Radical anti-fossil fuel activist group Climate Defiance on Thursday protested at Energy Department’s Washington, D.C., headquarters, claiming to have “shuttered” the entrance.
“Breaking: we have shuttered the entrance to the Department of Energy. Cops swarming by the 100. Senior officials on edge. Revolution in air. Updates imminent,” the group stated in a post on X.
Andrew Follett, senior analyst at Club for Growth and former DOE contractor, said the group was actually blocking an unused entrance to a parking garage.
“That’s the entrance to a closed parking garage you notwithstanding nitwit! The entrance is around the other side!” Follett said in a comment on Climate Defiance’s post.
It’s not clear that the protest was “shuttering” the agency as the group claims. The Department of Energy is one of the least-utilized federal headquarters in Washington, D.C.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/protest-against-fossil-fuel-use-climate-defiance-blocks-unused-entrance-doe
When the dust of history settles, some episodes are destined for the “You Can’t Make This Stuff Up” department. Case in point: Climate Defiance, a climate activism group, recently made headlines by “shutting down” the Department of Energy. Or so they claimed. In reality, they staged a protest blocking the entrance to an unused parking garage, which is as effective as barricading a revolving door with a sticky note. Their social media triumphalism was rich: “Revolution in the air!” they proclaimed, while senior DOE officials apparently remained blissfully unaware of this Earth-shaking inconvenience.
Blocking a Ghost Entrance: Bold Strategy, Guys
The self-described “shuttering” of the DOE turned out to be a laughably ineffective gesture. Andrew Follett, a senior analyst at Club for Growth and former DOE contractor, summed it up best: “That’s the entrance to a closed parking garage, you notwithstanding nitwit!” This group’s idea of guerrilla climate warfare is the equivalent of cutting off a phantom limb. But hey, when your primary goal is attention, success is measured not in CO₂ reductions but in retweets.
Virtue Signalers Backed by Big Money
Climate Defiance’s antics might seem like grassroots foolishness, but their funding paints a different picture. The group is backed by the Climate Emergency Fund, a $6 million war chest fueled by Hollywood elites like Adam McKay and Abigail Disney. These champagne environmentalists fork over millions from their air-conditioned mansions to bankroll protests that inconvenience no one except a few bemused D.C. commuters. McKay’s $4 million donation alone could buy enough private jet fuel to make Al Gore blush.
And speaking of mixed-up priorities, this crew also dipped its toe into Gaza activism, because nothing says “climate justice” like conflating environmental issues with geopolitical flashpoints. It’s as if the group spun a wheel labeled “causes to hijack” and just went with whatever came up.
Civil Disobedience Meets Champagne Socialism
Jane Fonda, Hollywood’s perennial activist-in-residence, graced a Climate Defiance event with her presence, urging attendees to engage in civil disobedience. It’s unclear if Fonda stayed long enough to endure the consequences of such acts or if she promptly returned to her five-star accommodations. The hypocrisy isn’t lost on anyone who remembers Fonda’s past escapades in Vietnam or her more recent knack for blending activism with high-gloss PR.
The Real Victims: Sanity and Public Discourse
What makes Climate Defiance uniquely absurd isn’t just their misguided tactics but their utter lack of self-awareness. They act as though they’re modern-day Rosa Parks while blocking an entrance that nobody uses. They cry injustice as “dozens” of members are arrested, calling it a “crime” to demand an end to fossil fuels. Meanwhile, their arrests are about as consequential as their protests. After all, no movement has been more coddled by sympathetic media and deep-pocketed donors.
Let’s not forget the irony of these activists relying on modern transportation and digital platforms—both heavily dependent on fossil fuels—to organize their protests. Perhaps their next act of civil disobedience will involve chaining themselves to an ExxonMobil gas pump while tweeting their demands from an iPhone.
Final Thoughts: A Movement Adrift
The Climate Defiance debacle isn’t just an indictment of the group’s tactics but a microcosm of the broader movement’s intellectual bankruptcy. Their actions scream privilege and superficiality, not substance. Blocking an unused garage in D.C. does less to “save the planet” than it does to confirm the movement’s image as a playground for Ivy League dilettantes who confuse hashtags with hard work.
So here’s some unsolicited advice for Climate Defiance: If you want to be taken seriously, try doing something that, you know, actually matters. Until then, enjoy your time in the police van—it might be the closest you get to making an impact.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.




I can see a whole lot of really nice, useful clothes made from fossil fuels.
Unfortunately, they’re covering a bunch of complete maroons. I mean, there’s actually a sign right behind them saying ‘Entrance Closed’!
‘Entrance Closed’
They can read all the words in that very long, complicated sentence …
… they just don’t understand the meaning of the last one !!
Woke education rules KO.
From all the vinyl jackets padded with poly wool, doesn’t seem to be much of a “global warming” issue either. 😉
“here’s some unsolicited advice for Climate Defiance: If you want to be taken seriously, try doing something that, you know, actually matters”
No, that’s absolutely wrong. If they want to be taken seriously, they should argue their case. Disrupting other people is totally unjustifiable. Persuading the general public to back their well-argued cause, now that would be truly effective.
They could actually give up using fossil fuel and anything made with or using it. After 12 months invite the press to their utopia to see how wonderful it is.
That should work
Crikey Ben, one year? They would not last one week, literally not one week. Get the press to do a study of any of the tribe wishing to ban fossil fuel use and its products from day one and see if the advocates for the destruction of civilisation made it to the end of the week.
Defecating in the back yard because to do anything other is using fossil fuels i.e. underground piping, would be the first chastening experience for the anarchic alarmists.
How could they survive without their smart phones?
You give them too much credit. The point of marxian criticism is to criticise, not debate. If this exercise served to practice gathering a group to protest, spread dissatisfaction, strengthen the false idea of class conflict, and maintain anti-establishment sentiment amongst a few faithful, it was a success. The facts that the DOE is their ally in the current outgoing administration, that no bureaucrat was inconvenienced or prevented from going to work (which would be against the law), that no one outside the in-group would find this credible or relevant, or that their financiers are actually “big oil” for all practical purposes, make no difference.
They have no arguments.
“they should argue their case”
True. Those who practiced civil disobedience in the past did- such as Gandhi when he opposed British rule in India- and Henry David Thoreau when he opposed America’s war with Mexico.
They could follow the example of the Doukhobors, or PETA sometimes, and strip off everything they are wearing made with the aid of fossil fuels. It would at least attract paparratzi.
Why is it that the only women who take off their clothes at protests like this, are the ones don’t want to see naked?
Yes, maybe that would be a good protest line for them “I’d rather be naked then wear clothes that were made of (or produced with) fossil fuels!”.
There are a lot of really dumb overeducated people out there.
Especially Ivy League. Wokeachusetts is full of them.
Sadly in this day and age, a so-called education in no way means that the person with such a degree(s) is smart. Book knowledge is good for trivia, but it doesn’t always correlate to having common sense.
overeducated? I see no evidence of education of any kind.
A joyless bunch who inadvertently do comedy.
It’s a bit incredulous to expect a bunch of climate liars to change their behaviours any time soon.
The cause of feigned outrage doesn’t matter a jot to them.
It’s a chance to play dress-up, make some indecipherable signs, act all French revolutionist, maybe hook up, get laid, even get paid for turning up.
Beats being cooped up in the basement all day.
Why is it not the oil barons who are getting carted off in handcuffs? Why?
Firstly because they’re not blocking folks garage doors when asked not to and secondly because all we knaves like buying their very useful products.
Reminds me of the “symbolic arrests” that the Berkely (CA) police made available for protestors who wanted to virtue-signal, but without the risk.
Maybe the DOE should offer Starbucks.
You can tell a group or movement is dying when its actions increasingly resemble a staged play.
Perhaps a RICO prosecution including their funders?
Don’t anybody move or I shoot the…….!!!!!!
Climate Defiance sounds a bit like climate denial. Regardless, perhaps they should consider actually trying to defy the climate in some more meaningful ways such as protesting outdoors in vegan fabric tunics during a deep winter freezing gale, or sunbathing al fresco in a mid summer Saharan sand storm. Perhaps they would enjoy a day of boating in a leaky cedar kayak during a mid Atlantic storm surge or tenting in the Florida keys during the next category 5 landfalling hurricane. There are a myriad of ways they could put their fervent environmental passion and utter stupidity to good use.
Isn’t the one in the middle of the throng right behind the banner in the white T-shirt with “End Fossil Fuels” on it wearing sunglasses and with his fist raised the TROLL “RichTARD Greene”….did I spell that right?….who SPAMS here frequently?
I think we have a consensus. 😉
How did they want the van heated?
All I can say is I’m glad these mindless nitwits aren’t on our side. They are pathetic.
The stupidity is stupendous! Maybe someone shouldn’t have told them they were at the wrong entrance – then they’d have inconvenienced nobody without even knowing it…
“Fonda’s past escapades in Vietnam”
Correct spelling is Viet Nam.
You mean they themselves spell it?
Visit Vietnam: The Official Tourism Website of Vietnam
Seems either is acceptable to the people who live there
To the tourism board, anyway. They’re catering to English speakers. All Viet Namese words are one syllable, according to Viet Namese I’ve known over the years.
Viet and Namese are both two syllables. So is it Vie Et Nam Ese?
Viet Nam was used in the 1960s. Vietnam is the current useage.
Remember when the capital of China was Peking?
This is classic leftism stupidity in open display, got to wonder if this is caused by a virus that infects only democrats.
Typical eco-activists, not skilled at doing homework.
(GoonPeace executives say truth does not matter, only publicity.)