality of life without fossil fuels and their products.. !!
….
Believe.. as in the Easter Bunny or Snow White or the boogie-man under your bed….???
Is that what you mean. !
No there was NO power production power problem until Ruinables started being forced onto us with overly generous tax breaks and subsidies that the super rich exploited as Buffet himself said wind power is worthless without the tax breaks to which he has gained $10 BILLION in just 7 years period.
YOur ignorance and stupidity is your prison.
Most have been believing for some time now but this is changing as the people see that all the climate predictions are way off. The world turning to renewables and electric cars isn’t really true. Major rental companies have got rid of thousands of cookers and the major car companies have done their maths and are returning to producing engines…for cars, before they go bankrupt.
The only believers of the fake science are waiting hours at charging points and lecturing others into making the same mistake that they did. Now that most of the bribery in the form of subsidies is being withdrawn, the electric car industry cannot compete.
“Winter Turns Severe”…Funny…that…
There’s a lot of cold (negative heat) in the Arctic;
See … https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/overlay=temp/orthographic=1.59,85.07,464/loc=-147.266,89.733
& it’s seeping out !!
Could we reverse the wind turbines & blow it back ?? (:-))
A few days ago the temperature in the Yukon plunged to -55° C. In winter in Canada,
carbon dioxide hibernates.
Actually it’s the water vapor that hibernates!
At that temperature the CO2 condenses and falls as snowflakes to the ground.
Sorry, not so. CO2 has a vapour pressure of 1 atmosphere at -78 degrees Celsius, which is far above the actual partial pressure of the gas in the atmosphere (0.0004 bar). For solid CO2 to be stable at -78C the air would have to be 100% CO2.
I read a lot of the paper “On the Link …” referenced by Ryan Maue. It became very clear that there is a simple solution: power all of Europe from fossil fuels. Weather dependency of supply would be eliminated, and the extra CO2 would help to make a repeat of the 1962/3 winter less likely. The paper spent nearly all of its effort on analysing the impact of the unreliability of renewables. With fossil-fuel power, there is effectively no unreliability. None. And with the high demand in cold winters reduced by the extra CO2, the picture is even clearer: Problem solved. Completely.
“the extra CO2 would help to make a repeat of the 1962/3 winter less likely.”
Why / how ???
“simple solution: power all of Europe from fossil fuels.”
No, we need a baseline Nuclear Power Source, combined with coal & gas, to even out any fluctuations in demand.
I thought someone would pick up on the CO2 bit, but it was based on the content of the article. Ditto the omission of nuclear. IOW, the article itself led to that solution.
A basic assumption in your post is that CO2 generates thermal energy.
It does not.
Nor does it “trap heat” as such is a violation of Kirchhoff’s Law.
Please see my reply to 1saveenergy.
Simple? Well yes. And it’s likely an appropriate answer for the US or Canada or Russia or Australia which have lots of fossil fuels relative to the population. It’s maybe not such a great answer for Europe or Japan who have much more limited fossil fuel resources. Europe in particular has nothing much to work with but a minimal amount of coal and a probably inadequate for 600 million people North Sea oil/gas supply. Moreover Europe has a choice of unreliable places nearby to import fossil fuels from — Russia, the Middle East, or North Africa. Probably their best choice would be to emulate China and burn what they have while building large numbers of nuclear plants.
No probably about it, nuclear is not the best choice, it’s the only choice. Ruinable energy is ruinous, none of this is complicated..
It would be tragic if it really took the spectacle of tens of thousands of people freezing to death in the dark to push the carbon dioxide alarmists to the status of an impotent fringe of political and economic discourse.
I suspect that the CO2 alarmists would say something along the lines of “See? We told you! Climate change! More CO2 restrictions are necessary. Also, the beatings will continue until morale improves.”
“Also, the beatings will continue until morale improves.”
And the insanity will continue until sufficient damages is acccrued.
“the spectacle of tens of thousands of people freezing to death in the dark”
I suspect it will take more than that to convince a lot of the zealots, because they have blind faith.
It’s far easier to con someone than to convince them they’ve been conned.
Look at Christianity; for ~2000 yrs people have believed in a virgin birth & resurrection & nothing will change their minds; it’s been a profitable business model.
“Blind Faith”- one of my favorite rock albums of all time. 🙂
Yup! that was another great cult following, long live Eric Clapton!
Clapton is god
only a demi-god,
The real god of rock is Tielman Susatohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBY-rC6s1bM&list=RDdBY-rC6s1bM&start_radio=1
More Medieval Rock music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJajRZMcQzQ&list=RDzx5JLNuahPc&index=11
Enjoy
I adored Cream. Played them every day for hours.
I suspect the vast majority of Christians never really believed the virgin birth story but they played along with their Church as there was/is no benefit to arguing about it. They probably believe – or should I say hope- in the resurrection story since nobody wants to be deleted from reality. Something to grab on to. But, again, I suspect a high % don’t take it serious. It certainly has been profitable for the Catholic Church.
In your opinion, a God that can create the entire universe is not capable of impregnating a virgin or bringing the dead back to life?
“a God that can create the entire universe”
That’s the opinion of a true believer, so it’s an opinion that can’t be altered, exactly like the opinions of the climate zealots can’t be altered.
We all saw the example of ‘true belief’ in the followers of ‘Harold Egbert Camping’.
Sadly, it will be an order of magnitude or more greater that tens of thousands if the scenarios play out.
Freezing to death does not include starving to death, which will likely also occur under the stated scenario conditions.
I fear you may be right about such a tragedy. It took the Bondi massacre of innocents before the delinquent Australian Labor government was forced to take action on Islamic terrorists operating openly in public spaces. I am afraid it is leftist woke ideology on both religion and climate that is forcing the current antisemitic and climate/energy confrontations with reality.
It would certainly be tragic, but I doubt very much that the environmental lobby would care.
Failure is an option and must occur to bring back rational, reasoned and logic back into vogue. Reading similar warnings and the other misgivings of these renewable energy policies just goes to show the utter stupidity of mankind. Its annoying and aggravating to have too occupy the same space as these imbeciles.
“Failure is an option and must occur to bring back rational, reasoned and logic back into vogue.”
The next world war will allow this CO2 nonsense to fade; currently, we can see too many parallels to 1920/30s politics, we all know what happened next.
At least it will keep some of the ‘Greenies’ happy, as there will be major (violent) depopulation.
We’re seeing depopulation right now in many nations.
The Population Bomb is the manual.
I think what we’re seeing in many nations is that the Left has succeeded in implementing policies that discourage the formation of traditional families and encourage the immigration of non-assimilating foreigners.
The next world war will be fought with wind- and solar-powered tanks, ships, planes and drones, and with non-explosive missiles, so that it won’t add any CO2 at all to the atmosphere. Our military are very diligent in sticking to the essentials, and obviously the other side will be too. We can all look forward to the next world war with confidence.
In other words, WWI again.
Renewables are useless we need fossil fuels to make affordable energy when weather gets colder.
“Renewables”? Try Retardables.
I fear that an extreme winter is exactly what is needed to wake Europe up. I would hope no one dies but a good dose of misery would likely be helpful to wake these people up.
The heaviest snowfall in Dublin in the past 25 years was from the end of November 2010 into Jan 2011. The country was not prepared for this and it was miserable but it would have been far worse if we had problems with the supply of energy in the capital. I do not wish this on the Germans but perhaps it is the only thing that will cause a sufficiently powerful backlash against the foolish climate policies of their government.
People were warning about this back when someone blew up Nordstream.
The Germans have plenty of firewood. Of course, some portion of them will not burn it because of their belieft that if they do, the climate will eventually get warm.
The problem is that it will not be the A****holes who forced this onto the community who die. It will be the poorest Germans who cannot afford energy or protective alternatives like generators to keep themselves from freezing. I would really hope that if this occurs, the German survivors will ensure that the climate creeps are tried for manslaughter because a heck of a lot more people die from cold than being too hot!
While a severe winter may cause a lot of problems for Germany, I’m sure it will also cause a lot of problems for all of Europe. I’d like to think it’d be the wake up call on CO2 warming scam, but I have my doubts.
Nations will be forced to return to fossil fuels AND temperatures will need to continue to cool in order for the grip of this idiocy to be broken. And even then, there will be a large minority of climate morons who will never realize that they’ve been conned by climate grifters.
Let’s hope they get the ship kicked out of them, then maybe they will finally elect the AfD to run the place.