CNN Peddles Alarm About Western Antarctica Melting

Guest essay by Linnea Lueken Originally Published on ClimateRealism

A recent article posted by CNN claims that western Antarctica is melting rapidly and can’t be stopped, due to human-caused global warming, which will result in a dangerous rise ocean levels. This is false. While the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) has seen more melting than other parts of the continent, it is due not to climate change but rather to localized temporary weather conditions and ongoing subsurface volcanic activity below the ice sheet. Indeed, outside of West Antarctica and the Antarctic peninsula, the larger part of the continent has gained ice mass in recent decades and has actually experienced a cooling trend.

The article, “Rapid melting in West Antarctica is ‘unavoidable,’ with potentially disastrous consequences for sea level rise, study finds,” says that West Antarctica’s ice shelves are melting rapidly, and probably can’t be stopped. CNN claims this will lead to “potentially devastating implications for sea level rise around the world,” citing a recent study in Nature Climate Change. The study’s authors claim that even if the world were to meet emissions and warming targets, like limiting warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial global average temperature, the WAIS will still experience “substantial ocean warming and ice shelf melting[.]”

The study’s authors considered most WAIS melting to be due to “basal melting,” due to warm ocean currents that heat the ice from below. It is notable that they do not consider subsurface geothermal heating from volcanic activity below the ice as a potential contributor, especially since several recent studies suggest that the WAIS, particularly around the Thwaites glacier, sits on top of a large number of subsurface volcanoes which are believed to be contributing to melting below the ice and localized increased water temperatures.

There is also a question as to whether or not Antarctica has seen much – if any – warming at all over the past 70 years, as discussed in the Climate Realism post “South Pole Warming Claims Contradicted by Actual Temperature Measurements.” According to NASA data, there was even some cooling between the early 2000s and 2019.

Basal melting, then, really is the best explanation, but only appears to be occurring in the WAIS, because the rest of the continent has seen a gain in ice mass in its interior.

Sea ice itself melting cannot contribute to sea level rise, since it is already displacing water, but the Nature Climate Change study’s authors explain that the melt of the sea ice can cause land ice to shift forward and likewise melt into the warmer waters. This makes sense and likely occurs; but the recorded interior ice mass gain makes it unclear whether there is a net loss of ice for Antarctica as a whole, and if so, by how much and at what rate, making claims about rising seas extremely uncertain. Data contained in a recent study even shows that Antarctica has seen a small expansion of sea ice in total over the past seven decades, providing a compelling visual demonstration of the continent’s recent cooling trend. (See graphic below)

From Singh and Polvani, 2020, here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-020-00143-w

Indeed, the authors of the Nature Climate Change study themselves admit that their modeling suggested “internal climate variability will be extremely important in determining the future of the WAIS.” Perhaps because this admitted uncertainty fails to advance the climate crisis narrative CNN consistently pushes, the news outlet did not quote from that portion of the study, and seemingly ignored its role in Antarctica’s net ice balance.

In the implications section, the authors explain that they only focused on a single ice-ocean model and a single climate model, in the process ignoring many other potential feedbacks. They also said that increased snowfall could actually offset sea level rise, which tracks with the ice mass gain in the interior as discussed. In any case, the study authors say adaptation should be a major focus when it comes to sea level rise over the next several centuries. Most notably, “[i]nternal climate variability, which we cannot predict or control, may be the deciding factor in the rate of ice loss during this time.”

Using only a single model, and including woefully flawed RCP8.5 scenario among those examined undercuts any confidence one might have in the accuracy of the study’s predictions.

Regarding “dangerous” sea level rise, again Antarctica’s contributions are uncertain. If, as some studies show, the interior and eastern portions are gaining ice even as the WAIS suffers some melt, the continent may not contribute very much at all. The authors acknowledge this. Regardless, adaption to sea level rise is something that city planners and developers should take into account, because as discussed in Climate Realism herehere, and here, sea levels are rising in some areas, and if there is ice melt as the planet modestly warms, we can expect this trend to continue, albeit at a less alarming pace than some in the media would have us believe.

Despite the paper acknowledging significant uncertainties, one of the study’s authors claimed that we have “lost control” of west Antarctic melting. This is pure hyperbole because humanity never had such control. The underlying paper cited by CNN displayed at least a modicum of caution and restraint. Sadly, CNN, in reporting on it, did not do the same. Rather they used some of its authors’ too-eager willingness to catastrophize in order to paint a picture of climate doom stemming from human fossil fuel use.

4.8 37 votes
Article Rating
46 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
November 1, 2023 6:09 pm

Any study using RCP8.5 should have a disclaimer “You know this is fear porn”

Reply to  Tom Halla
November 2, 2023 12:21 pm

I class it as “For entertainment purposes only”

Even Hollywood script writers struggle to make a more laughable story.

Bob
November 1, 2023 6:30 pm

Linnea you are far too kind to these rascals.

Dave Fair
Reply to  Bob
November 1, 2023 10:48 pm

Change rascals to crooks.

Bill Powers
Reply to  Dave Fair
November 2, 2023 10:31 am

Or lying, liars who lie for power and profit.

1saveenergy
November 1, 2023 6:33 pm

How about we send lots of fridge/freezers to the Antarctic & leave the doors open,
… that should cool things down & save the planet !!

Can I have my No Balls Praise now ??

Reply to  1saveenergy
November 1, 2023 7:46 pm

Send firefighting tugs to the South Pole to blast sea water into the interior where it will turn to ice. It’ll look cool… power it with wind turbines – it’s really windy down there. In fact the high winds were the reason the ice extent drop – high winds were blowing mostly towards the interior, restricting the flow of ice outward – but of course making it thicker than normal too.

Bill Powers
Reply to  PCman999
November 2, 2023 10:45 am

Or we could power the tugs and the freezers with penguins on treadmills which would be more realistic than a miniscule amount of CO2 at .04% of the atmosphere solely responsible for catastrophic irreversible global warm…aahhh they really meant climate change all along.

As Most WUWT readers already know (take the hint Nick/Griff) this is a fairy tale horror story to scare the children and by the reaction of the millennial/genZers and their poster child Greta, it appears to have been effective, which is why they don’t want these kids to ever grow up emotionally, thank you CNN for you year round horror stories and a belated Happy Halloween to everybody,

observa
November 1, 2023 7:02 pm

If the sea rises too much we can just grab the moon-
Earth swallowed up another planet – and it’s still lurking inside (msn.com)
Send the grant and I’ll look into it.

Reply to  observa
November 1, 2023 7:48 pm

You would have to lower it to a geosynch orbit over the Pacific to draw in the water from the rest of the planet – sorry, Hawaii…

Bob B.
Reply to  PCman999
November 2, 2023 3:58 am

Difficult to do as we have “lost control” over the lunar orbit.

Reply to  Bob B.
November 2, 2023 8:31 am

Oh, really? When did we ever have any control over the lunar orbit?

MarkW
Reply to  Richard Page
November 2, 2023 12:53 pm

I think it was right about the same time that we learned to control the Earth’s climate using CO2.

November 1, 2023 7:32 pm

One thing they seem to often forget when making these ‘catastrophic melting’ and ‘ice-free’ predictions is that it is far, far below 0C most of the year at the poles.
It’s really hard to keep ice from accumulating at -30C. You’d need warming on the order of 5-10 degrees C to have any hope of ‘catastrophic’ melting.

Oh – and here’s a nice article (aside from the stupid mention of how salt might need to be rationed like CO2) on how human salt use is causing more salt in the air and melting glaciers (SHOCK! It might not all be caused by the EVIL CO2!!)
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/10/231031111505.htm
“Salt has even infiltrated the air. In some regions, lakes are drying up and sending plumes of saline dust into the atmosphere. In areas that experience snow, road salts can become aerosolized, creating sodium and chloride particulate matter.
Salinization is also associated with “cascading” effects. For example, saline dust can accelerate the melting of snow and harm communities — particularly in the western United States — that rely on snow for their water supply. Because of their structure, salt ions can bind to contaminants in soils and sediments, forming “chemical cocktails” that circulate in the environment and have detrimental effects.”

Reply to  Tommy2b
November 2, 2023 3:41 am

I wonder what long term problems road salt will have on the batteries of EVs.

Oh, of course, silly me, the EVs won’t last long enough to have long term problems.

November 1, 2023 7:35 pm

“study’s authors explain that the melt of the sea ice can cause land ice to shift forward and likewise melt into the warmer waters. This makes sense and likely occurs; ”

No it doesn’t make sense – it’s stupid, glaciers don’t slide down the Alps, they melt up the mountain, they receed.

Reply to  PCman999
November 2, 2023 4:03 am

Not sure why as of 7 AM EST you have 3 demerits so I’ll give you a plus bringing it to only 2 demerits.

MarkW
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 2, 2023 12:58 pm

That melt water can lubricate the underside of some glaciers is well established.
To reject a possibility merely because you have found one instance in which it may or may not be in play is not good science.

MarkW
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 2, 2023 1:02 pm

Also, if the sea ice is grounded, it can provide back pressure to the ice on land that is trying to flow down to the sea. If the sea ice melts, then this back pressure is gone and the rate at which the land ice flows can pick up.

A couple of things matter.
Is the sea ice grounded?
If it is, how much back pressure is the sea ice generating?

MarkW
Reply to  PCman999
November 2, 2023 12:56 pm

Depends entirely on the glacier and the land underneath it.
Melt water can, and some cases, does lubricate the under sides of glaciers.

antigtiff
November 1, 2023 7:53 pm

Saw this a week or 2 ago…wondered why it had not shown up here. Never mind….deGrasse Tyson sez earth will be hit by asteroid so why worry about some ice melting?

Reply to  antigtiff
November 2, 2023 4:04 am

I cringe when I see Tyson. Don’t like his attitude.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 2, 2023 8:34 am

Yeah he’s made a career out of jumping on the latest bandwagon. No original ideas.

Bill Powers
Reply to  Richard Page
November 2, 2023 11:04 am

More like he is paid by the media to legitimize socio/political hypothesis drawn up by the bureaucracy to justify central authoritarian control over the great unwashed.

For anybody but the scarecrow sans a brain, he is unwatchable. Most of what he says is scientifically unfounded but spoken as he talks down to the audience in a tone that suggests if you disagree with him you are an idiot.

Reply to  antigtiff
November 2, 2023 4:14 am

“Saw this a week or 2 ago”

CNN isn’t the only one puting out this climate change propagada. I’ve seen at least a dozen articles covering this same subject over the last week or more.

What happens is a new scary climate change claim comes out in some scientific paper, and then the Media and Bloggers get hold of it and they all write stories based on the original, while giving their own spin to the story.

And many of them get paid by leftwing billionaires to promote climate change alarmism.

So one climate alarmist scientific study produces dozens of climate alarmist related articles.

The alarmist climate change propagada has been turned up to 11.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
November 2, 2023 8:42 am

Bloomberg’s green energy research team estimates it will cost $US300 trillion by 2050 to stop warming, other estimates are similar. According to Google, there is only around $US40 trillion in cash, checking, and savings accounts. The wealthy have $US208 trillion in assets. A 95% wealth tax would just about cover it.

John_C
Reply to  scvblwxq
November 3, 2023 8:43 am

Too bad that all estimates of cost are low. Also too bad that no proposed method will stop warming. Much as the envy in me wants to steal the accumulated wealth of others just to drag them down to experience what they want me to suffer, a better approach is to refuse to waste my time and their money fighting the boogeyman.

Chris Hanley
November 1, 2023 10:46 pm

Argo circum-Antarctic ocean temperature data from 2004 at various depths to 1900 m show no significant trend that can be attributed to the monotonic increasing trend of atmospheric CO2.

November 2, 2023 1:29 am

The study’s authors considered most WAIS melting to be due to “basal melting,” due to warm ocean currents that heat the ice from below.

Let me get this straight. The magic CO2 molecules heat up the air, which heats up the ocean, which melts the glaciers? Utter nonsense.

Here’s a thought experiment. Fill a bucket with water. Drop a thermometer in it, wait five minutes, take a reading. Next, hang a heating element 1 foot above the bucket and turn it on. Wait five minutes. Now take a second reading on that thermometer. Dollars to doughnuts it’s the same temperature.

MarkW
Reply to  PariahDog
November 2, 2023 1:05 pm

How many times does this bogus experiment have to be shot down before it finally dies?

Long wave radiation doesn’t heat water. Short wave radiation does.
However the temperature of the air does regulate how quickly the energy put in by the short wave radiation, gets out.

Gregory Woods
November 2, 2023 3:28 am

Nothing like Doom and The End of Life As We Know It to sell a good story.

November 2, 2023 3:54 am

“potentially devastating implications”

Oh, there we go again- something potentially could happen! Sure, and aliens might arrive to Earth and have us all for lunch. That could happen and it would have potentially devastating implications! 🙂

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 2, 2023 6:20 am

I have it good authority that it won’t be “for lunch”, but instead that Vogons will be constructing an intergalactic hyperspace express route and we’re in the way . . . still, potentially devastating implications.

November 2, 2023 6:05 am

Hmmm . . . let’s see, in Earth’s southern hemisphere it’s approaching the months of summertime, so could the “recent rapid melting” of western Antarctic ice be attributed to . . . nah, it couldn’t be as simple as that, could it? . . . could it???

Reply to  ToldYouSo
November 2, 2023 8:36 am

No they’re still milking the abnormal weather from Jan/Feb.

DavsS
November 2, 2023 6:58 am

Is there anything published in Nature Climate Change that is worth the (virtual) paper it’s written on?

Lee Riffee
November 2, 2023 7:48 am

I swear, I would just love to see a large diverse group of prominent CAGW proponents (on the short list names like Michael Mann, Al Gore, Greta Thunberg, Katherine Hayhoe, and the “scientist” who glued himself to the sidewalk are a few that come to mind) be dropped off in Antarctica for a two week “vacation”! Fly them in sometime in January (mid-summer down there) with food and camping supplies (which would include some propane heaters to keep warm, if they chose to use them) to last for two weeks. And then, return after two week’s time.
I bet that most all of them would be clamoring and begging to board the plane(s) that will return them to whatever temperate climate they live in! They’d be shoving each other out of the way to leave! And no doubt those propane tanks would empty, despite being an “evil” fossil fuel.

Therein lies the problem with this whole Antarctica nonsense…..the average person (politician, “scientist”, protestor, celebrity, etc) is so far divorced from the reality of what it would be like in the far south (or north, for that matter). I’ve lived most of my life in central Maryland. I cannot imagine what constant below zero (F) temps would feel like, because in my lifetime it’s never been colder than about 5F here. And then only at night for a couple of days at most. People just think the poles are like the snow that fell in their backyard that (in many places where it snows) will soon melt away in a few days, as it does here. It just doesn’t compute.

This is why they are able to fool so many people with this catastrophic melting nonsense. And even in places where melting is occurring, the average person cannot seem to grasp that it will take eons for the ice caps to disappear.

Reply to  Lee Riffee
November 2, 2023 8:25 am

It would be better to do this experiment in the Arctic. You know, polar bear country. Then give them sticks to defend themselves. This will reduce the crowd waiting to be evacuated from the scene. 😉

November 2, 2023 7:56 am

Rapid melting of West Antarctica’s ice shelves may now be unavoidable as human-caused global warming accelerates, with potentially devastating implications for sea level rise around the world, new research has found.”

Waffle word CYA.

“It appears that we may have lost control of the West Antarctic ice melting over the 21st century,” said Kaitlin Naughten, an ocean modeler with the British Antarctic Survey and lead author of the study.”

Another model programmer using the nonsensical RCP8.5 scenario and confirmation bias to reach absurd conclusions.

Naughten and her colleagues acknowledged their study has limits — predicting future rates of melting in West Antarctica is very complex and it’s impossible to account for every possible future outcome. But, looking at the range of scenarios, the report authors said they were confident the melting of ice shelves is now unavoidable.”

A complete CYA for when their model prediction utterly fails.

SteveZ56
November 2, 2023 8:10 am

Has anyone figured out how to plug a volcano under sea ice?

Somehow, the method didn’t work well at Mount Saint Helens.

Dave Andrews
Reply to  SteveZ56
November 2, 2023 9:50 am

I read something somewhere that said sacrificing mermaids was the only way to do that.

November 2, 2023 8:34 am

The underlying paper cited by CNN displayed at least a modicum of caution and restraint. Sadly, CNN, in reporting on it, did not do the same. Rather they used some of its authors’ too-eager willingness to catastrophize in order to paint a picture of climate doom stemming from human fossil fuel use.

This is SOP. A peer-reviewed scientific paper will make some highly-qualified conclusion about possible future scenarios. Then, in commenting on the paper, the authors (or other scientists not associated with the paper) may make off-the-cuff remarks. Perhaps, to make the story ‘sexier’ or because the qualified remarks sound ‘lame’. Then the non-scietifically-literate news reporter will take such remarks and run with them like a bandit in order to have the most alarmist climate scare story EVAH!!
Rinse and repeat. That is how we got to this ridiculous point.

November 2, 2023 10:28 am

I remember that we found excess He-3 in Lake Bonney, which indicates a nearby source of mantle fluids. Both the lake and the volcano are reasonably close to McMurdo.

MarkW
November 2, 2023 11:07 am

Melting sea ice around Antarctica results in more evaporation of sea water.
This both cools the water, and increases the amount of snow fall in the interior of the continent.

Coeur de Lion
November 2, 2023 2:40 pm

So what was the temperature in 1850? So when 1.5degsC ? How many SH thermometers in 1850? Why 2degs at Paris? ‘Cos three would be too easy, one would be too difficult. 2 wasn’t scary enough hence 1.5 at the Katowice COP and the ludicrous SR1.5 paper by the corrupt IPCC

November 2, 2023 6:35 pm

Well, they are correct in that whatever is happening can’t be stopped by humans.