Big news this week as EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has reportedly told the White House it should officially abandon the ruling that greenhouse gases pose a threat to human health and welfare. The so-called “endangerment finding” for carbon dioxide and methane emissions forms the backbone of government regulations to “fight climate change” by heavily regulating everything from power plants to automobiles to stoves. Will President Trump repeal the endangerment finding? Can he do it unilaterally? We will discuss.
Also, NOAA has “homogenized” the temperature data again. What does that mean? And does it correct the historical record, or distort it to support the alarmist global warming narrative?
In “climate grift” news, Climate Crusader Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse has been caught backing legislation that funneled millions of taxpayer dollars to his wife’s nonprofit organization. How convenient, and corrupt.
And good news, everyone! The absurd plot of the climate disaster movie The Day After Tomorrow is not actually going to happen, despite alarmist “scientists” claiming it could be imminent.
Join The Heartland Institute’s Anthony Watts, H. Sterling Burnett, Linnea Lueken, and Jim Lakely — along with special guest David Legates, former deputy assistant secretary at NOAA — to cover these stories, and more on The Climate Realism Show. Jump in the chat during the livestream on YouTube and Rumble to get your climate questions answered, too.
Same old, same old. Phony climate catastrophe. The greens use this to directly increase their personal gain in terms of grants, papers, being part of the “movement.” It’s always been a scam.
“Also, NOAA has “homogenized” the temperature data again.”
again?
I thought it was an ongoing process. Did “they” do it the same way or were there new downward adjustments?
At some point they will have to begin adding downward adjustments to numbers that used to get upward adjustments if records are to be set.
All possible variants have occurred. Data is re-plotted on a different scale, or with two scales one for one part and another for the second part. The data are subtly modified from the data bases, usually annoying deflections are suppressed. If one aspect is embarrassing, it is simply omitted. Data are unwittingly ‘misplaced’, so a new version cannot be checked. One very effective ploy is to move the data to new ‘agency’ or repository, then the changes can be made during the transition. The duplicity knows no bounds.
One aspect NEVER changes. Global warming is always found.
Had to google a Day After Tomorrow movie synopsis – have not seen it. For others:
“After climatologist Jack Hall is largely ignored by U.N. officials when presenting his environmental concerns, his research proves true when a superstorm develops, setting off catastrophic natural disasters throughout the world”
Setup for the movie is a climate change denying UN? That can’t be right. Has anyone seen it?
I first saw it in Kiev, dubbed in Russian. The movie has nothing to do with science. It is pure science fiction. The movie depicts the hoped-for event of global climate modeling in the guise of global freezing. The best line in the movie is when “Bilbo” is trapped in a weather station monitoring the North Atlantic Current, and the diesel runs out. The option is to use the 20 year old scotch to run the generator or to drink it. Bilbo wisely drinks it and freezes happily.
We need to post videos on Rumble in addition to youtube. It’s a free speech platform, and has no animus toward climate realists. Besides, youtube keeps wanting me to sign in to prove I’m not a bot.
Heartland does stream their videos to Rumble as well. That’s usually where I watch them
They should start a RICO investigation … against Whitehouse.