Essay by Eric Worrall
“… people spend more time outside … they are more likely to go to the beach or to the park … this means that their home will be unattended …”
Crime-ate change: Shock link between rising temperatures and rising crime rates
As temperatures continue to soar, a sobering study has found climate change will be responsible for 72,000 additional crimes a year in Australia.
Adelaide Lang
January 5, 2025 – 5:00PMAustralia will have to contend with an additional 1.64m crimes created by climate change over the course of the rest of the century, an alarming study has found.
Researchers Sefa Awaworyi Churchill, Russell Smyth, and Trong-Anh Trinh came to the staggering conclusion after matching weather data with crime rates over an 18-year period.
Their paper ‘Crime, Weather, and Climate Change in Australia’ found that increasing extreme heat events in Australia will generate an additional 72,000 crimes per year.
If emissions continue to rise as predicted, those yearly increases will amount to approximately 1.64m additional crimes throughout the rest of the 21st century.
…
A study published in 2022 analysed data from 171 countries over a decade and found a positive association between increasing temperatures and rates of homicide.
…
Read more: https://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/climate-change/crimeate-change-shock-link-between-rising-temperatures-and-rising-crime-rates/news-story/dc0d219339b5a4bd9ac179440841696a
The referenced study;
Crime, Weather and Climate Change in Australia*
Sefa Awaworyi Churchill, Russell Smyth, Trong-Anh Trinh
First published: 30 January 2023
Open access publishing facilitated by RMIT University, as part of the Wiley – RMIT University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.
Abstract
We estimate the effect of temperature on monthly crime using a panel dataset that matches weather with crime rates for over 3,000 postcodes in Australia over the period 2001–2019. We find that a standard deviation increase in average temperature is associated with a 0.008–0.011 standard deviation increase in the crime rate, depending on the specification. This translates to over 72,000 additional crimes per year across Australia. We estimate that over the course of the rest of the century, under a business-as-usual pathway, climate change will be responsible for approximately 1.64 million additional crimes.
Read more: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1475-4932.12720
The study explanation for why crime spikes on hot days are hilarious;
…
[T]he likelihood of being punished is a direct function of police deterrence and will be lower if the police reduce their patrolling on hot days. Given that police are paid a fixed hourly salary, if effort is more costly on hot days then a simple principal/agent model would predict that they would devote less effort on days when it is more comfortable to remain in an air-conditioned office or police car.
Temperature can also affect the expected cost of property crimes, such as burglaries, although this relationship is less clear cut. If people spend more time outside their home on hotter days – for example, if they are more likely to go to the beach or to the park to enjoy the sunshine or to the air-conditioned shopping centre to escape the heat – this means that their home will be unattended and reduces the probability that a potential burglar will be apprehended. However, on uncomfortably hot days, people may prefer to remain indoors with the air-conditioning on. If there is a positive relationship between the weather and the amount of time spent outside the home, this is likely to increase the likelihood that crimes committed outside the home will be detected and, hence, increase the expected costs of crime outside the home.
Studies have also documented that temperature influences judicial decision-making and, as such, could potentially affect the probability of being convicted and/or length of sentence and/or fine imposed (see, e.g., Heyes & Saberian, 2019).4 However, the temperature at the time of the trial or when the sentence is handed down is not in the information set of someone contemplating committing a crime and should not influence the decision as to whether to engage in illegal activity (Heilmann et al., 2021).
…
Read more: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1475-4932.12720
The premise that warm weather is a major driver of criminal activity is absurd. Hot climate countries like democratic Singapore, along with Arab gulf states like Dubai and Saudi Arabia, they have no problem keeping crime rates low.
I agree there is a problem with police motivation in Australia, but my personal experience is the poor motivation of police in Australia is not caused by warmer weather.
I live in a quiet rural town, but two years ago, a couple of teenagers rode scooters down the street, stabbing vehicle tires then sprinting off to the next victim. They used a narrow blade, so it wasn’t immediately obvious what had happened.
Everyone was furious, especially after we learned from neighbours one of the thugs had terrified an elderly pensioner couple by menacing them with the knife. People started organising into parties to find the criminals. I said to the police “if we catch them we’ll bring them to you”.
The police officer replied “There is no point bringing them to us. There is nothing we can do about it, they will be out the next day”. Sure enough, a few months later one of the police called me. The police went through the motions, but the judge imposed a non-custodial sentence, the criminals were back on the street less than a week after being arrested.
What would be the motivation for those police officers to endure discomfort on a hot day?
I don’t blame the judge – I’m sure the judge correctly applied the letter of the law. But Australia is signatory to a UN convention which discourages incarceration of minors, which allows hardened recidivist underage criminals to do whatever they want, until they actually kill someone.
Low crime rates in hot countries like Singapore and the Persian Gulf states at the very least prove weather is not the only factor. In my opinion low crime rates in hot climate nations with a strong culture of deterrence is evidence that Western nations could do a lot more to deter crime, regardless of the weather.
The killjoy suggestion that hot weather is a problem, because people are more likely to go out and enjoy themselves, in my opinion puts the onus for behaviour change on the wrong people.
“Crime and punishment” have been replaced with just “crime.”
Now they should consider immigration and its effect on crime.
We’ve already seen increases in crime with a minor correlation to changing climate.
Correlation is NOT causation though.
The cause for the crime increases comes from Democrat Policies and a soft on crime stance created by them.
It already has: Alarmist crimes against humanity,
Ridiculous – so weather is the control knob for crime according to these experts?
Well, let’s see, we’ve been warming ever since the 1970s at the conclusion of that cold snap (weather!!!). Hottest year evah!!!
Yet, here in the USA crime rates per 100,000 population have dropped precipitously since 1976 which were 22% more frequent than 2023 (446 vs. 363).
Of course, crime rates vary a lot year to year, mostly due to factors like economic conditions (higher rates during economic recessions, much lower rate in 2020 due to people being confined from being in public due to COVID). But it also seems pretty clear that warmer weather by itself is a non-factor over a long multi-decade timeframe.
There is no such thing as a weather control knob for crime.
Absolutely weather is the control knob for crime. Looting happens AFTER the storm has passed, in better weather, not during the hurricane.
No weather is NOT the control knob on a long term basis is claimed by these authors. As I wrote there is lots of variation even year to year, let alone day to day or month to month … but the long term trend shows no variation with weather – which is what the warmnists call “climate” but it is not.
Missed it by that much.
Careful Duane. While you are likely correct, you must be careful regarding the sources of your information. It has been established that Federal sources such as the FBI are notoriously inaccurate, indeed, fabricated so to make Biden look better. At least that is the only reason I can think of.
So climate change causes leftist brain rot? Warm weather causes more people to elect adherents of sillyass models of criminal behavior?
I believe you have Cause and Effect reversed
Rotted Left Brains cause Climate Change…just look at academia.
I live in a tourist beach town. We know for sure that the number of drownings increases directly with the number of hot dog sales and have 100 years of data that proves it.
The premise of the study is effing funny. Hilarious. And somebody – get this – got paid to do it! Climate Science has jumped the shark. Climate Science is Comedy.
Is there anything the Magic Molecule cannot cause?
This will be a short list.
“In my opinion low crime rates in hot climate nations with a strong culture of deterrence is evidence that Western nations could do a lot more to deter crime, regardless of the weather.”
The strong deterrence is digital in some of those nations. Swipe something from the store, lose a digit. Not suggesting this for Australia or the U.S., but it shows the range of cultural solutions to crime, no matter the weather. Surely we can do better than a slap on the wrist.
Singapore uses corporal for minor and capital punishment for severe crimes. Seems to work, worth trying as a starting point.
So RCP8.5, the same one the IPCC dismissed as highly unlikely.
And some people say the peer-review system isn’t broke
Soaring crime due to climate change has been happening for the last 50 years.
Rent-seekers and politicians are robbing us blind every bloody day
Just waiting for a paper that predicts that heart attacks will get worse with climate change because hot weather makes butter softer so you put more on your toast, leading to heart problems.
Anything goes when it comes to whipping up a climate crisis!
Or churning one up
Yes, the crime is in getting such nonsense published and being rewarded for it.
The hypothesis is correct; because catastrophic manmade global climate change is one of the most elaborate frauds in recorded history, and fraud is most definitely a crime.
The study is invalid for several reasons.
You cannot take the standard deviation of temperature the way the authors do, because the temperature data include factors like the change of station location, of type of instrument, of type of housing for thermometer, drift of LIG thermometers, urban heat island effect. For example, you get a different standard deviation for each different raw or adjusted data sets. The path is open to cherry pick the data set with the biggest S.D.
Next, if there is increased crime with higher temperature, this should show as one moves from cooler towns like Hobart, up the east coast of Australia to Cairns, a rather warm town. This would be another way to test the hypothesis.
Finally, immigrants from different backgrounds tend to congregate in towns with weather and crime rates similar to their homelands. This could be a large confounding variables, perhaps related to alcohol consumption by original residents as well as immigrants.
Geoff S
So global warming causes more crime. Well why not, it’s been blamed for causing everything else.
It is far worse than the author suspects. The study is utter, total epidemiological nonsense. Daily temperature is NOT A CAUSE of crime — it may be a cause of increased heat exhaustion, but not crime. There is no plausibility — only a series of “just so…”-style hypotheses on how temperature might related to crime rates.
In a complete “how we trick ourselves” move, the authors substitute the seasonal differences in air temperature for the real evidence: which is that studies found that more crimes are committed in Summer months (in New South Wales) than in Winter months. There is absolutely no reason to attribute this to solely air temperature, in degrees, which was not measured in those the studies.
The speculation about whether police patrol ‘harder’, more ‘foot patrol” vs. car patrol on pleasant or hot days has nothing to do with crimes committed by criminals. No evidence is offered for any of these speculations.
The logic of the study is so ridiculous it is not even worth considering, except as a violation of all principles of social epidemiology.
It’s rather like the statistical correlation between higher ice-cream sales and an increase in drownings. Both are the result of warm weather but there’s no direct link between the two.
“an alarming study”
well, at least they admit to being alarmists 🙂
There is an interesting website at https://tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations. It is a frequently updated to include newly discovered correlations such as a recently discovered correlation titled “The Distance Between Saturn and the Sun Correlates with Google Searches for ‘How to Make a Baby.’ The details of the analysis are included. It seems to me that this website and this recent correlation are pertinent to the conclusions of Adelaide Lang’s article.
Why would people spend more time outside if the climate has gone straight to hell?
They did speculate really extreme heat might keep people at home.
Nullifying their own argument?
Crime without consequences has huge consequences. Uphold the law it is that simple and outfits like the United Nations can go to hell. They don’t know their backside from a hole in the ground.
Watch out for Dave’s Syndrome!
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STmRuQjeu3E?si=oL4i8_zt0pz7NRK8&w=560&h=315%5D
Claim: Global Warming Trepidation causes rise in reasoning stupidity
No problem. People should merely install wading pools in the backyards so they can both keep cool and keep an eye on their homes and possessions during heat waves. With such action, the overall crime rate will really plummet and society in general will be much safer.
If the police are less likely to want to be out in the high temps, why does the same reasoning not apply to the criminals.
Also, hot weather might make people more likely to not being present to foil criminals but so does having to go to work.
“Singapore” — “…a strong culture of deterrence…”
In 1968/69 this was very true. From memory there was just one murder reported in the “Straits Times” in that period.
I bet the theft of combustion engine vehicle’s will skyrocket because unsustainable EV’s won’t live up to expectations.
“expectation’s”
Fixed so you remain consistent.