By Vijay Jayaraj
Kooky tales about Antarctica abound – including the presence of UFOs, a lost civilization and a passage to Earth’s interior. All are generally dismissed as absurd. Yet, some widely accepted claims about climate change and ice sheets at the planet’s southernmost end are equally far-fetched.
The world is told daily that rising CO2 levels are melting polar ice, shrinking crop yields, and pushing humanity toward extinction. “Institute radical decarbonization or we’re all dead!” is the cry of our enlightened overlords, as if swapping incandescent bulbs for LEDs and banning gas cars would spare us from their predicted apocalypse. They demand immediate economic hara-kiri to avoid weather predictions based on pseudoscience and outright deception.
Real-world data – from Brazil’s record harvests to the rebound of Antarctica’s ice – expose the climate crusade for the baseless hysteria that it is.
Brazil’s agricultural triumph
The Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics projects cereals, legumes, and oilseeds to reach more than 325 million metric tons of production this year, an 11% increase over 2024.
Production of soybeans, another cornerstone crop of global food security, is expected to hit 161 million metric tons in Brazil, a 6% jump from the previous year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Foreign Agricultural Service. Brazil’s National Supply Corporation forecasts total grain production to be more than 322 million metric tons, up over 8% from the prior harvest, as rice leads with an increase of nearly 10% in planted area.
What does this mean for you? These numbers are evidence of a thriving agricultural sector that feeds millions worldwide. Brazil’s success challenges dire warnings from the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of rising CO2 and temperatures disrupting agriculture.
Warmer climates and higher CO2 levels are enhancing plant growth, as warmth extends growing seasons and CO2 acts as a natural fertilizer, facts that are evident across the globe.
Antarctica’s ice rebound
Far south of Brazil, in the freezing landscape of Antarctica, another climate myth is derailed. A poster child of climate disaster forecasts, Antarctica is adding to its inventory of ice for the first time in decades. Recent data reveal that Antarctica’s ice sheet is growing. Between 2021 and 2023, Antarctic ice gained mass at a rate of approximately 108 metric gigatons per year, driven by anomalous precipitation accumulation.
This marks the first sustained ice growth in decades and should be headline news. The melting of polar ice has long been used to justify urgent policy interventions – from net-zero mandates to oil and gas restrictions to agricultural taxes. We were told rising CO₂ meant inevitable ice loss and catastrophic sea-level rise. But when the ice grows instead of shrinks, the climate establishment barely flinches.
Why are the people most entrusted with global climate policy ignoring or dismissing data like this? And more importantly, why are policymakers doubling down on economically destructive climate agendas when the physical world is contradicting their models?
Some independent researchers, farmers and energy analysts have raised red flags about flawed assumptions underlying the climate narrative. But they are often silenced or labeled “deniers” – a term designed to shut down inquiry rather than invite discussion.
Record crops and growing ice sheets are empirical evidence that challenges climate orthodoxy. Ignoring this information is not only unscientific but also immoral.
The IPCC, the supposed gold standard for climate science, has built entire policy frameworks around the assumption of irreversible polar ice loss and inevitable climate collapse from the use of fossil fuels. These frameworks have been adopted wholesale by politicians like Canada’s Mark Carney, England’s Keir Starmer, Australia’s Anthony Albanese, California’s Gavin Newsom and others.
So, what happens when nature refuses to follow their political scripts? Nothing. The policy train keeps moving, fueled by inertia, institutional pride and personal hubris. The crisis is not in our atmosphere. It is in institutions corrupted by groupthink, rent-seeking and lust for power.
Until some measure of integrity is restored to scientific and political leadership, the real catastrophe is the collapse of trust in those designated to protect liberty, engender economic growth and allow for the continued advancement of human civilization.
This commentary was first published at BizPac Review on May 9, 2025.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO₂ Coalition, Arlington, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The default position of all climate carpetbaggers is –
“I’m just following the science . . . ”
And they know they’re lying as the words escape their gobs.
That assumes they’re frauds. Of course, they might not know – which means they are just fools. Or suffering from a mental deficit – unable to discern fantasy from reality.
True, but the money keeps coming, that is the important thing!
Like climate modellers, who think their model results create reality. If observations don’t agree with the model results, the observations are wrong.
Yes, the old “we know (because the models say so)” – while the models contradict reality.
A couple of quotes.
— “The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.” – Professor Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research.
— “The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.” – Dr David Frame, climate modeler, Oxford University.
So they then use their models to “correct” the observations.
It really is the absolute opposite of science.
All various forms of dishonesty. Parsimony insists that intent is involved at some level. Self-deception for self-preservation may indeed be a mental deficit, but an intentional one.
Random drug testing seems to be in order, especially for politicians.
The science as hyperbolized by corrupt media.
They read the headlines so the are following the science (of propaganda).
If the Antarctic is cooling, and the Arctic is warming, and carbon dioxide levels are similar – then it strikes me that means something other than carbon dioxide causes warming and cooling.
Joke alert:
The theory I propounded in answer to my own above comment was that the anomaly is because heat rises – and as the Arctic is above the Antarctic – heat is moving upwards from south to north. 🙂
That was enough to get me banned from The Times for promoting mis-information – even though I marked it as a joke (or even a goak).
No, the heat only gets as far as the equator. That’s why the tropics are hot. Cold water falls round the globe from the Arctic, but because of capillary action, it adheres to the surface, follows the globe and accumulates at the bottom of the globe, which accounts for the ice piling up – several kilometers thick.
All pretty simple, really.
/pathetic_humour off
How do you know which way the Earth is, up and down are conceptually flawed! More misinformation?
/sarc etc.
Just look at a map.
/s
Like this one
Arctic warming? Phooey. See website ocean.dmi.dk and observe that the Arctic which is 80N and above unfreezes to perhaps one and a half degrees (oh the horror) for about four weeks in the summer and follows a freezing pathway otherwise. This SINCE 1958! Check out the graphs
AGW…
One ‘happy’ soul firebombed two tier’s £2m NW5 pad and another Starmproperty
Oh well.
Can you translate that into English, please?
A car which was parked in the same street as Sir Keir Starmer’s family home, was destroyed in a suspicious fire last Thursday.
It can now be revealed that the car was once owned by the Prime Minister, but it is believed that it was later sold to a neighbour.
Two days after the vehicle blaze, a flat once owned by Sir Keir in Islington in the 1990s was also damaged in an alleged arson attack.
And in a third incident in the early hours of Monday morning, Sir Keir’s family home in Tufnell Park was targeted in a suspected firebomb incident.
Counter-terrorism police are investigating the three incidents and a 21-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of arson with intent to endanger life.
Thanks!
Property prices in London are ridiculous!
So, what happens when nature refuses to follow their political scripts? Nothing. The policy train keeps moving, fueled by inertia, institutional pride and personal hubris.
Well in Oz you have 40% of homes with those subsidised Chinese solar panels on their rooves and that’s a lot of voters also expecting Chinese battery subsidies now because FIT is going to zero and headed negative. So that’s a lot of voters to let down with OOPS! we might have over egged the pudding here folks but not to worry just keep telling yourselves the fickles are cheaper….the fickles are cheaper…
Anything which doesn’t fit the “CO2 causes everything” fantasy is obviously anomalous.
Only in climate “science” is something “anomalous” because it is different from some arbitrary 30-year average of the same thing.
“Until some measure of integrity is restored to scientific and political leadership”
“It’s dead , Jim ”
😉
“So, what happens when nature refuses to follow their political scripts? Nothing. The policy train keeps moving, fueled by inertia, institutional pride and personal hubris.”
You’re leaving out the over-arching reason: The de-industrialization of the West.
The original charter of the UN climate organization (whatever it was called back then) was to study the climate and its natural and anthropogenic factors. That quickly morphed into feed in CO2 and see how the temperature changes.
One of the first, if not the first science report clearly stated the researchers could not detect a human signature in the climate. A US government official (name escapes me) went and rewrote the summary report stating the signature was real and clear and the scientists and researchers protested, but the change stayed. In addition, it became a rule that if the science reports disagreed with the summary, the science reports had to be modified to agree.
One can no longer find any of this history using Google. Then again Google reached agreement with the IPCC to promote their disinformation above anything else.
I am not making any of this up. The records have been suppressed so verification is impossible.
Anyone who can access those old files, please provide links.
Have you tried searching here on WUWT? Using “summary for policy makers” returns posts such as: The Disparity Between IPCC Science Reports, Summary For Policymakers and Reality, Requires a Political Science Solution; by Tim Ball – from 10 years ago.
Civilisations thrive in warm periods, and die off in cold periods. All you need to know really.
Brazil is both poor and already hot.
Two things the climunists have proclaimed dooms countries to agricultural collapse in the near future.
The fact that Brazil is not only not collapsing, but thriving and expanding, is just further proof that the claims of the climunists were never based in reality.
The reason these people mentioned above are so supportive of the climate narrative is that they’re looking for ways to establish or re-establish carbon pricing that in most cases was terminated to garner votes in federal elections. Canada is a good example since Mark Carney was a long-standing advocate of environmental taxation. Except when he realized the main party opposing him in the April 28 election was running much of its platform on abolishing carbon pricing which it claimed was just costing consumers money without showing any appreciable drops in national e. missions, he suddenly jumped on the “Axe the Tax” bandwagon. Now Canadians shouldn’t be surprised if some sort of similar tax is imposed on producers who’ll promptly pass on their increased costs with higher prices in the marketplace. So consumers are likely to pay higher prices regardless.
The CAGW clowns aren’t the least bit interested in climate, science or the truth. All that interests them is power and control, they are liars and cheats.