Climate Change Weekly #515: 🔥 EV Dangers Daily Becoming More Evident

From Heartland Daily News

YOU SHOULD SUBSCRIBE TO CLIMATE CHANGE WEEKLY.

IN THIS ISSUE:

  • EV Dangers Daily Becoming More Evident
  • Video of the Week: The Cold, not the Heat, Is the Big Killer
  • Natural Gas Use Up as Wind Power Fails
  • Podcast of the Week: ‘Green’ Olympics Make Athletes See Red – The Climate Realism Show #121
  • Climate Comedy
  • Recommended Sites

Get your tickets TODAY to meet and hear Nigel Farage and Larry Arnn at The Heartland Institute’s Gala on Sept. 13, 2024 in Chicago

Farage1

Click here for more info and tickets.


EV Dangers Daily Becoming More Evident

It seems that hardly a week passes by when the world and I are not reminded of the dangers of green technologies relying on large lithium ion (LI) batteries for transportation and electricity.

The mainstream media couldn’t suppress a story out of Baker, California, where a truck transporting LI batteries overturned and caught fire. A Climate Realism story described the situation, thusly:

(A) long-haul truck carrying lithium ion batteries for electric vehicles and for electric power battery back-up facilities overturned on Interstate Highway 15 (I-15) between Los Angeles and Las Vegas. The truck caught fire and forced the closure of first one lane, and then eventually the entire highway. As described by various media outlets, such as KVVU-5 Las Vegas and the  Las Vegas Review-Journal,  the accident caused a massive traffic jam, closing the highway from Friday through Monday.

“I mean, I’ve never seen anything quite like it,” Benjamin Leffel, an associate professor of public policy at UNLV, told KVVU-5 News. “Many have called it the worst traffic jam of their lifetime. I have to agree.”

Because of the unique dangers and nature of the lithium ion battery fire, firefighters were unable to put out the fire, and eventually were forced to push the truck 100 feet off the road and into the surrounding desert, where they then constructed a berm around it. As the  Review-Journal  pointed out, “[f]ires involving lithium batteries are particularly hazardous because they produce chemicals and toxic gases, which made it essential to handle the situation with extreme caution ….” As a result, the Hazmat team called in said the fire would be allowed to burn itself out, and provided no timeline for when they expected it to be extinguished.

And that’s just one truck in a fairly isolated location. As a follow-up to the story, enterprising KTNV, Channel 13 in Las Vegas spoke on camera to residents in Las Vegas and the Deputy Chief of the Clark County fire department discussing their concerns about the possibility of a similar fire occurring on roads and highways actually in the city itself. The Deputy Chief admitted the department had spent a lot of time discussing how to deal with toxic LI battery fires and that dealing with such fires would be challenging in the city.

Of course, the highway between Los Angeles and Las Vegas is not the only location where LI battery fires have proved to be “challenging.” Electric bus fires have been breaking out all over, from Paris, to London, to all over the United States. As a video details, the dangers the fires have posed have resulted in entire fleets being pulled offline and sent back to the factories.

And electric bus fires are hardly the only or most common and dangerous threat. E-scooters have become the scourge of the New York City fire department (FDNY). The  New York Post  reported that Chief Fire Marshal Daniel Flynn said fires caused by LI batteries “have gone up nearly nine-fold since the pandemic, with more blazes related to the batteries happening in the last two months than in all of 2019.” Indeed, in 2023, LI batteries were the largest single cause of fires in the city. As Fox News wrote:

Electric bicycles caused a record number of fires, injuries and deaths in New York City last year as Democrats continued to push for greater adoption of the device as a solution to global warming.

Overall, e-bikes sparked 267 fires which caused 18 deaths and 150 injuries in the city, according to New York Fire Department (FDNY) data shared with Fox News Digital. The figures represent the highest levels of each statistic, with e-bike related deaths increasing 200%, fires increasing 21% and injuries increasing 2% in the city year over year.

E-scooter fires have also resulted in deaths in India. Individual incidences of scooters catching fire on the streets are rife, but the largest single, and most deadly incidence of an LI battery fire  in India was when the electric scooters in a sales/showroom in Mumbai spontaneously combusted, killing eight people and putting 11 more in the hospital.

Then, there are the electric car fires that have resulted in homes and charging stations burning,  resulting in recalls; ships carrying LI battery cars catching fire and sinking with the crews unable to put the fire out—think about that, an entire ship going down due to nothing but an LI battery spontaneously combusting; insurers in the United Kingdom ceasing to insure EVs; and standards being set for the spacing of EVs in repair lots and salvage yards. In Australia, waste management companies say they need a coordinated plan to handle LI battery waste, with the batteries causing more than 10,000 fires a year.

In just the past week, two electric car fires broke out in parking garages in South Korea. One car was charging when it burst into flames. Firefighters were able to put the fire out with no damage to surrounding vehicles and without compromising the integrity of the facility itself, dragging the car out of the garage to ensure it caused no further damage. The other incident had more than 100 innocent casualties. As The Wall Street Journal  described the incident in which an electric Mercedez spontaneously combusted, acting like a bomb, taking out the surrounding vehicles:

It took just seconds for an underground South Korean residential parking lot to be engulfed in flames. The culprit: a Mercedes-Benz EQE electric vehicle that hadn’t been charging.

The blaze incinerated dozens of cars nearby, scorched another 100 vehicles and forced hundreds of residents to emergency shelters as the buildings above the parking lot lost power and electricity. Nobody died, but the fire took eight hours to extinguish.

Those are just the “small” fires. Time and time again, battery warehouses, manufacturing facilities, and back-up power plants consisting of aisle after aisle of LI batteries constructed to deliver power to the grid for relatively short periods of time when wind and solar facilities stop working, have erupted in flames, unextinguishable for days, taking lives of firefighters, on occasion, and spewing toxic emissions into the air, resulting in evacuations.

One fire at a battery plant in South Korea in early June resulted in the deaths of 22 workers and the hospitalization of eight others. This amounted to nearly a third of the entire work force at the time the battery cells began exploding. The fire burned so hot the building’s roof collapsed before the blaze could be extinguished.

Fire official Kim Jin-young reportedly told Agence France-Presse that “Most of the bodies are badly burned so it will take some time to identify each one.”

Just two weeks earlier, on May 15, 2024, a fire erupted at a large backup LI battery energy storage facility in a suburb of San Diego. The batteries began exploding in a cascading fashion. The fire, which burned for six days and smoldered for five more, spewed toxins into the air for the duration. Roads were closed to and around the plant, evacuations of local businesses and residences were ordered, and a “shelter-in-place” order was given for a nearby prison.

Prior to the fire, New York-based LS Power bragged the Gateway project, which opened in August 2020, was “the largest battery energy storage project in the world.” Unless and until the project is rebuilt, all that back-up power is offline, meaning California residents better hope the sun shines and the wind blows steadily.

In fact, the threat of large factory/storage facility fires has been recognized and yet ignored by authorities pushing green tech for some time. As I detailed in a previous CCW post, in late July of 2021, a fire erupted at one of the largest battery factories in the world, a partnership with Tesla in Australia. The factory caught fire during testing and burned for days, with firefighters initially unable to fight the blaze because they lacked respirator equipment to protect them from the toxic fumes. Authorities told nearby residents to stay indoors and close windows and other air vents.

At the time of that fire, CNBC had already detailed more than 40 such spontaneous combustion incidents at battery factories or battery storage facilities over the previous decade, most of which have occurred since 2019. A fire at a battery factory in Arizona in 2019 seriously injured two emergency responders, and two firefighters in China were killed when a battery module connected to rooftop solar panels at a shopping mall burst into flames.

And, by August of 2021, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) reported the battery modules of approximately 12,000 residential energy solar-panel systems had been recalled by their manufacturers, in 2020 and to that point in 2021, because of the threat of combustion.

In 1965, Ralph Nader’s book,  Unsafe at Any Speed,  was published as an indictment of the purported dangers of the Chevrolet Corvair. Within a few years, the car ceased production and has been touted as an example of advocacy keeping consumers safe in the decades since. This despite the fact that there is no evidence the Corvair resulted in any injuries or deaths that might not have occurred in an accident in any other car built during the period. Subsequent testing by both the U.S. Department of Transportation and independent automobile testing labs indicated that the Corvair was not especially dangerous by the standards of the day.

When I was a kid, we had a toy/game called lawn darts. They were banned for sale by the CPSC long after I had stopped tossing them. The reason: in the preceding decade, 6,100 Americans had visited emergency rooms due to lawn dart accidents, with more than half of the injured being 10 years old or younger.

The dangers of technologies dependent upon LI batteries are evident for all to see and grow daily as the tech enters more common use, largely driven by government climate policies. EV cars and factories are paradigmatic of a product that is “unsafe at any speed,” and would have been pulled from the market a decade ago for redesign or replacement if the government weren’t so obsessed with fighting climate change. EV tech is destroying lives and property and endangering health today, on the off chance that its use will modestly reduce impacts of a warmer world decades from now. That is an irrational and immoral trade-off, in my considered opinion.

Sources: Climate RealismClimate Change WeeklyClimate Change WeeklyBBCEnergy CentralAustralian Broadcasting CorporationClimate Change Weekly

CAAG-ad-QRcodes

Video of the Week

The Heartland Institute’s Linnea Lueken explains how climate activism rather than climate change poses a significant threat to U.S. national security.


Natural Gas Use Up as Wind Power Fails

It’s been a hard summer for the nation’s utilities, which have had to scramble to secure electric power supplies amid falling industrial wind output. Natural gas has made up the difference.

Multiple industry and news outlets are reporting on the problem. Indeed, on July 9, industrial wind supplies dropped to just 0.3 million MWh of electricity, a fraction of the rated capacity nationwide, and just 23 percent of the amount of the average amount of power it provided daily in June.

To make up for the shortfall, Zero Hedge reports, “U.S. power plant operators in the Lower 48 states generated 6.9 million MWh of electricity from natural gas, marking a record high since the collection of hourly data began on January 1, 2019.”

July 9th’s power supply characteristics were not unique in the month, as a steep decline in wind power, accompanied by sustained high summer temperatures, ratcheted up the demand for natural gas again, on July 22. The United States experienced its lowest wind output in 33 months on July 22, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. This is despite the huge expansion in the number of wind turbines over the decade, adding new capacity—which, as July of 2024 clearly demonstrated, doesn’t necessarily mean additional reliable power. Once again, U.S. natural-gas-fueled generation made up the power supply difference to keep large portions of the electric power grid from failing during the peak summer heat.

Wind power has showed poorly in July 2024, but it is not just July, Oil Price reports; despite growing rated capacity, wind power fell as a portion of power supply delivered in 2023:

So far this year, six of the 10 lowest days for wind power have occurred in July, according to Reuters’ estimates. Last year, just two of the 10 lowest wind power output days were in the month of July.

Last year, slower wind speeds than normal led to the first annual drop in U.S. electricity generation from wind turbines since the mid-1990s, despite the addition of 6.2 gigawatts (GW) of new wind capacity in 2023, the EIA said earlier this year. U.S. wind generation in 2023 totaled 425,235 gigawatthours (GWh), down by 2.1% compared to the 434,297 GWh generated in 2022.

Natural gas-fired electricity generation in the United States has jumped year-to-date compared to the same period last year, as total power demand rose with warmer temperatures and demand from data centers.

For years, natural gas has accounted for the largest share of U.S. power generation, at around 40% of all electricity-generating sources.

Texas has the most industrial wind power rated capacity and a largely self-contained power grid. It has also suffered this summer from wind (power) doldrums, resulting in repeated power conservation warnings from the state’s power regulator, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), despite July not being particularly warm for Texas in July. For July, ERCOT data showed industrial wind power supplied less than 10 percent of the source’s total generating capacity.

“Power demand is surging as people crank up air conditioners,” Al Jazeera wrote, reporting on Texas’ power woes. “But meanwhile, wind speeds have fallen to extremely low levels, and that means the state’s fleet of turbines is at just 8% of their potential output.”

Fortunately for Texas, it is a major source of natural gas, and gas makes up the largest percentage of its power supply and peaking plants, when an unusual spike in demand arises.

The experience of Texas and the nation demonstrate the dangers of the government-forced transition to Net Zero, with ever more electricity generated by intermittent wind and solar sources, large-scale, and when battery backup is expensive, in its infancy, and, thus, in short supply.

Sources: Al JazeeraZero HedgeOil Price


Heartland’s Must-read Climate Sites

CRbanner3-1024x216-1
CaaGbanner3-1024x216-1
EaaGbanner3-1024x216-1

Podcast of the Week

The Paris Olympics are underway, and it pledged to be the “greenest” games ever. No air-conditioned dorms. Bed frames made of recycled cardboard. An emphasis on plant-based protein instead of meats and eggs. Well, those moves are going over with the athletes about as well as its opening ceremonies did with normal people. This is yet another case of climate virtue signaling crashing into reality. South Korean swimming stars decided to ditch the Olympic Village and check into the nice, air-conditioned hotels that the organizers enjoy.

Subscribe to the Environment & Climate News podcast on Apple PodcastsiHeartSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts. And be sure to leave a positive review!


Climate Comedy


Recommended Sites

Climate at a GlanceClimate Realism
Heartland’s Climate PageHeartland’s Climate Conferences 
Environment & Climate NewsWatts Up With That
Liberty & EcologyHeartland’s Energy Conferences
Junk Science (Steve Milloy)Climate Depot (Marc Morano)
CFACTCO2 Coalition
Climate Change DispatchNet Zero Watch (UK)
GlobalWarming.org (Cooler Heads)Climate Audit
Dr. Roy SpencerNo Tricks Zone
Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)JoNova
Master ResourceCornwall Alliance (Cal Beisner)
International Climate Science CoalitionScience and Environmental Policy Project 
CAR26.orgGelbspan Files
1000Frolley (YouTube)Climate Policy at Heritage
Power for USAGlobal Warming at Cato
Science and Public Policy InstituteClimate Change Reconsidered NIPCC)
Climate in Review (C. Jeffery Small)Real Science (Tony Heller)
WiseEnergyC3 Headlines
CO2 ScienceCartoons by Josh
The Climate BetSteve Milloy on Twitter
CAR26Chris Martz
5 11 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 10, 2024 6:35 am

It’s super important the US not fall behind the rest of the world.

Future president Kamala ‘Cackles McGee’ Harris put battery technology at the forefront of her energy policy and will not rest until the US leads the world in uncontrollable battery fires.

‘We must lead by example,’ said the former McArthur Genius Grant winner. ‘Examples are things other people follow. Yesterday I followed a short bus. I rode a short bus to school in the hood where I bought my rap records.’

Harris concluded ‘Who else loves the short bus?’ while leading the media in a round of off-beat rhythmic clapping.

John Hultquist
August 10, 2024 7:45 am

TIP
 SunPower, one of the USA’s top rooftop solar installers, just declared bankruptcy, the latest solar rooftop business to fail this year. Others include Titan Solar Power and Sunworks. { from the WSJ }

Reply to  John Hultquist
August 10, 2024 7:56 am

The SunPower bankruptcy was mentioned earlier in WUWT:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/08/07/major-solar-company-files-for-bankruptcy-after-california-strips-subsidies/

SunPower started as a spin-off from Cypress Semiconductor, and 10-15 years ago was a decent company with the highest efficiency modules on the market. Cheap Chinese modules have killed just about all competition.

Erik Magnuson
Reply to  karlomonte
August 10, 2024 9:40 am

The company that is buying up the assets is run by T.J. Rogers who was the CEO of Cypress before it got bought out. I do remember SunPower was focusing on high efficiency.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
August 10, 2024 8:46 am

What’s very scary about LiOn batteries in transportation vehicles is they don’t need an accident to literally explode as many videos show. The thermal runaway can happen at any time for no apparent reason. Makes one think twice about parking them in a garage attached to the home.

Mr.
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
August 10, 2024 10:06 am

Or in a parkade under a condo building.

My strata is looking for strategies to ban them.

It’s an uphill battle against the ideologically-captured legislators, regulators / bureaucrats and gullible car buyers though.

August 10, 2024 9:49 am

If I added properly this article states that there were 48 Deaths and over 150 Injuries, caused by lithium ion (LI) batteries. 

Meanwhile, in the Sane World, the US has had over 50 years of commercial operation of Electric Power totaling ~ 20% of the US Electrical Power without a single death caused by the commercial generation of electricity.

P.S. I was a Nuclear Engineer at TMI-II during the TMI-II Incident and have closely followed the incident. To date, It has been confirmed that no deaths can be attributed to the TMI Incident. Without a doubt far more than 48 people have died in this failed experiment.

If the same money burnt, shredded, embezzled and added to the off shore accounts of the executives before declaring Bankruptcy had been spent on building NPPs the US CO2 emissions would be 3/4s to 1/2 of what they re now and the reliability of power generation would be at least twice what it is now. Now that the Local NPP has been shut down and over 1/3 (? – as that is Name plate) of the utilities electricity comes from Wind Power, There is a loss of electricity power, lasting one second to ~10 minuets, in my home on average over 3 times a month.

Tom Halla
August 10, 2024 10:03 am

“Unsafe At Any Speed” is a classic liability lawyers screed. Nader was plausible, as long as one knew nothing about chassis tuning and the performance characteristics of motor vehicles. I first read it naive, and it was plausible. Later, I had gotten into trying chassis tuning of sports cars, and reread it. With that knowledge, Nader was insultingly oversimplifying when he was not outright lying. No, Ralphie baby, oversteer is not always unsafe, no matter your ignorant claims.

Joe Crawford
Reply to  Tom Halla
August 10, 2024 12:08 pm

I had a ’64 Corvair Monza coupe that was one of the best handling cars I had driven once I had installed some decent tires and straightened out the recommended tire pressures. Of course the first thing I did after buying it was to take it out on back country dirt roads and learn how to drift it. Several months later, after only a 3 or 4 inch snow storm, unusual in that area of the country, my Monza and a VW Bug were the only cars still on the road after all the accidents.

As far as setup, the factory had recommended an especially large difference between air pressure in the front and rear tires. If you rotated the tires front to back, without changing the tire pressure first the car was actually outright dangerous for most drivers. The average U.S. driver, as taught by the drastic understeer of Detroit iron and learn-by-trying, was probably one of the worst drivers in the world. They didn’t have the foggiest idea of how to handle balanced steering, much less oversteering.

Yooper
August 11, 2024 4:45 am

Is there any battery chemistry/technology that can match/beat LI energy density?

Yooper
Reply to  Yooper
August 11, 2024 4:55 am

So, I asked ChatGPT:

ChatGPT
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries are currently the dominant technology when it comes to energy density, but several emerging battery chemistries and technologies are being developed that could potentially match or surpass the energy density of Li-ion batteries. Here are some of the most promising:
1. Solid-State Batteries

  • Energy Density Potential: 2x of current Li-ion batteries.
  • Technology: These use a solid electrolyte instead of a liquid one, which can allow for the use of a lithium metal anode, significantly increasing energy density while also improving safety.

2. Lithium-Sulfur (Li-S) Batteries

  • Energy Density Potential: Up to 5x of current Li-ion batteries.
  • Technology: These use sulfur as the cathode material, which is much lighter and can store more energy per unit weight. However, they currently face challenges with cycle life and stability.

3. Lithium-Air (Li-Air) Batteries

  • Energy Density Potential: Theoretical up to 10x of Li-ion.
  • Technology: These batteries generate electricity by combining lithium with oxygen from the air. The energy density could be extremely high, but the technology is still in the early research phase with many technical challenges.

4. Silicon Anode Batteries

  • Energy Density Potential: 1.5x to 2x of current Li-ion.
  • Technology: By replacing the graphite anode in Li-ion batteries with silicon, the energy density can be increased. Silicon can store more lithium ions, but it also expands significantly, leading to potential structural issues.

5. Metal-Air Batteries (Zinc-Air, Aluminum-Air)

  • Energy Density Potential: Comparable or higher than Li-ion, especially for aluminum-air.
  • Technology: These batteries are lightweight and have high theoretical energy densities, particularly aluminum-air, which could be very high. However, they are not rechargeable in the same way conventional batteries are, which limits their application.

6. Sodium-Ion Batteries

  • Energy Density Potential: Close to Li-ion.
  • Technology: Sodium-ion batteries use sodium instead of lithium. They are less energy-dense than lithium-ion, but advances are being made to narrow the gap. Sodium is more abundant and cheaper, which could make these batteries a cost-effective alternative.

7. Hydrogen Fuel Cells

  • Energy Density Potential: Higher than Li-ion in terms of gravimetric energy density.
  • Technology: While not a battery, hydrogen fuel cells are often compared to batteries because they store and release energy. They have a high energy density by weight, but the volumetric density and storage challenges remain significant.

While none of these technologies have yet fully surpassed Li-ion batteries in commercial applications, ongoing research and development could lead to breakthroughs that either match or exceed the energy density of Li-ion batteries in the future.

Someone
Reply to  Yooper
August 12, 2024 8:05 am

Focusing on energy density does not tell the full story. All of these factors should be consistently compared:

energy density per weight and volume
projected number of charge cycles
performance in hot/cold weather; discharge rate at cold temps
charging speed
safety
mfg cost
recycling cost

Some of these technologies might challenge LiB in smaller consumer devices like phones and laptops.

Hydrogen is a non-starter because of the H2 cost and distribution/storage cost and hazards. It makes more sense to burn methane, from which H2 is obtained, directly.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Someone
August 12, 2024 12:41 pm

Safe use range. LiPO usually operate between 10% an d90% of rated capacity.

Someone
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
August 12, 2024 1:39 pm

Yes, min and max % recommended charge ranges also vary and factor into energy density.