Net Zero is Impoverishing the West and Enriching China

From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

BY WILL JONES

The West’s headlong rush to jettison fossil fuels and hit ‘Net Zero’ carbon dioxide emissions is impoverishing us while enriching China, which is ramping up its coal-fired industry to sell us all the ‘green’ technology, says Bjorn Lomborg in the Telegraph. Here’s an excerpt:

Starting in the 1990s, climate change has become a fixation for rich country politicians and elites. It emerged as the world had just seen the end of the Cold War. There was relative peace and trust across the world, broad economic growth and swift progress being made against poverty. In the capitals of Europe in particular, it felt like most of the planet’s big problems were fixed, so climate change was the final frontier.

These proponents of climate action advocated with relish the goal of ending reliance on the very fossil fuels that had powered two centuries of astonishing growth. Sure, this would cost hundreds of trillions of dollars, but there would always be more growth.

What a naïve, narrow-minded world view. Time has not been kind to the foolish idea that climate change was humanity’s sole remaining problem – or that the planet would unite to solve it. Geopolitics and economics mean a rapid global transition from fossil fuels is impossible.

As has long been clear for many, the majority of the world never shared this myopic focus on climate change. Despite immense progress, in some countries life remains a battle against poverty, hunger and disease. In many more countries including India, the top priority is to create more jobs and life-changing growth and development. Outside the most advanced economies, climate change has understandably always been a relatively low voter priority.

Leaders from Europe and the United States talk up “Net Zero” as though it has global support. But this unity is quickly revealed as a mirage. For one thing, the destabilising axis of Russia, Iran and North Korea are not about to support Western efforts to solve climate change. Indeed, according to McKinsey, achieving the Net Zero target would require Russian climate policies costing $273 billion every year – around three-times what Russia spent on its military last year. That won’t happen.

The geopolitical challenges run even deeper. China’s growth has relied on burning ever more coal. It is the world’s preeminent greenhouse gas emitter, with the largest increase of any nation last year. Renewable energy made 40% of China’s primary energy in 1971, reducing to 7% by 2011 as it ramped up coal use. Since then, renewables have inched up to 10%. Strong climate action could cost China nearly a trillion dollars annually, hurting its journey toward becoming a rich nation.

The reality is that most of the world – including powerhouse India and emerging economies – will continue to focus on becoming richer, often with fossil fuels. Russia and its ilk will ignore the fixation on climate change altogether. And China will make money from selling the West solar panels and electric cars, while only modestly curbing its own emissions.

As rich countries irresponsibly attempt to export the cost of climate policy to poor countries through carbon adjustment taxes, they will drive a further wedge into an already fractured world.

Worth reading in full.

5 14 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

64 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
July 25, 2024 6:08 am

Net Zero is Impoverishing the West

But, but… Just this morning I heard Ed Miliband assure the nation that his push for renewables will drive down electricity bills “within the lifetime of this parliament”. He said it. In words. On the BBC.

Reply to  quelgeek
July 25, 2024 6:14 am

Yes, I know;it is possible for consumers’ bills to go down even as the nation as a whole misallocates its capital.

I bet our bills won’t go down though. And I bet once we have reached an irreducible minimum of dispatchable fossil fuel generating capacity and start having to fulfil peak demand by competing with everyone else at the other end of the interconnects, it will be just like buying oil and gas on the spot market. Neither secure nor cheap.

Reply to  quelgeek
July 25, 2024 6:54 am

Wholesale prices decrease, and consumer prices follow. For me that was already the case twice this year. Guess the problem is greedy corporations.

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 7:18 am

“” For me that was already the case twice this year. “”

Where? In which nation state? Do tell.

Bryan A
Reply to  strativarius
July 25, 2024 10:43 am

Certainly not the US where Bidenflation has caused prices to double in the last 4 years. Electricity has tripled since Y2K in Ca.

Reply to  Bryan A
July 25, 2024 7:46 pm

Ours are about the same in Ohio.

Bryan A
Reply to  scvblwxq
July 25, 2024 10:08 pm

We’re paying 36¢ off peak and 56¢ on peak

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 7:18 am

Wholesale and consumer prices of what? And whatever ‘it’ is, did you buy it from a corporation? And if prices are the result of corporate greed, have they become less greedy two times so far this year?

Bill Toland
Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 7:40 am

I presume the greedy corporations you are referring to are the owners of solar farms and wind farms. They are given guaranteed prices which ensures that they make a handsome profit at the expense of the poor consumer.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 9:45 am

What planet do you live on?

Bryan A
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
July 25, 2024 10:44 am

Uranus… User is the final Klingon

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 1:40 pm

Are you really that much of an idiot or do you just play one on message boards?

heme212
July 25, 2024 6:19 am

and we all though those trinkets were so cheap. manhattan is nothing but mosquitos anyway

Ron Long
July 25, 2024 6:23 am

Follow the money! Wonder what China thinks about a second Trump presidency? Then, the next question: wonder where the Dark Money is flowing?

Reply to  Ron Long
July 25, 2024 6:56 am

At least Putin would love it – he spend a lot of money on his republican toys.

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 7:23 am

Have you made your campaign contribution to Adam Schiff yet? You two seem to have something in common.

Bryan A
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
July 25, 2024 10:45 am

Yep…Moronity

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 7:59 am

That lie is disproven. Repeatedly.

Putin supported Clinton’s election in 2016, Biden in 2020 and again in 2024. Presumably now Putin also hopes to face Harris at the summit conference tables rather than Trump.

Someone
Reply to  More Soylent Green!
July 25, 2024 8:31 am

I doubt Putin cares too much. Historically Russians were able to strike political deals with Republicans, for example Nixon and Reagan, and had more problems with Democrats, just recall Kennedy and Clinton.

Reply to  Someone
July 25, 2024 8:54 am

Trump plans to halt weapon delivery to ukraine to force them into a disadvantageous peace talk with russia. I think putin cares about that.

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 3:56 pm

Seems like a good idea to me.

Do you support Hamas as well ??

The far-left that you represent, would much rather the war continued to last for ages.

There is money to be made…

And they gotta keep Hunter’s secrets from coming out.

Reply to  bnice2000
July 25, 2024 7:51 pm

What defense contractors do the far-left own?

Reply to  scvblwxq
July 25, 2024 8:22 pm

You have it the wrong way around.

strativarius
July 25, 2024 7:00 am

Impoverishing….

“”Sadiq Khan’s wallet-hitting ULEZ expansion cost the taxpayer a whopping £500 million, and despite the spin that emissions are “dramatically” lower, the first report shows that roadside nitrogen dioxide concentrations in outer London were just 4.4% lower since the scheme. 

Susan Hall AM slammed the revelations:

“From day one, we were absolutely clear that expanding the ULEZ was going to cost the taxpayer a huge sum and hammer the poorest drivers, whilst making very little difference to air quality in outer London. Despite the Mayor’s outrageous attempts to spin the figures, we can see the effect of the expansion on air quality was minimal.”

A kick in the teeth for those having to fork up the £12.50 daily fee… 

https://order-order.com/#_@/wJLubnJnb8s3yA

July 25, 2024 7:05 am

China is building most of renewable capacity in their own country – the west has slept on and actively destroyed future technologies, and now the whining begins.

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 7:20 am

Who are you talking to?

Who are you trying to wind up?

Reply to  strativarius
July 25, 2024 7:29 am

I’m not trying to wind up anybody – but if you followed the energy policies of china in the last years, you would have seen that they are on their way to make renewables their new base supply, while coal power is used as support. They build their new coal powerplants to be able to load-follow.

And germany had a great opportunity for a thrieving PV industry in the early 2000s.
Now we see the same destruction in the EV sector. And all they can do is whine about tarifs. As if this is going to prevent EVs from taking over.

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 7:34 am

You live in an alternative reality or it’s a wind up

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 7:56 am

It’s a wind up

Reply to  strativarius
July 25, 2024 8:12 am

If it helps you to cope. Here is more “wind up”

https://rmi.org/insight/the-battery-mineral-loop

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 8:21 am

You’re wasting your time

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 9:51 am

A lot of wishful thinking in that climate activist report.

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 8:25 pm

rmi….. where subsidy money goes to hide. !

Bryan A
Reply to  MyUsername
July 26, 2024 1:26 pm

It’s the Wind-Up…
And the Pitch…
Ooo…
High and outside for Ball Four

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 1:17 pm

carbon brief.. far-left propagandists and know lies..

Meanwhile , back in the real world, China continues to install massive amounts of Coal generation.

They know wind and solar cannot be relied on.

China-coal-added
KevinM
Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 12:49 pm

“You know who tried that?… Germany. Uh, seven straight days with no wind… Their factories are shutting down.”

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 1:38 pm

On their way, perhaps. But they have a very long way to go, if indeed they are really going to go much further. They are more interested in having export industries and tying the West in to China dependencecand in due course obeisance. Renewables were just 9.4% of Chinese energy supply in 2023. Much of Europe is more than double that.

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 7:55 pm

China just demonstrated a nuclear power plant that won’t melt down when the coolant is removed. That is their future energy source.
https://www.ans.org/news/article-6241/china-pebblebed-reactor-passes-meltdown-test/

story tip

Reply to  scvblwxq
July 25, 2024 8:31 pm

Once a simple, inherently safe reactor is proven, the use will expand rapidly..

Wind and solar will be tossed into the dustbin of history…

.. leaving the taxpayer to clean up the mess, of course.

Future generations will look back on the wind and solar debacle and wonder WT* the current generation were thinking !

Reply to  MyUsername
July 26, 2024 12:08 am

And then there’s reality

share-energy-source-sub
oeman50
Reply to  MyUsername
July 26, 2024 5:09 am

The Chinese are masters at touting their additions of renewable power to goad the West into using more and more of it. Yet their increases in use of coal more than make up for any decreases in coal use in the West.

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 8:02 am

Which alternate reality do you occupy?

strativarius
Reply to  More Soylent Green!
July 25, 2024 8:20 am

He won’t say where he hails from

One wonders why….

Reply to  More Soylent Green!
July 25, 2024 9:11 am

The land of Unicorn farts and Fairy vomit.

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 1:13 pm

Again with the ignorance .. wind and solar are basically tiny bit players in China.

Wind and solar are NOT future technologies, they are a virtue-seeking parasitic waste the future generations will curse the current idiots for installing.

Future generations will be burdened with the cost of getting rid of the crap.. already happening !!

Future technology would be able to provide amble electricity 24/7. Wind and solar can never do that.

China-Energy-consumption
Dave Andrews
July 25, 2024 7:10 am

Meanwhile the Grauniad’s front page today screams “Revealed: rich western countries lead global gas and oil expansion”

However, buried in the small print on the inside page is

“PetroChina, the Chinese state owned oil and gas arm has spent the most on exploration and well development over the past decade with ExxonMobil, Saudi Aramco, Sinopec and Chevron among the other biggest investors in new oil and gas”

Didn’t know China, Saudi Arabia, and private companies were ” rich western countries”

strativarius
Reply to  Dave Andrews
July 25, 2024 7:32 am

Monbiot has been singing China’s praises ignoring, well, the obvious

China, while building some solar farms, added a record 47 Gigawatts of coal power in 2023, which is double the amount from the rest of the world combined. That’s the equivalent of two new coal plants every week,
https://order-order.com/2024/07/23/monbiot-says-coal-obsessed-china-puts-us-to-shame-on-climate/

mleskovarsocalrrcom
July 25, 2024 7:56 am

No one should be surprised. The Marxists are slow walking the death of Capitalism so it won’t upset the proletariat. They knew the position of the earth this century would promote higher temperatures in the northern hemisphere and used it to push their scam with China being the eventual winner.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
July 25, 2024 9:53 am

India iss going to give China a run for its money.

Someone
July 25, 2024 8:07 am

 “China will make money from selling the West solar panels and electric cars”

Making products, selling them and making money.
Such a crime. How dare they!

No, seriously, how can one blame them?
Isn’t it what any capitalist would do?

Reply to  Someone
July 25, 2024 8:56 am

No, you see – it’s endangering the profits of our fossil fuel friends. And that’s where it starts to become problematic. Nobody ever cared about where their phones or clothes came from.

Someone
Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 11:14 am

Wrong. No amount of solar cells or EVs will ever reduce society dependence on carbon/hydrocarbon fuels.

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 1:43 pm

It has endangered the profits of Western industry, but it has allowed oil prices to remain in a very comfortable range, as renewables need subsidies to function. Oil and coal remain profitable, even if not quite as profitable as during the energy crisis which was caused by attempts to shut down fossil fuels. Renewables were completely incapable of replacing oil, gas and coal, let alone at a competitive price.

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 2:38 pm

Everything in your pitiful juvenile existence is there BECAUSE OF FOSSIL FUELS.

You could end your absolute reliance of fossil fuels, by moving out of your padded basement, into a cave wearing animal rags, and burning their dung.

You would not last one day without access to everything that fossil fuels provide.

Reply to  MyUsername
July 25, 2024 2:56 pm

“it’s endangering the profits of our fossil fuel friends”

roflmao.

Wind and solar are made using fossil fuels, you ignorant moron.

Did you know that  Australia’s coal exports are forecast to lift from an estimated 163 Mt in 2022–23 to 175 Mt in 2024–25 as several new mines open.

The World LUVS COAL…… The World NEEDS Coal 🙂

Reply to  MyUsername
July 26, 2024 12:13 am

Nobody ever cared about where their phones or clothes came from.

Phones and clothes rely on fossil fuels for their manufacture and distribution.

Anyone who uses either of these or the other 6000+ products and wants to stop the use of fossil fuels is a hypocrite and an idiot.

Are you a hypocrite?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Someone
July 25, 2024 9:54 am

Funny how Marxist capitalism is so much better than free market capitalism.
Oh. Wait. We no longer have a free market.

July 25, 2024 10:19 am

China will never “curtail its emissions.”

They will pay plenty of lip service to the notion that they will, of course. Anything to keep the leftist idiots in “western” nations stampeding THEIR economies towards the cliff.

Another six years and we’ll hit 2030, the year China “committed” to “peaking” its emissions. When that “deadline” approaches, we’ll see China move the goalposts.

Bryan A
Reply to  AGW is Not Science
July 25, 2024 11:02 am

Probably out to 2070 to match India

Bob
July 25, 2024 12:52 pm

Net Zero is madness. It has nothing to do with climate or emissions of any kind. It is a purely political movement meant for leftists to gain more power and control. They need to be stopped and they need to be stopped now. The time for pussy footing is past.

July 25, 2024 7:37 pm

The biggest greenhouse gas by far is water vapor which the oceans and rain emit constantly and in vast quantities..

The atmosphere of Mars is 95 percent CO2 and its average temperature is -80 F / -60 C.

observa
July 25, 2024 7:51 pm

Net Zero is Impoverishing the West and Enriching China
Them thar commies aint trying to snow us are they?
Eye-watering cost of EV transition (msn.com)

markm
July 29, 2024 3:08 pm

<s>Geopolitics and economics</s><i>Physics and chemistry</i> mean a rapid global transition from fossil fuels is impossible.