[Round and round the p-hacking wheel goes. Where it stops, nobody knows. It is PEER-REVIEWED. It says so right down there. I wonder if they were even looking for this before they found this “correlation”.~cr]
UC Davis archaeological study points to potential competition for limited resources
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA – DAVIS
Climate change in current times has created problems for humans such as wildfires and reduced growing seasons for staple crops, spilling over into economic effects. Many researchers predict, and have observed in published literature, an increase in interpersonal violence and homicides when temperatures increase.
Violence during climatic change has evidence in history. University of California, Davis, researchers said they have have found a pattern of increased violence during climatic change in the south central Andes between A.D. 470 and 1500. During that time, which includes the Medieval Climatic Anomaly (ca. A.D. 900-1250), temperatures rose, drought occurred, and the first states of the Andes collapsed.
Climate change and potential competition for limited resources in the south central Andes likely led to violence among people living in the highlands at that time, researchers suggest in a new paper. Their study looked at head injuries of the populations living there at that time, a commonly used proxy among archaeologists for interpersonal violence.
“We found that decreased precipitation predicts increased rates of cranial trauma,” said Thomas J. Snyder, a doctoral candidate in the Department of Anthropology’s Evolutionary Wing and the primary author of the study.
“This observation suggests that climate change in the form of decreased precipitation exerted a significant effect on rates of interpersonal violence in the region.”
The study was published June 5 in Quaternary Research, Cambridge University Press. Co-author of the paper is Randall Haas, formerly of the same lab at UC Davis and currently a professor at Wayne State University.
Violence not found in coastal, mid-elevation regions
The same results were not found in coastal and mid-elevation regions, indicating they chose nonviolent solutions to climate change or were not affected by it, researchers said. There was also more agricultural and economic diversity there, potentially buffering against the onset of climate change. Drought-induced resource scarcity in the highlands, however, seems like a likely explanation for the violence there, researchers said.
Snyder said looking at the history of people’s interaction with nature is important when considering possible effects of current climate change challenges and people’s interaction with their climate.
“Our findings reinforce the idea that people living in already marginal environments are the most likely to be hit hardest by climate change,” he said. “Archaeological research can help us predict how best to handle the challenges faced by people in precarious positions in a rapidly changing climate.”
UC Davis researchers recorded violence during early years in the Andes by analyzing existing data of nearly 3,000 skeletal fractures of humans found at 58 archaeological sites — comparing them to ice accumulation at the time at the Quelccaya glacier — in what is now Peru, Chile and Bolivia. At the same time, there was widespread abandonment of Wari and Tiwanaku sites in the region, indicating a sociopolitical unraveling after the onset of the centuries-long global climate changes.
The archaeology of the Andes provides an excellent opportunity to study the human response to climate change given the region’s extreme climatic variability, incredible archaeological preservation and robust records, researchers said. In this study, researchers found that on average, for every 10-centimeter decrease in annual ice accumulation at the Quelccaya glacier, the likelihood of interpersonal violence more than doubled.
JOURNAL
Quaternary Research
DOI
METHOD OF RESEARCH
Data/statistical analysis
ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE
5-Jun-2023
Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of new
Here is the article’s abstract and introduction.
Climate change intensified violence in the south-central Andean highlands from 1.5 to 0.5 ka
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2023
Thomas J. Snyder and Randall Haas
TypeResearch ArticleInformation
Quaternary Research , First View , pp. 1 – 11
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/qua.2023.23

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023
Abstract
The archaeology of the pre-contact Andes provides an ideal study of human responses to climate change given the region’s extreme climatic variability, excellent archaeological preservation, and robust paleoclimate records. We evaluate the effects of climate change on the frequency of interpersonal violence in the south-central Andes from ca. 1.5–0.5 ka (AD 470–1540) by comparing incidents of skeletal trauma observed among 2753 crania from 58 sites to rates of ice accumulation at the Quelccaya Glacier. We find that, in the highlands, the odds of identifying inter-personal violence increase on average by a multiplicative factor of 2.4 (1.8–3.2; 95% C.I.) for every 10-centimeter decrease in annual ice accumulation. Our statistical analysis does not detect a relationship between ice accumulation and interpersonal violence rates among coastal or mid-elevation populations. This disparity likely resulted from variable economic and sociopolitical strategies at different elevations. The failure of rain-fed agriculture during periods of drought and concomitant dissolution of organizing polities likely predisposed highland populations to socioeconomic stress and violent competition for limited resources. Conversely, diversity among lowland and midland economies may have buffered against the effect of drought.
NTRODUCTION
Anthropogenic climate change has begun to create immediate problems for human populations, ranging from increased wildfire frequency to reduced growing seasons for staple crops (Skarbø and VanderMolen, Reference Skarbø and VanderMolen2016; Allen et al., Reference Allen, de Coninck, Dube, Hoegh-Guldberg, Jacob, Jiang, Revi, Masson-Delmotte, Zhai, Pörtner, Roberts, Skea, Shukla and Pirani2019). Many scholars and agencies predict that one of the primary consequences of rising global temperatures will be an increase in the prevalence of interpersonal violence (Anderson and DeLisi, Reference Anderson, DeLisi, Forgas, Kruglanski and Williams2011; Caruso et al., Reference Caruso, Petrarca and Ricciuti2016; Mares and Moffett, Reference Mares and Moffett2016; Levy et al., Reference Levy, Sidel and Patz2017; Robbins Schug, Reference Robbins Schug and Robbins Schug2020). Recent sociological studies observed upticks in direct interpersonal violence associated with rising global temperatures in modern contexts (Anderson and DeLisi, Reference Anderson, DeLisi, Forgas, Kruglanski and Williams2011; Mares and Moffett, Reference Mares and Moffett2016; Levy et al., Reference Levy, Sidel and Patz2017). For example, Mares and Moffett (Reference Mares and Moffett2016) note that global homicide rates increased by an average of 6% for each degree of increase in average annual temperature (Celsius).
The extent to which such relationships apply across variable ecological and cultural contexts remains poorly understood. Sociological studies and the human securities literature operate at limited timescales and within cultural contexts shaped principally by European colonialism and global markets (Robbins Schug et al., Reference Robbins Schug, Parnell, Harrod and Buikstra2019; Robbins Schug, Reference Robbins Schug and Robbins Schug2020; Rockman and Hritz, Reference Rockman and Hritz2020). The cultural breadth and temporal depth of archaeology provide a means of investigating the diverse ways that humans respond to climatological changes more broadly (Douglass and Cooper, Reference Douglass and Cooper2020; Burke et al., Reference Burke, Peros, Wren, Pausata, Riel-Salvatore, Moine, de Vernal, Kageyama and Boisard2021). Bioarchaeological research is uniquely situated to evaluate questions about the effects of climatological fluctuations on human behaviors. Life experiences manifest themselves in the skeleton through a process of embodiment, potentially reflecting disease, violence, and malnutrition, or lack thereof. Through various biological and cultural processes, the social and physical environments are transcribed on the skeleton (Walker, Reference Walker2001; Armelagos, Reference Armelagos2003; Sofaer, Reference Sofaer2006; Larsen and Walker, Reference Larsen, Walker and Larsen2010; Agarwal and Glencross, Reference Agarwal, Glencross, Agarwal and Glencross2011; Tung, Reference Tung2021).
Violence is a complicated topic and often difficult to define. The World Health Organization (WHO) broadly defines violence as “The intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, that either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment or deprivation” (Krug et al., Reference Krug, Mercy, Dahlberg and Zwi2002, p. 1084). Alternatively, Francis Galtung (Reference Galtung1969) conceived of violence as tripartite, consisting of direct violence, structural violence, and cultural violence. While structural and cultural violence can be subtle and invisible (Farmer, Reference Farmer2004), only direct violence takes the form of readily visible interpersonal assault (Galtung, Reference Galtung1969).
Within the archaeological record, evidence for the different types of violence can take numerous forms, including cranial fractures, paleopathological lesions indicative of metabolic stress, and stable isotope signatures indicative differential access to important foodstuffs (Walker, Reference Walker2001; Tung, Reference Tung2021). These forms of evidence often point to events of direct and structural violence among past populations (Klaus and Tam, Reference Klaus and Tam2009). Additionally, violence is not necessarily limited to events that affect living persons directly. One example of post-mortem structural violence includes the dissection of deceased individuals interred in cemeteries belonging to subaltern communities by medical schools in the nineteenth century (Nystrom, Reference Nystrom2014; Nystrom et al., Reference Nystrom, Sirianni, Higgins, Perrelli, Liber Raines and Nystrom2017). Within Andean contexts, another form of violence includes the sacrifice of human individuals by slitting the throat or strangulation—as is seen in Moche, Chimú, and Inka contexts (Verano, Reference Verano, Bourget and Jones2008; Faulbaum, Reference Faulbaum2011; Prieto et al., Reference Prieto, Verano, Goepfert, Kennett, Quilter, LeBlanc and Fehren-Schmitz2019).
As one of the most environmentally variable landscapes in the world, the South American Andes, presents an ideal opportunity to investigate how people respond and adapt to rapid climatological change and environmental variation. People have inhabited the extreme environments of the Andes for at least 13,000 years (Lindo et al., Reference Lindo, Haas, Hofman, Apata, Moraga, Verdugo and Watson2018; Contreras, Reference Contreras2022; Fiedel, Reference Fiedel2022). They rapidly developed an impressive suite of cultural and biological adaptations leading to a number of diverse archaeological cultures and traditions (Dillehay and Kolata, Reference Dillehay and Kolata2004; Silverman and Isbell, Reference Silverman and Isbell2008; Malpass, Reference Malpass2016; Lindo and DeGiorgio, Reference Lindo and DeGiorgio2021). To facilitate discussion of the diversity of archaeological cultures in the Andes, archaeologists have divided time periods into ‘horizons’ of widespread sociopolitical organization and relative cultural homogeneity, and culturally differentiated ‘intermediate periods’ between horizons (Rowe, Reference Rowe1962). This analysis is specifically concerned with the Andean middle horizon and late intermediate period.
The Andean middle horizon (MH), ca. 1.5–1.0 ka (AD 500–1000), saw the rise of the first states in the Andes—Wari and Tiwanaku (Isbell and Schreiber, Reference Isbell and Schreiber1978; Janusek, Reference Janusek2004, Reference Janusek2008; Isbell, Reference Isbell, Silverman and Isbell2008; Nash, Reference Nash2019; Williams and Nash, Reference Williams and Nash2021). Previous research showed clear evidence for interpersonal violence during this period (Tung, Reference Tung2012; Arkush and Tung, Reference Arkush and Tung2013). The Wari Empire is thought to have engaged in numerous episodes of violent conquest, an aspect of their culture mirrored in the bioarchaeological and archaeological records through the prevalence of skeletal trauma during periods of expansion and militaristic iconography on Wari ceramics (Williams, Reference Williams2002; Schreiber, Reference Schreiber2004; Tung, Reference Tung2007; Arkush and Tung, Reference Arkush and Tung2013). Trophy heads are frequently found at sites in the Wari heartland, and isotopic evidence compellingly suggests that these trophy heads were the victims of conquered communities (Williams, Reference Williams2002; Tung, Reference Tung2008a; Tung and Knudson, Reference Tung and Knudson2008). Conversely, Tiwanaku traditionally has been thought to have exerted its sphere of influence more subtly, taking a “Zen road to statecraft” (Janusek, Reference Janusek2008, p. 287) with cultural hegemony diffusing via multi-regional exchange networks. However, recent bioarchaeological studies have begun to complicate the image of Tiwanaku’s peaceful hegemony, with some middle horizon archaeological sites within Tiwanaku’s sphere of influence revealing evidence of direct interpersonal violence (Torres-Rouff et al., Reference Torres-Rouff, Knudson, Pestle and Stovel2015; Becker and Alconini, Reference Becker, Alconini, Tiesler and Lozada2018; Blom and Couture, Reference Blom, Couture, Tiesler and Lozada2018).
The abandonment of Wari and Tiwanaku sites at the end of the middle horizon has been the subject of debate. Despite impressive monumental architecture and the wide-scale regional influence wielded by these states, their influence receded and vanished almost entirely by ca. 1.0 ka (AD 1000). Interestingly, this sociopolitical unravelling occurred slightly after the onset of the Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA), a centuries-long global climate perturbation that occurred from ca. 1.05–0.70 ka (AD 950–1300) (Lüning et al., Reference Lüning, Gałka, Bamonte, García Rodríguez and Vahrenholt2019). Previous research demonstrated that the MCA broadly affected human behavior around the world. For example, bioarchaeological meta-analyses indicate that there was a sharp increase in violence among foragers throughout what is now the state of California during this period (Schwitalla et al., Reference Schwitalla, Jones, Pilloud, Codding and Wiberg2014; Allen et al., Reference Allen, Bettinger, Codding, Jones and Schwitalla2016). Closer to the study region, the MCA likely had consequences for Indigenous populations within the Amazon Basin, as indicated by increased rates of interpersonal violence (Neves, Reference Neves, Nielsen and Walker2009; Moraes and Neves, Reference Moraes and Neves2012) and site abandonment during this time frame (Riris, Reference Riris2019; Bush et al., Reference Bush, Nascimento, Åkesson, Cárdenes-Sandí, Maezumi, Behling and Correa-Metrio2021).
Within the Andes, some scholars argue that enduring drought caused by the MCA may have played a causal role in the decline of Wari and Tiwanaku (Binford et al., Reference Binford, Kolata, Brenner, Janusek, Seddon, Abbott and Curtis1997; Kolata et al., Reference Kolata, Binford, Brenner, Janusek and Ortloff2000). According to the model, this drought undermined Tiwanaku’s agricultural economy, which is adapted to relatively wet conditions adjacent to Lake Wiñaymarka on the Andean Altiplano. Drought-induced resource scarcity appears to have further jeopardized critical cycles of reciprocity and exchange between Tiwanaku elites and commoners (Janusek, Reference Janusek, Alt and Pauketat2019). The undermining of this inter-class trust destabilized the Tiwanaku sociopolitical and cultural system (Ortloff and Kolata, Reference Ortloff and Kolata1993; Binford et al., Reference Binford, Kolata, Brenner, Janusek, Seddon, Abbott and Curtis1997; Moseley, Reference Moseley, Oliver-Smith and Hoffman1999; Kolata et al., Reference Kolata, Binford, Brenner, Janusek and Ortloff2000; Janusek, Reference Janusek2008). Other scholars suggest that drought was unlikely to have affected agricultural productivity (Erickson, Reference Erickson1999), or that the temporal resolution of paleoclimatological reconstructions and radiocarbon do not permit strong claims regarding the effect of climate change on Tiwanaku’s sociopolitical stability (Marsh et al., Reference Marsh, Contreras, Bruno, Vranich and Roddick2021).
Although the potential drivers of Wari sociopolitical collapse have not been systematically investigated, bioarchaeological evidence demonstrates that the immediate aftermath of collapse was a violent time within the Wari heartland of the Ayacucho Basin, perhaps indicating a backlash against elite groups perceived as being responsible for the difficult times (Williams, Reference Williams2002; Finucane et al., Reference Finucane, Valdez, Calderon, Pomacanchari, Valdez and O’Connell2007; Tung, Reference Tung2012). The period after the collapse of Wari and Tiwanaku, and before the rise of the Inka Empire, is termed the late intermediate period (LIP), ca. 1.0–0.6 ka (AD 1000–1400), and is frequently characterized as a period of unrest and violence suggesting something of a cultural “collapse” across the MH–LIP transition (Covey, Reference Covey2008; Arkush and Tung, Reference Arkush and Tung2013).
Sociopolitical ‘collapse’ is not a simple process. Nor is ‘collapse’ a particularly fitting word to describe the destabilization of the Wari and Tiwanaku as sociopolitical hegemonies during the Andean Middle Horizon when one considers that these cultural traditions persisted, albeit in different forms. Resilience theory presents a more apt framework for thinking about the nature of societal reorganization (van der Leeuw and Redman, Reference van der Leeuw and Redman2002). Borrowed from ecology, resilience theory posits that human societies function similarly to natural systems—moving through adaptive cycles over time (Redman, Reference Redman2005). These cycles include exploitation, in which rapid expansion is emphasized; conservation, characterized by the slow storage of energy and material in increasingly organized structures; release, what archaeologists broadly understand as collapse; and finally, reorganization in which human societies develop new social systems and methods of adaptation (Holling and Gunderson, Reference Holling, Gunderson, Gunderson and Holling2002). Importantly, although the process is cyclical, reorganization entails movement to new socioeconomic forms that retain some characteristics of earlier ones. Within this framework, the people living towards the end of the Middle Horizon within the Wari and Tiwanaku hegemony likely separated themselves from their spheres of influence in something of a release phase. This is exemplified in the Moquegua Valley where a new cultural style of settlement, known as Tumilaca, emerged during the end of the Middle Horizon. Associated with Tiwanaku style architecture but lacking Tiwanaku iconography, these individuals were descendants—cultural, biological, or both—of those who abandoned Tiwanaku colonies (Sutter and Sharratt, Reference Sutter and Sharratt2010).
The hypothesis that environmental conditions may have affected the frequency of interpersonal violence in the Andes is supported by recent quantitative research by McCool et al. (Reference McCool, Wilson and Vernon2022a), who identified a positive relationship among interpersonal violence, altitude, and altitudinal variation. They argued that the increased marginality of high-altitude environments, caused by hypoxic conditions and extremely low temperatures, reduced the carrying capacity of the environment and motivated violent competition over scarce resources.
In a more region-specific study, McCool et al. (Reference McCool, Codding, Vernon, Wilson, Yaworsky, Marwan and Kennett2022b) found that violence rates in the Nazca highlands were, counter to expectation, greatest during periods of elevated precipitation. The authors hypothesized that the increased precipitation may have acted as a pull factor—drawing more people to the area than the environment could support (McCool et al., Reference McCool, Codding, Vernon, Wilson, Yaworsky, Marwan and Kennett2022b). These findings conflict with findings from other world regions indicating increased violence associated with increasingly dry conditions (Allen et al., Reference Allen, Bettinger, Codding, Jones and Schwitalla2016; Schwindt et al., Reference Schwindt, Bocinsky, Ortman, Glowacki, Varien and Kohler2016). The Nazca case shows that human responses to climate change can be highly variable with micro-ecologies and socio-political contexts influencing outcomes within macro-ecological conditions.
The study presented here offers a systematic evaluation of the hypothesis that drought and climatological instability drove interpersonal violence throughout the south-central Andes. Thus, the study presents a meso-scale analysis that spans multiple cultural regions within the south-central sub-region of the Andes. Following on these previous findings, we hypothesize that the highest incidences of cranial trauma in the south-central Andes occurred during periods of drought and climatological instability, particularly during the LIP. We therefore expect to observe that, on average, increased rates of violent trauma in the highlands corresponded to decreased and more variable ice accumulation rates. Additionally, we evaluate the relationship between climate and violence proxies across an elevational gradient in order to assess the extent to which these dynamics apply in different ecological contexts.
That’s right. Totally natural climate change has brought fluctuations far greater than the effect of widespread coal burning at the end of the Little Ice Age, affecting history.
We will not have reached peak CAGW hysteria until someone finally writes the definitive paper demonstrating that climate change caused Hitler to rise to power!
And its sister paper, the rise of Trump.
Except that CO2 was falling in 1933, thanks to the Great Depression.
It didn’t?
They appear to have discovered that people who live in marginal environments, will fight each other when there is a drop in resources.
What a groundbreaking piece of work.
And today we’re a Biden stumble away from WWIII.
And today we’re a
BidenPutin stumble away from WWIII.Fixed it- Putin started his war and he can finish it by pulling his army out of Ukraine.
Putin says he is moving battlefield nukes into Belarus, and threatens to use them by saying if there is a nuclear war the whole world will be destroyed, including the United States.
That’s true, Mr. Putin. You should think about that. The “whole world” includes you. You will not survive a nuclear war. If you are set on suicide, why don’t you just put a gun to your head, and leave the rest of us out of it.
And that request goes out to all the psychopaths contemplating killing people because of the demons in their head. Kill yourself, and leave the rest of us out of it.
Putin isn’t going to start a nuclear war. He’s not suicidal. He’s just trying to scare the pacifists in the United States.
He’s sounding crazier by the day. I often see him talking on the many YouTube channels dedicated to the war. He doesn’t raze his voice and rant like Hitler, but he does sound crazy. I find it amazing that he seems so calm- if he didn’t talk crazy. He really seems to think everything is going according to the plan. Supposedly, American generals have told him directly- that they always know exactly where he is- and if they feel a need to bomb Russia, they’re going to get him first- as a threat to not nuke Ukraine. I spend hours every day watching those war videos- along with hours watching UAP videos- along with hours thinking about the climate nonsense. Keeps this old man busy!
I’m no fan of Putin and I deeply resent the fact that, even on a fairly tolerant site like WUWT, sometimes I have to preface a post with those words. However, it’s difficult to call Putin crazy for moving tactical nukes into Belarus after supposedly sane US Presidents moved tactical nukes into Europe during the cold war for similar political leverage. Putin is just using the NATO and US playbook against us at the moment for whatever advantage he can get.
Let’s not equate the West with Russia and it’s formerly revolutionary regime, the CCCP- which following commy doctrine had declared that communism must rule the world. So, if the US sent such weapons to Europe for leverage, good that they did it. Besides, those nukes in Belarussa don’t mean much- a few hundred miles further west than before- so what- they can’t use them- wouldn’t dare. Not much leverage there. Personally, I didn’t mention that subject when saying he’s getting crazier by the day- it’s based on listening to him on countless YouTube channels. Today I heard him say he didn’t kidnap Ukrainian children- but of course he did. Meanwhile, those foolish African leaders said in Moscow that the problem is that the West is arming Ukraine and that they should stop- that would bring peace. What idiots! Why don’t they ask Moscow to stop arming its troops in Ukraine? Those Africans probably hate the history of western imperialist exploitation of their nations- but it’s OK to them for Putin to rebuild his empire?
Putin isn’t trying to rebuild a Russian Empire by invading Ukraine. He is rebuilding the Russian navy in the Crimean shipyards – he let Ukraine shell the people of Donbas from 2014 until 2022 but invaded the moment that Ukraine assembled armoured divisions near Crimea to retake it. The western sanctions haven’t hurt Russia as badly as hoped but they have effectively stopped the construction of any more missile corvettes, frigates and the 2 large amphibious warfare ships that had been building there. If Putin keeps control of Crimea he will rebuild the navy with modern warships – without it he’ll find it next to impossible. Everything he’s doing and saying is designed to exert pressure and leverage on the West so he can retain Crimea; gaining territory in Ukraine is a means to this end, little else.
And people fight and kill each other even when everything is great- just out of greed or stupidity or jealousy and countless other reasons. It’s built into our species.
So climate change in the past occurred without the use of fossil fuels? Who knew? How do we know that today’s climate change (if it is actually occurring) isn’t due to natural causes like in the past? Maybe man-made CO2 has nothing to do with it.
Hunger is typically a symptom. Hurricanes, floods, bad politics, bad leaders, technical failure, invasion, genocide, pestilence, epidemics, etcetera. Climate change is barely going to be noticed in the average depopulation event.
So there was a conquest going on during the Medieval Warm Period? But only in the highlands?
It looks like funding buzzword bingo. Tie whatever to climate change.
I’m glad I’m heading to the end of this feeding trough. In my last proposal I had to declare my personal pronouns and describe how the research would be inclusive and benefit underrepresented groups.
Like straight, white males?
Apparently it’s now the ‘medieval climatic anomaly’ – as if it’s anomalous not a cyclical occurrence – a new buzzword.
What they forget is that any change can spark violence in historical societies – they found evidence of Cretan human sacrifice after the Theran explosion/tidal wave. Unless they explain, then rule out all other factors then it’s just sheer idle speculation.
Wow, good find – “medieval climatic anomaly”. Word choice requires thought. What were the thoughts behind that word choice? Only the author knows for sure, but I have guesses.
It used to be the “Medieval Warm Period” but that made claims of unprecedented post-industrial warming hard to maintain.
So there was a campaign to claim that it never happened and that temperature followed a hockey stick-shape with a flat handle.
This paper clearly denies the hockey stick hypothesis.
Which is progress.
Why stop here when the climate alarmists could be also attributing the Punic Wars between Rome and Carthage about 2300 years ago to climate change. No doubt excessive carbon emissions from wood burning for heat cooking fires were to blame then too.
Cutting down trees for the massive fleets at the Battle of Cape Ecnomus, 256 BC! With an estimated combined 680 ships and 290,000 sailors and marines, it’s in the running as largest naval battle of all time, by number of men involved.
Aeneas should have married Dido, perhaps.
Have we learned anything?
Tough, since the Trojan war, if it happened, was about 300 years before the founding of Carthage.
Yes, but then Aeneas would not have travelled to Italy and so on, and so on.
It’s a known fact that the East-West schism in 1053 was part of the Medieval Warming Period’s effects.To your point…
What, it stops?
Many researchers predict, and have observed in published literature, an increase in interpersonal violence and homicides when temperatures increase.
If these are the studies I read about a few years ago, what they actually discovered was that there was more violence in the summer than there is in the winter.
From this they determined that heat causes people to get violent. Just as in the climate science papers that assume that if anything has changed, CO2 is behind it.
If you are holed up indoors in a snowstorm, you must be less likely to be out robbing and fighting.
I’m doing my part. Partly sunny and 69F here and if the ran holds out, I’m going to grill steak out on my deck.
“Many researchers predict, and have observed in published literature, an increase in interpersonal violence and homicides when temperatures increase.”
Anyone who has studied medieval history knows that wars were fought mainly in spring/summer (just like the current Ukraine offensive)
And well before that:
2 Samuel 11:1 It was now spring, the time when kings go to war.
1 Chronicles 20:1: The next spring, the time when kings go to war,
Generally true, with notable exceptions, such as Hastings and Agincourt in October and Granada in January.
The new thing is ‘dangerous dog attacks happen more in hot weather’, as a way of explaining the recent spate here in the UK. Which fails to account for the rise in dog ownership during lockdowns and the increase in unregisteted breeders supplying that particular market. It seems more to do with idiot owners who can’t or won’t train their dogs and then getting out more in the warm weather, bringing their uncontrollable dogs into contact with more people. A correlation not a causation.
So with even worse, unprecedented climate change we’re supposed to be suffering, Peruvians and all other peoples must be piling up cracked skulls like crazy. We numbered only 100 million 1500 years ago and now we have 8 billion! Gosh, poor Putin can probably blame climate change for his war.
In a 1000 years UC Davis Archos can dig the 19th century century up and conclude the same thing.
World population c. AD 500 has been estimated at 210 to 280 million, but that was before the Plague of Justinian, which peaked about 542.
What!
Justin’s Plaque killed 279,999,458 people…
No, the 100 million estimate is too low, but the plague did make a dent, although Justinian himself survived it.
Someone must have edited their comment. Flow makes no sense.
It makes sense if ‘someone’ misread 542 as a casualty figure rather than a date….
Yup
542 survivors repopulated the earth
Noah was a piker
“The same results were not found in coastal and mid-elevation regions, indicating they chose nonviolent solutions to climate change or were not affected by it, researchers said.”
*************
Nonviolent solutions to climate change? I didn’t know there was such a thing as violent solutions to climate change.
Methinks that they are confusing solutions with reactions.
I used to worry that the “climate change” cult would lead to “violent solutions”.
I am now getting more concerned that they WON’T and that the cultists will walk away, laughing all the way to the bank; leaving rational people and the most vulnerable it the deepest dump.
Must have been all that CO2 from the sacrifice of virgins !
Honest accountings of the Aztec human sacrifice headcount were quietly disappeared during my lifetime.
it would be racist to tell the truth about that subject so we mustn’t /sarc
METHOD OF RESEARCHData/statistical analysis
Did not someone claim: “There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.”?
I learned that in a class on statistics way back when. Usually, statistics can be bent to show any point of view as I recall. Same reason not to trust polls.
They do “meta-study” now to imply modern times have obsoleted your understanding. To be clear, modern times have NOT obsoleted your understanding, but they invented a term, so, um, what are we gonna do now?
The opening line is the giveaway, “Climate change in current times has created problems for humans such as wildfires and reduced growing seasons for staple crops,”. The current climate change, as minuscule as it is, neither creates wildfires nor reduces growing seasons. Codswallop from beginning to end.
It’s possible they don’t actually believe that. It’s something they have to say so they have a better chance in their next grant application.
Back in the sixties (ah… that was a time to be alive!) I had to read a few Russian papers on geochemistry (in translation, I hasten to add). Some had preambles like “In accordance with the principles announced by Comrade General Secretary whatshisname…..”. Same idea, it just shows you’re a good conformist.
In today’s academia, you have to keep your head down and pretend to go along with all the nonsense, and now it’s a lot more than just climate conformity that’s demanded.
I suppose we’ll have to wait for “turnover” to know what this generation really thinks of what they’re being told. We’ll only hear from a few, but if USA preserves democracy their adult forms might vote.
true, and I have zero respect for such people
ummm.. warming give increased length of growing seasons.
Rubbish.
“Climate change in current times has created problems for humans such as wildfires and reduced growing seasons for staple crops, spilling over into economic effects. Many researchers predict, and have observed in published literature, an increase in interpersonal violence and homicides when temperatures increase.
“Increasing temperatures” – “reduced growing seasons”.
I should have stopped reading immediately.
Hypothesize, imagine, fantasize, hallucinate, etc. all part of alarmist pseudo science.
The Shamans, the first of the Climate Religion.
I have a theory that fossil fuel is causing humans in advanced society’s to devolve. All the advances in standard of living better health care , shelter , plenty of food ( less local squabbling and killing over limited resources) This means natural selection has been thwarted. Which explains the rise of endemic woke leftists thought dominating academia and society in general. In the past individuals lacking in critical thinking skills did nt live to long.
To paraphrase Ninotchka, there were fewer but better people before fossil fuels.
“Anthropogenic climate change has begun to create immediate problems for human populations, ranging from increased wildfire frequency to reduced growing seasons for staple crops…”
When a paper starts out with blatant lies it’s not worth reading – peer reviewed or not.
From the article: “Their study looked at head injuries of the populations living there at that time, a commonly used proxy among archaeologists for interpersonal violence.
“We found that decreased precipitation predicts increased rates of cranial trauma,” said Thomas J. Snyder. . . ”
Perhaps when the weather was warmer there was more time to play their version of basketball, which was pretty rough and could account for more head trauma. Or maybe we don’t consider any other alternatives because hey, they are scientists, so who are we to question their assumptions?
“Climate change in current times has created problems for humans such as wildfires and reduced growing seasons for staple crops”
An imaginary version of self asks the author about “reduced growing seasons“.
Is a growing season limited by hot or cold, wet or dry?
I know enough not to expect an honest or direct answer to questioning on the real planet.
Why don’t they call it Global Warming? It always was until the Hiatus in the 1980s. You get laughed at if the unprecedented Brazilian snowy is caused by GW but not if by CC
Living in a marginal environment, where subsistence level survival is the best one can hope for, is far more strongly correlated with violence than “climate change”. It’s the extremely well known difference between living in a civilized society with a standard of living well above mere subsistence, and living in an uncivilized society.
A civilized society requires a high degree of specialization and cooperation between members, as in some people grow crops, others build buildings, others teach the young, others become scribes, etc. etc. Such specialization requires mutual cooperation, which reduces the level of violence. This is why social anthropologists and archaeologists have always considered agriculture, as opposed to hunter-gathering, to be the birth of civilization, because the efficiencies inherent from agriculture are what enables the specialization of skills and occupations necessary for a sophisticated civilization to develop.
An uncivilized society has little to no specialization of skills, nobody depends upon anybody else for food. Therefore cooperation between members is of little value except when engaged in thievery and warfare. So violence is more common whenever a dispute arises, or one person wants to take what another person possesses.
In 2000 years time, archaeologists will discover that 21st century man, died of head injuries caused by banging heads against the wall over “climate crisis ” denial
Over thousands of years the correlation between human wellbeing and climate has been remarkable:
When it’s warm, humans are more prosperous, more healthy, better fed and longer living.
When it’s cold, humans starve, their physical stature literally shrinks, they suffer more from illness and die younger.
Possibly without exception, the great civilisations failed during cold periods which probably triggered more drouts.
Global warming isn’t a problem. It’s a huge benefit.
The real threat doesn’t come from global warming. It comes from barking mad government policies intended to solve a completely imaginary problem.
Chris
I guess that Inca SUVs had very primitive IC engines and brakes, and no belts. The unstable performance of the engines could explain the “drought and climatological instability” and the bad brakes of course were the cause of such high “incidences of cranial trauma“: the absence of belts could explain all those head hits on the windshields.
Here is a link to the paper:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/quaternary-research/article/climate-change-intensified-violence-in-the-southcentral-andean-highlands-from-15-to-05-ka/12872D1C1FE495A97A3EDB88F904B899
It has a graph 🙂
“Climate change in current times has created problems for humans such as wildfires and reduced growing seasons for staple crops”
First paragraph, two incorrect statements, wildfires are reduced and would not be noticeable if people would stop lighting them.
And of course the slight warming mainly at nights has lengthened the growing seasons if anything.
They aren’t even trying.