Wrong, ProPublica, Climate Change Is Not Causing Hurricanes, Wildfires, or Migration

Originally posted at Climate Realism.

An article by the website ProPublica titled The Flooding Will Come “No Matter What” linked to Hurricane Katrina, storm refugees, and climate change, claiming that the storm was evidence of the beginning of a “climate migration” in America. The connection is false. Data refutes a climate connection to any particular hurricane or trend in migration.

The article does a lot of rambling coverage of a family that was displaced by Hurricane Katrina back in 2005, saying:

Another great American migration is now underway, this time forced by the warming that is altering how and where people can live. For now, it’s just a trickle. But in the corners of the country’s most vulnerable landscapes — on the shores of its sinking bayous and on the eroding bluffs of its coastal defenses — populations are already in disarray.

The article goes on to follow the trials and tribulations of a single family who had their home destroyed during Hurricane Katrina. Pro Publica believes this case is evidence of climate change causing a “migration,” because the family have not moved back to the same location.

The article itself cites no data and or study to support its claim about hurricane Katrina. Rather, it simply state’s the author’s opinions as if it were an established fact. Later article similarly describes families displaced by the 2018 campfire in Paradise CA, as climate refugees writing:

As the number of displaced people continues to grow, an ever-larger portion of those affected will make their moves permanent, migrating to safer ground or supportive communities. They will do so either because a singular disaster like the 2018 wildfire in Paradise, California — or Hurricane Harvey, which struck the Texas and Louisiana coasts — is so destructive it forces them to, or because the subtler “slow onset” change in their surroundings gradually grows so intolerable, uncomfortable or inconvenient that they make the decision to leave, proactively, by choice.

First, it should be noted that weather events such as a hurricane are not proof of climate change, and ProPublica is falsely conflating short term weather events with long-term climate change. Further, as discussed in Climate at a Glance: Hurricanes, even the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) admits to finding no increase in the long-term frequency or severity of hurricanes. Also, after Katrina, the United States went through its longest period in recorded history without a major hurricane strike, and recently experienced its fewest total hurricanes in any eight-year period. There has been no increase in the number or intensity of tropical cyclones since 1972 as the planet has modestly warmed. Indeed, for some basins the data suggests tropical cyclone frequency has actually declined over the past century.

Data presented in more than 100 previous Climate Realism posts, hereherehere, and here, for example, clearly show that hurricane trends are relatively flat over the past 50 years of modest warming, and the trend in powerful Atlantic hurricanes is downward (see the figures below)

Figure 1: Global Hurricane Frequency (all & major) — 12-month running sums. The top time series is the number of global tropical cyclones that reached at least hurricane-force (maximum lifetime wind speed exceeds 64-knots). The bottom time series is the number of global tropical cyclones that reached major hurricane strength (96-knots+). Adapted from Maue (2011) GRL. https://climatlas.com/tropical/
Figure 2: Figure: Last 50-years+ of Global and Northern Hemisphere Accumulated Cyclone Energy: 24 month running sums. Note that the year indicated represents the value of ACE through the previous 24-months for the Northern Hemisphere (bottom line/gray boxes) and the entire global (top line/blue boxes). The area in between represents the Southern Hemisphere total ACE. https://climatlas.com/tropical/

Simply put, contrary to the claims made by ProPublica, there is no upward trend in hurricane frequency or intensity, and thus claims that climate driven migration, leaving “populations in disarray,” is completely false.

The claim made about wildfire in Paradise, CA causing “climate driven migration,” is equally false. Paradise burned to the ground during the 2018 Camp Fire, which was due to lack of maintenance on Pacific Gas and Electric power lines. That was combined with a weather event causing high winds on a single day and low fuel moisture to create the perfect storm of flammability. California’s drought at the time was certainly a contributing factor, though drought has been historically common across the region, due by periodic weather patterns in the Pacific Ocean.

These patterns have occurred for millennia and are not a feature of man-made climate change. In fact, tree ring studies of the western United States show past mega-droughts lasted as long as 200 years at times.

report from California State University notes active forest management is a key practice in preventing wildfire.

“One of the reasons we’re observing more fires is because of 100 years of poor Forest Service policy where we didn’t allow prescribed fire or wildfires to burn,” says Dr. Craig Clements, a San Jose State University meteorology and climate science professor and director of the school’s Fire Weather Research Laboratory.

So, poor forest management and poorly maintained power lines affected by weather led to the wildfire devastation in Paradise, not climate change.

ProPublica simply failed to do basic research, relying on opinion and storytelling instead of factual reporting to weave yet another misleading story where climate change is blamed as part of the ongoing narrative told by the media blaming climate change for everything bad, even when the facts clearly say otherwise.

5 11 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
39 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 17, 2024 10:16 pm

I had a toenail fall off the other day. I’m pretty sure it was climate change.

Reply to  Shoki
April 18, 2024 6:00 am

But of course- warmer temperatures increase toenail fungus! 🙂

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 18, 2024 9:44 am

Oh no! Does that mean I should go sockless?
Or would toe odor become the latest criminal greenhouse gas?

Adrian Wright
Reply to  Shoki
April 22, 2024 12:35 pm

I lost a couple of toenails, but I’m pretty sure it was because my ski boots were too tight..

Bryan A
April 17, 2024 10:57 pm

Flooding along the Mississippi and hence Louisiana where the Mississippi drains into the sea has been occurring long before Fossil Fuels were discovered and utilized.
This site has data going back to 1543
https://www.weather.gov/lix/ms_flood_history

Reply to  Bryan A
April 18, 2024 4:10 am

The Mississippi Delta — the flat, northwestern part of the state, not the river’s mouth — and the flat, eastern part of Arkansas are among the most fertile flood plains on earth. They were formed by repeated, “catastrophic” floods that carried silt down the river from the Great Plains to the north, and deposited the silt in thick, accumulating layers, over millions of years.

The formation of other fertile, historically productive flood plains — the Nile Valley in Egypt, the Tigris/Euphrates Valley in Iraq, the Indus and Ganges/Brahmaputra Valleys in South Asia, and the Huang Ho and Yangtze Valleys in China, were formed the same way.

The Amazon Basin in South America, and the Congo Basin in Africa flood often, and nurture the largest, richest, most varied, tropical rain forests on earth.

There are many other fertile flood plains on every continent but Antarctica, Without those “catastrophic” floods, the world would have far less fertile farmland, and far fewer tropical and subtropical forests.

So much for the notions that flooding is new, and caused by climate change, or invariably bad.

oeman50
Reply to  Bryan A
April 18, 2024 6:08 am

To your point, why did they build levees (such as they are) along the Mississippi in Louisiana? Oh, I know! I have visited there and found the views from the levees to be outstanding!

Bryan A
Reply to  oeman50
April 18, 2024 8:31 am

That’s an easy one…
1) To try and eliminate what Nature has done for…ever…and remove the area flooding risk..
2) So that they can build and live in that fertile area without going to the expense of raising the entire area itself above flood levels

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bryan A
April 18, 2024 9:46 am

Nononono…. It’s for the view! (/humor)

hdhoese
Reply to  Bryan A
April 18, 2024 1:53 pm

Interesting link flood coverage, both the 1927 and 1973 floods apparently raised the channel making higher flood stages, also apparent in the 2019 flood. Second paper covers the man-made problems of levee construction causing constriction starting in 1837. Amazing river, been on it in a 16 foot flat bottom boat, not fun.
Cline, I. M. 1928. Floods in the lower Mississippi. New Orleans Board of Trade. 29p.
Belt, C. B., Jr. 1975. The 1973 flood and man’s constriction of the Mississippi River. Science. 189(4204):681-684.

Capt Jeff
April 17, 2024 11:18 pm

The stupid thing is they are rebuilding in these low lying areas that never should have been developed.
Even if numbers decreased they are on a hurricane prone coast and will be susceptible repeat events.
worst natural disaster for Canada was a hurricane in 1775.

Reply to  Capt Jeff
April 18, 2024 4:23 am

The biggest natural disasters in U.S. history occurred close together in time nearly a century ago, and had nothing to do with climate change. They were weather events, not trends.

In 1927 rain caused the Great Mississippi Flood that inundated eastern Arkansas, Western Mississippi, and northeastern Louisiana. A flood plain the size of Vermont and New Hampshire placed end to end went underwater for months. From 1931 through 1939 the Great Plains, particularly the Southern Great Plains centered around the Oklahoma and Texas panhandles, suffered a nearly decade-long drought with repeated, massive dust storms that killed people and livestock, and displaced millions of farmers. That event is referred to by historians as the Dust Bowl.

There have been floods and droughts in the Midwest and Southern Great Plains since then, but none so severe. Plus, management practices — many made possible by fossil-fueled equipment — have improved, so the consequences are less catastrophic.

Reply to  tom_gelsthorpe
April 18, 2024 9:15 am

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S026483772300251X

Determinants and consequences of large-scale tree plantation projects: Evidence from the Great Plains Shelterbelt Project

There is a good picture of how the Shelterbelt was laid out after the Dust Bowl was over at the link below:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/shelterbelt

These Shelterbelts cover large areas of the Central United States today. I saw a high-altitude or satellite picture of the Central U.S. one time and the Shelterbelts were all over the place. You could see them plainly once you knew what to look at. I don’t have a link to that one.

Reply to  tom_gelsthorpe
April 18, 2024 9:53 pm

Not too many years ago a paper was published on a study of a large northern plains lake that has existed for thousands of years without much disturbance of the silt layers laid down each year. It found that large droughts are a common, recurring feature of the region. The dust bowl drought was a fairly small, short duration example of drought conditions that have come and gone many times over the past few thousand years. There is thus much evidence to suggest that such droughts will continue far into the future.

Bryan A
Reply to  Capt Jeff
April 18, 2024 8:34 am

Worst natural disaster for the Caribbean islands was a Hurricane in 1782…
Stripped whole islands bare
Debarked trees
Killed over 24,000

observa
April 17, 2024 11:35 pm

As the number of displaced people continues to grow, an ever-larger portion of those affected will make their moves permanent, migrating to safer ground or supportive communities. 

No they won’t. If anything goes bump in the night they’ll get hold of some lefty lawyers and get the community to cough up-
Man who lost Norfolk home joins climate change legal bid (yahoo.com)
Moral hazard and the ‘community’ be damned with the dooming.

1saveenergy
Reply to  observa
April 18, 2024 1:03 am

“Man who lost Norfolk home joins climate change legal bid”

So why did he buy a temporary wooden structure built on an eroding sand & clay embankment ??

Documented by the Romans, the area has been eroding for1,000s of years, ( a huge area detailed in the Doomsday Book (1086) has totally disappeared ).

Reply to  observa
April 18, 2024 9:43 am

In the US people are moving from colder northern states to the southern states for the warmer weather since they have become more urbanized.

Reply to  observa
April 18, 2024 9:57 pm

Well, why not? The practice is making quite a bit of money for many other people.

April 18, 2024 4:10 am

Both data and climate models show that global warming is making the tropical atmosphere more stable — which inhibits hurricane formation … https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/04/08/global-warming-inhibits-hurricane-activity-as-indicated-by-decreasing-tropical-cape-values/

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  John Shewchuk
April 18, 2024 9:49 am

Yes. A thermal engine requires and energy differential. The greater the differential, the greater power in the engine.

As oceans warm, the differential decreases.

massieguy
April 18, 2024 4:49 am

ProPublica does “investigative journalism” without the “investigative” part.

Tom Halla
Reply to  massieguy
April 18, 2024 5:51 am

ProPublica is usually carrying water for one activist group or another, all in a tone of high dudgeon.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  massieguy
April 18, 2024 9:49 am

Strike investigative and replace with advocacy.

Reply to  massieguy
April 18, 2024 10:17 am

The first part of any investigation is a definition of terms. without that, there is no reference point to base any conclusion on.

Since climate is defined as “30 years of weather in a given location” by NASA, NOAA and WMO, anyone who claims that climate affects the weather has their premise exactly backwards.

The weather must change first and for 30 years before any claim of climate changing can be made. There is cause and effect in the real world and the order in which that occurs is fundamental to claiming knowledge of any events.

April 18, 2024 5:45 am

Article says:”…American migration is now underway, this time forced by…”.

My bet is more people have migrated because of bad governance in a couple of states and the desire for warm weather than any climate change.

April 18, 2024 5:57 am

Katrina? Much of the city was below sea level! Much of the natural wetlands along the Mississippi were converted to farmland and dikes were built- and that just pushed heavy rainfall to New Orleans. Such a catastrophe was inevitable for those reasons.

April 18, 2024 5:58 am

“So, poor forest management and poorly maintained power lines affected by weather led to the wildfire devastation in Paradise, not climate change.”

Well managed private forest land in the west has a much lower fire problem.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 18, 2024 9:50 am

Blame the ecowarriors for the elimination of proper forestry.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
April 18, 2024 10:19 am

They’re trying very hard right now in New England. The battle rages. I fight them every day. Most of these ecowarriors live in large, wood homes with nice wood furniture and tons of paper products.

April 18, 2024 6:02 am

Not only are tropical cyclones decreasing but they are shifting toward the poles as the Hadley circulation weakens.

Tropical cyclone genesis projected to move toward the poles

Beards
April 18, 2024 6:18 am

Pretty sure high taxes are causing more migration from CA than climate change.

Reply to  Beards
April 18, 2024 10:24 am

People can live with high taxes when they receive great services in exchange for those high taxes.

What people won’t tolerate is high taxes and decreasing services. California consistently delivers less and less services and charges more and more for the privilege.

People figure out quickly that their standard of living is decreasing and move to where the grass is greener.

Duane
April 18, 2024 6:51 am

So much for “climate migration”:

Per US Census data for the period 2021-2022, of the 13 states that all experienced 1% or greater population growth (but for one, DE) are either southern tier states (FL, SC, TX, AZ, SC, UT TN, GA, and NV), or very red northern tier states (ID, SD, MT) where the people totally reject climate alarmism.

14 of the 16 states with negative population growth during that time period are all northern and/or BLUE states … the only exceptions being MS and WV.

In other words, 12 of the 13 fastest growing population states are the warmest states or are northern states that totally reject wamunism.

If people are voting with their feet due to “climate migration” it’s pretty clear they want RED governance and WARM.

Reply to  Duane
April 18, 2024 9:50 am

Ohio, a RED state in the north has been losing population as people move south for warmer weather.

People originally moved to the northern states because they were more urbanized and the wages were better but now the south is more urbanized and the wages are competitive.

April 18, 2024 9:11 am

Populations are not in disarray due to climate change. Many individuals are in disarray due to climate change policy, and due to ridiculous climate alarm messaging, but no one anywhere is in disarray due to climate change.

April 18, 2024 10:56 am

If flooding is something “new”, how were “floodplains” determined?

Bob
April 18, 2024 2:59 pm

Yeah right that is why over a million people in the US moved south, to escape global warming.

Editor
April 19, 2024 3:44 pm

The Paradise Fire became a disaster because the whole town was a wildland urban interface (WUI) — suburbs of modern houses with flammable siding and flammable roofs and flammable landscaping, intentionally built into a woodland setting. As Anthony Watts has pointed out, there were inadequate escape routes (one single road) and the town center itself had been re-designed to slow traffic flow through the shopping district.