July 02, 2024
Governor Glenn Youngkin announced recently that Virginia would decouple from California’s onerous mandate requiring all new vehicles sold in the Commonwealth to be electric or plug-in hybrid vehicles (EVs) by 2035. This regulation—a ban on sales of new gas, diesel and traditional hybrid vehicles—promulgated by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), would have taken effect as soon as next year when 35% of all model year 2026 cars sold would be required to meet California’s definition of “zero emission.”
This all stems from a 2021 bill championed by then-Governor Northam and his allies in the General Assembly. They enacted policy directing the Virginia Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) to adopt regulations tying Virginia law to California’s vehicle emission standards. And if you can believe it, the law was intentionally exempted from the Administrative Process Act, denying Virginians any opportunity to give input on the regulatory process and dodging larger economic review for the policy.
It sounds brazen, but that’s exactly what happened: the previous administration in Richmond put Virginia vehicle policy in the hands of Californians.
In November 2022, California finalized entirely new regulations at the direction of their Governor Gavin Newsom. Under the new California policy, selling any new gas, diesel, flex-fuel or traditional hybrid cars and trucks would be unlawful and subject to severe penalties, whether in California or in states aligned with California.
California’s gas car ban would have been devastating for Virginia drivers and small businesses and damaging to U.S. national security. Consumers would have paid dearly under the ban, facing higher costs in both the new and used car markets and finding more and more vehicles simply priced out of reach for families. Any compliance penalties levied on automakers—roughly $20,000 per vehicle—would also likely be passed on to Virginia consumers.
The absurd and un-American mandate to “go electric” on California’s timeline would also have increased Virginia’s and the U.S. dependence on China, since China controls the global EV battery and mineral supply chain.
Make no mistake: criticism of California’s gas car ban and EV mandate policies—and fervent opposition to the spread of those policies in the Commonwealth of Virginia and to any other state—should not be construed as an indictment of EVs themselves. EVs are a good choice for many Americans, and if those cars and trucks work for a family’s needs and fit within their budgets, that’s wonderful. Families have every right to make the choice to buy an EV, but no government mandate should compel them toward that purchase or restrict their access to other vehicle options.
When the stakes are absolutely clear and the choice is between government mandates and consumer freedom, the right move is to err on the side of consumers. And that’s exactly what Governor Youngkin did when he chose to end California’s control over the vehicles that can and cannot be sold in Virginia. Virginia drivers, not California regulators 3,000 miles away, should be able to choose for themselves which vehicles to purchase. When people are free to choose, they make decisions that work best for them, their businesses and their families.
Other states tethered to California’s EV mandate should follow Governor Youngkin’s bold and necessary leadership and free their residents, too, from the tyranny of California’s gas car ban.
Chet Thompson is president and CEO of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM). He previously served as deputy general counsel for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency during the George W. Bush administration and was a partner at Crowell and Moring, where he chaired the Environment and Natural Resources Group.
This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I would not have said such nice things about electric vehicles.
Burns me up. (Not really, I drive a 3.6L 6 cylinder vehicle and I’m quite happy with it.)
I drive a 6.2L gasoline engine 3/4 ton pickup truck and I’m quite happy with it.
“Governor Glenn Youngkin announced recently that Virginia would decouple from California’s onerous mandate requiring all new vehicles sold in the Commonwealth to be electric or plug-in hybrid vehicles (EVs) by 2035.”
Hybrids would be OK? Not in Wokeachusetts. Gotta be an EV after 2035.
Things might change by the time we get to 2035.
I think there’s going to be a lot of changes in a matter of months from now.
The reason given for the “decoupling” is California changed its mandate to make it more burdensome. The Va. legislature had approved requirements under the old regulation, giving a legal premise for Youngkin to withdraw. Since greenies can never stop moving the goalposts, this was practically inevitable.
“EVs are a good choice for many Americans…”
Fine, but let them pay the full price with no subsidies.
And all the taxes that most countries levy at the fuel pump.
New Zealand already has a road user charge that is levied on certain vehicles other than through the fuel pump so it is a small step to include EVs in the RUC:
https://www.nzta.govt.nz/vehicles/road-user-charges/ruc-rates-and-transaction-fees/
The State of Victoria tried to levy an EV distance charge but it was defeated in the courts because only the Federal Government can levy such charges and so far they have not done that.
EV’s are certainly not a good choice for Americans since their range is far too short for driving the distances in such a huge country. I won’t even mention the problems EV’s have in cold weather.
More good news.
“EVs are a good choice for many Americans, and if those cars and trucks work for a family’s needs and fit within their budgets, that’s wonderful.”
Yes I suppose EVs may be a good choice for some families but they should pay the full cost for them. That the government is propping up EVs with my money is criminal. EVs are a second rate choice let’s not pretend otherwise.
The only purpose for such legislation would be to bring up the price of “politically undesirable” ICV cars and bring them more in line with the overpriced unwanted EV cars
All this nonsense about forbidding the sale of anything but EV cars in a state is nothing but virtue signaling. It will never happen even if they provide practical charging for everyone and affordable pricing. It will decimate vehicle sales in the state. They can’t stop gasoline sales and out of state visitors will cease and legacy ICE cars will be useless.
Seems there’s a good market for charging cables.
They should make the charging cables out of Aluminum instead of Copper
No, if they really want to save the world, they should mandate silver to reduce the I^2R losses in charging to the lowest possible amount.
I mean, we are doing all this stuff to save the world, right?
Gold has an even higher electrical conductivity than copper or silver. Problem solved.
Er, no. Silver has the highest electrical and thermal conductivity of any metal. Gold is used to plate electrical contacts because of its resistance to corrosion.
I love physicist v engineer exchanges. Silver does indeed have superior physical properties. The engineer says, yeah for how long in actual service? Gold plated copper wire in teflon jackets. The sweet spot of all the disciplines.
Nonsense, the costs can only increase due to scarcities. The Cali “transition” is going to face-plant when the engineering realities hit the fan.
More elected officials need to face reality and realize that consumers in their jurisdictions don’t want green mandates shoved down their throats to ostensibly save the planet. They’re quite capable to make the necessary choices on their lifestyles and priorities without academics, politicians, bureaucrats, and environmentalists deciding for them, especially when these “experts” have little evidence that their theories will actually be more beneficial than what’s already working.
RE Northam’s use of administrative power: “if you can believe it, the law was intentionally exempted from the Administrative Process Act, denying Virginians any opportunity to give input on the regulatory process”
— it’s bad enough that governors are pulling these stunts. Presidents croak about how many of the previous administration’s policies they will countermand through their unilateral executive action “on their first official day in office.”
On his first day, Biden froze all of Trump’s “midnight regulations” issued before Trump left office, and issued 16 executive orders of his own – mostly unwinding conservative rules and laws and sending the country (at least superficially) in the opposite direction overnight.
https://www.politico.com/interactives/2021/interactive_biden-first-day-executive-orders/
Presidents need the power to make such decisions and issue edicts, even make laws, but seem to be guided by their animus for the “other side” and no longer even tipping their hat to the role of Congress, the separation of powers, or the representation of “all the people”.
Do democracies have to yo-yo back and forth between the polar ends of the latest fractionation of policy. Hardly aspirational, Churchill’s observation about democracy as “the worst form of government…”
Happy Fourth everybody.
“it’s bad enough that governors are pulling these stunts.”
Let’s be specific: Democrat governors pull such stunts. Democrats try to figure out ways to go around the people they supposedly represent, if those people don’t happen to agree with the Democrat agenda. That’s what Northam did here.
Northam is the Democrat governor who thinks it is a good idea to abort/murder a baby after it has been born, if it is not wanted by the mother or Democrats.
Democracy is not mentioned in the US Constitution, but it does figure prominently in the Communist Manifesto and is a chaotic transitional state to the tyranny of the elite.
Presidents need the power to …, even make laws
I disagree with this part. It’s the job of Congress to make laws, not the President.
Every president has issued executive orders with the exception of William Henry Harrison, some 14,123 edicts in all counting the 220 that Trump issued and the 139 that Biden has issued so far. And as cited above, many of these just unwind the orders given by the last president. The point is executive orders are overused and misused. Biden’s declarations (see the link above) look like stunts to curry favor among his progressive fan base.
There are too many examples of the justifiable use of presidential executive power to list here, but among the most obvious… a military commander is obliged to issue orders, and those orders must be obeyed. The president is the commander in chief.
The “broad discretion” given the president in the constitution allows him to interpret and execute laws as he deems fit. Presidents constantly issue mandates and orders which are in effect laws.
He is commander in chief of the armed forces, not of the civilian population.
NO, THEY MOST CERTAINLY DO NOT!!! And in fact, the Constitution specifically prohibits the Executive branch from making laws:
…if you’re having trouble understanding, seek the aid of a dictionary to define “all”. Just in case I’m not making myself clear, I believe every Executive Order, from the first one right up to the present day, is unconstitutional. FDR went so far as to cover his ass, the very first piece of legislation he asked Congress to pass began with a paragraph about everything he has done up to this point is legal… So even FDR recognized there was a problem with E.O.s. I’m amazed that has not been adjudicated already. Anyone want to make a name for themselves, and ambitious enough…?
Can Governor Younkin please come out here to California and free us from the tyranny of the faceless, unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats?
And if you can believe it, the law was intentionally exempted from the Administrative Process Act, denying Virginians any opportunity to give input on the regulatory process and dodging larger economic review for the policy.
It’s what they do because they know what’s best for you and you can’t be trusted to know truth from misinformation deplorable-
IPA prove eSafety Commissioner’s ‘garbage’ claims (msn.com)
They must be locked in with regular remuneration updates by like minded experts to do what they do and that’s the only oversight necessary.
Maybe I’m being pernickety, but that sounds more like a statement of intent rather than a done deal. If it’s still in the works, then no doubt there will be some protests and legal action from the left which might prevent that from happening – or does Governor Youngkin have his house in order such that the legislature will be able to revoke this without too much trouble?
“or does Governor Youngkin have his house in order such that the legislature will be able to revoke this without too much trouble?”
Good question. There are a lot of Democrats in the Virginia legislature.
Hmmm! Youngkin for VP??
Well, at least this is another neighboring state where us Marylanders can buy new cars after these draconian Cubafornia-based laws take effect in our state. It’s one thing to do this in a huge state like CA, but a whole different story to do it in a tiny state like Maryland. There are things that cannot be sold here (most kinds of fireworks included) yet people simply travel to VA, PA, or WV to buy what they want and celebrate the 4th as they wish. They will do the same with cars.
Here, in Washington State, we go to the Indian Reservation (and, no, any mis-informed, non-American, readers, the Indians do not have to STAY on their reservation land and they get a lot of non-Indian taxpayer-funded benefits — I write this because, for some reason, there is a trend among Europeans to view the American Indian as persecuted by the rest of the Americans) to buy excellent fireworks (illegal to sell off “the res” — heh, illegal to USE off the reservation, too, but, we do it anyway! Bwah, ha, ha, ha, haaaaaaa! A little rebellion is, at times, a good thing).
The “gaming” industry partners with Indians to sell their product… .
Time for the American Indian to get into the ICE vehicle business! 😀
GM, Toyota, Ford, et al., follow the “gaming” industry’s model!
We Americans WILL come and buy.
******************
@the EV/HYBRID market tyrannists: Pass a law against using ICE vehicles off the reservation and you will be looking at TAIL LIGHTS.
Yet it is D.J.Trump who is “the existential threat to democracy.”
The government is suppose to protect the people FROM the government. All of the mandates are simply codifying dictatorship.
Meanwhile, here in the UK the i newspaper (5th July) reports
“Ineos Automotive has indefinitely delayed production on its first electric vehicle. The Ineos Fusilier SUV was planned to be available in pure electric and plug-in hybrid versions. The company cited reluctant consumer uptake of EVs and uncertainty around tariffs, timing and taxes”
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) in the UK also today report that
“less than one in five of all new battery electric vehicles are being bought by individual customers” – sales are overwhelmingly to fleets
My eldest just picked up a brand new V8 4×4 high clearance pickup truck. This is a great thing for the environment. Why? She is a plant scientist. Her work results in better tomatoes using fewer resources for better yields. Said research involves driving sometimes many hundreds of miles with a truck bed of experimental seedlings to far flung corners of massive farms to test in various microclimates. Without this “beeg azz” wasteful tool the progress would not be possible.