By Vijay Jayaraj
The archipelago nation of Indonesia represents just 1% of Earth’s land area, but it has set the stage for global geopolitics surrounding fossil fuels and climate policies.
As a part of climate negotiations between G-7 nations, Indonesia was expected to be the first among developing countries to announce early closures of coal plants.
In the spotlight is the 660-megawatt Cirebon-1 plant in West Java province, which had been scheduled to shut down by 2035. However, it is understood that Jakarta will not follow that timeline but rather continue to operate the plant to its originally projected end of life in 2042. A stumbling block to the early closure is a price tag of more than $1 billion to replace the coal plant with so-called renewable energy.
In reaffirming its commitment to the unrestricted use of coal, Indonesia makes a bold and sensible decision to put energy security and economic priorities ahead of international climate politics. The move sets up Indonesia as a model for other developing countries to defy the western agenda to reduce emissions in favor of their own self-interest.
Coal in Indonesia
For developing nations like Indonesia, the path to prosperity is paved with affordable energy. Coal, abundant and cheap, has long been the fuel of choice for powering economic growth. The country sits atop vast coal reserves, estimated at 37 billion metric tons, which are primarily located in Sumatra and Kalimantan.
Jakarta has approved a coal production quota of 922 million metric tons for 2024, a significant increase from previous years. This move has sparked international criticism, but it’s a calculated step to ensure energy affordability.
Coal remains the backbone of Indonesia’s energy sector, accounting for over 60% of its electricity generation. Also, Indonesia relies on coal-fueled smelters for most of its nickel production.
Producing about half of the world’s nickel, Indonesia is the top producer of the metal, which is needed to make batteries that run electric vehicles and energy storage devices.
Economic Case for Fossil Fuels
In the late 1990s, nearly 50% of Indonesia’s population lived in poverty. Today, that number is closer to 10%, thanks to unabated use of coal during the past two decades. At 70%, Indonesia manages to maintain one of the highest employment rates among the G20 countries.
“Despite challenges in 2023, Indonesia has demonstrated resilience to global shocks and an ever more diversified economic base is expected to mitigate adverse impacts,” says a spokesman for financial services company PwC.
Much of this success is due to a stable and reliable energy supply of coal, oil, and natural gas for electricity and industries. Coal and petroleum, along with nickel and ferroalloys, are among Indonesia’s top exports.
Poverty, though declining, remains a pressing issue, with over 26 million Indonesians classified as poor. Rapid industrialization and economic growth are essential for improving living standards and creating opportunities for millions.
Western Hypocrisy
Many western leaders lecturing Indonesia on the evils of coal had their own economies built with that very fuel and continue to rely on oil and gas.
The United States, for instance, underwent an energy revolution through fracking, which unlocked vast reserves of natural gas and oil. In 2023, U.S. was the number one oil producer in the world.
Similarly, Norway, often lauded for its commitment to “sustainability,” continues to issue oil drilling permits in the North Sea. If Norway, a country with a superior economy and high standard of living, can still prioritize its economic self-interest by extracting its oil, why should Indonesia be criticized for utilizing its coal reserves?
The $1.4 trillion Indonesian economy is in no mood to compromise its future or the continuing upward trend in economic growth. Count on Jakarta to exploit its natural resources well into the future.
This commentary was first published at California Globe on October 14, 2024.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition in Arlington Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University (both in the U.K.), and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“A stumbling block to the early closure is a price tag of more than $1 billion to replace the coal plant with so-called renewable energy.”
And if they wanted ruinables- where would they put them? Chop down vast areas of rain forest? Wind mills at sea?
That whole discussion misses the point entirely. YOU CANNOT ‘replace the coal plant with so-called renewable energy.’
Not unless you’re willing to tolerate a failed electric grid.
Much “weeping and gnashing of teeth”.
The crumbling fort of WEF¨s agenda for geen energy and Western hypocrisy!?
Who said that you can ignore reality but you cannot ignore the effects of reality? The reality is that the developing nations will not allow Western Leftist ideologues to keep them in poverty; they will increasingly use nuclear and FF energy resources. And the West’s destruction of its industrial base has led to the increasing economic, political and strategic domination by the BRICS coalition.
Learn Mandarin.
Distilling the above article down to its essence:
Indonesia has joined a growing list of nations that have said F### THAT to the Paris Agreement on Climate Change that they previously signed.
Indonesia signed the Paris Accords on 23 April 2016 (https://ppid.menlhk.go.id/siaran_pers/browse/299 ).
Like other emerging countries, Indonesia only signed the Paris Agreement because they thought that they were promised free money. They never had the slightest intention of doing anything which would damage their economic prospects.
Well, perhaps . . . what about China, India and Russia, each signed the accords 22 April 2016?
Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parties_to_the_Paris_Agreement
China and India are never going to do anything which is against their own best interests.
And certainly not Russia.
So, basically what you’re saying is that no country that signed the Paris Agreement on Climate Change—with the possible exceptions of the US, Great Britain and Germany—ever had any real intention of enacting what they agreed to do!
I concur.
DUH!
In Canada, our emissions have risen the last three years, despite implementing a carbon tax! We’re are well-intentioned though! (sarc)
US emissions rose for the first time in decades under the Biden regime’s stupid “fighting climate change” policies.
They cynically cheerleaders the “climate crisis” bullshit while privately laughing at the stupidity of ‘western nations dumb enough to pursue the self-destructive policies demanded by the Eco-Nazis.
First thought that entered my mind!
Hopefully this action will snowball.
Indonesia Dumps Climate
Miliband won’t be best pleased. He firmly believes the sacrifice of the British economy at the altar of net zero will persuade others to follow suit.
And they are now also working for team Sesame Street Harris
Miliband will spin it as “we have to show countries like Indonesia they are wrong by installing more renewables. It’s the only way to save humanity”
I’d like him to go to Nigeria and Cuba for a week each to taste what saving the planet implies.
Story tip. Getting good PR
Degrowth needs to solve its image problem for the sake of the planet – The Guardian
https://apple.news/A6AoW1mGwTACoq_Bq3C9x8g
Mind blowing stuff
I’ll grant that killing off billions of people does have image problems.
“You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.” Abraham Lincoln
As usual with a Gruniad article.. it is mind-blowing BS from the very first word. 🙂
More good news.
When virtue signaling bumps up against reality it’s reality that always wins.
Meanwhile in Germany climate politics is alive and well (the opposite of their recession plagued economy)
https://co2coalition.org/publications/it-is-time-to-talk-about-capacity-factors/
Update:
Comment
Germany in 2024 is 45% wind and solar and their most recent wind and solar auction was oversubscribed at the same time that utilization rate is decreasing because of their expensive energy induced two year long recession (with no end in sight).
With 284 million people, Indonesia is the 4th most populous country in the world and has wisely decided to ignore the alarmist rhetoric that’s currently impeding the economic growth and personal welfare of less realistic jurisdictions. More countries like this are needed to lead the way toward realistic energy futures, not quixotic dreams of unreliable alternatives.
Meanwhile on bigger island to the south 27 million folks struggling with taxes and grocery shopping will be pleased to hear the fickle energy transition is back on track after a big overhaul-
Back on track for clean energy overhaul, investors told (msn.com)
According to the IEA’s ‘Coal Mid-Year Update’ (July 2024)
Global coal demand in 2023 grew 2.6% ” to reach an all time high of 8.2bn tonnes”…..”Driven mainly by strong growth in China (6%, 276Mt) and India (9.2%, 105Mt”.
“The growth in China and India more than offset declines in the EU (103Mt) and US (81Mt)”
“In 2023 production by the three largest coal producers, accounting for 70% of global output grew considerably, China (3.4%), India (12%) and Indonesia (13%). Global coal production reached an all time high of 8.9bn tonnes”
“Indonesia aims to produce 720Mt in 2024 but has mining approvals for over 900Mt”
“Indonesia became the first exporting country to exceed 500Mt in a year”
As Vijay says Jakarta will continue to exploit it’s resources