Bonner Cohen
Author, Fixing America’s Crumbling Underground Infrastructure
In her speech at the Democratic National Convention on Thursday night, Vice President Kamala Harris vowed to “pass a middle-class tax cut that will benefit more than 100 million Americans.” In fact, while serving as vice president, Harris played a key role in enacting legislation that increased the cost of living for all Americans.
When President Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) on Aug. 16, 2022, he said that it was “one of the most significant laws in our history.”
That was no exaggeration.
Contrary to its label, the law had nothing to do with reducing inflation. In fact, it would soon drive-up prices for such essentials as food, electricity and transportation. The IRA is the administration’s signature energy-transition initiative, with a few provisions strengthening the government’s role in healthcare and an expansion in the number of IRS employees thrown in for good measure. Passage was a close call, with Harris casting the deciding vote in a Senate that was deadlocked 50-50. (RELATED: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly: Biden’s Climate Bill Turns Two Years Old)
Sold to the American public as a vehicle to combat the “climate crisis,” the IRA’s backers put the price tag at $750 billion. But by April 2023, Goldman Sachs calculated the costs of the statute’s subsidies and other handouts at $1.2 trillion over ten years. In truth, the IRA’s costs cannot be measured in dollars and cents, because the law’s effect on the lives of ordinary citizens, the viability of the U.S. economy and American national security are so profound as to defy quantification.
At the core of the IRA are lavish handouts to politically favored industries and organizations, paid for by taxpayers, most of whom will see their quality-of-life decline as the law tightens its grip on the nation’s energy sector. In its push to rid the country of fossil fuels, for example, the law expands subsidies for notoriously inefficient offshore wind turbines at a time of high-profile cancellation of several ocean-borne wind projects off the Atlantic Coast due to rising costs and resistance from coastal residents.
Rigging the game against gasoline-powered cars, the IRA extends the $7,500 tax credit for purchases of new electric vehicles (EVs) to include point-of-sale discounts, provided the EVs and their batteries have been assembled within the United States and the minerals in the batteries are sourced from the United States or from countries with free-trade agreements in place.
Yet, despite the favorable treatment lavished on EVs by the IRA, sales of the vehicles have stalled, an ominous sign for U.S. autoworkers, who are being transitioned to make cars the driving public continues to shun and whose assembly already requires a smaller workforce. EVs currently make up 6.8 percent of new sales, meaning that over 93 percent of buyers are sticking with gas-powered cars. People purchasing traditional vehicles, however, are nevertheless subsidizing the sale of EVs through the federal taxes they pay.
America’s already shaky power grid will also be at the not-so-tender mercies of the IRA. In a publication titled “Building a Clean Energy Economy: A Guidebook to the Inflation Reduction Act’s Investments in Clean Energy and Climate Action,” updated in January 2023, the White House boasted that the IRA “invests nearly $3 billion in the U.S. transmission system to help overcome the financial and permitting challenges that hinder the build-out of high-capacity lines. These investments will not only address critical vulnerabilities but also connect Americans to cleaner and cheaper power, advancing the Biden-Harris Administration’s ambitious goal of 100 percent carbon-free electricity by 2035.”
But therein lies the problem. The power sources the IRA favors — wind and solar — are neither clean nor cheap, nor are they in any way reliable. Dead wind turbines and solar panels, laden with toxic chemicals, are destined for landfills across the country, transforming each dump into a potential mini-Superfund site. They are “cheap” only because they are propped up by taxpayers, and even with the handouts, wind and solar cannot compete with natural gas, which is at its lowest price in years.
Feeding the electric grid a steady diet of intermittent power will only increase its vulnerability. In an Aug. 16 coalition letter to Congress, 55 free-market and conservative organizations urged lawmakers to eliminate the IRA’s subsidies and noted the threat the law poses to the electric grid.
“The very threats to grid reliability warned about by such entities as PJM and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation are the ones actively encouraged under the statute,” the coalition wrote. “Thanks to the IRA, the American people face a greater likelihood of future blackouts – and are being made to pay for the privilege.” (RELATED: DIANA FURCHTGOTT-ROTH: After Two Years, It’s Clear Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act Did The Exact Opposite)
The energy chaos the IRA and like-minded “climate-friendly” Biden administration regulations are unleashing on the country may temporarily benefit recipients of the IRA’s giveaways. But the law’s real beneficiary resides in Beijing. China can only marvel at how the United States is unilaterally disarming itself by abandoning its global leadership in fossil-fuel production and embracing energy sources controlled by Beijing. China has a stranglehold on the global supply chain for cobalt, lithium, graphite, nickel, copper and rare-earth elements that are the centerpiece of the energy transition the IRA is meant to promote.
Decades before the IRA was enacted, economist Friedrich Hayek captured the spirit of central planners’ “fatal conceit,” who demonstrate “how little they know about what they imagine they can design.”
Bonner Russell Cohen, Ph. D., is a senior policy analyst with the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT).
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
What is preventing virtual President Harris from doing that now?
Certainly not the Republicans.
Because the tax cuts she ‘offers’ are completely offset by her increased tax on unrealized capital gains on 144 million home (at around $4000-$5000 per home) at a time when she promises to increase home values by at least $25000.
No unrealized capital gain = no tax cuts
Yes, the current Biden-Harris budget proposal calls for about a five TRILLION dollar increase in taxes. And Kamala can add another two TRILLION in tax increases if she cancels the Trump tax cuts in 2025.
Kamala will claim that noone paying less than $400,000 will be taxed, but that’s not true. Kamala says she will tax the Big Corporations and they will have to pay the money, but any knowledgeable person knows that corporations don’t really pay increased taxes, they just pass the costs on to the consumer, whether that consumer makes $30,000 per year or $400,000 per year. It’s called inflation. Everybody pays for inflation, right down to the poorest person in the nation. Kamala’s plan will take more money out of everyone’s pocket.
That’s what Kamala and the other radical Democrats offer.
All of what you say is very true . . . but I’m afraid it will only hasten the inevitable collapse of the US dollar within the next 10 or so years.
Neither the Democrats or the Republicans talk much about—let alone have any defined plans—to deal with the massive, exponential growth in the US national debt due to year-after-year deficit spending.
It is relatively simple to do a curve fit of the rate of increase in the national debt relative to growth in US GDP over just the last 10 years (as I have done using Excel) and that curve reveals the following predictions:
Year-End Debt-GDP ratio (%)
2024 123
2025 130
2030 171
2035 225
2040 296
2045 390
2050 513
You can pick the year when you believe the whole system of exponentially-increasing national debt comes crashing down . . . based on the above, I believe it will happen before 2035 because by then there will insufficient annual total tax revenue to even meet annual interest payments due on that debt. I predict we have less than 11 years to get the USA off its addiction to deficit spending (but I also predict that won’t happen absent a world-wide economic meltdown . . . you know, the US political beast must be fed if at all possible).
It will be impossible for Congress to increase taxation of US corporations and citizens enough to delay this development significantly without that increased taxation itself triggering the collapse.
The one “out” the US theoretically has at its disposal, remonetizing the US dollar to, say an old:new ratio of 0.1:1, would be tantamount to the US defaulting on its credit both internationally and domestically, also almost certain to trigger worldwide economic collapse. Such a move would wipe out people’s savings and retirement plans (in USD) and necessarily usher in socialism.
And people merrily talk about what the climate will be in 2050, how to achieve “Net Zero” by then, and what AI will look like then, and heck even that the US might be sending humans to Mars by then . . . heads in the sand, all.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad new (I fervently hope I’m proven wrong, somehow), but for now trust the math . . . BOHIC!
I love it!! If passed, the Government could inflate the price of everything and then tax us for the inflated gain……
How dare you use the word “could”. It’s all past-tense now. 😳
“Certainly not the Republicans.”
Good poijnt! Republicans would love to support a tax cut. What is Kamala waiting for?
The “Inflation Reduction Act” was named on Orwellian principles. War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength.
The somewhat downsized Green New Deal is classic Green.
Yep – and I wonder if it is also a hat-tip to the eponymous Irish group!?
Now that her coronation as President has concluded, Vice President Kamala Harris now says she is not opposed to fracking.
That should tell you something about Vice President Harris. Flip Flop.
NO! Her entire political history tells you she is simply lying in hopes of more votes.
If elected, her actions will make that very clear.
Luckily, nobody will believe she’s pro fracking. Anyone who likes fracking will obviously vote for Trump, so her saying this is just plain stupid.
Quite so: when Rishi Sunak was thrusting himself forward to be leader of the CON- servatives (and hence PM) in the UK he said he would support fracking in the UK. Virtually his first action as PM was to continue the ban on fracking.
Words are cheap!
Actually, Kamala has not publicly stated her position on fracking since she became the Democrat nominee. Her previous public statments on the subject were that she would ban fracking.
Some unnamed source among Kamala’s handlers has said Kamala is not against “some” fracking, but there has been no similar public statement from Kamala herself.
Yep, like Trump on abortion….
And wasn’t Trump a Democrat not long ago? Now that is a flippity floppity guy.
Possibly – but before the Democrats gave up on democracy.
Vice President Kamala Harris now says
Has SHE said it? Or has it been some “campaign spokesperson” or the like? I’ve noticed that SHE isn’t saying a whole lot of anything.
Look on the bright side.
Harris never won a single Dem electoral vote in 2020. Dropped out before Iowa. Chosen by Biden as VP for two reasons: insurance policy against replacement, female half black.
Biden replacement only because (a) she helped hid his decline until his debate,(b) female half black VP entitlement.
Won’t end well because she knows cannot survive an unscripted press interview. Hkw she will survive the 9/10 ‘debate’ is beyond me, because cackling won’t do.
Harris is reading a teleprompter for now.
She does not need to be a good debater to tie or beat Trump. Trump can only win a debate if the opposition is a dementia case.
Trump constantly lies and exaggerates, when not using hyperbolic words like “destroy”, “disaster”, “skyrocketing”, “devastating”. “tragedy”, “invasion”, “nightmare”, “plunging”. All these words are from Trump’s 2024 acceptance speech. Almost every number in a Trump speech is inaccurate.
But don’t worry, Trump thinks he was the greatest President in US history, and he will fix every problem on day one in 2025? Perhaps he will retire on day two?
All pre-election promises are meaningless whether they are from Trump or Harris.
Our choice is simple
Trump = capitalism
Harris = socialism or communism
I’m voting for capitalism and I believe Trump will win. He is doing much better in swing states in 2024 than he was in late August 2020.
I don’t believe Harris can smile her way to a victory and pretend to be a moderate for two more months. … But she has never lost an election and 95% of the mass media is on her side. I still think she is a word salad dingbat
RG has terminal TDS.
RG constantly is mal-informed. Its comments are often twisted and distorted, showing manic leftist bias, while pretending to be something else.
Harris will destroy the US, it will be a tragedy and a nightmare… I hope you enjoy it.
There is an “invasion” across the southern border.. Nothing exaggerated about any of those words.
Trump has done many hours of non-teleprompter interviews, on task nearly all the time.
Harris has done NONE, since being crowned queen of the demorats.
And if you think Harris isn’t demented, you haven’t listened to any of her off-script blathering. !!
Kamala : 220 Million Dead From COVID
Yep: let’s face it, all this TDS (on both sides of the Atlantic) is extremely tedious.
“Trump can only win a debate if the opposition is a dementia case.”
Depends on how you define “win”. If the decision is based on what Ivy League intellectuals think, he’ll lose. If based on what the majority of Americans think, he’ll win. It’s not about some ultimate truths – which nobody knows anyway.
“Trump constantly lies and exaggerates” Any proof of this? Or are we just supposed to believe cnn/cbs/nbc/blahblahblah?
KH is running on a proposition the election is a choice between freedom and chaos.
She is correct in the choice, but has the roles flipped. Too much chaos under Biden to be continued under Harris. Trump will not have chaos.
Just a thought. Harris has spent most of her career in the company of criminals. Trump, with businessmen who build and create jobs.
The “other shoe”, waiting to drop: reports resurfacing about the affair that Harris had with politician Willy Brown in California, at the time a married man but separated from his wife.
(ref: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-willie-brown-mistress/ )
Why mention this if it was between “consenting adults”? . . . it speaks directly as to character and honor and values . . . you know, all those platitudes spewed forth recently at the DNC.
As it turns out, Women, when polled, have a very dim view of other women who have sex with married men. Especially when the sex is in trade for other considerations.
If you have evidence to dispute that, I’d like to see it because I have had a very difficult time getting women to agree with that premise.
I have published this in as many places as I frequent. There is an additional danger in the IRA in that it may end up having a much longer lifespan than people think. There is a belief that the law will sunset in 2032. Paul Mueller, writing at the American Institute for Economic Research (aier.org) wrote on August 8, 2024 that the provision is actually 2032 or whenever CO2 emissions drop to 25% below 2022 level whichever is later. It is thus likely to continue a decade or two beyond 2032, providing lots of green to rent seekers.
Trillion-Dollar Surprise in the Inflation Reduction Act, by Paul Mueller
Trillion-Dollar Surprise in the Inflation Reduction Act | AIER
I predict that it’s lifespan will be shorter if it is successfully implemented to any great degree – not because we will be better off, but because it will cause such harm that our co2 emissions will drop commensurate with our quality and length of life. Our economy is already on life support, the IAA (Inflation Acceleration Act) will just add a few more nails to the coffin.
“In fact, it (IRA) would soon drive-up prices for such essentials as food, electricity and transportation.” B. COHEN
Cohen scares readers by ignoring reality
June 2022
YoY CPI inflation peaks at 9.1%
August 2022
Inflation Reduction Act signed
July 2024
YoY CPI inflation down to 2.9%
The US inflation rate merely followed the the price of crude oil that peaked at around $115 per barrel in June 2022, the price falling subsequently due to the release of 1 million barrels per day from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve from May 2022.
It now sits around $75 while the average during Trump’s term was around $58 more or less in line with the corresponding inflation rates.
Supply and demand, it’s obvious how vital oil is for US and world economic health.
“Drill baby drill”.
It looks to me true inflation amounts in total about 25% due to Biden inflation up to last year. We will never get deflation so those prices are built in. 2.9% in today dollars equals 3.625 cent increase cost of goods compared 2.9 cents in 2020. Add in what the true inflation rate is really far exceeds 5% which will be an addition 5 cent increase for this year for the same good last year and 30 cents more for the same goods only four years ago. The real reason for inflation is increase money supply from over spending(printing money with out an expansion of the economy). Do you want to buy a bridge.
Yeah, the inflation rate came down, but the inflated prices are still with us and will be with us for a while. Forever, if Kamala is elected.
Let me explain it to you this way. If it takes you 4 seconds to go from 0 to 60, and 8 seconds to go from 60 to 120, your rate of acceleration is half what it was, but you are still doing 120. That’s all that 2% means – it’s a reduction in the rate of inflation on top of the inflation that has already occurred.
Thank you! Most Americans have no clue about what inflation is.
Oh yes they do. Everyone who wants to buy a home knows just exactly what inflation is.
THAT’S WHY HOME SALES HAVE CRATERED
A slightly longer-term view is attached below. There is enough actual data there for people to “read into” it whatever they want to.
The latest (year-on-year) CPI figure is 2.9% for the month of July 2024 (the graph only goes up to May 2024), roughly equal to the summer 2018 “peak” of Trump’s term.
Note that Barack Obama’s second term started in January 2013, while Donald Trump’s term started in January 2017.
Ignores the Covid debacle.
Contrary to its label, the law had nothing to do with reducing inflation.
Show me where printing lots of helicopter money ever reduced inflation? It can for the lucky select few for a while but the trickle down effect for struggletown is ugly just like the Covid cash splash washing through the global economy.
Fire up all fossil fuel and nuclear generators. Build new fossil fuel and nuclear generators. Remove all wind and solar from the grid. Upgrade the grid. Remove all tax preferences, subsidies and mandates for EVs.
Remove subsidies, excess regulation and tax preference for everything leaving only charitable giving and deprecation allowance. We would have a much healthier economy and less power in the hands of politicians, a win win in my book.
As is the case with virtually all legislation, no one ever reads what the legislation says.
The reason for that is simple.
The acts are written in such a way they are unreadable or purposely overlong specifically to discourage casual readers.
I have not read the IRA and wonder how many commenting here have?
Most of us get the ‘gist’ of what is in it from those who have studied parts of interest and how the grants and tax incentives might impact them.
Here is a brief overview I came across that gives some of the details of the IRA.
https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/public%20and%20social%20sector/our%20insights/the%20inflation%20reduction%20act%20heres%20whats%20in%20it/the-inflation-reduction-act-heres-whats-in-it_final.pdf
It looks like the Act is nothing more than a bribe offered to the American tax payers and big business to adopt what is euphemistically called ‘Green energy’, via subsidies. The money is simply tax payers contributions redirected from wherever to Net Zero promotion programs. All that money, without any concern about the efficacy of the $billion/ $Trillions being given away.
Where is the actual measure the IRA spending is supposed to impact?
We can see there is mention of reduction of CO2, but to what effect will that reduction of CO2 have on anything?
Am I missing something here?
Where is the claimed Reduction of Inflation supposed to come from?
Everything the IRA does is inflationary, the bill does the opposite of what it claims?
“Where is the claimed Reduction of Inflation supposed to come from?”
Well, obviously, the wind and sunlight are free- so green energy will not only save the planet but drastically lower energy costs and create millions of new, high paying jobs. /s
Just about every politician since the dawn of time has promised to cut taxes. Yawn! Nobody takes them seriously- so it’s just stupid for them to say it.
If I remember correctly, Bill Clinton promised a middle class tax cut.
Then after he won (thanks to Ross Perot) he announced, with crocodile tears, that he’d have to raise taxes instead. Which he did. And he even made the raise retroactive!
(Maybe that’s when said, “I feel your pain.”?)
But didn’t Clinton balance the budget? I think it’s the last time anyone has done that.
“the law had nothing to do with reducing inflation”
Why did any Republicans vote for it?
No Republican voted for it. It was a 50-50 vote. Fifty Repubicans voted against it, and 50 Democrats voted for it, and Vice President Kamala Harris, acting in her role in the U.S. Senate, cast the tie-breaking vote that passed the Inflation Reduction Act.
Trump says he is going to undo the Inflation Reduction Act if elected. He’s going to stop the wasteful spending and the crony capitalism.
I know you are worried about spending Tom and fair enough, but how do you square that with the fact that Trumps spending last time was more than any other president in history. 7.8 trillion added to the national debt. https://www.propublica.org/article/national-debt-trump
Yes, Trump added a lot to the national debt. He was told on his first day in office that the U.S. military had been so neglected by the Obama-Biden administration, that it was now critically short of ammunition. And that wasn’t all that was short, so Trump had to increase defense spending.
Trump said today he was going to have to increase defense spending again if he is elected as the Biden-Harris administation is running us out of ammunition again.
Do you see a pattern here when it comes to Democrats and the U.S. military? Democrats screw up the military, and Republicans have to come in and fix things. And then the Democrats complain about increased defense spending.
Trump also had a pandemic emergency with a shutdown economy as a result, and had to spend big money to keep businesses afloat and their employees paid during the shutdown.
Trump did add to the debt but it was necessary spending and I believe Trump’s additon to the national debt is only about half of what the Biden-Harris administration has added.
And Biden and Harris’ spending was not necessary spending, it was Democrat porkbarrel, crony capitalism spending, and nothing for defense.
Their defense budget doesn’t even make up for inflation they created, so the military budget has effectively been cut. Typical for clueless Democrat politicians. So clueless they are dangerous on the international scene and at home.
“Do you see a pattern here when it comes to Democrats and the U.S. military?”
I wonder why it is then that the military generals who have worked closely with him have absolutely no time at all for him. Zero, They seem as a man who who is totally incompetent and should never be near the controls again. You could write this off it it was just one, but Milley, Kelly, Mattis, (and let’s not forget he appointed these men) are all publicly saying to the people of the US…. do not elect this man, he is a danger. I just don’t understand how you can dismiss the concerns these experienced men have? It is beyond me Tom.
I can dismiss these generals opinions because Trump has been proven right, and they have been proven wrong.
Which one of these generals told Trump it would take five years to wipe out the Islamic Terror Army (ISIS)? Trump ordered it done, unlike Obama and Biden, who allowed ISIS to rampage across the Middle East unopposed, killing and displacing millions of people, many of which migrated to Europe, and the Islamic Terror Army was wiped out by Trump in a matter of months.
As in everything in life, there are smart generals and there are dumb generals.
Trump doesn’t know whether they are smart or dumb in the beginning, because he wasn’t familiar with most of these people and appointed them because of recommendations made to him by others, but when he finds out they are dumb, he fires them quickly.
And when he fires them, they resent it, and say bad things, including outright lies, about Trump. So what else is new?
Trump sees the “Big Picture” better than anyone, including these generals you name.
“As in everything in life, there are smart generals and there are dumb generals.”
But Tom Trump says he only appoints the best. So if he appoints the best how come they get it so wrong?
And …. Now I see General McMaster has just come out and said Trump has to take some responsibility for the Afghan stuff up.
Generals at the highest levels are politicians. Talk to the NCOs.
And? Are you saying they are corrupt like Trump?
That’s a hell of a jump, Simon, and a pretty nasty one. I’m guessing you must not know many soldiers.
The NCO’s are soldiers. Warriors. The top brass are politicians. The NCOs are the boots on the ground who are most directly affected by the CIC’s policies.
Not that you care, from your sick response.
You talking about the NCO’s Trump said were suckers and losers?
How is it I knew you were going to go for that one? There is no evidence he said that, and multiple people have said that he didn’t. But it looks bad for Trump, so of course you believe it without any evidence.
I’m guessing you still believe he told people to inject bleach and called white supremacists “fine people”.
I’m seeing a pattern here, Simon, and it’s a very clear one: You don’t care about facts or evidence, you just automatically believe any bad thing you hear or read about Trump, and disbelieve any good thing, regardless of evidence. Thanks for demonstrating it yet again.
“How is it I knew you were going to go for that one?”
Coz it was a vile comment by Trump and is worth reminding people he has zero respect for the troops… contempt even.
“I’m guessing you still believe he told people to inject bleach and called white supremacists “fine people”.”
Yep…. coz he did.
“I’m seeing a pattern here, Simon, and it’s a very clear one: You don’t care about facts or evidence,…”
I check my evidence, double check…. do you? I watched the disinfectant clip. I watched the ” there are good people on both sides” clip. Are you saying he didn’t say those things? Or are you doing
what most Magat’s do and try to interpret the english language another way. Look for any reason to interpret words another and so save your messiah from the humiliation he deserves.
Even Snopes lists the “fine people” as false.
This is what turned me from being against Trump into a supporter – seeing how the media was lying about what he was doing and saying.
Here we have a perfect example of a good sheep. Simon sees the edited clips he is shown, believes the media interpretation he is told to believe, and doesn’t bother to look into it any deeper. He CLAIMS to “research” but doesn’t take that research beyond a surface look that reinforces his predetermined beliefs. It’s easier than thinking for himself.
NB : I am not “Tony_G” !
I usually try to check before posting, and try to give links (or at least references) to my “supporting evidence”, but there are occasions when I fail to do so … and all too often end up in a “post in haste, repent at leisure” state …
Maybe you should have “double checked” exactly how that particular “clip” was edited.
Link 1, LA Times, August 2017 (the day the interview happened).
Link 2, Real Clear Politics, March 2019 (19 months later)
Link 3, Politifact, April 2019 (20 months later)
Link 4, Snopes, June 2024 (almost 7 years later …)
A quote from the second article by its writer, Steve Cortes :
The appropriate name is the Inflation Acceleration Act. If fully implemented, it will cause irreparable harm. That, the open borders, foreign policy fiascos and a corrupt media pose serious national security risks – possibly the most serious in our history.
It’s becoming increasingly obvious that these supposed “green” alternative methods of generating electricity won’t work – especially as demands for electricity are projected to double by 2050 due to AI, charging of EV’s, data centers, government-mandated electric heating, and cooking, and charging grid-backup batteries.
Intermittent electricity from wind and solar cannot power modern nations. In addition, wind and solar cannot produce thousands of essential products that require petrochemical feed stocks.
These “green” wind and solar projects primarily exist because they are financed with taxpayer money, i.e., disguised from taxpayers as “Government subsidies”.
History that should never be forgotten:
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 originated in the US House of Representatives and was so named by the Democrats that introduced the legislation. It was passed by the House with 220 Democrats voting “yea” and 207 Republicans voting “nay”, and 4 members of the House not voting. (source: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/117-2022/h420 )
How does know one when Democrat Party representatives are lying? . . . when their lips are moving or their pens are moving.
How are tax cuts important if taxes pay interest only?
2023 Federal budget deficit was 1.7 Trillion.
One has to be very careful about how the US government reports on the budget deficit . . . they play “shell games” with that figure all the time to hide the truth from the taxpayers.
Try this:
“The federal budget deficit—the difference between government spending and revenues—increased from 5.4% of GDP in FY 2022 to 6.3% of GDP in FY 2023. Adjusting for the effects of President Biden’s student loan forgiveness program, which boosted the deficit in FY 2022 when it was announced and decreased it in FY 2023 when it was ruled unconstitutional, the increase was significantly larger—from 3.9% of GDP last fiscal year to 7.5% in 2023.”
— https://www.brookings.edu/articles/why-did-the-budget-deficit-grow-so-much-in-fy-2023-and-what-does-this-imply-about-the-future-debt-trajectory/
(my bold emphasis added)
Let’s do the math:
According to https://www.statista.com/statistics/188105/annual-gdp-of-the-united-states-since-1990/
— the 2022 US GDP was $25.7 trillion
— the 2023 US GDP was $27.4 trillion
So, with the above-noted adjustment and actual budget deficit percentages of GDP we have:
— the 2022 Federal budget deficit was $1.0 trillion
— the 2023 Federal budget deficit was $2.1 trillion
Given that the US national debt was $33.2 trillion at end-FY2023, that budget deficit represents a one-year increase in the debt of about 6.3%, well above the rate of inflation in FY 2023 of about 3.9%.