Essay by Eric Worrall
“It continues to be regrettable that global crises are being squandered when they could be the occasions to bring about beneficial changes.” – but ceding national sovereignty might help.
APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION
LAUDATE DEUM
OF THE HOLY FATHER
FRANCISTO ALL PEOPLE OF GOOD WILL
ON THE CLIMATE CRISIS…
2. Eight years have passed since I published the Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’, when I wanted to share with all of you, my brothers and sisters of our suffering planet, my heartfelt concerns about the care of our common home. Yet, with the passage of time, I have realized that our responses have not been adequate, while the world in which we live is collapsing and may be nearing the breaking point. In addition to this possibility, it is indubitable that the impact of climate change will increasingly prejudice the lives and families of many persons. We will feel its effects in the areas of healthcare, sources of employment, access to resources, housing, forced migrations, etc.
…
6. In recent years, some have chosen to deride these facts. They bring up allegedly solid scientific data, like the fact that the planet has always had, and will have, periods of cooling and warming. They forget to mention another relevant datum: that what we are presently experiencing is an unusual acceleration of warming, at such a speed that it will take only one generation – not centuries or millennia – in order to verify it. The rise in the sea level and the melting of glaciers can be easily perceived by an individual in his or her lifetime, and probably in a few years many populations will have to move their homes because of these facts.
7. In order to ridicule those who speak of global warming, it is pointed out that intermittent periods of extreme cold regularly occur. One fails to mention that this and other extraordinary symptoms are nothing but diverse alternative expressions of the same cause: the global imbalance that is provoking the warming of the planet. Droughts and floods, the dried-up lakes, communities swept away by seaquakes and flooding ultimately have the same origin. At the same time, if we speak of a global phenomenon, we cannot confuse this with sporadic events explained in good part by local factors.
…
11. It is no longer possible to doubt the human – “anthropic” – origin of climate change. Let us see why. The concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which causes global warming, was stable until the nineteenth century, below 300 parts per million in volume. But in the middle of that century, in conjunction with industrial development, emissions began to increase. In the past fifty years, this increase has accelerated significantly, as the Mauna Loa observatory, which has taken daily measurements of carbon dioxide since 1958, has confirmed. While I was writing Laudato Si’, they hit a historic high – 400 parts per million – until arriving at 423 parts per million in June 2023. [7] More than 42% of total net emissions since the year 1850 were produced after 1990. [8]
…
19. Finally, we can add that the Covid-19 pandemic brought out the close relation of human life with that of other living beings and with the natural environment. But in a special way, it confirmed that what happens in one part of the world has repercussions on the entire planet. This allows me to reiterate two convictions that I repeat over and over again: “Everything is connected” and “No one is saved alone”.
…
36. It continues to be regrettable that global crises are being squandered when they could be the occasions to bring about beneficial changes. [28] This is what happened in the 2007-2008 financial crisis and again in the Covid-19 crisis. For “the actual strategies developed worldwide in the wake of [those crises] fostered greater individualism, less integration and increased freedom for the truly powerful, who always find a way to escape unscathed”. [29]
…
43. All this presupposes the development of a new procedure for decision-making and legitimizing those decisions, since the one put in place several decades ago is not sufficient nor does it appear effective. In this framework, there would necessarily be required spaces for conversation, consultation, arbitration, conflict resolution and supervision, and, in the end, a sort of increased “democratization” in the global context, so that the various situations can be expressed and included. It is no longer helpful for us to support institutions in order to preserve the rights of the more powerful without caring for those of all.
…
Read more: https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/20231004-laudate-deum.html
A sort of increased democratization implies ceding national sovereignty to international institutions – which the Pope proposes should be advanced on the back of “occasions” presented by global crisis.
Remind me, weren’t there a few problems, last time the Catholic Church told us which scientific theories to believe in?
Future generations will look back on this embarrassing Papal attempt to propagate scientific ignorance, much as we look back on the embarrassing efforts of the Catholic Church to suppress the theories of Galileo.
Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny. Free men pull in all kinds of directions. – Terry Pratchett.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I thank god every day that I am not a blind believer in any faith.
This latest Papal presentation simply endorses my belief in humanity and disbelief in religious belief.
The Pope is an effing communist.
‘They’ really DO have in process a plan to take control of the world.
I saw this on the news the other day. I guess this sort of spells the end of the climate change hysteria. Now that the pope has declared this heresy, we can get back to real science and engineering and start spending our time and money on things that are real.
The Pope and the head of the UN seem to be having a contest over who can spread the greatest degree of climate alarmism. Neither one seems to realize that no one’s listening nor do any of the big fossil fuel producers or consumers have any intention of changing their ways because any renewable energies have consistently proven to be inadequate and unreliable.
The Catholic Church has a strong record of suppressing national powers in favour of bureaucratic multi-national organisations.
Back in the 1100s there were two courts and systems of law in the UK – the civil law and ecclesiastic law. If you were a priest then the national could not touch you – the King could not punish you. Only the Church Authorities could do that.
It was Henry VIII who brought that to an end. We badly need another Dissolution of Davos…
I saw this on Twitter discussing how pope’s actually are experienced on climate change.
Maybe Pope Marxist the First will next declare that climate realism is akin to witchcraft, and thus all skeptics must be punished like the witches of old. He does have a volcano or two nearby as well!
This Pope is a lightweight compared to, for instance, Pope Paul VI. His understanding of human kindness and Christian values are badly distorted by his obedience to WOKE social justice, which is really a synonym for Totalitarian thought and misdeeds. Pope Paul VI’s encyclical of 1991 is a study of reason, humility, and powerful observation and thinking; unlike the current yahoo.
Sorry, that’s John Paul II (?).
Raised Catholic. Went to Catholic schools through 8th grade. The current Pope is an embarrassment.
Any religion, organised crime syndicate or otherwise, that appoints this dotard as its spokesperson…
.. is not one I would trust to even run a chook raffle.
The Pope and many of the Catholic clergy are pushing Panteisim . I participate in many Catholic events and challenge the Clergy when they push a Dystopian message of the end of the world “Green Religion ” yet are silent on the poverty of the homeless and drug abuse..
The paradox is the same Catholic priests who oppose Oil and Natural Gas, Mining, and tree-cutting ignore the Massive mines in the Congo for Cobalt with child labor. The huge benefits of Oil and Nat Gas for civilization are ignored to pander to a Cult that is against development which themselves enjoy
11. It is no longer possible to doubt the human – “anthropic” – origin of climate change.
Of course, there is room for doubt
Room to fly a 747 thru.
There are so many things wrong with this “exhortation” that a brief message cannot address them all. First, and foremost, there is nothing apostolic or holy about this satanic poser. Word has it that a new, tenth level of hell, hotter and with a higher level of torment, is under construction exclusively for this most wicked of all false “prophets”. Frankie is in for the shock of his life/afterlife when confronted by his Creator at the Judgement Throne.
Phil Leeds as Chief Monk,
Inquisition Scene,
Mel Brooks
History of the World Part 1
I think we are facing a Religious Cult in the NET ZERO that notwithstanding the data and or Science is determined to fight against virtually all resource development ( except cobalt and lithium for the batteries )
Economically we are about to see a Major Recession, a Sigma 3 which will certainly wake up Civilization, people will be happy to have basic Energy vs fantasies
They say words but they are meaningless. A friend is technical advisor to a proposed copper mine they want to build in BC, and was rejected in June.
They started in 2009.
All talk of electrification is nonsense.
The first time I read this, I thought the Apostolic Exhortation was so foolish, in so many ways, that it must be a scam. I was going to post a comment to this effect, but WordPress got in my way somehow.
Anyway, it wasn’t a scam, was it? It’s the real thing. God help us, and I hope s/he is listening, and taking note.
Aah, another proclamation from Frank, the Peronista Pope.
He never knew a capitalist who was not of the “crony” kind.
I would suggest that Frank stick to his own knitting, but he’s not really very good at that, either.
I think he may bring about the end of the Mother Church…
“In order to ridicule those who speak of global warming, it is pointed out that intermittent periods of extreme cold regularly occur. One fails to mention that this and other extraordinary symptoms are nothing but diverse alternative expressions of the same cause: the global imbalance that is provoking the warming of the planet.”
That deserves ridicule, intermittent means irregular, and it’s standard for climate models to predict fewer cold extremes with a warming climate. The only imbalance I see is in his reasoning, which I suppose has quasi global impacts.