Fake News, CNN and UN, Climate Change Is Not Disrupting Latin America’s Food Production

From ClimateREALISM

By H. Sterling Burnett

caribbean-552072_1280

A recent CNN story claims that climate change has caused recent disruptions in food production across the Caribbean and South America. This is false. Although in Latin America as elsewhere farm production varies from year to year and weather in 2023 did bring hardship to some farmers in some countries, since 1990 overall crop production in the region has regularly set records. Despite being a period during which the Earth warmed modestly, improving supplies of major crops resulted in a decline in hunger. With no sustained decrease in production and no long-term trend, it is simply false to claim climate change is harming food production in Latin America.

The CNN story, “Climate change is disrupting food systems across Latin America, UN report says,” cites a recent U.N. report, “Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Overview of Food Security and Nutrition 2024,” to claim:

Violent weather exacerbated by climate change fueled hunger and food insecurity across Latin America and the Caribbean in 2023, according to a new United Nations report.

Extreme weather drove up crop prices in multiple countries in the region in 2023, the report, which was written by several UN agencies including the World Food Program (WFP), says.

To begin, extreme weather affecting crop prices in 2023, or in any other year, is not unusual, ask any farmer. Extreme weather is not unusual across Latin America or elsewhere. Every year, extreme weather strikes somewhere at some time. When it does, it can hamper planting, tending, harvesting, and/or transporting crops, complicating getting crops from field to market. As my colleague award winning meteorologist Anthony Watts and I have discussed at Climate Realism many times previously, herehere, and here, for example, the World Meteorological Organization is clear that weather is not climate. Only long-term weather trends can signify a change in climate, and there has been no sustained, multi-decade or even multi-year trend of more frequent or more severe weather events across the Caribbean or South American.

While there is no evidence climate change impacted Latin American agriculture in 2023, El Niño, a natural large scale oceanic shift, almost certainly did drive multiple severe weather events across the region. El Niño results in shifting weather patterns, like excessive rainfall in some areas, causing flooding, and less rainfall in others, causing drought. It can also impact the formation of hurricanes, their strength, and where they are likely to strike, and contribute to conditions favorable or disfavorable to wildfires. There is no evidence at all that climate change is affecting El Niño/La Niña oceanic shifts.

The strongest evidence rebutting claims that climate change is “disrupting food systems across Latin America,” as CNN asserts, comes directly from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), which assembles data on food production. FAO data show that between 1990 and 2025, the most important crops grown in the Caribbean, and in Central and South America, cereal crops (maize, rice, wheat, oats, barley, rye, etc.) and tubers and roots (potatoes, sweet potatoes, yams, manioc (cassava), carrots, beats, etc.) have all set records for production repeatedly over the period.

  • Cereal grain production grew approximately 44 percent across Central America, 18 percent in the Caribbean, and 275 percent across South America;
  • Tuber and root production expanded by about 91 percent in Central America, 52 percent across the Caribbean, and by 6 percent in South America. (See the figure below)

Facts are facts and while CNN and the U.N. may try to spin a single year’s food disruption for some farmers in some countries into evidence of a regionwide climate crisis, the data tells a different story. Amid ongoing modest warming, while some farmers, in some countries, in some years, have down years, and transportation may be made difficult due to storms, overall in Latin America food production is increasing. Farmers and agricultural areas across the region are doing well. There is no evidence, none whatsoever, that climate change is disrupting the food supply or causing hunger or malnutrition in Latin America.

H. Sterling Burnett

H. Sterling Burnett

H. Sterling Burnett, Ph.D., is the Director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy and the managing editor of Environment & Climate News. In addition to directing The Heartland Institute’s Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy, Burnett puts Environment & Climate News together, is the editor of Heartland’s Climate Change Weekly email, and the host of the Environment & Climate News Podcast.

5 9 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scissor
February 1, 2025 6:08 am

Plantain liars strike again.

February 1, 2025 6:22 am

If Climate Alarmists didn’t have lies, they wouldn’t have anything.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 1, 2025 8:48 am

The so-called “Climate Crisis” is “The Big Lie”

February 1, 2025 7:19 am

CNN’s motto must be “don’t let facts get in the way of a good story.”

2hotel9
Reply to  John Aqua
February 1, 2025 7:32 am

Rush was saying that back in the 90s.

2hotel9
February 1, 2025 7:30 am

The only thing harming food production around the globe is the climatard agenda. Blatantly obvious example is the EU.

February 1, 2025 7:33 am

A very short Google search on “World Food Production”
finds graph after graph after graph of increasing trends.

This one here by region shows Central America

JTraynor
February 1, 2025 7:48 am

CNN continues to misinform as they wage war against misinformation. Also notice how parts of the UN point to disruption in food production while another part of the UN reports year over year record setting food production.

John Hultquist
February 1, 2025 8:25 am

I think the CNN folks mistook their own company chart for squash.

Scissor
Reply to  John Hultquist
February 1, 2025 9:31 am

Butternut, knucklehead pumpkin, or jester squash perhaps?

Ron Long
February 1, 2025 9:31 am

Here’s an observation: elect a Socialist/Marxist/Communist Administration and the whole country collapses into the toilet. I just got back from a week vacation in coastal Chile, and the impact of electing Boric as President is shocking. Chile will struggle to regain its footing in the future, unless Trump can run for their President after cleaning up the other mess.

February 1, 2025 10:09 am

The “Heartland Institute”. 😂😂😂. Good god are there really people dumb enough to listen to that conspiracy group

Reply to  Eric Flesch
February 1, 2025 10:55 am

There is no evidence, none whatsoever, that climate change is disrupting the food supply or causing hunger or malnutrition in Latin America.

This the claim that The Heartland Institute has made.

Feel free to post any data countering this claim at anytime. We will wait while you do that.

Reply to  doonman
February 1, 2025 12:05 pm

There are people dumb enough to believe the conspiracy group 😂😂😂. Claims with no evidence can be dismissed with none Conspiracy its tend to believe multiple conspiracies

MarkW
Reply to  Eric Flesch
February 1, 2025 2:17 pm

In other words, you can’t support your claims. Thank you for playing.

EmilyDaniels
Reply to  Eric Flesch
February 3, 2025 2:37 pm

So actual data doesn’t count as evidence to you. I’d ask what you would accept, but I don’t really care. Also, if you don’t want to read articles by Heartland Institute, why are you on a website run by a member of that organization? Didn’t do your research, or just showed up to make senseless comments?

Reply to  Eric Flesch
February 1, 2025 12:09 pm

Heartland are provably correct about most things..

The statement …..

There is no evidence, none whatsoever, that climate change is disrupting the food supply or causing hunger or malnutrition in Latin America.”

Is just another example of something they are correct about.

conspiracy
czechlist
Reply to  Eric Flesch
February 1, 2025 12:23 pm

Recent empirical evidence has revealed the differnce between conspiracy and fact.
The difference is about 3 months.

MarkW
Reply to  Eric Flesch
February 1, 2025 2:16 pm

Disagreeing with socialists makes one a conspiracy group?

Reply to  MarkW
February 1, 2025 3:24 pm

….

leftist-conspiracy
February 1, 2025 12:19 pm

Back in 1988 when co² was ~350ppm, Brazil had a drought that was exceptionally prolonged and intense that lasted 2 years. The drought led to massive crop failures, livestock also suffered due to water scarcity and lack of forage.

Was that Global warming?

Back in 1976 when co² was ~ 330ppm, Mexico suffered one of the most severe droughts in it’s history, significantly impacting agriculture and water resources. Cities like Mexico City faced water rationing.

Was that a Climate emergency?

CNN-fake-news
MarkW
Reply to  Alpha
February 1, 2025 2:19 pm

Keep presenting facts like that, and Eric will accuse you of being a conspiracy nut.

Bob
February 1, 2025 2:13 pm

Very nice Sterling.

Verified by MonsterInsights