Guest Essay by Kip Hansen — 18 December 2024 — 2000 words
For the last couple of months, the press in the United States has been hammering on about drought conditions, in front page stories such as:
In a Record, All but Two U.S. States Are in Drought
and
What’s Going On in This Graph? | Drought
All of these claims about drought are based on the U.S. Drought Monitor, which itself is mostly just a metric based on rainfall – above or below normal.
When one digs down to discover “what’s going on…?” one discovers that the fact is that October 2024 was a dry month across most of the country, and it followed on September, which was likewise a bit less rainy than “normal”. That’s it, the whole story.
What results from that is a US Drought Monitor graphic, touted far and wide, that looked like this:

Climate.gov attempts to make hay out of this:
“The average temperature of the contiguous U.S. in October was 59.0°F, 4.9°F above average, ranking second warmest in the 130-year record. October precipitation for the contiguous U.S. was 0.95 inch, 1.21 inches below average, tying for second driest with October 1963.”
So, yes, looking at a continental average – if such a thing is real and reasonable – October was dry. But claims, made in almost all press articles about the October droughtiness, include things like: “Drought conditions are driven by abnormally high temperatures that can quickly suck moisture from the atmosphere and the ground.” [source ]. The silly assertion that 59°F (15°C) is “abnormally high” doesn’t quite make the grade as plain language explanation. That may be “warmer” for Octobers across the United States, but it is not high. Those temperatures are cool temperatures. [ source ]
But the deficit of rainfall in many areas of the country does cause concerns.
U.S. Northeast
For the city of New York, which derives almost all of its drinking water from reservoirs in the Catskills and the Croton Watersheds, dry weather in late summer leads to low reservoir levels:
The beleaguered Mayor is worried: “we’re doing everything we can to make sure that we can water our parks and fill our pools come summer…”
Where does NY City’s drinking water come from?
It should be clear from the maps below that New York City takes water from far upstate (as they call any part of the state above Westchester). The Delaware System of three reservoirs feeds water to the Rondout Reservoir which then sends the water to the Croton Watershed system via the Delaware Aquaduct while the Catskill Watershed feeds all the way south to the Kensico Reservoir from the Ashokan Reservoir.

If this water was not being diverted to NY City, where would it go? Three of the reservoirs in the Delaware System would flow to the Delaware River, past Philadelphia, and eventually to the Atlantic Ocean where it forms the border between New Jersey and Delaware, at Cape May. In the north of the Catskill System is the Schoharie Reservoir on the Schoharie Creek, which naturally flows into the Mohawk River (which runs west to east across central New York State) which feeds the Hudson River near Albany, NY. Rondout Reservoir has its own watershed, but also receives the water from the Delaware System reservoirs enroute to NY City. The Rondout Creek flows northeast and empties into the Hudson River at Kingston, NY, while the Ashokan Reservoir spills into the Esopus Creek which flows into the Hudson at Saugerties, NY. All of the Croton Reservoirs would also naturally flow into the Hudson River.
Reservoir levels, at the end of October 2024, were lower than usual, at 63% of capacity:

They still are a little low in early December 66%, 16% less than what is usual for this time of year:

But notice, just above, in the lower left corner, the precipitation figures. Both November and December (so far) have had above normal rain
Below we see the situation for NY City Reservoirs in September 2024, at the end of the long so-called hottest ever summer:

Total water storage was a bit over normal at 78.2% of capacity, even after a poor rainfall in September. So, we can see that it is the combined rainfall deficits of September, down 2.5 inches, and the 3.3 inch deficit in October that was the source of the problem. That’s a total of 5.8 inches less rain in just those two months. But the rebound in November and December has not quite made back the shortfall.
Important Note: Reservoirs such as these are best visualized as buckets with a hole in them. The outflow is more or less constant (in the larger sense). Usually, the inflow depends on rainfall. But in the NY City system, some reservoir outflow becomes inflow into other NY City reservoirs. Two of the major rivers that flow into the Hudson River from the west in the Central Hudson Valley (the Esopus and the Roundout) have their streamflow determined by “releases” and spillage from NY City Reservoirs. Reservoir storage is not a measure of available water – only of what is allowed to remain in the reservoir.
NY City consumes, on average, 1 Billion Gallons of fresh water daily, not including the estimated leakage of 35 million gallons per day lost in transit.
What effect does NY City’s water system have on Philadelphia?
Now that is an interesting question. Philadelphia and surrounding cities take their drinking water from the Delaware River. Philadelphia is a major U.S. seaport: “Delaware River port complex to collectively refer to the ports and energy facilities along the river in the tri-state PA-NJ-DE Delaware Valley region. They include the Port of Salem, the Port of Wilmington, the Port of Chester, the Port of Paulsboro, the Port of Philadelphia, and the Port of Camden. “
Those ports combined create one of the largest shipping areas of the United States. Most of these ports are clustered long both sides of the Delaware River in a 20 mile stretch from River Mile 80 to River Mile 100 (a River Mile is generally the distance from the mouth of the Delaware River).
Unlike NY City, whose adjacent Hudson River is saline, the water in the Delaware River at Philadelphia is fresh and the major drinking water intake is located at about River Mile 110 (upstream from the ports and their potential polluting activities). But, the Atlantic Ocean is only 110 miles downstream from the intake.
Salt water naturally flows upstream from the sea and is held at bay by the downstream flow of the fresh water coming down the river. The leading edge of that salt water intrusion is called the Salt Front (sometimes the Salt Wedge).
“One important metric for understanding salinity concentrations in the Delaware Estuary (the tidal Delaware River & Bay) is the seven-day average location of the salt front, the 250 mg/L chloride concentration based on drinking water quality standards.”
“The salt front indicates water that is not safe to be used for drinking water because it is too salty. Because there are no dams on the Delaware River, ocean derived saltwater can move up the Delaware River from the Delaware Bay. While you cannot see the salt front, its location fluctuates in response to changing freshwater inflows, which either dilute or concentrate chlorides in the river.”
The average location of the Delaware River Salt Front is around Wilmington, Del. (see below graphic) but in times of extreme drought, such as in 1960, has been as far north as Camden, NJ (River Mile 102).
So, what does this have to do with NY City? Three of the major inflow streams for the Delaware River are controlled by releases of water from three NY City reservoirs. Much of the natural flow of the Delaware is diverted to deliver water to NY City.

Why is this important?
For Pennsylvania Climate Crisis advocates, the advance of the Salt Front is always blamed and predicated on the wildly exaggerated predictions of Sea Level Rise. And, it is true, as sea level rises at the mouth of the Delaware, it does have a tiny effect on the upstream movement of the Salt Front. But The Delaware River is tidal, with a tidal range of 6 to 7 feet at the Delaware-Pennsylvania border and at Philadelphia, where sea level has been rising at a steady 3+ mm/year since 1900, equivalent to a change of 1.02 feet in 100 years.
The evidential argument against the cry of “Sea Level Rise” is the simple fact that it is the downstream flow of fresh water that regulates the position of the Delaware Salt Front and the overall river flow needed to keep the Delaware Salt Front at bay depends natural rainfall and on NY City allowing water to be released from its three Delaware System reservoirs. In times of drought (less rainfall) NY City tends to hoard water and releases it grudgingly – never a drop more than required by long-standing policies set by the a rather long list of agencies and legislatures, mostly controlled by the Delaware River Basin Commission.

Down there at the bottom, near the red arrow, is what water flow remains to keep the Salt Front downriver, after the Out-of-Basin Diversions of up to 900 million gallons of water daily, 800 million of that to NY City.
Bottom Lines:
1. Megalopolises need fresh clean drinking water – a lot of it. NY City needs a billion gallons a day.
2. NY City ‘steals’ much of that water from the Catskills – at least in the opinion of the people that live there and are subject to arbitrary rules made and enforced by armed officers from a NY City agency, the NY City Department of Environmental Protection.
3. NY City, to fulfill its water needs, also takes water that should supply New Jersey and Eastern Pennsylvania cities such as Philadelphia via the Delaware River.
4. The solution to “not enough drinking water” for these dense population and industrial centers is and has always been build more fresh water storage and to waste less of the fresh water.
5. The planet Earth is not short of water, 70 some percent of the surface is covered by it. Proper nuclear power plants could both provide fresh water and electricity to coastal cities – as well as centralized heating in dense city centers.
# # # # #
Author’s Comment:
I grew up in Los Angeles, California. Then a rapidly growing megalopolis in a very dry climate, some say ‘a desert’, but it is more correctly a Mediterranean climate. It too steals its water from other places (see the movie “Chinatown”).
My youth was one continuous sunny day, interrupted occasionally by too much rain, atmospheric rivers, that flooded the city, washed homes down the hillsides, filled its concrete ‘flood control canals’ and turned our local park into a lake (by design). (To see the blue canals, zoom in on any part of the city.)
The US Drought Monitor is a misleading tool and often used to intentionally mislead the general public. See my earlier essays on Drought.
If one were to believe the main stream media, we live in a madding maelstrom of crises. Hold onto your hats and turn up your critical thinking skills knob to full blast.
Thanks for reading.
# # # # #
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Very nice Kip.
I second the “very nice Kip”, Kip!!!
Back in the olden days when people were still smart, they solved the too-much-and-not-enough-water problem. They built dams. Dams minimize flooding when there’s too much and store extra water for times when there’s not enough.
Israel was largely a desert a hundred years ago. Now it is largely green (as in forests and agriculture) and it sells fresh water to much of the Middle East.
What have the
RomansIsraelis ever done for us?Provided a good example of how to better manage water resources.
Yes desalination is the source of the water they sell but much of the desert lands were reclaimed by learning how to use the scant rain that fell there. Now more rain falls there because they have changed the local climate, the only climate thing that humans can actually do. Other parts of the world have since made significant advancements through similar practices, often modified to fit the local conditions.
Of course there is no expectations that US politicians will profit by learning from other people’s work out in the real world about what actually works and does not work. All, for some reason, believe that their own fancies are sure to produce the results they think they want, regardless of any evidence.
DESAL !
Back in the really olden days, beavers built leaky dams, river plains were allowed to flood and vast amounts of water seeped into underground aquifers, forever free of the burning hot summer sun that will evaporate vast amounts of reservoir-stored water in summer in Mediterranean climates.
But human ‘civilisation’ came along and chopped down most of the trees, dredged most of the rivers, prevented all the natural plain flooding and ensured that all water that fell in cities went straight back to the ocean, not under the ground. So they had to deplete the aquifers year on year and still they didn’t have enough water.
If humans would just let nature do its job, it would make many things a lot simpler.
To a point.
There are those who think we should remove all dams.
So much for hydropower.
Flash floods would increase.
Water supply for many large and small cities would dry up.
Crops? Where would the water come from for irrigation? Wells? Sure. But much more would the groundwater aquifers be depleted if we didn’t also have dammed surface water?
Build a dam and you not only make a new ecosystem, you give that water more time to soak into the aquifer.
Sure thing. Back to the days of devastating floods that killed thousands of people. And no water storage. No thanks. The benefits of dams and reservoirs vastly outweigh the problems. And you can pump water back into the aquifer from those reservoirs or the rivers. Lots of places are doing it now. No need to get rid of the dams.
Parts of Australia suffer from occasional fresh water shortage..
Again , same reason, not enough has been stored because there have been very few dams built in the last few decades.
Below is a graph of major dam capacity added per decade, (up to 2010.. I must try to update it some day)
I think the problem becomes obvious, particularly considering the population growth since the 1980s.
ps.. just did a check, the capacity added from 2010-2019 is only 181000 10³m³, which is pretty much indistinguishable from zero if added to the graph
Good review, Kip. However, there is another issue with the U S Drought Monitor, as the drought condition also includes “Evaporative Demand Drought Index (EDDI)”, which they describe as “An experimental tool that monitors drought and provides early warning guidance.” This assumes, due to CAGW, that we are on the way to a burning hell on earth, so the water will all evaporate (except seawater, which somehow keeps rising). Kip, right on with double duty nuclear energy generation doubling as desalination plants, two for the price of one.
Ron ==> The overall effort, the U.S. Drought Monitor is not just a service, it is itself an index, mostly based on rainfall, with a few expert judgements thrown in, undefined.
The site, drought.gov, also shows other drought indexes, there are quite a few.
Has anybody read John Steinbeck´s Grapes of Wrath? To get a perspective on draughts!
G of W is a fictional account, well worth reading. A non-fiction account is:
The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl by Timothy Egan
“Main stream media…”
I see what you did there.😅
Dan! Caught….maybe…sorta….
… more like a stagnant puddle !!
If only the drought could dry up the main stream media. Maybe there is a silver lining.
Well, there you have it in the money quote:
So under this simplistic (actually, simpletonistic) explanation, when the air is warmer all that water “sucked” from the ground (???), to where else, exactly, could it go?
It would have to go to the atmosphere.
Where humidity increases thus causing more precipitation.
Even a third grader can figure out the BS factor on that explanation.
It is well known by actual scientists (not the media hacks who write this stuff) that a warmer world is in fact a wetter world … and that a cooler world is in fact a dryer world. All due to the wonderful sciences of physics and chemistry. Warmer air causes the thin surface layer of the oceans (70% of the planet’s surface) to warm and thus have a higher vapor pressure, causing greater evaporation. And warmer air holds more moisture than cooler air. So when that warmer, wetter air inevitably rises due to the lower density of warm air, when it reaches the altitude where the temperature falls below dew point, precipitation occurs. Voila! More rain.
In any event, aside from global effects of a warming planet, droughts are always regional in nature – it may be drier in region A than average (not “normal”), but it is guaranteed that an equalizing region B somewhere else has higher precipitation to counter that. Because world wide it all has to equalize out. What causes regional variations involves cyclic changes in oceanic currents and heat transport from equator to polar regions that in turn cause air masses to be drier or warmer than average.
Beside, it all averages out, everywhere and all the time.
I also wondered about that.
Most of the tropics are known for higher temps and higher humidity.
Of course there are desert regions, but to say that warmer air is less humid just because its warmer?
That’s needs a bit more explanation.
Duane ==> All pretty spot on, sir.
Last week in the Hunter Valley we had our first genuine heat wave since probably 2019.
Grass, which only a week ago was green and lush, needing near constant mowing…
.. is now a light brown colour..
Did not take long !!
bnice ==> If you are still reading here, where is Hunter Valley? The grass turned brown because of low temperature (first week of December, as it does here) or from lack of rain?
What was the temperature rain that week?
Municipalities should be looking hard at the enormous water consumption of data centers; but I don’t think they are.
I don’t know how the water is used for cooling in a data center, but I suspect most, if not all, of the cooling water is returned to the receiving waters.
Just like in agriculture, they love wail about how much water is used for farming, cattle, etc. but ignore the fact that most of the water is returned back to ‘nature”.
(If a cow drinks a gallon of water, how much does it “pee”?)
Returning, heated cooling water is not viable.
Of the water quality limited streams in Oregon (all of them), only one was not defined as too warm.
Adding ‘heat’ to the streams can’t be done anymore if the antics are paying attention (and it is not a govt pet project).
“It’s Chinatown, Jake”
Steinbeck’s “East of Eden” also has interesting commentary on the Salinas River in Central Coastal California
The Chemist ==> Good quote!
Never let bad news go to waste when you can further your ideology. And it doesn’t have to be really bad, just divergent from norm.
Water availability problems are economic, technological, and political problems. IIRC, (and I own a residential property in Manhattan) New York City charges residents for water by a formula based on street frontage, and landlords do not explicitly pass the charge through to tennats. Water is not metered.
If you want New Yorkers to stop wasting water, meter their usage by apartment unit. They will have an incentive to fix leaks and curb usage. (“Turn off the faucet!”).
Walter ==> NYC does need to get its usage under control. Plus the leakage in the aqueducts.
Metering the water use is a good idea, but may be fabulously expensive.
Why would metering be fabulously expensive. You don’t have to dig up the streets, you just put meters in the basement.You don’t need meter readers anymore. The meters can phone their readings in every month.
Walter ==> I meant metering individual users — like each apartment. Metering a whole building might be reasonable….
But remember, NY City knows its aqueducts leak 35 million gallons of water a day….
I had an aunt who lived in Kerhonkson, NY, up 209 from Matamoras, PA at the base of the Catskills in a smaller unpronounceable mountain range that starts with an S. Been through there including the Delaware Water Gap a few times. Just an abstract buried somewhere but he reported on the reduction of Delaware oyster production associated with diversions of water to New York City in 1929 and 1953. Oysters need freshwater to keep the predators and diseases out so there must be a lot happened since because Delaware Bay are still producing oysters and I have read about some recent restoration below the Hudson.
Gunter, G., 1974. An example of oyster production decline with a change in the salinity characteristics of an estuary, Delaware Bay 1800-1973. Proceedings National Shellfisheries. Association. (Abs.) 65:3.
Texas is worried about a drought, wait until the 1950-57 one repeats which was worse in Texas than the 1930s. There was this short severe one that got lots of attention.
Nielsen-Gammon, J. W. 2012. The 2011 Texas Drought. Texas Water J. 3(1):59–95.
https://doi.org/10.21423/twj.v3i1.6463
HD == Kerhonkson is right there near the Rondout Reservoir. You are speaking of “The Gunks” — or more officially, the Shawangunks. Famous as a rock climbing destination.
I have sailed the Delaware Bay many times, but haven’t been aware of any oystering there. I’ll have to check it out.
An old axiom….
If you don’t like the weather, hang on for a few minutes. It will likely change.
In central NJ we had three consecutive months without rain leading to water restrictions, I only had to mow my lawn twice instead of the normal every week.
Phil ==> Some specific areas were more impacted than others — Sept and Oct were dry.
10th August to 20th November no rain compared with the monthly average of about 3.8″.
I’m near one of the severe drought areas and it’s the driest I’ve ever seen it.
Up in the mountains we were in stage 2 fire restrictions for two months last
summer. I have to look at the Hunga Tonga as having an impact on the weather
patterns. The local ag producers on irrigated ground are making some serious
income this year off of their hay, the one without irrigation might not make it.
I grew up hearing about the dust bowl homestead days. They couldn’t
get into the fields in 1919 due to too much rain that spring and summer. It dried up
that fall and went into a 20+yr drought. They starved out and folded in the early 30’s. I asked
my granddad about those times and after a long pause all he said was “we survived”.
Mr Ed ==> When it doesn’t rain, rain-fed ag takes a hit. When it rains too much, almost all ag takes a hit. That’s what crop insurance it for.
And the Dust Bowl years were truly awful for so many people. Glad your Granddad survived, many did not.
A side note:
They built a new tunnel/pipeline to augment the old one.
(It was the setting for one of (The 3rd?) Die hard movies.)
They wanted to shut off the original for inspection and repairs. It had been, maybe decades(?) since that was done. But, as they started to shut the valve down, a tremendous rattling and shaking began so that reopened the valve all the way.
If I’m not mistaken, that original tunnel/pipeline was brick lined.
(I imagine a lot of the water loss due to leaks is in that old line?)
Gunga ==> Here’s part of the story: With New York City aqueduct in repair, mayor promises water will remain safe and tasty
Reminds me of an incident many years ago in Newcastle NSW.
The old historic main water supply cistern was up on a hill, a large tank, with a dome lid and air intake.
Trouble was, over time, a substantial amount of gas built up inside the cistern… possibly from old mine workings.
Then one day, some children were playing with sparklers near the air vent……
KaBOOM !! !
Lost Newcastle The Obelisk
Great story! In my area, the ground water contains enough methane that well water faucets can support a constant flame if one lights the methane that comes up with the water. I had a friend that drilled wells on a property he hopes would support greenhouses heated by the methane from his water wells — alas, there was no sufficient gas to heat a large greenhouse.