Trump Administration Plans to Finance $120 Million Rare Earths Mining Project in Greenland

From Legal Insurrection

Meanwhile, Ford struggles with supply of rare earth magnets as geologists question if there are truly significant mineral deposits under the Arctic island.

Posted by Leslie Eastman 

The last time I wrote about Greenland, the nation had elected independent-minded leaders to the top spots in its political system.

This was then followed by Vice President Vance’s trip with his wife to the Pituffik Space Base on the Arctic island to support the trips.

During an address during the visit, Vance unleashed some hard-hitting statements directed at our ally Denmark. Essentially, Vance took a diplomatic sledgehammer to Denmark’s treatment of Greenland, suggesting that Copenhagen has treated the island more like a neglected outpost than a strategic priority.

Vance did not sugar-coat his opinion of the obliviousness Denmark has had to the threats Russia and China pose in this region.

Given the recent spate of international conflicts (India vs Pakistan, Israel pummeling Iran), Greenland seems to have dropped out of the news. However, it has not been completely forgotten about by President Donald Trump.

The Trump administration is considering financing a $120 million rare earths mining project in the Arctic island nation through a loan from the U.S. Export-Import Bank (EXIM) to Critical Metals Corp, in what would be the administration’s first overseas investment in a mining venture. The project, known as the Tanbreez rare earths mine, is aimed at reducing U.S. reliance on China, which currently dominates the global rare earths market.

Critical Metals Corp (CRML.O) has received a letter of interest from the U.S. Export-Import Bank (EXIM) for a loan worth up to $120 million to fund the company’s Tanbreez rare earths mine in Greenland, in what would be the Trump administration’s first overseas investment in a mining project.

The loan, if approved, would boost U.S. access to minerals increasingly at the center of global economic trade and help offset the country’s reliance on market leader China….

…In a letter dated June 12 and reviewed by Reuters, New York-based Critical Metals has met initial requirements to apply for the $120 million EXIM loan and, if approved, would have a 15-year repayment term, longer than the company likely would have with private financing.
The project would have to be “well-capitalized with sufficient equity from strategic investors” to receive the loan, the letter said.

EXIM, which acts as the U.S. government’s export credit agency, said in the letter that Critical Metals qualifies for a loan program designed to support companies that compete with China.

Diversifying from China is becoming an urgent matter. For example, Ford Motor Co. reports that it is struggling with supplies of rare earth magnet because of China tightening the level of exports.

Automakers, especially those focused on EVs, are among the largest industrial consumers of rare earth materials.

China granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top three U.S. automakers, including Ford, earlier this month, according to a Reuters report.

But Farley told Bloomberg News the company continues to struggle.

“It’s day to day,” Farley said. “We have had to shut down factories. It’s hand-to-mouth right now.”

Will Greenland be the answer? Maybe…and maybe not.

Several prominent geologists are skeptical about the widely touted prospects of Greenland’s rare earth reserves, arguing that the narrative of a “mineral bonanza” is exaggerated and that significant challenges remain before these resources can be meaningfully developed.

Minik Rosing, a Greenlandic geologist and professor at the University of Copenhagen, is among the most vocal critics of claims that Greenland holds vast, easily accessible rare earth riches. Rosing emphasizes that while rare earth elements are present in Greenland, they are not uniquely abundant or concentrated compared to other parts of the world. He points out that rare earths are neither rare nor earths in the traditional sense—they are a group of metals found in many rock types globally, and large known deposits exist elsewhere.

Rosing, a native Greenlander and professor at the University of Copenhagen, is credited with making life on Earth no less than 300 million years older by discovering a carbon signature in Greenlandic rock formations. He has spent years studying the territory’s terrain. He argues that the assumptions about getting rich quickly from untapped resources in Greenland are akin to planning to get wealthy by playing the lottery. The widespread lack of detailed knowledge about geology, mining, and minerals has resulted in, he says, an almost “mythological misunderstanding” of what rare earth elements truly are.

“In geology, we say what characterizes rare earths is that they are neither rare nor earth. They are a group of metals that are commonly occurring in many rock types, and there are large known deposits of them throughout the world,” Rosing explained to 60 Minutes.

According to Rosing, nothing points to a special concentration of minerals and rare earths in Greenland, and there are many places in the world where minerals are easier and cheaper to obtain, such as the USA.

In the U.S. Geological Survey’s overview of known rare earth reserves from 2024, Greenland sits eighth in the table, ranked just behind the US but far behind countries such as China, Vietnam, and Brazil.

Whether or not there are large deposits, this move could be an important phase in showing the Greenlanders that the U.S. is serious about in investing in the region for our security and theirs.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 7 votes
Article Rating
38 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
June 17, 2025 6:42 am

I think the Danes are conflating neglect and being Green.

2hotel9
June 17, 2025 6:49 am

This sounds more like something Musk should be doing, not USG. USG should be prioritizing rare earths development inside continental US, instead. Musk’s companies are major rare earth mineral users, as are other American manufacturers, USG should be clearing obstacles blocking our own rare earths mining/processing industry.

KevinM
Reply to  2hotel9
June 17, 2025 8:41 am

Sounds almost like the guy elected to reorganize the government is mining for battery supplies and the guy running the battery car company is reorganizing the government.

2hotel9
Reply to  KevinM
June 17, 2025 12:47 pm

Long as they get it done, and a$$bang the Democrat Party in the process, I’m happy.

Curious George
Reply to  2hotel9
June 17, 2025 1:00 pm

Will we send the mined minerals to China for processing as usual?

2hotel9
Reply to  Curious George
June 17, 2025 1:11 pm

If Democrat Party is involved in the process.

June 17, 2025 7:00 am

What sort of geologic formations are “rare earths” likely to be found?

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
June 17, 2025 7:33 am

In the U.S., they are apparently found in geologic formations that are overlain by critical habitat for “endangered species”.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  pillageidiot
June 17, 2025 10:27 am

Ha-ha!

KevinM
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
June 17, 2025 8:42 am

rare formations?

Reply to  KevinM
June 17, 2025 11:31 am

limestone? sandstone? granite? fluvial deposits? shale?

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
June 17, 2025 12:21 pm

There are actually several common geologic mechanisms for creating deposits.

1.) Magmatic intrusives
2.) Placer deposits (usually derived from slightly weathered and altered igneous rocks)
3.) Certain sedimentary sequences – typically high in phosphatic minerals (However, there are some clay deposits, and even some coal layers with rare earth concentrations.)
4.) Some laterite soils

The link below is to a basic powerpoint discussion on rare earths from the DOE.

Probably worth reading if you want a little more information on the topic.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/netl-file/S-T-REE-TechTeam-Mtg-062716-TBank-Classification-Scheme-of-REE-deposits.pdf

KevinM
Reply to  pillageidiot
June 17, 2025 3:15 pm

Awww, you answered the real question. Have you nothing sarcastic to add?

ilma630
June 17, 2025 7:07 am

Or we forget about EVs and wind turbines, and just refine steel & aluminium for ‘normal’ transport and power generation.

potsniron
June 17, 2025 7:09 am

We know already that there are Thorium deposits that are being mined with Chinese involvement. They had increased the closeby harbor facilities for transporting the ore away. Originally Denmark had opposed this effort, but the Greenland administration went ahead.
I would venture to say that a lot of geology remains unexplored, and Trump would not be so eager, just on speculation.

Petey Bird
June 17, 2025 7:51 am

I know for sure that junior mining investment is very risky. Anywhere in the world.

Scarecrow Repair
June 17, 2025 7:57 am

More stupid market meddling. If there’s a market demand for those minerals, greedy capitalist pigs will finance extracting them. Government “investment”, by definition, is for projects that markets have already decided are not worth the investment.

I’d really like to just once have an administration that actually believes in markets and capitalism.

Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
June 17, 2025 9:34 am

I think you might be missing the potential big back-story here. If Greenland is the neglected wife and the big, “handsome” guy next door asks her out for a cup of coffee, and so on and so forth ……

Reply to  philincalifornia
June 17, 2025 10:30 am

SR is correct. Trump has some rent-seeker in his ear.

Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
June 17, 2025 6:51 pm

The hypotheses are not mutually incompatible. I suspect that we’ll see more of Greenland over the next few years, by methods such as this. As you might also see with the Diego Garcia supposed Starmer fiasco. From perplexity.ai :

Yes, US bombers have recently landed at Diego Garcia. Multiple credible sources confirm that B-52 Stratofortress bombers arrived at the US military base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean in May 2025, joining B-2 Spirit stealth bombers that had been stationed there since March 2025

KevinM
June 17, 2025 8:38 am

Article titled “DOGE is missing a trillion dollars a year in regulatory costs
appears right beside article titled “Trump Administration Plans to Finance $120 Million Rare Earths Mining Project in Greenland”

Trillion: 1000000000000
120 M: 120000000

Mining project about 0.01 percent in scale of the missing money.
about a quarter the ratio of CO2 to Nitrogen in air

Reply to  KevinM
June 17, 2025 10:39 am

There is a difference, in addition to magnitude.
These actions are opposition to each other.
Doge was supposed to save money (supposed, little has been saved so far; it is vaporware).
The 120 $million is real, new spending – justification for DJT to waste time on Greenland when he has far larger problems on his plate – such as stopping two or more wars.

2hotel9
Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
June 17, 2025 1:06 pm

IDF doesn’t need input from leftists to end the war Iran started in 1979, and the real focus DJT should be concentrating on is using the Democrat Party tool of Asset Forfeiture to strip the billions of dollars of capital .edu have been sitting on in endowments all the while stealing billions of dollars in tax payer money. As for Putin and Zelensky, that is not a war, it is a criminal enterprise both of them are massively profiting from while killing off 100s of thousand of their “useless eaters” and political opponents. Cut off their personal profits and it will end over night.

John Hultquist
June 17, 2025 9:34 am
Reply to  John Hultquist
June 17, 2025 10:40 am

Thanks for the map reference.

2hotel9
Reply to  John Hultquist
June 17, 2025 1:08 pm

All this mining is going to be done at the airport? That is all that map shows, airports.

June 17, 2025 10:17 am

To be sure that I’m reading this right: this is the US Government giving (or lending?) money for this?

I don’t care for this approach, even if a loan. Encouraging private investment is fine. But no direct government involvement.

June 17, 2025 10:28 am

DJT does not understand two things and his advisors are controlled by rent-seekers:

  1. The ‘rare’ in rare earths has little to do with being rare. Rare earths are abundant within the boundaries of the USA. We need to mine and process rare earths responsibly and with environmental safety. Plus, we get a thorium bonus at the same time.
  2. The permanent magnet business counts on the exponential expansion of wind turbines. Superconducting rare earth magnets for fusion energy devices are a small additional boondoggle. Both blunders are now well underway.

Building wind turbines is an incredible waste of commodities, including rare earths.

2hotel9
Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
June 17, 2025 1:09 pm

Wow, Trump certainly has your .edu panties in a twist.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
June 17, 2025 10:46 am

The problem in the US with mining rare earth minerals is the same problem with building nuclear energy plants …. eco zealots and permissions. The only reason I can tell that China is a leading producer is the government fronts the mining money, labor is cheap, and they don’t care about collateral damage to the environment. “Rare earth” minerals aren’t rare and they exist in every country.

Bruce Cobb
June 17, 2025 11:39 am

“Mind if we plant the American flag over here? Just for looks, of course!”

oeman50
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
June 18, 2025 4:52 am

Cue “Immigrant Song.”

Bing Videos

John Hultquist
June 17, 2025 12:29 pm

TIP – – -WSJ June 17
Automotive Energy Supply Corp., or AESC
How a Chinese-Owned Battery-Maker’s Bet on U.S. EVs Went Wrong

BigE
June 17, 2025 2:57 pm

There is sufficient rare earth minerals in the US if you mine for them. Finding and getting environmental approvals to process these metals in the US is the problem.
China has come to dominate the rare earth market because it can do so without heavy oversight and regulation, including finding people to work in the processing plants die to hazards.

ResourceGuy
June 17, 2025 6:00 pm

Rare earth’s are just the latest version of mineral resource hype and misunderstanding of perceived scarcity. A bigger concern that is under appreciated is complexity and cost of processing. Maybe also look closer to home with the saga of the Mountain Pass mine in California for the real issues.

June 18, 2025 8:00 am

Rare earths in Greenland…hmmmm…..sounds more like a cover for Trump’s dream of going down in the history books of expanding the U.S. empire borders to include Greenland and Canada, since U.S. has enough rare earths, just nobody likes the vats of various acids and disposal of waste required to purify them….

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  DMacKenzie
June 18, 2025 9:14 am

You have credible verification available that Trump has such a dream?

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
June 19, 2025 9:50 am

Just search for ‘51st state’…