If You Want an Investment Portfolio Full of Dog Stocks Try Filling it With Renewable and Green Punts

From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

by Chris Morrison

Many renewable energy stocks are dog shares to be avoided at all costs by investors seeking a reasonable rate of investment return. Perhaps not the advice you would receive in the advertising-compromised financial pages of mainstream media, and certainly not a message that resonates with promoters of the Net Zero fantasy. The Renewable Energy Industrial Index (RENIXX) is a widely-consulted global stock capitalisation index of the 30 largest renewable energy industrial companies in the world and it has shown near zero growth since it was started in 2006, along with a reverse projection back to 2002. Over the last three years alone it has lost almost half its value.

The retail exchange traded fund iShares Global Clean Energy aims to “target access to clean energy stocks around the world”. Last year its value fell by 26.1% and from its inception in 2008 it has more or less halved an initial investment of £10,000. Greencoat Renewable PLC is a U.K.-quoted investment trust and the owner and operator of renewable energy infrastructure assets in Europe. It is said to provide “attractive risk adjusted returns with a compelling growth opportunity; supported by a robust regulator regime and managed by a proven investment manager” – which is one imaginative way of explaining a loss in share value of 18.6% over the last five years.

Out in the real world where serious money talks, it is becoming obvious that the conclusion has been drawn that many green technologies, unless subsidised by the state, provide profit-free, second-rate solutions to problems invented around a politicised climate crisis.

This is the graph showing the real world performance of RENIXX. Consider also that an investment made over the same period in the U.S. Dow Jones Industrial Index would have quadrupled.

The RENIXX covers a broad spectrum of activities including wind power manufacture and supplies, along with producers of solar PV cells. Current members of the Index include Orsted, Tesla and Vestas Wind Systems. The stock of this latter company has risen only 7% over the last 16 years and it has fallen 58% from a high in 2021. Typical of the RENIXX dogs is the U.S. operation First Solar which has risen since 2021 but is below its all-time high price reached in 2008.

In fact many of the indexes such as RENIXX would look even worse if the performance of Tesla was removed from the charts. Over its lifetime, Elon Musk’s Tesla share price has risen an astonishing 18,000%, although in common with almost all green shares it has suffered in recent years. But Tesla is the value exception with Real Clear Energy noting that its worth by 2021 soared to over $1 trillion, making it more valuable than Toyota, Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, General Motors, Ford, BMW and Honda combined. Its stellar rise helps deflect from the dreadful performance of other green stocks including EV manufactures. Real Clear Energy notes that since 2020, 31 EV companies have gone public on U.S. stock exchanges, but only one, the Chinese Li Auto, has seen its price rise since an initial public offering. Most were real bow-wows, but standout disasters were recorded by Fisker (-99%), Nikola (-94%), NIO (-50%), Lucid group (-75%) and Rivian (-88%). Six other companies are already bankrupt.

One EV company, Plug Power, supplies hydrogen energy systems, and in its 27 years of existence has never turned a profit. In 2024 it lost $1.45 billion, up from a deficit in 2018 of $43.8 million. Even the big boys find renewable equipment a challenge. In 2023, Ford lost $4.7 billion on sales of 116,000 electric vehicles, or over $40,000 per vehicle. General Electric’s wind turbine business lost $1.1 billion in 2023.

Of course the excuses come rolling in. Same thing happened with the early dot.com revolution, it is argued. But the green revolution is not a free market gold rush. It peddles second-rate solutions and produces equipment such as cars that the market does not want to buy in bulk. Collecting the breezes and the beams is only viable with huge amounts of subsidies taken from trapped consumers. Nobody would build a windmill to supply power to the electric grid if their mouths were not first stuffed with taxpayer gold. In Britain, electricity prices are soaring and wind and solar power, which supplies barely 6% of total energy needs, requires an annual bung of £12 billion. In the U.S., the Biden Administration has thrown vast amounts of money around in a desperate attempt to boost a green economy that few people would be willing to start and support with their own hard-earned.

The supplicant nature of many green businesses perhaps explains their bombed-out share prices, along with the end of cheap interest rates and higher inflation. But provide a heady mixture of free money and subsidies designed to guarantee a profit and the chancers will initially beat a path to your door with any number of whacky schemes to save the planet. At the U.K. Energy department, Mad Ed Miliband and his band of weird wonks are currently entertaining any number of financial black holes including carbon capture, hydrogen manufacture and battery storage.

But the money – and borrowing capacity – is running out for luxury pet projects across Europe and the seemingly unlimited government spending will have to end in the near future. And fears are rising about the heavy environmental damage inflicted by EVs, the lack of national green jobs created, the further de-industrialisation of western economies and the horrific, mostly unreported, toll on wildlife caused by the countryside-blighting growth of monster wind turbines and overhead power cables.

It is said that if you want to predict how people will vote in an election, the prices offered by bookmakers are a more reliable guide than opinion polls, which are often distorted for the benefit of the paying customer. Next time someone is punting green stories, ask to see what their value is in the real commercial world where hard-won cash is not necessarily God, but it is a deeply religious experience. In these cases, past results are probably a very good guide to future performance.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

5 14 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Toland
September 23, 2024 10:57 pm

The reason why “green” shares do so badly is that they are invariably subsidised in one form or another. Once the subsidies expire or are cancelled, most of these investments become worthless because there is no underlying profitable business model. These investments usually only get financed by green investors who cannot count or subsidy chasers who will disappear once the subsidies disappear.

oeman50
Reply to  Bill Toland
September 24, 2024 4:47 am

Indeed. What the government giveth, the government can taketh away.

Coeur de Lion
September 23, 2024 11:52 pm

My financial advisor recommended Octopus Energy . I would have lost half

September 24, 2024 1:41 am

This is the graph showing the real world performance of RENIXX. Consider also that an investment made over the same period in the U.S. Dow Jones Industrial Index would have quadrupled.

Worryingly, over the same period, gold—a non-productive asset—rose over 700%. What does that tell us about the world? (I mean, apart from: don’t invest in renewables.)

Reply to  quelgeek
September 24, 2024 4:18 pm

Gold holds it’s value. The dollars/pounds you use to buy it have changed in value/purchasing power. Commonly called “inflation”.

strativarius
September 24, 2024 1:51 am

If You Want an Investment Portfolio Full of Dog S…
Buy into GB Energy

Editor
September 24, 2024 3:42 am

Correction needed to “many green technologies, unless subsidised by the state, provide profit-free, second-rate solutions to problems invented around a politicised climate crisis”. It should be “many green technologies, even if subsidised by the state, …”

Reply to  Mike Jonas
September 24, 2024 4:14 am

Another correction needed – should read “provide profit-free, second-rate NON-solutions to problems invented around a politicised climate crisis.”

September 24, 2024 4:16 am

There is no “profit” that has been or ever will be generated by “green energy” or EV “investments” – only transfer of taxpayer money to the “investors” in these scams.

September 24, 2024 4:25 am

Green Technology was never a real investment, but always a subsidy-farming scam. The smart money bought in early when the subsidies were paid, and got out after the sugar rush in share price, leaving the ordinary rubes with the long-term loss.

Mr.
September 24, 2024 4:45 am

Didn’t Warren Buffett say that without all the subsidiaries and tax breaks, renewables stocks make no sense.

Editor
Reply to  Mr.
September 24, 2024 4:59 am

Warren Buffett said  “I will do anything that is basically covered by the law to reduce Berkshire’s tax rate. For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That’s the only reason to build them. They don’t make sense without the tax credit.”. My understanding is that Warren Buffett’s (or Berkshire Hathaway’s) tax is negative in spite of large profits in normal people’s language.

Editor
September 24, 2024 5:26 am

For energy investment, coal isn’t exactly going out of fashion. China has built and is building hundreds of new coal-fired power stations. Will global coal production keep up with the increase in demand from those new stations. That’s the $64*10^n question. I wish I knew the answer.

Dean S
Reply to  Mike Jonas
September 24, 2024 10:04 pm

Yes, plenty of places around the world have coal to keep going for many hundreds of years. Is not that hard to increase production with new mines in countries happy to have them.

Neo
September 24, 2024 11:57 am

BREAKING IN NYC: WORLD’S BIGGEST BANKS PLEDGE SUPPORT FOR NUCLEAR
Banks and funds totaling $14 TRILLION in assets have just signed an unprecedented statement in support of nuclear power.
https://x.com/energybants/status/1838108983413895314

Bob
September 24, 2024 3:36 pm

Very nice report. Take away the government money and mandates and the whole sorry mess collapses. If wind and solar ever stood a chance of working properly it would have already happened. They have been given every advantage and still they suck.

Edward Katz
September 24, 2024 6:14 pm

This is another example of the hype exceeding the reality. The promoters of these investments slyly bypassed the fact that the technologies and companies they were promoting had no extended track records; instead they were based on wishful thinking, and once it became evident that they couldn’t deliver the type of clean, affordable energy so beloved by the climate alarmists, whatever smart money that was left headed for the exits. This is another reminder that the Green Dream is still largely a hallucination, and investors need to see better track records before risking their money.

Mr Ed
September 25, 2024 7:40 am

I’ve spent a bit of time looking at the financial side of alt energy especially after
a sizeable wind farm was built in my area. The scale of the farm was very large.
The media reported it was done by Invenergy. A quick google showed a private
firm based in Chicago reported to be the largest of it’s type. Blackstone, CDPQ and GE Renewables were listed as investors , no dogs on that list.
CDPQ is said to be involved with public sector retirement funds. Blackstone
is the largest publicly traded private equity firm around with 1.1T under management, T as in trillion. If Invenergy was a publicly traded unit it would be big. The public sector funds
involvement need some close scrutiny due to some possible conflicts of interest…