It’s hard not to chuckle while reading Bloomberg’s opinion piece, “Years of Climate Action Are Being Demolished in Days by Trump.” One gets the sense that Mark Gongloff and Elaine He were typing furiously through a cascade of tears, their trembling hands barely able to clutch their reusable bamboo keyboards. Their anguish is palpable — and deeply entertaining.

According to the authors, “nothing could have prepared us for the breadth or intensity of the assault on climate action that Trump has unleashed.” Ah yes, the horror of returning to basic national sovereignty and energy affordability! Apparently, the unleashing of logic and cost-benefit analysis is too much for the climate-industrial complex to handle.
The article catalogs 82 actions across 20 government bodies in Trump’s first 52 days. Yes, 52 days. That’s one climate heresy every 15 hours. Magnificent. It’s almost poetic how efficiently bureaucratic bloat, pseudoscientific hand-waving, and fiscal recklessness were being scaled back. Bloomberg calls this a “climate onslaught”; most Americans would call it a long-overdue spring cleaning.
Here are a few gems that made the writers gasp in horror:
- The Environmental Protection Agency began overturning its 2009 “endangerment finding” that declared CO₂ — the gas you’re exhaling as you read this — a “threat to public health.” Reassessing this laughable conclusion is now apparently akin to committing a war crime.
- The Transportation Department ceased expanding the EV-charger network and halted congestion-pricing schemes. In other words, they stopped using tax dollars to subsidize cars for rich people and punishing working-class drivers.
- The Energy Department resumed approving LNG export projects, aka promoting energy abundance and American jobs. Scandalous.
- NOAA was told to halt international communications. Given NOAA’s track record of producing press releases about “record warm years” by tweaking data sets like they’re playing Jenga, this may be the most scientifically responsible act of the century.
The authors frame this as “abdicating America’s role as a global climate leader.” But let’s translate: Washington D.C. stopped spending billions to appease unelected foreign bureaucrats at climate conferences while saddling U.S. citizens with skyrocketing energy bills. Leadership, indeed.
We’re also treated to the classic Bloomberg refrain about “trillions in damages threatened by climate change.” Not projected — threatened. The assumption, as always, is that climate models, with their documented biases and missed predictions, are sacrosanct. Dissent is blasphemy. Ironically, these models continue to predict doom while observable data stubbornly refuses to cooperate.
And the best part? The fear. Gongloff and He declare that Trump’s actions “will deepen our climate crisis.” Oh no! Not the climate crisis! You know, the one that requires infinite subsidies, zero accountability, and science by press release.
Nowhere in this breathless obituary for climate bureaucracy do the authors mention the economic toll of Net Zero, the trillions spent for negligible climate benefit, or the consistent failure of international agreements to do anything measurable to global temperature or extreme weather trends. To question this is, of course, heresy.
This entire article is a monument to the worldview that believes government must centrally plan energy use, transportation choices, agricultural practices, and even your air conditioning settings — all in the name of an unverifiable catastrophe that always lies 10 years in the future. It’s not journalism. It’s therapy for the climate clergy.
So, to Trump’s team: bravo. In just 52 days, you’ve inspired more genuine reform, more reevaluation of flawed premises, and more public discussion than a decade of carbon tax conferences ever achieved. If the reactions from the climate alarmist media are this apocalyptic, it’s a clear sign you’re doing something right.
The scale and complexity of Trump’s onslaught — highlighted in the following table — may seem discouraging. Even the actions that courts have tried to overturn have still left chaos and uncertainty in their wake. But awareness is the first step to recovery. Our hopes of having a livable environment depend on it.
To the rest of us? Sit back, relax, and enjoy the sound of bureaucracies being defunded. It’s not just the hum of freedom — it’s the sound of common sense making a comeback.
For a good laugh, here’s a non-paywalled version, but finish your sip of coffee and put the cup down before reading. It’s got charts!
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“Not the climate crisis! You know, the one that requires infinite subsidies, zero accountability, and science by press release.”
…… and doesn’t exist.
“Our hopes of having
a livable environmentan eventual Marxist state depend on it.The authors can take a long walk off of a short pier if they expect me to be stupid enough to believe that this has anything to do with the climate.
Long walk off a short pier is an expression I have not heard in ages. Takes me back to the good old days of youth when summers were hot and winters were cold.
You know. Weather is part of life on Earth. Deal with it or, if needed, hunker down until it passes.
Haven’t used the expression for a long time myself. Never really forgot it.
Long walk off a short plank.
Plank or pier. Either one works.
Or if you live in Chicago: the saying is: “Walk East until your hat floats”
We could say that here in Wisconsin as well from Green Bay all the way to the Illinois state line.
Most of the graduates of the so called elite universities have been propagandized into believing that a Marxist state is the only one worth living in. (At least for them, as they envision themselves as being the ones who will be running this Marxist state.)
They forget that,generally speaking, the elites are the first ones liquidated.by the not-so-elites with the guns
Why do you think there is a major push to ban guns.
Not saying the tragedies are anything but real, but disarming the population goes against what the Founding Fathers envisioned. The ability of the States and/or the people to be rid of tyranny should it become invested in the government.
This is such a nice change from the Obama/Biden years. Obama notoriously refused to call a real crisis a crisis, namely the invasion across the southern border and hundreds of thousands of our citizens dying from illegal drugs, but people across the country with slightly lower heating bills at night during the winter is a “climate crisis”. But now, sanity is back in office. I’m lovin’ it!
This entire article is a monument to the worldview that believes government must centrally plan energy use, transportation choices, agricultural practices, and even your air conditioning settings”
Here in Wokeachusetts, the Governor created a “climate smart forestry committee” to come up with brilliant climate smart forestry policies and practices. The committee included few people with the slightest understanding of the climate and even less of forestry. What they now call for is much less logging and when it does occur, much lighter. It’s idiotic- brain dead- which of course I’ve been screaming about but I’m one of the few people in this Mecca of climate lunacy so they just ignore me.
So, the result is less wood products being produce locally. Meanwhile, the Governor whines about a huge housing shortage. She seems to fail to understand you need a lot of wood to produce housing. She must think it’s climate smart to import wood from the far corners of the planet.
Does anybody know who wrote the article?
He did.
🙂
But Who’s on first.
Yes, she did.
It’s at the top.
Yes it is
One gets the sense that Mark Gongloff and Elaine He were typing furiously through a cascade of tears, their trembling hands barely able to clutch their reusable bamboo keyboards.
Thanks.
government must centrally plan
How many times has this been the approach?
Marist
Socialist
Communist
oops Democrats
Socialists have been trained to believe that they are the smartest people in any room. The burden of being so smart obligates them to run everyone’s lives. For the good of the planet of course. Peons just can’t be trusted to think for themselves. Of course, they expect to be rewarded handsomely for bearing this burden.
EXACTLY! I know people like that, they have no idea how wrong they are.
What really sad is how supposedly smart people think a gas that is essential for life is a pollutant. Even more insane is that humans can come up with a global temperature accurate to a hundred degree. The question has always been the not that the climate is changing(it always is) it how much which way, why and what time frame. Those question remain unanswered all though I would bet in the history of earth that this is one of the coldest ever in the time frame of the last 100,000 years. The little variation with that time frame doesn’t matter that much. Yet, I believe the trend is for colder not warmer. People enjoy the warmth for as long as it last, because sometime in the not to distant future in earth time it going to get colder. My guess at my age I won get to see it, Yet it a sure bet future generation will. The next ice age will come and I doubt humans will be able to stop it.
It does appear that we have passed the inflection point; it might get warmer for a while, but near generations are likely going to have something other than social media posts to keep them busy.
Too much CO2 will undoubtedly (by some) be blamed for the reverse and the cold.
You mean like in the 70s when CO2 was blamed for the approaching mini ice age?
Actually mal, this Holocene period is an interglacial, so no it’s on the high-end of temperatures for the past 100,000 years. If it follows the normal course of such an interglacial, we are on its downslope and we don’t have enough fossil fuel to burn to avoid that by that method. We are however clever enough to be able to figure out other ways to keep the planet at this habitable temperature for humans so, unless we obliterate ourselves first, planet Earth won’t be going glacial again. Certain classes of humans may have to be “defunded” shall we say, but that necessity will take care of itself.
Thinking humans can control Earth climate preventing the next glaciation is as naive as believing that anthropogenic CO2 causes climate warming.
Of course, when the onset of the next glaciation will become obvious, there will be no shortage of charlatans offering their “solutions” to climate cooling at public expense.
Some do, but not all of them. But they sure think that promoting this narrative can make the rich.
Amendment 28
Section 1
Congress shall make no law to regulate,
tax, sequester or license atmospheric
carbon dioxide.
The right of the people to freely emit
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere from
any source, from any place at any time
in any amount shall not be interfered with.
Section 2
All activity commercial or private within
the United States and all territory subject
to the jurisdiction thereof for the purposes
of altering climate is prohibited.
The Congress and the several States shall
have concurrent power to enforce this article
by appropriate legislation.
Are these literally the words used, or is this a hopeful poem? This is a serious question, even if it might be a naive one. If these are the words used, then good. What is it an amendment to? And where should I go for the legal detail about such an amendment, and for the document that it amends? Thanks for any help with this, and my apologies if the answers seem obvious.
Hopeful poem.
Thanks. A pity.
So it turns out that elections really do have consequences, and some are not happy about it. Nice. And just like for better border security, “…it turned out that all we really needed was a new president.” (DJT, 3-4-2025)
A new president is not quite correct. We have had several new presidents that allowed this to reach the point we are at.
We needed a new leader. Unfortunately Trump was forced into lawfare battles his first term so he was less than effective to the solving the need.
Disagree…. leadership of a complex structure of humanity called government requires paying attention to those around you who have more relevant experience. In Trump we apparently have a leader with a childhood dream of world domination based on beggaring neighbors who already cooperate on economic, political and military issues. His dislike of climate nonsense is not based on knowledge but instead business expansion. It will not end well when his “you’re fired” tough guy schtick wears thin.
You sound like you suffer from TDS.
Certainly the leader needs to have advisors and experts, that is not the argument.
The point is a new president is not necessarily a leader or possibly not the leader we need.
I made no comment on how the current administration is performing.
Anything that causes the climastrologists to lose sphincter control is a good thing.
True, however, the additional methane produced would make things worse than we thought.
Good line, but the absorption spectrum for CH4 overlaps water vapor, so methane is not a significant greenhouse gas.
Hoo boy, I guess you ain’t heard the news, methane is 82.5 times more powerful
at trapping heat than CO2. It’s right there in the latest IPCC report (#6).
As stated that’s a lie and even if it were stated correctly, “Climate Science” and
the newly minted “Legacy Press” never say how much warming methane will produce. It’s about 1/20th of a degree by 2100.
If anyone thinks it’s any more than that, they should pipe up with their source
and work.
I have no clue to how much energy is inserted into the atmosphere when lightning ignites methane. It is non-zero and probably about as worthless as this post.
I don’t know, Tom. Many climastrologists are also vegan or vegetarian, so any lose of sphincter control could result in quite a bit of additional water vapor being released, and that doesn’t take into account all the unusual volatiles due to their damaged intestinal biome and high legume consumption! I’d recommend at least double the Covid distancing requirements, just to be safe!
So wet farts are climate friendly then?
And has only 1ppm in air – infra red would difficulty finding any CH4 mols.
It’s not the weather that will be affected. It will be nostrils.
Common Sense, Courtesy of Trump
The UK hasn’t got the memo.
“Jingye, the Chinese company which owns British Steel, is set to close its Scunthorpe steelworks blast furnaces with 2,000-2,700 jobs up for the chop. “
And
“Just Stop Oil says it’s giving up on protests.
…
initial demand to end new oil and gas is now government policy, making us one of the most successful civil resistance campaigns in recent history. “
Guido Fawkes
For JSO Miliband is the man.
Trump may be the greatest president in our lifetime. He may be in the same class as George Washington, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt.
Seems to have made a extraordinary amount of progress in destroying the idiotic “climate” agenda that has put a brake on productivity he world over.
A big WELL DONE…. and KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.. is needed.
You think
You cannot possibly compare Donald Trump with George Washington, Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln. Grover Cleveland yes because he was rather keen on tariffs
“The article catalogs 82 actions across 20 government bodies in Trump’s first 52 days.”
Maybe the authors could be persuaded to list the next 82 actions he shouldn’t take?
Everybody needs a plan. 😎
That would make the authors truly useful idiots!
read those 82 actions… seem like basic common sense to me.
On the right track… lots more still to do. !
So He had her chance to cry and we can say He needs to learn her climate facts.
How dare you presume to know He’s pronouns! 🤣
He’s on second.
😂 😆 😂 😆 😂
Who???
OT but a classic. (I don’t Y.)
https://youtu.be/z8D4C3hR8PY
(Reagan sent Jonny a note saying he loved it!)
Nice.
There is a reason this publication is nicknamed “Doomberg”.
Nice writeup, thanks for sharing , Trump and Musk are great men on many
levels. . I read this on Al Gore this am=================>
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/al-gore-still-wrong-about-everything
Bloomberg needs to feature/share this, but won’t.
Nice article, Mr. Ed, but I do worry about some of Tulsi’s National security assessment.
She didn’t specifically rule out the High Tech Overlords using AI to build Emperor Palpatine’s Deathstar, and since I’m looking at traveling to the Pacific Northwest, I want to be prepared for the possibility of yeti attacks. Those are much bigger concerns for me than climate change!
Be careful out there in the woods. I like to carry a big stick and make lots of noise as I walk the mountain trails. It’s 100% effective because in all my years of doing this I’ve never had to deal with a Yeti. You’re welcome.
It’s not the end of the world again is it?
It certainly could be. This US Administration doesn’t seem to have got the memo that the only sure way to avoid ends of the worlds is by increasing taxes.
Yes.
Without the end of the world looming, there is no sense in worrying about “the” children. After all, we are doing everything we can to “save” them. Just ask Sally Struthers.
Turning Bloomberg writers apoplectic is called a good start.
The changes won’t be permanent until the EPA is shuttered.
Along with every bit of climate related bushwah at NOAA and NASA, except for explicit climate physics.
What exactly is “climate action?”
People getting paid to spout sh!te
“Climate action” is everything already thought of that you can do that has had absolutely no effect on global CO2 emissions whatsoever.
Very nice Charles.
God, it’s great to live in Colorado. Bernie Danders and Pistachio Cortes drawing record crowds at Civic Center (50 k – and according to one count the largest that BS has been able to rally – Friday afternoon and the kids were out), and today, our strident, outspoken Senator Michael Bennet interviewed by softballer Ryan Warner on CPR.
Bennet (of Wesleyan and Yale), on his website, fighting for the American West:
Bennet, likely gubernatorial candidate, stumping today for Democracy with nary a breath about climate change:
The winds are definitely shifting. Climate alarm losing its sex appeal. Saving Democracy gaining.
The climate crisis exists in their feeble minds. So, yeah, President Trump’s actions will definitely deepen that. They will feel it in their pineal gland by now. 🙂
If renewable energy is able to provide a good product at a reasonable price, it will have no problem competing in a free market without subsidies. Let the investors and customers decide!
The two authors here are likely to be typical of those being paid under the table to hype the climate crisis agenda. The fact that the new administration is slashing support for the various green projects that at best are having only negligible, zero or even negative results here and aren’t in the least being missed by taxpayers prove that they had little justification from the outset. Closer scrutinization of the real motives behind these projects is the rule now and never mind the
‘”Saving the Planet” rhetoric because people stopped buying it years ago.
“Saving the Planet” rhetoric because people stopped buying it years ago.
Ah yes, the horror of returning to basic national sovereignty and energy affordability!
Europe prepares for attacks on power grid while battling soaring energy prices
This entire article is a monument to the worldview that believes government must centrally plan energy use,
Well when you’ve got all those dilute dispersed fickles to manage…….?
Bravo! 1. It always warms after an ice age- “little ice age” ended slightly before the Civil War and affected the Revolutionary! And that’s where the charts start 2. They never examine the terminal effects of cold- there is near 0 population on the Poles- but plenty near the Equator! 3. Temperature measures are archaic and biased 4. Nor have they definitely determined if CO2 is the cause or result of rising temperatures. 5. Further the science is developing but skeptics are shut out! 6. Climates change very slowly- any observations starting from the mid 1800’s are weather or the means climate uses to save the planet!