
Forbes’ recent article, “Climate Change Threatens Food Security—Can Data Be the Real Hero?” pushes a familiar but misleading claim: that climate change poses a significant threat to global food production. This narrative is not only false, it implies just the opposite of what is true. Real-world agricultural data, and the sciences which study plant growth and food production, show that the modest warming and rainfall improvements thus far have benefitted plant growth in general and crop yields, more specifically.
Agricultural yields continue to reach record highs, and multiple scientific analyses show no evidence of imminent climate-related threats to farming. In fact, a recent peer-reviewed study published in Scientific Reports found no significant global climate-related risks to food production. Yet, Forbes and other media outlets continue to promote an alarmist view that doesn’t align with observed trends.
The study published in Scientific Reports explicitly contradicts Forbes’ fearmongering. Researchers found that climate variability has not led to a global reduction in agricultural productivity. Instead, technological advancements, better farming methods, and increased atmospheric CO₂ levels (which enhance plant growth) have more than offset any minor regional climate fluctuations. The study states:
“There is no clear trend indicating a decline in global agricultural output due to climate change. Instead, yields have continued to rise, supported by improvements in irrigation, genetics, and farming techniques.”
This aligns with broader research that shows human adaptation continues to far outpace climate-related challenges, both real and theoretical. The notion that climate change is an existential crisis for agriculture simply does not withstand scrutiny.
If climate change were truly devastating agriculture, we would expect to see declining yields and widespread crop failures. Instead, the opposite is happening. Global production of staple crops—corn, wheat, rice, and soybeans—has been consistently increasing. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) both report record-setting agricultural production year after year.
For example:
- Global wheat production is at an all-time high, despite claims that climate change is making farming more difficult.
- Corn and soybean yields have continued their upward trend, benefiting from improved technology, CO₂ fertilization, and better farming practices.
- Even in regions often cited as “at risk,” such as Africa and South Asia, crop production has been increasing steadily.
Forbes’ claim that food security is under threat is debunked by the reality of the greening Earth and record crop yields. The truth is that food abundance has grown dramatically over the last century, and there is no data suggesting a reversal of this trend.
Forbes’ article follows a long line of exaggerated claims about climate change and farming, many of which have been debunked. For further evidence, consider these reports from Climate Realism, which highlight real-world agricultural success despite alarmist claims:
- “U.S. Corn Yields Continue to Break Records, Defying Climate Doom Predictions” —Shows how U.S. corn production has steadily increased, countering the claim that climate change is harming agriculture.
- “Global Food Production Hits New Highs, Again Contradicting Climate Alarmism” —Details how worldwide food output keeps increasing, undermining fears of climate-driven food shortages.
- “Africa’s Crop Yields are Rising, Not Falling—Yet Alarmists Ignore the Data” —Refutes the claim that Africa is suffering from declining agricultural productivity due to climate change.
- And just a few months ago, my colleague, Linnea Lueken, called out Forbes for similar false article in her essay: Forbes is Wrong, Agriculture is Doing Well Amid Modest Warming
These fact filled rebuttals, informed by government and industry data, completely refute Forbes’ claims about food security being threatened by climate change, suggesting that its speculation about the future is politically motivated. Data clearly show that agricultural productivity is increasing, not declining, and scientific research finds no significant global climate threats to farming. Instead of pushing unfounded fear, we should recognize the continued success of modern agriculture, driven by technology, adaptation, and CO₂ fertilization.
Global warming lengthens growing seasons, reduces frost events, and makes more land suitable for crop production. Also, carbon dioxide is an aerial fertilizer for plant life. In addition, crops also use water more efficiently under conditions of higher carbon dioxide, losing less water to transpiration.
The benefits of more atmospheric carbon dioxide and a modestly warming world have resulted in 17 percent more food being available per person today than there was 30 years ago, even as the number of people has grown by billions. Indeed, the last 20 years have seen the largest decline in hunger, malnutrition, and starvation in human history. These facts should have informed Forbes’ analysis of the impact of climate change on food security – instead the media outlet ignored declining hunger and malnutrition to flog the catastrophic climate change narrative.
The real threat to food security isn’t climate change, rather it is flawed reporting being used to encourage and provide cover for bad policies. Restrictive environmental regulations, misguided carbon reduction schemes, and anti-modern-agriculture policies pose a far greater danger to global food production than natural climate variability ever has.
Forbes, as usual, has chosen narrative over nuance. The data tell a much different story—one of resilience, progress, and record-breaking harvests. Readers deserve facts, not fear.

Anthony Watts is a senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute. Watts has been in the weather business both in front of, and behind the camera as an on-air television meteorologist since 1978, and currently does daily radio forecasts. He has created weather graphics presentation systems for television, specialized weather instrumentation, as well as co-authored peer-reviewed papers on climate issues. He operates the most viewed website in the world on climate, the award-winning website wattsupwiththat.com.
Originally posted at ClimateREALISM
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
No, it is a bad thing because all that food encourages obesity?
You left off a /sarc
Only large amounts of carbs encourage obesity! The human body is a flex fuel vehicle; you can burn carbs or ketones for your energy. Large amounts of carbs lead to high insulin levels and, eventually, to insulin resistance; the precursor to metabolic syndrome, heart disease, diabetes, and obesity! Large amounts of fat turn your body into a fat burning machine; any carbs it needs are produced through gluconeogenesis from the protein and glycerol in your system. No study so far has found a strong link between saturated fats and heart disease; it is another of the SAD food myths!
Food, finance, and freedom; all three the alarmists wish to limit. I occasionally ponder; if an alien species were trying to weaken Earth to prepare it for an invasion, what would they do differently from GangGreen and their useful idiot supporters!?
Sell more farm land to China and Bill Gates?
the Galactic Coalition of Free Planets has a charter rule that only allow for direct communication/ membership when there is a one world governance. indirect manipulation of fragmented societies is against the rules as well, but policing/enforcement is lax (like California) .
What’s far more threatening to food security is increasing its cost and decreasing its supply by making fuel, fertilizers, and refrigeration more expensive with misguided energy and environmental policies.
More people died in Bangladesh in a single year from idiot climate policies than have died due to man made climate change globally throughout history
No one has ever died from man-made climate change.
The Left is miffed that things aren’t going the way they had predicted. They secretly wish that the world by now would resemble Soylent Green. Instead, we have Terra Verde.
Climate Change Is Not Threatening Food Security
But wind and solar farms are.
The real threat to food security isn’t climate change, rather it is flawed reporting being used to encourage and provide cover for bad policies. Restrictive environmental regulations, misguided carbon reduction schemes, and anti-modern-agriculture policies pose a far greater danger to global food production than natural climate variability ever has.
In other words, it is the Climate Fearmongering that is the greatest threat to food security.
Valeria Kogan of Fermata is pushing her own startup, that appears to offer some useful ideas. This article in Forbes is just free advertising for her company.
The extra Co2 is doing wonders for food production Globally, but the Nut Zero jobsworths in the UK want to reduce food production by 27%. The UK population is growing so all that does is increase food imports from overseas with all the extra food miles they are always going on about.
QED
Very nice Anthony. Once again we need to force these mongrels to stop blaming bad things on climate change. The climate changes all the time sometimes we’re happy with the changes and sometimes we aren’t. What these dishonest people mean to say is added CO2 threatens global food security. Think about that, think how utterly ridiculous that is. CO2 the substance that plants require, their food is endangering our food supply. That is just stupid.
If agricultural and food production have been adversely affected by climate change, wouldn’t the planet’s overall population, life expectancy and infant mortality rates reflect this? Yet the numbers in the first two categories have been steadily rising for decades now, while they’ve been declining in the last. So Forbes is just throwing out a bit of climate alarmism that’s refuted by the facts and supported only by the anti-capitalists and extreme environmentalists looking for ways to profit from such distortions.
Let’s be honest. This is all Trumps fault. Orange man bad.
Fact. The Climanista movement is endangering food security.