By Jim Steele
There have been many news articles about the human suffering caused by the floods that inundated the town of Pajaro in Monterrey County, California on March 11, 2023. But NPR’s article This Winter’s Floods May Be ‘Only a Taste’ of the Megafloods to Come, Climate Scientists Warn was the most disgusting example of how Daniel Swain and National Public Radio dishonestly use any tragedy to fearmonger a climate crisis. Alluding to CO2 driven climate change Swain stated, “As disruptive as this year’s events have been, we’re nowhere near to a plausible worst-case storm and flood scenario for California.”
However, the real story is about government ineptitude and the human risky penchant for building in natural flood plains. When California’s county lines were being drawn up in 1850 as California achieved statehood, the concern was not how to best manage a watershed, but the result of compromises between competing political interests. Thus, the Pajaro River and its main tributary the San Benito River became the dividing line between 4 different counties.
The town of Watsonville, in Santa Cruz County on the north side of the river, and Pajaro, in Monterrey County on the south side, were first developed by non-natives in the 1850s in the middle of the Pajaro River’s flood plain. Floods were common and inevitable. Each winter the returning rains turned the flood plain into a mosaic of meandering streams, marshes, ponds, and flooded fields. So, levees were constructed to prevent flood damage to buildings and agricultural fields. The first levees were built to protect the relatively wealthier town of Watsonville on the north side of the river. Still these levees frequently failed as evidenced by this man canoeing down Watsonville’s main street in February 1922.
In the 1930s the US Army Corp of Engineers began drawing up plans to expand and rebuild the Pajaro River levee system but due to various delays the levees weren’t completed until 1949. Within only 10 years of levee completion in 1955 and 1958, two major floods exceeded the level design capacity. Unlike NPR, no honest scientist would ever suggest that climate change caused those failures within just 6 years of its design.
In 1963, the USACE acknowledged poor planning in levee design, and congress authorized re-construction of the flood control system, however no funds were provided from the federal government. Since 1949 seven major floods over the next 50 years exposed the flaws in the designs by these so-called flood control experts.
In an interview with the NY Times, Mark Strudley, the Pajaro Regional Flood Management Agency’s executive director said “federal, state and local officials had talked since the 1960s about the need to shore up the water infrastructure around the Pajaro River, but the property values in the area were so low that they did not meet the threshold for repair under the cost-benefit formula that the federal government and the Army Corps of Engineers were using.
After winning several lawsuits regards the levee failures in the 1995, politicians finally developed a new plan to rebuild the levee system, set to begin in 2024. But NPR simply pushed gloom and climate doom asking, “whether those plans will account for the changing climate and the increased frequency and ferocity of storms expected.” NPR ignored that the 2023 Pajaro flooding was undeniably caused by another failed levee which was largely due to the political battles regards how each county contributes to the maintenance and repairs of an aging levee system.
The root of the political battles goes back to 1850 county boundaries. On the west side of the Pajaro Gap lies 2 counties comprising the river’s lower basin and on the east side another 2 counties that comprise upper basin. Most of the rainfall happens in the upper basin, then flows through the mountain gap into the floodplains of the lower basin to threaten Watsonville and Pajaro. The lower basin counties argue that the rapid urbanization in the upper basin had created an “asphalt effect” which increased runoff and river water volume. Thus, those counties should contribute the most money for levee upgrades in the lower basin. The upper basin blames the lower basin counties for not maintaining the levees and stream channels. For decades such squabbles delayed funding for improvements that could have definitely prevented the 2023 flooding.
But climate alarmists always push the scientific factoid that in a warmer world the atmosphere holds more moisture thus CO2 is causing bigger floods. But that factoid is totally irrelevant here. They ignore California’s rainy season happens during the cooler winter and historically the greatest amount of flooding in over a thousand years happened during the cold Little Ice Age.
And worse, NPR and Swain failed to share NOAA’s data showing global warming never caused the Pajaro River to reach flood stage. Pajaro River’s flood stage is set at a level determined by its history of numerous floods. The Pajaro River did not exceed historical levels that naturally happened during floods for the past century. The only honest attribution for the devastating flooding was that the people of Pajaro were victimized by political infighting between county governments who had agreed to maintain the levees needed for Pajaro to survive in this natural flood plain. Levees and government promises have long been known to give people a false sense of security, only to settle them into more dangerous locations.
NPR and Swain never addressed any of the natural and political issues leading to the flooding of Pajaro, incessantly choosing to fear monger climate change and push catastrophic speculation about the future. They interviewed Antonio Hueso, a 72-year-old retired farmworker, whose home was damaged for the 2nd time during levee failures. Hueso wisely said “I’m going to fix my house, and when people forget about the flooding, I will sell my house and move to Madera or Fresno”. Such a wise and simple solution of moving out of harm’s way didn’t fit NPR’s narrative, so in the radio version they added “But In a warming world will a move to higher ground suffice?”, as if the climate gods have warned us about coming floods of biblical proportions.
Daniel Swain, who was groomed by climate alarmists Noah Diffenbaugh and Michael Mann, chose to rant that warming of the climate has doubled the likelihood of a mega-flood and every degree of new warming increases that likelihood even more. What was once considered unlikely to happen in our lifetimes “has become quite likely.” Swain wouldn’t be surprised if as many as four megafloods happened just in this century. “We’re not necessarily talking about 100 years from now. We’re talking about the next 20 or 30 years.” Of course, such catastrophic predictions have served Swain very well as he frightened California politicians into funding his flood-modeling project.
NPR finished with an interview with Denia Escutia, a high school senior. “I think Pajaro deserves climate justice. I call this my home, but is it really my home if they don’t want to help us?” Her final reply to NPR was her future is gone. Then NPR closed with one last scare tactic blaming broken levees on climate change by saying, “gone because the climate the levees were designed for no longer exists.”
And once again climate alarmists obscure the real problems and real solutions. It is disgusting!
UCLA and NPR Collude to Flood Our minds with Climate Fear Mongering!
___________________________________________________________
Is anyone surprised by this?
It should be called NPCR, Non-Player Character Radio, for all those tell me what to think types.
Extreme weather is normal for California. Check 1861, if one wants an example.
Maybe NPR should cover topics like declining Fed independence from political pressure.
story tip
The Fed’s Climate Studies Are Full of Hot Air – WSJ
Their model based disaster fantasies are not convincing people and are in fact having the opposite effect according to this study.
Study: Catastrophic Climate Predictions Fail to Shift Attitudes (breitbart.com)
About half the population can tell the difference between people concerned about the environment versus media manipulators looking for the gullible doom-scroller vote….Unfortunately that’s the other half…
I suspect most who listen to NPR never question anything they hear. NPR is relentless with the climate change nonsense creating an alternate reality in their devotee’s minds.
As long as they get their “free” tote bags, they’ll be content. 😉
The Albany, NY NPR (AMC) spends far more time ranting against Trump- not my favorite person- but I’d rather hear the news.
The middle Yukon Valley and its tributaries are in danger of flooding every spring. People still live in the flood plain while knowing that sooner or later their living room will be underwater. This is because the available option, moving to a higher elevation a further distance from the river means trying to build on unstable permafrost and being removed from the transportation and fishing available on the river, there being no roads. But that’s a little different than the situation in St. Louis or Grand Forks.
Money.The available options are rarely less expensive or more convenient.
But if you can figure out how to claim money from oil companies or people who heat their houses, or drive cars, suddenly what was previously too expensive….is justice….
Poor little Pajaro – didn’t have a chance did it
Here’s the nearest Wunderground I can find, in the centre of Watsonville.
Standing at the dizzying height of 2 metres above sea level and about 5 miles inland
(Pajaro town is below where it says “G11 San Juan Road”)
And it wasn’t their fault, as stated.
Yes it did rain on that day in March but only about half an inch. It was somebody else’s water.
I went to visit ‘my river’ recently, The Nene.
Tide was coming in and it was running backwards faster than you could run to keep up.
The point where I was was = 7 metres AMSL and the river is 65 metres wide at that point
Thus I’d guess that the flow (backwards) was running at 30,000 cubic feet per second = 40 acre-feet per minute.
That’s how to do drainage. Call in a Dutchman with a shovel.
(The Nene is a backwater creek, wait till you meet The Ouse)
PofN,
The station you have used is about 3.5 miles inland, 37 feet elevation (11 m).
Either that or my hangover is messing with my keyboard.
Use Biden’s approach: Declare any catastrophe a success.
What a shameful bit of reporting by NPR. What a great piece of history by Jim Steele. I wish these articles by Jim could reach a wider audience but maybe I am being overly optimistic that doing so would help squelch this bout of superstition’s return we’re presently living through. The 72 year-old farm worker has learned through experience. The 18 year-old high school senior probably never will.
AGW fanatics are invariably History Deniers.
I just skimmed the article because all you need to know is it is from NPR – literally the tax payer supported propaganda agency of radical socialists government controlled “utopia “ advocates. I used to listen to NPR many years ago mainly as a sort of natural form of valium after a busy stressful week. Then they started to show their true colors every time a Republican threatened to win a election.
Someone should hand Denia Escutia (high school senior) a copy of Jim’s report; it should be required reading in her senior class.
“… property values in the area were so low that they did not meet the threshold for repair …”
Newport and Covington KY (south of the Ohio River at Cincinnati) provide another example.
Floodplains flood — who knew?
Taxpayers Provide More Than 25 Percent of NPR’s Funding, Analyst Says | Fox News
As Republican lawmakers lead the charge to cut off public funding to National Public Radio, which has been under fire ever since it sacked Juan Williams last month [in 2020], the network insists it gets no more than 3 percent of its total budget from taxpayers.
But one analyst has argued that NPR’s $166 million budget is actually made up of more than 25 percent of taxpayer dollars and that its member stations across the country haul in another 40 percent of public funds.
***********
Whatever federal and other public fund’s contribution to NPR’s budget actually is, I say DEFUND IT. When media outlets are nothing more than a mouthpiece for a particular party line on any and all issues, they do not deserve any public/federal money.
If the defunding happens, wealthy left-wing individuals and organizations may step in to replace the lost monies. If that does happen, so be it. It is still a matter of principle however that media outlets should be middle-of-the-road and impartial when they are even partially funded with public money.
Oops, Juan Williams was sacked at NPR in 2015.
Story: Much to NPR’s chagrin, they do face organized opposition.
“I think Pajaro deserves climate justice. I call this my home, but is it really my home if they don’t want to help us?” Wow. Talk about Entitlement with a Sympathy Chaser!
You picked the perfect quote.
I’d love to explore who the speaker means when she says “they”.
“What was once considered unlikely to happen in our lifetimes “has become quite likely.”
Considered by whom? I’m sure somebody expected a flood. The expectant party probably bought a house on higher ground.
“NPR finished with an interview with Denia Escutia, a high school senior.”
The target demographic is not paying its own rent yet.
“I think Pajaro deserves climate justice”
The target demographic has not understood how limited resources and unlimited wants works. Deserves?
What happens to a news reader who invests a whole career development phase into perfecting a gentle-but-authorative Midwestern reading voice to speak someone else’s writing, then learns “too late” that they don’t agree with the someone else’s writing? When mortgage, rent or utility bills come due they must keep reading.
Are dams an option on the Pajaro or its tributaries?
No. The river really isn’t that long, it has no real altitude or snowmelt to contain and at most times you can walk across it and even drive across it at Murphy’s crossing. It’s all farmers fields on both sides for miles. The problem is levy construction, maintenance and always has been. Monterey County ignores Pajaro and would rather spend it’s money promoting the Concours d’ Elegance, Cannery Row and visiting Carmel.
“The street … turned into a 5-foot-deep muddy river …, submerging his baby-blue Ford F-150 truck…”
Look out for that truck on a used car lot – or disabled on a HW shoulder beside its sad/confused next owner.
Seems like levees just make a minor problem into a worse one. They raise the water level needed to flood, so that when it does, it’s much worse than it would be without them. Deal with seasonal flooding, and forget the levees.
I have to disagree with you Jeff Alberts.
Levees or as we call them in New Zealand stop banks work very well as long as they are set well back from the rivers.
This allows the flood water to spread out over grassed land between the river and the stop banks and the towns are safe .
The problem is that stopbanks are built far to close to the riverbanks in many instances.
Many towns in New Zealand have been built on flood plains which was very bad planning in the late 1880s early 1900s.
The other problem that occurred in the recent Hawkes Bay flood in New Zealand was that forestry slash was washed into the rivers which blocked up the rivers against the bridge piles.
This caused the river levels to rise and breach the stop banks,once the water started flowing over it soon cut channels through the stop banks.
This forestry slash is certainly a man made problem and forestry companies have to be held liable for this destruction .
Shortly after this disastrous flood a TV documentary “Sunday ” featured a “engineer “who was against stopbanks but it was very one sided interview and I doubt that he had any experience with stop banks.
I live near a town that had a disastrous flood in 1958 which led to a major flood prevention operation .
The rivers were straitened and miles of stop banks were erected well back from the river .New bridges were built and the railway was raised .
The stopbanks have protected the town for the last 65 years .
“The problem is that stopbanks are built far to close to the riverbanks in many instances.”
This is where my statement went. The only ones I’m familiar with are the ones in my area. They ARE the river banks. There is no intermediate area.
That is right but when a so called engineer states that stopbanks don’t work because once the water breaches the stop bank he claimed it makes the problem worse .
I get annoyed when a TV documentary trots out an engineer who has absolutely no experience who then states that stopbanks make the problem worse .
The channel between the top of the stop banks should be calculated to at least cope with a one in one hundred year flood .
Well levees or stop banks DO make flooding worse, somewhere downstream on the river.
When you don’t let flood waters spread out into the flood plains, that puts more water into the flood plains downriver. It has to go somewhere.
Same here in Calgary, some work has been done since the 2013 flood but not much, the banks of the river have been shored up a bit but its nothing compared to the amount of water we will one day see again.
The “extra area” is all city.
Was Denia educated alongside Greta?
Yes, welcome to California, the land of earthquakes, floods and fires… And it all happens over and over and over again… Climate Change? I don’t think so…
Farmers used to build farm buildings on rocky high-grund while farming the flat, fertile bottom-land
The bottom-land was flat and fertile because flooding in the past had leveled the land and left behind new, rich soil
As population grew these bottom-lands were turned into cities where the flat land was the low cost option for building. And eventually the cities flooded, not be cause the climate changed, but because cities were built over floodplains.
Good job Jim. Stories like this really make you proud of our government don’t they. The only thing they are good at is spending money, pointing fingers and scaring the crap at of people. Well done, not.
California floods:
Great Flood of 1862 – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Flood_of_1862
The Great Flood of 1862 was the largest flood in the recorded history of Oregon, Nevada, and California, occurring from December 1861 to January 1862. It was preceded by weeks of continuous rains and snows in the very high elevations that began in Oregon in November 1861 and continued into January 1862. Much of Sacramento remained under water for 3 months after the storms passed. As a result of flooding, the California State Legislature was temporarily moved to San Francisco during rebuilding and renovating the sunken city of Sacramento.
Floods in California – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floods_in_California
Beginning on December 24, 1861, and lasting for 45 days, the largest flood in California’s recorded history occurred, reaching full flood stage in different areas between January 9-12, 1862. The entire Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys were inundated for an extent of 300 miles (480 km), averaging 20 miles (32 km) in breadth. The entire Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys were inundated for an extent of 300 miles (480 km), averaging 20 miles (32 km) in breadth. State government was forced to relocate from the capital in Sacramento for 18 months in San Francisco. The rain created an inland sea in Orange County, lasting about three weeks with water standing 4 feet (1.2 m) deep up to 4 miles (6 km) from the river.[1]
Parents should take a page from the climate activist playbook and start suing media corporations on behalf of their children. NPR should probably be high on that list. They have been lying to them. There needs to be consequences.
https://mobile.twitter.com/aaronshem/status/1602834395567718401
NPR is “State aided News” (Or Government funded news) aka National Panhandler Radio.
Interlude – Joel Ross – After the Rain from the album Who Are You
I had property in a bay off Lake Ontario. Because the Army Corps of Engineers (often) guessed wrong on the springtime flow from the other western Great Lakes we had substantial shoreline erosion from the higher lake levels.
Sadly we never thought to use “Climate Justice” as a claim for reparations!
Clearly a missed opportunity.