Essay by Eric Worrall
Excepting those Amazon trees which were bulldozed for the COP30 climate conference of course.
Amazon rainforest trees are resisting climate change by getting fatter from CO2 in the atmosphere
By Sascha Pare
Tree trunks in the Amazon are getting 3.3% thicker every decade as the plants absorb extra carbon dioxide, suggesting they are more resilient to global warming than previously thought.
Trees of all sizes across the Amazon rainforest are getting fatter due to climate change, a new study shows.
…
“We knew that the total amount of carbon stored in the trees of intact Amazonian forests has increased,” study co-author Tim Baker, a professor of tropical ecology and conservation at the University of Leeds in the U.K., said in a statement. “What this new study shows is that all sizes of trees have grown larger over the same period — the whole forest has changed.”
…
Read more: https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/climate-change/amazon-rainforest-trees-are-resisting-climate-change-by-getting-fatter-from-co2-in-the-atmosphere
I led with the “fat trees” article because it is an admirable attempt to spin this good news into something bad, because being fat is bad right?
The university press release also attempts to maintain the tension in the face of some very good news.
Average size of trees in Amazon has increased as CO₂ levels rise
SEPTEMBER 25, 2025
by University of Birmingham
edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Robert EganAverage tree size across the Amazon has increased by 3.2% every decade, consistent with a response to rising carbon dioxide levels, a new study suggests.
…
Co-author of the study, Professor Beatriz Marimon, from Universidade do Mato Grosso, who coordinated much of the Brazilian data collection in southern Amazonia, commented, “This is a good news story. We regularly hear how climate change and fragmentation is threatening Amazonian forests. But meanwhile, the trees in intact forests have grown bigger; even the largest trees have continued to thrive despite these threats.”
…Joint lead author of the RAINFOR paper Dr. Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert, from the University of Cambridge—who led the research while at the Universities of Birmingham and Leeds—commented, “Ahead of COP30 in Brazil later this year, these results underscore just how important tropical rainforests are in our ongoing efforts to mitigate against man-made climate change.
“Large trees are hugely beneficial for absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere and this study confirms that. Despite concerns that climate change may negatively impact trees in the Amazon and undermine the carbon sink effect, the effect of CO2 in stimulating growth is still there. This shows the remarkable resilience of these forests, at least for now.”
…
According to Professor Oliver Phillips of the University of Leeds, “What happens to big trees—including how they deal with increasing climate threats and manage to disperse their seeds—is now mission-critical. The only way the giants will stay healthy is if the Amazon ecosystem stays connected. Deforestation is a huge threat-multiplier and will kill them if we let it.”
…
Read more: https://phys.org/news/2025-09-average-size-trees-amazon-co8322.html
No soup for Professor Beatriz Marimon, “this is a good news story” gets you in trouble with the climate community.
The abstract of the study;
Increasing tree size across Amazonia
Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert,† Rebecca Banbury Morgan,† Roel Brienen,† Emanuel Gloor, Simon L. Lewis,† Kyle G. Dexter,† Everton Almeida,† Edmar Almeida de Oliveira,† Esteban ¡lvarez-D·vila,† Atila Alves de Oliveira,† Ana Andrade,† Simone Aparecida Vieira,† Luiz Arag„o,† Alejandro Araujo-Murakami,† Eric Arets,† Luzmila Arroyo,† Gerardo Aymard-Corredor,† Olaf Banki,† Plinio Barbosa de Camargo,† Jorcely Barroso,† Lilian Blanc,† Foster Brown,† JosÈ LuÌs Camargo,† Wendeson Castro,† Victor Chama Moscoso,† JÈrÙme Chave,† Ezequiel Chavez,† James Comiskey,† AntÙnio Carlos Lola da Costa,† Jhon del Aguila Pasquel,† GÈraldine Derroire,† Anthony Di Fiore,† Sophie Fauset,† Ted R. Feldpausch,† Gerardo Flores Llampazo,† Rene Guillen Villaroel,† Rafael Herrera,† Niro Higuchi,† EurÌdice Honorio Coronado,† Isau Huamantupa-Chuquimaco,† Walter Huaraca Huasco,† Eliana Jimenez,† Timothy Killeen,† Susan Laurance,† William Laurance,† Aurora Levesley,† Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez,† Yadvinder Malhi,† Beatriz Marimon,† Ben Hur Marimon Junior,† Simone Matias de Almeida Reis,† Casimiro Mendoza Bautista,† Irina Mendoza Polo,† Abel Monteagudo-Mendoza,† Paulo SÈrgio Morandi,† Adriano Nogueira Lima,† Percy N˙Òez Vargas,† Nadir Pallqui Camacho,† Alexander Parada Gutierrez,† Julie Peacock,† Maria Cristina PeÒuela-Mora,† Georgia Pickavance,† John Pipoly,† Nigel Pitman,† Adriana Prieto,† Carlos Quesada,† Freddy Ramirez Arevalo,† Maxime RÈjou-MÈchain,† Zorayda Restrepo Correa,† Rocio Rojas,† Lily Rodriguez Bayona,† Anand Roopsind,† Rafael Salom„o,† Natalino Silva,† Javier Silva Espejo,† Marcos Silveira,† Juliana Stropp,† Joey Talbot,† Hans ter Steege,† John Terborgh,† Raquel Thomas,† Luis Valenzuela Gamarra,† Peter van der Hout,† Rodolfo Vasquez Martinez,† Ima CÈlia Guimar„es Vieira,† Emilio Vilanova,† Roderick Zagt,† Timothy R. Baker&† Oliver L. Phillips†
Abstract
Climate change and increasing availability of resources such as carbon dioxide are modifying forest functioning worldwide, but the effects of these changes on forest structure are unclear. As additional resources become available, for example, through CO2 fertilization or nitrogen deposition, large trees, with greater access to light, may be expected to gain further advantages. Conversely, smaller light-suppressed trees might benefit more if their light compensation point changes, while bigger trees may be the most negatively impacted by increasing heat and drought. We assessed recent changes in the structure of Earth’s largest tropical forest by analysing 30 years of Amazonian tree records across 188 mature forest plots. We find that, at a stand level, trees have become larger over time, with mean tree basal area increasing by 3.3% per decade (95% CI 2.4; 4.1). Larger trees have increased in both number and size, yet we observed similar rates of relative size gain in large and small trees. This evidence is consistent with a resource-driven boost for larger trees but also a reduction in suppression among smaller trees. These results, especially the persistence and consistency of tree size increases across Amazonian forest plots, communities and regions, indicate that any negative impacts of climate change on forests and large trees here have so far been mitigated by the positive effects of increased resources.
Read more: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-025-02097-4
Reading further, the study notes “The increase in tree size was observed across the whole community.“. All the trees benefited from additional CO2. It also noted that their findings are counter to the alarmist hypothesis that big trees should become rarer, because big trees are more susceptible to the ravages of climate change.
What can I say? Yet another alarmist climate claim bites the dust. All the dust bowl amazon claims are contradicted by observational evidence that trees not currently being chopped down for climate conferences are growing fatter and healthier. But I can’t say it’s much of a surprise that the noisy alarmists who keep claiming the Amazon is dying didn’t bother to actually check.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Climate Change is making Amazon Trees FATTER?
Strange headline.
Trees don’t get FAT.
Trees can’t get FAT.
Trees are Fiberous Cellulose…no fat on them.
FATTER is a term used to describe potential health issues. (fatty liver, fatty heart)
The trees are healthy and simply growing at an increased pace hence the “Thicker Bark”
Not FATTER trees
Healthy trees enjoying the benefit of enhanced CO2 in the atmosphere.
People have fat bank accounts. Mountain bikes have fat tires.
A number of lunatic socialist liberals think having a fat wallet/bank acct is a cancer on society. As far as Mtn Bikes go having a Fat Tire beats having a Flat Tire any day.
“People have fat bank accounts.”
I wish ! 🙁
We should start a revolution. No more “fat” bank accounts or tires! From now on it’s “Healthy bank accounts”, “Healthy tires”!
Well, as trees grow their trunks get wider.
“Does my trunk look big in this?”
New species.. “Fatarsis Kardasionis” !
🤣
Cut down on the root beer.
🤣
Gotta admire a tree with loads of Trunk Space
Tell that to the COP30 Carpetbaggers and their airline pilots due to arrive in droves soon.
Trees like warmth and CO2. Only biology deniers would be surprised at this finding.
The places that have the most species are located in warm countries.
And the evolutionary peaks like the Cambrian explosion happened during warm periods iirc.
Therefore warming should be very beneficial.
Some trees like really, really hard frosts in the winter to kill off their pests. You know, trees like apples and all the trees you find in Yellowstone.
Only because they’ve evolved to suit their climate.
I have not seen any data that indicates rising tropical temperatures. The only effect Amazonian trees are experiencing is a more favorable vegetative growth environment due to increased CO2. Now, if we could just persuade people to stop clearing rainforest…
There’s little evidence that tropical temperature has varied that much even over millennia. It’s the polar/temperate regions that seem to vary much, much more.
They used the word “fatter” on purpose to imply negativity…leftist newspeak or better said utter BS.
Fat…essential part of a healthy diet…only brainwashed idiots try to tell you otherwise, sounds similar to CO2 eh?
Crispy bacon rules…leftards
Much like use of “carbon emissions” to invoke past memories of smog.
That was already proven 3 news before.
Twiggy once used to be a skinny girl and is now a fat dude.
All because co2.
Thanks for the visual 🙁
Fatter equals larger diameter usual growth of trees more value to the locals !
Is this a artefact of measuring still growing forest ?
Plots are where, in cut over or mature forest ?
Fatter logs have higher value if they are not full of termites as they have grown faster it is likely that the termites have not eaten them yet more value
Tropical forests typically do not have huge volumes of merchantable logs / Ha or Acre (usually in single digit cubic meters / ha)again a huge win for the locals
Now World Bank fund roads sawmills plywood mills so the locals can benefit and set up a sustainable forest harvest , if you don’t you are raciest.
In my lifetime, I have observed that as trees grow, their diameter increases and continues to increase until they die. I expect that this phenomena can be observed in any common forest or with any single tree and I expect it could have been observed since trees evolved. What are these 50 or so “researchers” trying to say? Is this report an AI joke?
“AI” wouldn’t have been that stupid.
.Have these people ever gone to school?
.Do they actually read what they write?
.What ”negative impacts” are they talking about?
.Do they just assume there are negative impacts or is it that they have just been told there are?
.Have they considered positive impacts at all?
Wait a second. Is it climate change or increased CO2 which are making trees fatter?
Do you believe climate change and extra CO2 are one and the same? Please explain, dear twonk.
These people don’t write for you, the public, they write for their paymasters.
We’ll figure out how this is bad, just give us a minute…
“at least for now.”
Yuh, those trees might grow so fast and get so fat that they’ll start exploding. Could be bad! 🙂
“Oh shit! It’s Mr Creosote!”
News Flash from the climate bureau..
Climate change makes trees obese !!
“What can I say? Yet another alarmist climate claim bites the dust.”
Call me when this good news hits the front page of The New York Times.
One can always tell the quantity of BS in an article, it’s directly proportional to the number of authors involved in its production. This particular Study, Increasing tree size across Amazonia , has 90 individual authors, a list longer than the abstract.
Yes, but each is blessed by placing a cross after their name. I guess that makes it ok.
Headline writers are a menace even in reporting facts. They are clearly targeting the distracted readership.
The trees need to cut back on their carbons.
Carbs? Perhaps? 🙂
Title of above article:
“Claim: Climate Change is Making Amazon Rainforest Trees Fatter”
Well, multiple doctors have assured me that what is most important is not just girth or absolute weight, but instead body mass index (BMI). Given that, what is the average BMI for Amazon rainforest trees and has it really increased over, say, the last 50 years?
I wanna see OBJECTIVE DATA on this! After all, trees, including rainforest trees, have always lived sedentary lifestyles AFAIK. /sarc
So, Dr Sherwood Idso, vilified by enviros as a shill which the fossil fuel industry paid to spread lies . . . . was right this entire time about trees benefiting from more CO2.
No one is surprised that more CO2 would lead to more plant growth, Amazon trees included. This study just showcases the gymnastics the other side must engage in to persist in their lie. Climate change is a meaningless phrase that is why it is so popular with the other side, it can justify anything they want to justify. This study proves one thing clearly, CO2 is not the boogeyman they want it to be. Bunch of crackpots!
“…trees are resisting climate change by getting fatter …”
I thought we weren’t supposed to fat shame?
Well ‘no foolin’ – is been all over climate news that CO2 increases growth of plants.
Dry land is greening:
With CO2 Levels Rising, World’s Drylands Are Turning Green – Yale E360
thanks to FOS Calgary for that lead.
(Authors seem to still believe that CO2 is causing substantial global warming.)
Is that based on the log diameter of trees being clear cut for the next COP meeting?