Climate Collapse in 52 Glorious Days: Common Sense, Courtesy of Trump

It’s hard not to chuckle while reading Bloomberg’s opinion piece, “Years of Climate Action Are Being Demolished in Days by Trump.” One gets the sense that Mark Gongloff and Elaine He were typing furiously through a cascade of tears, their trembling hands barely able to clutch their reusable bamboo keyboards. Their anguish is palpable — and deeply entertaining.

According to the authors, “nothing could have prepared us for the breadth or intensity of the assault on climate action that Trump has unleashed.” Ah yes, the horror of returning to basic national sovereignty and energy affordability! Apparently, the unleashing of logic and cost-benefit analysis is too much for the climate-industrial complex to handle.

The article catalogs 82 actions across 20 government bodies in Trump’s first 52 days. Yes, 52 days. That’s one climate heresy every 15 hours. Magnificent. It’s almost poetic how efficiently bureaucratic bloat, pseudoscientific hand-waving, and fiscal recklessness were being scaled back. Bloomberg calls this a “climate onslaught”; most Americans would call it a long-overdue spring cleaning.

Here are a few gems that made the writers gasp in horror:

  • The Environmental Protection Agency began overturning its 2009 “endangerment finding” that declared CO₂ — the gas you’re exhaling as you read this — a “threat to public health.” Reassessing this laughable conclusion is now apparently akin to committing a war crime.
  • The Transportation Department ceased expanding the EV-charger network and halted congestion-pricing schemes. In other words, they stopped using tax dollars to subsidize cars for rich people and punishing working-class drivers.
  • The Energy Department resumed approving LNG export projects, aka promoting energy abundance and American jobs. Scandalous.
  • NOAA was told to halt international communications. Given NOAA’s track record of producing press releases about “record warm years” by tweaking data sets like they’re playing Jenga, this may be the most scientifically responsible act of the century.

The authors frame this as “abdicating America’s role as a global climate leader.” But let’s translate: Washington D.C. stopped spending billions to appease unelected foreign bureaucrats at climate conferences while saddling U.S. citizens with skyrocketing energy bills. Leadership, indeed.

We’re also treated to the classic Bloomberg refrain about “trillions in damages threatened by climate change.” Not projected — threatened. The assumption, as always, is that climate models, with their documented biases and missed predictions, are sacrosanct. Dissent is blasphemy. Ironically, these models continue to predict doom while observable data stubbornly refuses to cooperate.

And the best part? The fear. Gongloff and He declare that Trump’s actions “will deepen our climate crisis.” Oh no! Not the climate crisis! You know, the one that requires infinite subsidies, zero accountability, and science by press release.

Nowhere in this breathless obituary for climate bureaucracy do the authors mention the economic toll of Net Zero, the trillions spent for negligible climate benefit, or the consistent failure of international agreements to do anything measurable to global temperature or extreme weather trends. To question this is, of course, heresy.

This entire article is a monument to the worldview that believes government must centrally plan energy use, transportation choices, agricultural practices, and even your air conditioning settings — all in the name of an unverifiable catastrophe that always lies 10 years in the future. It’s not journalism. It’s therapy for the climate clergy.

So, to Trump’s team: bravo. In just 52 days, you’ve inspired more genuine reform, more reevaluation of flawed premises, and more public discussion than a decade of carbon tax conferences ever achieved. If the reactions from the climate alarmist media are this apocalyptic, it’s a clear sign you’re doing something right.

The scale and complexity of Trump’s onslaught — highlighted in the following table — may seem discouraging. Even the actions that courts have tried to overturn have still left chaos and uncertainty in their wake. But awareness is the first step to recovery. Our hopes of having a livable environment depend on it.

To the rest of us? Sit back, relax, and enjoy the sound of bureaucracies being defunded. It’s not just the hum of freedom — it’s the sound of common sense making a comeback.

For a good laugh, here’s a non-paywalled version, but finish your sip of coffee and put the cup down before reading. It’s got charts!

4.9 39 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

84 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 27, 2025 10:08 am

Not the climate crisis! You know, the one that requires infinite subsidies, zero accountability, and science by press release.”

…… and doesn’t exist.

CD in Wisconsin
Reply to  philincalifornia
March 27, 2025 10:34 am

“Our hopes of having a livable environment an eventual Marxist state depend on it.

The authors can take a long walk off of a short pier if they expect me to be stupid enough to believe that this has anything to do with the climate.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  CD in Wisconsin
March 27, 2025 12:10 pm

Long walk off a short pier is an expression I have not heard in ages. Takes me back to the good old days of youth when summers were hot and winters were cold.

You know. Weather is part of life on Earth. Deal with it or, if needed, hunker down until it passes.

CD in Wisconsin
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 27, 2025 2:46 pm

Haven’t used the expression for a long time myself. Never really forgot it.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 27, 2025 3:11 pm

Long walk off a short plank.

CD in Wisconsin
Reply to  Streetcred
March 27, 2025 7:32 pm

Plank or pier. Either one works.

Gilbert K. Arnold
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 27, 2025 6:45 pm

Or if you live in Chicago: the saying is: “Walk East until your hat floats”

CD in Wisconsin
Reply to  Gilbert K. Arnold
March 27, 2025 7:33 pm

We could say that here in Wisconsin as well from Green Bay all the way to the Illinois state line.

MarkW
Reply to  CD in Wisconsin
March 27, 2025 12:23 pm

Most of the graduates of the so called elite universities have been propagandized into believing that a Marxist state is the only one worth living in. (At least for them, as they envision themselves as being the ones who will be running this Marxist state.)

George Thompson
Reply to  MarkW
March 27, 2025 12:44 pm

They forget that,generally speaking, the elites are the first ones liquidated.by the not-so-elites with the guns

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  George Thompson
March 28, 2025 1:51 pm

Why do you think there is a major push to ban guns.

Not saying the tragedies are anything but real, but disarming the population goes against what the Founding Fathers envisioned. The ability of the States and/or the people to be rid of tyranny should it become invested in the government.

March 27, 2025 10:09 am

This is such a nice change from the Obama/Biden years. Obama notoriously refused to call a real crisis a crisis, namely the invasion across the southern border and hundreds of thousands of our citizens dying from illegal drugs, but people across the country with slightly lower heating bills at night during the winter is a “climate crisis”. But now, sanity is back in office. I’m lovin’ it!

March 27, 2025 10:16 am

This entire article is a monument to the worldview that believes government must centrally plan energy use, transportation choices, agricultural practices, and even your air conditioning settings”

Here in Wokeachusetts, the Governor created a “climate smart forestry committee” to come up with brilliant climate smart forestry policies and practices. The committee included few people with the slightest understanding of the climate and even less of forestry. What they now call for is much less logging and when it does occur, much lighter. It’s idiotic- brain dead- which of course I’ve been screaming about but I’m one of the few people in this Mecca of climate lunacy so they just ignore me.

So, the result is less wood products being produce locally. Meanwhile, the Governor whines about a huge housing shortage. She seems to fail to understand you need a lot of wood to produce housing. She must think it’s climate smart to import wood from the far corners of the planet.

Curious George
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 27, 2025 11:20 am

Does anybody know who wrote the article?

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Curious George
March 27, 2025 11:38 am

He did.

Mr.
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
March 27, 2025 11:46 am

🙂

fah
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
March 27, 2025 3:31 pm

But Who’s on first.

Eamon Butler
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
March 27, 2025 6:22 pm

Yes, she did.

Reply to  Charles Rotter
March 27, 2025 12:13 pm

Yes it is
One gets the sense that Mark Gongloff and Elaine He were typing furiously through a cascade of tears, their trembling hands barely able to clutch their reusable bamboo keyboards.

Curious George
Reply to  Charles Rotter
March 27, 2025 12:32 pm

Thanks.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 27, 2025 12:12 pm

government must centrally plan

How many times has this been the approach?
Marist
Socialist
Communist
oops Democrats

MarkW
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 27, 2025 12:26 pm

Socialists have been trained to believe that they are the smartest people in any room. The burden of being so smart obligates them to run everyone’s lives. For the good of the planet of course. Peons just can’t be trusted to think for themselves. Of course, they expect to be rewarded handsomely for bearing this burden.

J Boles
Reply to  MarkW
March 27, 2025 2:22 pm

EXACTLY! I know people like that, they have no idea how wrong they are.

mal
March 27, 2025 10:27 am

What really sad is how supposedly smart people think a gas that is essential for life is a pollutant. Even more insane is that humans can come up with a global temperature accurate to a hundred degree. The question has always been the not that the climate is changing(it always is) it how much which way, why and what time frame. Those question remain unanswered all though I would bet in the history of earth that this is one of the coldest ever in the time frame of the last 100,000 years. The little variation with that time frame doesn’t matter that much. Yet, I believe the trend is for colder not warmer. People enjoy the warmth for as long as it last, because sometime in the not to distant future in earth time it going to get colder. My guess at my age I won get to see it, Yet it a sure bet future generation will. The next ice age will come and I doubt humans will be able to stop it.

Reply to  mal
March 27, 2025 10:49 am

It does appear that we have passed the inflection point; it might get warmer for a while, but near generations are likely going to have something other than social media posts to keep them busy.

Too much CO2 will undoubtedly (by some) be blamed for the reverse and the cold.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  DonM
March 27, 2025 12:13 pm

You mean like in the 70s when CO2 was blamed for the approaching mini ice age?

Reply to  mal
March 27, 2025 2:18 pm

Actually mal, this Holocene period is an interglacial, so no it’s on the high-end of temperatures for the past 100,000 years. If it follows the normal course of such an interglacial, we are on its downslope and we don’t have enough fossil fuel to burn to avoid that by that method. We are however clever enough to be able to figure out other ways to keep the planet at this habitable temperature for humans so, unless we obliterate ourselves first, planet Earth won’t be going glacial again. Certain classes of humans may have to be “defunded” shall we say, but that necessity will take care of itself.

Someone
Reply to  philincalifornia
March 28, 2025 12:19 pm

We are however clever enough to be able to figure out other ways to keep the planet at this habitable temperature for humans 

Thinking humans can control Earth climate preventing the next glaciation is as naive as believing that anthropogenic CO2 causes climate warming.

Of course, when the onset of the next glaciation will become obvious, there will be no shortage of charlatans offering their “solutions” to climate cooling at public expense.

Someone
Reply to  mal
March 28, 2025 12:11 pm

What really sad is how supposedly smart people think a gas that is essential for life is a pollutant.

Some do, but not all of them. But they sure think that promoting this narrative can make the rich.

March 27, 2025 10:37 am

Amendment 28

   Section 1

   Congress shall make no law to regulate, 
   tax, sequester or license atmospheric 
   carbon dioxide. 

   The right of the people to freely emit 
   carbon dioxide into the atmosphere from 
   any source, from any place at any time 
   in any amount shall not be interfered with.

   Section 2

   All activity commercial or private within 
   the United States and all territory subject 
   to the jurisdiction thereof for the purposes
   of altering climate is prohibited.

   The Congress and the several States shall 
   have concurrent power to enforce this article 
   by appropriate legislation.

Malcolm Chapman
Reply to  Steve Case
March 28, 2025 7:55 am

Are these literally the words used, or is this a hopeful poem? This is a serious question, even if it might be a naive one. If these are the words used, then good. What is it an amendment to? And where should I go for the legal detail about such an amendment, and for the document that it amends? Thanks for any help with this, and my apologies if the answers seem obvious.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Malcolm Chapman
March 28, 2025 1:46 pm

Hopeful poem.

Malcolm Chapman
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 29, 2025 4:17 am

Thanks. A pity.

March 27, 2025 10:45 am

So it turns out that elections really do have consequences, and some are not happy about it. Nice. And just like for better border security, “…it turned out that all we really needed was a new president.” (DJT, 3-4-2025)

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  David Dibbell
March 27, 2025 12:15 pm

A new president is not quite correct. We have had several new presidents that allowed this to reach the point we are at.

We needed a new leader. Unfortunately Trump was forced into lawfare battles his first term so he was less than effective to the solving the need.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 28, 2025 7:04 am

Disagree…. leadership of a complex structure of humanity called government requires paying attention to those around you who have more relevant experience. In Trump we apparently have a leader with a childhood dream of world domination based on beggaring neighbors who already cooperate on economic, political and military issues. His dislike of climate nonsense is not based on knowledge but instead business expansion. It will not end well when his “you’re fired” tough guy schtick wears thin.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  DMacKenzie
March 28, 2025 1:50 pm

You sound like you suffer from TDS.

Certainly the leader needs to have advisors and experts, that is not the argument.

The point is a new president is not necessarily a leader or possibly not the leader we need.

I made no comment on how the current administration is performing.

Tom Halla
March 27, 2025 10:51 am

Anything that causes the climastrologists to lose sphincter control is a good thing.

Doug S
Reply to  Tom Halla
March 27, 2025 11:10 am

True, however, the additional methane produced would make things worse than we thought.

Tom Halla
Reply to  Doug S
March 27, 2025 11:17 am

Good line, but the absorption spectrum for CH4 overlaps water vapor, so methane is not a significant greenhouse gas.

Reply to  Tom Halla
March 27, 2025 11:34 am

Hoo boy, I guess you ain’t heard the news, methane is 82.5 times more powerful
at trapping heat than CO2. It’s right there in the latest IPCC report (#6).

As stated that’s a lie and even if it were stated correctly, “Climate Science” and
the newly minted “Legacy Press” never say how much warming methane will produce. It’s about 1/20th of a degree by 2100.

If anyone thinks it’s any more than that, they should pipe up with their source
and work.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Steve Case
March 27, 2025 12:17 pm

I have no clue to how much energy is inserted into the atmosphere when lightning ignites methane. It is non-zero and probably about as worthless as this post.

abolition man
Reply to  Tom Halla
March 27, 2025 12:44 pm

I don’t know, Tom. Many climastrologists are also vegan or vegetarian, so any lose of sphincter control could result in quite a bit of additional water vapor being released, and that doesn’t take into account all the unusual volatiles due to their damaged intestinal biome and high legume consumption! I’d recommend at least double the Covid distancing requirements, just to be safe!

another ian
Reply to  Tom Halla
March 27, 2025 7:57 pm

So wet farts are climate friendly then?

Hoyt C Hottel
Reply to  Tom Halla
March 28, 2025 4:13 am

And has only 1ppm in air – infra red would difficulty finding any CH4 mols.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Doug S
March 27, 2025 12:16 pm

It’s not the weather that will be affected. It will be nostrils.

strativarius
March 27, 2025 10:55 am

Common Sense, Courtesy of Trump

The UK hasn’t got the memo.

Jingye, the Chinese company which owns British Steel, is set to close its Scunthorpe steelworks blast furnaces with 2,000-2,700 jobs up for the chop. “

And

Just Stop Oil says it’s giving up on protests.

initial demand to end new oil and gas is now government policy, making us one of the most successful civil resistance campaigns in recent history. “

Guido Fawkes

For JSO Miliband is the man.

Marty
March 27, 2025 10:58 am

Trump may be the greatest president in our lifetime. He may be in the same class as George Washington, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt.

Reply to  Marty
March 27, 2025 12:40 pm

Seems to have made a extraordinary amount of progress in destroying the idiotic “climate” agenda that has put a brake on productivity he world over.

A big WELL DONE…. and KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.. is needed.

Hoyt C Hottel
Reply to  Marty
March 28, 2025 7:34 am

You think

Hoyt C Hottel
Reply to  Marty
March 31, 2025 8:20 am

You cannot possibly compare Donald Trump with George Washington, Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln. Grover Cleveland yes because he was rather keen on tariffs

March 27, 2025 11:10 am

The article catalogs 82 actions across 20 government bodies in Trump’s first 52 days.”

Maybe the authors could be persuaded to list the next 82 actions he shouldn’t take?
Everybody needs a plan. 😎

Reply to  Gunga Din
March 27, 2025 11:33 am

That would make the authors truly useful idiots!

Reply to  Gunga Din
March 27, 2025 12:41 pm

read those 82 actions… seem like basic common sense to me.

On the right track… lots more still to do. !

DMA
March 27, 2025 11:20 am

So He had her chance to cry and we can say He needs to learn her climate facts.

Reply to  DMA
March 27, 2025 11:34 am

How dare you presume to know He’s pronouns! 🤣

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  DMA
March 27, 2025 11:42 am

He’s on second.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
March 27, 2025 3:17 pm

😂 😆 😂 😆 😂

Eamon Butler
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
March 27, 2025 6:31 pm

Who???

Reply to  Eamon Butler
March 28, 2025 9:03 am

OT but a classic. (I don’t Y.)
https://youtu.be/z8D4C3hR8PY

(Reagan sent Jonny a note saying he loved it!)

John Hultquist
March 27, 2025 11:20 am

Nice.

March 27, 2025 11:23 am

There is a reason this publication is nicknamed “Doomberg”.

Mr Ed
March 27, 2025 11:28 am

Nice writeup, thanks for sharing , Trump and Musk are great men on many
levels. . I read this on Al Gore this am=================>

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/al-gore-still-wrong-about-everything

Bloomberg needs to feature/share this, but won’t.

abolition man
Reply to  Mr Ed
March 27, 2025 1:01 pm

Nice article, Mr. Ed, but I do worry about some of Tulsi’s National security assessment.
She didn’t specifically rule out the High Tech Overlords using AI to build Emperor Palpatine’s Deathstar, and since I’m looking at traveling to the Pacific Northwest, I want to be prepared for the possibility of yeti attacks. Those are much bigger concerns for me than climate change!

Doug S
Reply to  abolition man
March 28, 2025 7:59 am

Be careful out there in the woods. I like to carry a big stick and make lots of noise as I walk the mountain trails. It’s 100% effective because in all my years of doing this I’ve never had to deal with a Yeti. You’re welcome.

Westfieldmike
March 27, 2025 12:04 pm

It’s not the end of the world again is it?

Reply to  Westfieldmike
March 27, 2025 2:36 pm

It certainly could be. This US Administration doesn’t seem to have got the memo that the only sure way to avoid ends of the worlds is by increasing taxes.

Reply to  Westfieldmike
March 27, 2025 3:04 pm

Yes.

Without the end of the world looming, there is no sense in worrying about “the” children. After all, we are doing everything we can to “save” them. Just ask Sally Struthers.

Rud Istvan
March 27, 2025 1:55 pm

Turning Bloomberg writers apoplectic is called a good start.

March 27, 2025 2:00 pm

The changes won’t be permanent until the EPA is shuttered.

Along with every bit of climate related bushwah at NOAA and NASA, except for explicit climate physics.

March 27, 2025 2:04 pm

What exactly is “climate action?”

Reply to  John Aqua
March 27, 2025 2:32 pm

People getting paid to spout sh!te

Reply to  John Aqua
March 27, 2025 3:08 pm

“Climate action” is everything already thought of that you can do that has had absolutely no effect on global CO2 emissions whatsoever.

Bob
March 27, 2025 3:00 pm

Very nice Charles.

Bill Parsons
March 27, 2025 4:05 pm

God, it’s great to live in Colorado. Bernie Danders and Pistachio Cortes drawing record crowds at Civic Center (50 k – and according to one count the largest that BS has been able to rally – Friday afternoon and the kids were out), and today, our strident, outspoken Senator Michael Bennet interviewed by softballer Ryan Warner on CPR.

Bennet (of Wesleyan and Yale), on his website, fighting for the American West:

“Fighting Climate Change While Building A Clean Energy Economy For The 21st Century

In Colorado and across the West, severe drought and record wildfires threaten our farmers, ranchers, homes, and businesses. Climate change endangers Colorado’s vital water supplies, more than 22 million acres of forests, and outdoor recreation economy… To protect the American West as we know it…

Bennet, likely gubernatorial candidate, stumping today for Democracy with nary a breath about climate change:

Donald Trump is trying to dismantle, consider pieces of our democracy through, 

I see their assault on the federal government as just part of their broader assault on American democracy.

I’m hearing from people that are worried about whether or not we’re going to be able to turn over to our kids and our grandkids, a functioning democracy. I believe t…

for the sake of our democracy…

We’re being called on at this moment to stand up for our democracy, to stand up for the rule of law, to stand up for the example that o…

The winds are definitely shifting. Climate alarm losing its sex appeal. Saving Democracy gaining.

JoeG
March 27, 2025 5:45 pm

The climate crisis exists in their feeble minds. So, yeah, President Trump’s actions will definitely deepen that. They will feel it in their pineal gland by now. 🙂

March 27, 2025 6:15 pm

If renewable energy is able to provide a good product at a reasonable price, it will have no problem competing in a free market without subsidies. Let the investors and customers decide!

Edward Katz
March 27, 2025 6:37 pm

The two authors here are likely to be typical of those being paid under the table to hype the climate crisis agenda. The fact that the new administration is slashing support for the various green projects that at best are having only negligible, zero or even negative results here and aren’t in the least being missed by taxpayers prove that they had little justification from the outset. Closer scrutinization of the real motives behind these projects is the rule now and never mind the
‘”Saving the Planet” rhetoric because people stopped buying it years ago.

“Saving the Planet” rhetoric because people stopped buying it years ago.

observa
March 28, 2025 4:15 am

 Ah yes, the horror of returning to basic national sovereignty and energy affordability! 
Europe prepares for attacks on power grid while battling soaring energy prices
This entire article is a monument to the worldview that believes government must centrally plan energy use,

Well when you’ve got all those dilute dispersed fickles to manage…….?

Mrtenez
March 28, 2025 5:58 am

Bravo! 1. It always warms after an ice age- “little ice age” ended slightly before the Civil War and affected the Revolutionary! And that’s where the charts start 2. They never examine the terminal effects of cold- there is near 0 population on the Poles- but plenty near the Equator! 3. Temperature measures are archaic and biased 4. Nor have they definitely determined if CO2 is the cause or result of rising temperatures. 5. Further the science is developing but skeptics are shut out! 6. Climates change very slowly- any observations starting from the mid 1800’s are weather or the means climate uses to save the planet!

Verified by MonsterInsights