Guest essay by Vijay Jayaraj
When a purported climate crisis dominates much of the discourse of public policy, the trap of attributing every ecological issue to climate change easily ensnares anyone who fails to note the abundant evidence to the contrary.
Over the past few decades, we have witnessed remarkable success stories of species being brought back from the brink of extinction—stories that defy the popular media narrative that a climate modestly warmer than the Little Ice Age is killing our planet’s life forms.
From the Brink of Extinction
The iconic polar bear, long heralded as the unofficial emblem of climate advocacy, has now multiplied in a remarkable way despite media houses like NBC claiming that they are on an “extinction path”.
In certain Arctic regions, these ursine sovereigns of the North are thriving in greater numbers during periods of diminished sea ice coverage—a phenomenon that challenges conventional wisdom about their habitat requirements.
Down south, the verdant, equatorial realms of India are witnessing a resurgence of the majestic Bengal tiger. Being apex predators and linchpins of their ecosystems, the tigers’ burgeoning numbers often herald an expansion of forests as well.
Nonetheless, it was not long ago that the New York Times tried to mislead Western readers about the state of these beasts with a fearmongering article titled “Bengal Tigers May Not Survive Climate Change.”
India has also managed to help the population of the greater one-horned rhinoceros to increase from 200 to 2,600!
In the picturesque Iberian Peninsula of Spain and Portugal—where I’ve worked as a wildlife ecologist—the Iberian lynx has experienced a meteoric rise, surging more than tenfold over the past two decades. This extraordinary resurgence is hailed by the scientific community as unparalleled in the realm of feline conservation.
Also staging a remarkable comeback are the iconic curlews, an avian species once teetering on the brink of local extinction in Northern Ireland’s lake system known as the Lough Erne and the uplands of the Antrim Plateau. Conservation experts attribute this phoenix-like revival to strategic habitat improvements.
In the nearby rugged expanse of Scotland’s Affric Highlands, a mere stone’s throw from my former abode, rewilding initiatives have spurred an avian resurgence. The enigmatic black grouse, along with several other species, have reached a population zenith unseen in nearly two decades.
In light of these remarkable recoveries, a compelling question emerges: How do these species manage to increase their numbers during what is widely characterized as an era of unprecedented climatic adversity?
Successful Conservation Rests on Sound Science, Not Climate Myth
Successful conservation requires a deep understanding of the specific needs of species, their ecosystems and the threats they face. The scientific foundation of conservation biology draws from various fields, including ecology, genetics, wildlife biology and environmental science.
Researchers use advanced techniques to study population dynamics, habitat requirements and genetic characteristics of species and identify the most critical threats to a species’ survival. Possible interventions are then prioritized accordingly.
This kind of work by conservation biologists shows the effects of changes in the climate are not as dramatic as portrayed.
A 2016 study published in “Nature Climate Change” analyzed the main drivers of population decline for 8,688 species on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species. Excessive exploitation and agricultural practices were the biggest threats, not climate change.
Similarly, a 2018 study found that habitat loss, overexploitation and invasive species were the primary drivers of vertebrate extinction since the year 1500.
Many species can recover if threats more immediate than gradual climatic changes are addressed effectively. Species are proving that they can adapt and thrive if given the space and appropriate protections from over-hunting and other intrusions.
The experience of modern conservation efforts shows that mitigating real dangers to animal populations makes more sense than attempting to reverse or slow climatic changes – an impossible venture in any case. Besides, our relatively warm climate has been beneficial to the growth of the vegetation that sustains the creatures we so treasure.
This commentary was first published at California Globe on November 22, 2024.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Once again:
1. More rain is not a problem.
2. Warmer weather is not a problem.
3. More arable land is not a problem.
4. Longer growing seasons is not a problem.
5. CO2 greening of the earth is not a problem.
6. There isn’t any Climate Crisis.
1. Sea level rise did not accelerate as Hansen asserted.
2. Arctic summer sea ice did not disappear as Wadhams and Gore asserted.
3. Glacier National Park glaciers did not disappear as USNPS asserted.
4. UK children still know snow, opposite what Viner asserted.
5. Ocean isn’t boiling as Guterres asserted.
6. Our planet is greening.
And there are more polar bears now than there were a decade ago.
Only relatively warm compare to the LIA !! 🙂
Imagine the species growth if we were a bit warmer and there was more CO2 ! 🙂
Surely this indicates that Northern Island is not doing enough on their wind turbine build-out.
Thanks V.J.,
“The experience of modern conservation efforts shows that mitigating real dangers to animal populations makes more sense than attempting to reverse or slow climatic changes – an impossible venture in any case. ”
Too many people hear the climate message and use it as an excuse to NOT do the hard work. Authors of books and magazine articles do this to the point I dislike starting to read something knowing the bad is coming.
You are far from alone in both statements. Succinctly stated, and part of why I don’t even bother reading many articles. Looking forward to CC falling flat on its puffed up face.
But but but…..whatabout Dengue fever?…..its on the rise you know?
On the evening of Nov. 5, 2024, as the election returns showing Donald Trump’s re-election was assured were still coming in, the DOJ moved to dismiss the qui tam lawsuit against the Cresent Dunes solar project in Nevada! This marvel, that is capable of incinerating birds in midflight if they wander into the right area, is still trying to get into operation after going bankrupt in 2020!
Once again our beloved rulers seem to be more concerned with their money laundering operations then the environment! Like Forever Wars and the National Institute of Ill-Health, the bureaucracy’s only concern for the environment seems to be how much money they can launder through “green” projects without getting caught by the See-no-evil media!
We will never be able to achieve a clean, safe environment; a safe and healthy food supply; or a world without war for profit; until we can remove the criminally insane individuals infesting our institutions! Those that support the slaughter of raptors and bats, whales and other species; to achieve a world without reliable energy; are as delusional as any fanatic cult in history!
Well Raptors in Scotland may be heading for decline because of Net Zero. In the Telegraph today (“story tip”) is an article about a Golden Eagle killed after colliding with a wind turbine, and they only discovered this one as it had a tracker. I wrote to the RSPB about this a while ago as they are always on about raptors being killed by estate gamekeepers, but never seem bothered by these sort (obviously the wrong sort..!) of Raptor deaths. All I got back was a pretty limp statement about working with wind farm designers to ensure they aren’t built on bird flight paths – what! Perhaps if everyone here in UK also writes to the RSPB they might take some notice, although I fear they are totally embedded the Net Zero stupidity.
So, basically it is the bird’s fault it got chopped.
Such a world. Can someone please issue the sanity drug?
Let’s see… Raptor birds use the wind (air currents) to stay aloft in their ‘hunt’…. so we’ll build the windmills elsewhere… oh, wait…
The Highlands of Scotland has a battle of values going on, between those seeking to maintain a status quo of shooting/fishing estates, primarily for very rich non-Scottish folks; vs a group of rewilders who want to create something else, which may or may not create too much long-term work for Scottish folks.
I’m sure there are a myriad of alternatives in between those two extremes, however my view on rewilding is that it should start in places where there’s not too many alternative possibilities. That makes it less tendentious and allows alternative ideas to flourish in areas where a greater variety of possibilities exist.
I love conservationists. It’s part of my Boy Scout experience that led to this.
Environmentalists, not so much. When pollution was a real issue back in the day, they served a useful function. Now the are activists looking for a cause, pretty much so.