Discovery highlights dual threat to the climate and survival of plants, shellfish, coral reefs and other marine life
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
CREDIT: PHOTOS COURTESY OF ZHANGXIAN OUYANG, WEI-JUN CAI AND LIZA WRIGHT-FAIRBANKS/ UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
An international team of researchers have sounded new alarm bells about the changing chemistry of the western region of the Arctic Ocean after discovering acidity levels increasing three to four times faster than ocean waters elsewhere.
The team, which includes University of Delaware marine chemistry expert Wei-Jun Cai, also identified a strong correlation between the accelerated rate of melting ice in the region and the rate of ocean acidification, a perilous combination that threatens the survival of plants, shellfish, coral reefs and other marine life and biological processes throughout the planet’s ecosystem.
The new study, published on Thursday, Sept. 30 in Science, the flagship journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, is the first analysis of Arctic acidification that includes data from more than two decades, spanning the period from 1994 to 2020.
Scientists have predicted that by 2050 — if not sooner — Arctic sea ice in this region will no longer survive the increasingly warm summer seasons. As a result of this sea-ice retreat each summer, the ocean’s chemistry will grow more acidic, with no persistent ice cover to slow or otherwise mitigate the advance.
That creates life-threatening problems for the enormously diverse population of sea creatures, plants and other living things that depend on a healthy ocean for survival. Crabs, for example, live in a crusty shell built from the calcium carbonate prevalent in ocean water. Polar bears rely on healthy fish populations for food, fish and sea birds rely on plankton and plants, and seafood is a key element of many humans’ diets.
That makes acidification of these distant waters a big deal for many of the planet’s inhabitants.
First, a quick refresher course on pH levels, which indicate how acidic or alkaline a given liquid is. Any liquid that contains water can be characterized by its pH level, which ranges from 0 to 14, with pure water considered neutral with a pH of 7. All levels lower than 7 are acidic, all levels greater than 7 are basic or alkaline, with each full step representing a tenfold difference in the hydrogen ion concentration. Examples on the acidic side include battery acid, which checks in at 0 pH, gastric acid (1), black coffee (5) and milk (6.5). Tilting toward basic are blood (7.4), baking soda (9.5), ammonia (11) and drain cleaner (14). Seawater is normally alkaline, with a pH value of around 8.1.
Cai, the Mary A.S. Lighthipe Professor in the School of Marine Science and Policy in UD’s College of Earth, Ocean and Environment, has published significant research on the changing chemistry of the planet’s oceans and this month completed a cruise from Nova Scotia to Florida, serving as chief scientist among 27 aboard the research vessel. The work, supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), includes four areas of study: The East Coast, the Gulf of Mexico, the Pacific Coast and the Alaska/Arctic region.
The new study in Science included UD postdoctoral researcher Zhangxian Ouyang, who participated in a recent voyage to collect data in the Chukchi Sea and Canada Basin in the Arctic Ocean.
The first author on the publication was Di Qi, who works with Chinese research institutes in Xiamen and Qingdao. Also collaborating on this publication were scientists from Seattle, Sweden, Russia and six other Chinese research sites.
“You can’t just go by yourself,” Cai said. “This international collaboration is very important for collecting long-term data over a large area in the remote ocean. In recent years, we have also collaborated with Japanese scientists as accessing the Arctic water was even harder in the past three years due to COVID-19. And we always have European scientists participating.”
Cai said he and Qi both were baffled when they first reviewed the Arctic data together during a conference in Shanghai. The acidity of the water was increasing three to four times faster than ocean waters elsewhere.
That was stunning indeed. But why was it happening?
Cai soon identified a prime suspect: the increased melt of sea ice during the Arctic’s summer season.
Historically, the Arctic’s sea ice has melted in shallow marginal regions during the summer seasons. That started to change in the 1980s, Cai said, but waxed and waned periodically. In the past 15 years, the ice melt has accelerated, advancing into the deep basin in the north.
For a while, scientists thought the melting ice could provide a promising “carbon sink,” where carbon dioxide from the atmosphere would be sucked into the cold, carbon-hungry waters that had been hidden under the ice. That cold water would hold more carbon dioxide than warmer waters could and might help to offset the effects of increased carbon dioxide elsewhere in the atmosphere.
When Cai first studied the Arctic Ocean in 2008, he saw that the ice had melted beyond the Chukchi Sea in the northwest corner of the region, all the way to the Canada Basin — far beyond its typical range. He and his collaborators found that the fresh meltwater did not mix into deeper waters, which would have diluted the carbon dioxide. Instead, the surface water soaked up the carbon dioxide until it reached about the same levels as in the atmosphere and then stopped collecting it. They reported this result in a paper in Science in 2010.
That would also change the pH level of the Arctic waters, they knew, reducing the alkaline levels of the seawater and reducing its ability to resist acidification. But how much? And how soon? It took them another decade to collect enough data to derive a sound conclusion on the long-term acidification trend.
Analyzing data gathered from 1994 to 2020 – the first time such a long-term perspective was possible — Cai, Qi and their collaborators found an extraordinary increase in acidification and a strong correlation with the increasing rate of melting ice.
They point to sea-ice melt as the key mechanism to explain this rapid pH decrease, because it changes the physics and chemistry of the surface water in three primary ways:
- The water under the sea ice, which had a deficit of carbon dioxide, now is exposed to the atmospheric carbon dioxide and can take up carbon dioxide freely.
- The seawater mixed with meltwater is light and cannot mix easily into deeper waters, which means the carbon dioxide taken from the atmosphere is concentrated at the surface.
- The meltwater dilutes the carbonate ion concentration in the seawater, weakening its ability to neutralize the carbon dioxide into bicarbonate and rapidly decreasing ocean pH.
Cai said more research is required to further refine the above mechanism and better predict future changes, but the data so far show again the far-reaching ripple effects of climate change.
“If all of the multiple-year ice is replaced by first-year ice, then there will be lower alkalinity and lower buffer capacity and acidification continues,” he said. “By 2050, we think all of the ice will be gone in the summer. Some papers predict that will happen by 2030. And if we follow the current trend for 20 more years, the summer acidification will be really, really strong.”
No one knows exactly what that will do to the creatures and plants and other living things that depend on healthy ocean waters.
“How will this affect the biology there?” Cai asked. “That is why this is important.”
JOURNAL
Science
DOI
ARTICLE TITLE
Climate change drives rapid decadal acidification in the Arctic Ocean from 1994 to 2020
ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE
29-Sep-2022
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Sorry, did I miss the data – what was the actual ph-value, and how, exactly, had it changed?
You expect actual data? It’s enough that you know that it’s “worse than they thought”..
It’s a supply chain issue. There is no litmus paper to be wasted here.
Data? They ain’t got no data. They don’t need no data.
They don’t have to show you any stinkin’ data!
“We own the science and the science is what we say it is”, paraphrasing for the WEF
The scientific data is showing it is already 3 basic WEF units towards catastrophe, so there it is, case proven
WEF = World Ecommunist Forum.
There’s quite a bit of data in the supplemental file.
file:///C:/Users/Randy/Downloads/science.abo0383_sm.pdf
Table S1 shows that variables are hardly controlled for with different methods, times, analysts acquiring data.
But it’s a sad joke. They basically assume their conclusions, then show that their conclusions agree with their assumptions.
Hi Scissor – or is it really Randy?
The link you gave is to your computer’s drive. We won’t be able to access it.
Perhaps this link is more useful:
https://www.science.org/doi/suppl/10.1126/science.abo0383/suppl_file/science.abo0383_sm.pdf
Thanks for the link to the data, JMarkW. It appears the authors are concerned about changes in mean pH over the past twenty years of about 8.13-8.00, 8.18-8.00, 8.18-8.00, 8.16-8.06, and 8.22-8.13 in various regions of the Arctic. No mention that I saw of the daily range of pH change in each of the areas, but I suspect it dwarfs these changes.
So, there´s no acidification. Acidification happens only below pH7. If pH drops from 8.1 to 8.0 it´s still alkaline, such a reduction is not an acidification, it´s neutralization. But that wouldn`t cause headlines. Nobody gets scared when the story is “arctic ocean gets a little more neutral”.
DATA = Dis Aint Too Accurate.
See here
they’re comparing to a study done over 100 years ago using cork stoppered phials of sea water that took up to 18 months to return to the lab without any kind of pressure or temperature control… which obviously became mildly more alkaline than when sampled due to evaporation
A few years ago I saw actual data from Hawaii. Seems that “terribly acidic” waters nearby have a pH of over 8. So what is the alarm all about?
Also, one wonders about the historic pH. How many years has pH data been availalble? Note that the alarmists used to fear the ozone hole, but that data has only been available for a bit over 50 years OH, and the ozone hole closed all by itself.
Or how about “historic” rises in temps the past 150 yrs? Reliable data has only been available since the beginning of that era. And note that the Little Ice Age ended a bit before that, and these rises are most likely due to a return to “normal.”
Very little reliable temperature data older than 1990 since all the thermometers wear out with age and before the 1960’s they had to be SLUNG down every day by hand… statistically nobody actually bothered and the thermometers were delivered in boxes so most aged together. When thermometers get old they stop rising to the actual temperature. You’ll literally have 2.5°F slack over 25 years.
It’s “peer-reviewed” a.k.a. consensus science a.k.a. social philosophy (e.g. cargo cult, political congruence) a.k.a. “flat-Earth”.
Can I suggest that crimatologists just shut up and collect data for a coupe of thousand years before we start talking of trends and drawing conclusions.
They don’t say what pH values they recorded.
“”…collaborators found an extraordinary increase in acidification and a strong correlation with the increasing rate of melting ice.””
What increasing rate of melting?
Fret rating: more alarmist nonsense
….
Bender for President
Their melting more acidic ice sampling.
Nor did they define “extraordinary” other than to imply it is 3-4 times greater than elsewhere in the world.
OCh I’m fed up reading the sometimes waffle over a non-event ( as in AGW stuff) alarmism / crisis.
So ‘fast-melting Arctic ice’ = not Slowly or Ordinary / common ice melting. and the Western Arctic ? Where do yo turn to from the N Pole ? All points South. But, so it sounds like its coming from / through the Bering Strait? China ( ! 🙂 ) but could also be Japan, Korea, Oh no – its RUSSIA …. och give over – it’s from COntinental AMerica CALIFORNIA – all those greenies dumping their unwanted non-green debris on other people. ( all sarc).Is this another case of perhaps Chinese influence through a Western Institution for Control ? …Just having a say. better than simply “reblogged elsewhere”.
The talk about the person from University of Delaware who just “completed a cruise from Nova Scotia to Florida” and then start jabbering about the western Arctic Ocean. When did the Arctic Ocean include Nova Scotia to Florida?
Rivers are acidic and moving, yet they freeze.
LOL,
The drop in sea ice since the extreme high of 1979 has allowed many marine creatures to return to the Arctic.
Narwhal, molluscs, etc that show no remains since the MWP are being seen in increasing numbers as the Arctic recovers from its deep freeze.!
The Arctic is NOT acidic and will never become acidic.
The drop in sea ice slightly toward the pre-LIA levels has opened up the food supply for the nearly extinct Bowhead Whale, and they are returning to the waters around Svalbard.
https://partner.sciencenorway.no/arctic-ocean-forskningno-fram-centre/the-ice-retreats–whale-food-returns/1401824
The Blue Mussel is also making a return, having been absent for a few thousand years, apart from a brief stint during the MWP.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959683617715701?journalCode=hola
Many other species of whale are also returning now that the sea ice extent has dropped from the extreme highs of the LIA. Whales cannot swim on ice. !
https://blog.poseidonexpeditions.com/whales-of-svalbard/
“Whales cannot swim on ice.” Good point. Nor can they breath through it. To breath, they need to be able to surface.
The US and Russia are doing their part to assist the survival of Arctic marine mammals by surfacing submarines to create breathing holes for the air breathers.
If whales are present doesn’t that mean the biologic food chain they feed upon is also intact?
Similarly polar bear numbers seemed to have increased in recent decades in the Arctic though I can’t quote a census data reference other than Jim Steele’s Landscapes and Cycles.
I do remember specific Experimental data from 20 years ago found that Crustacean shell Formation is biologically resistant to acidic PH conditions in the lab.
It’s the same BS as coral reef bleaching alarms. One does have to applaud the Climate Change Alarmist cult for their garbage recycling capability.
When Al Gore was born there were 5000 polar bears in the world. Today only 26000 remain. Send money!!!
Captain Obvious has joined the discussion…
The press and the global warming crowd deliberately suppress the fact that ANTARCTICA has had record cold, snow and ice accumulation for decades. Even the last few years, ANTARCTICA cold, snow and ice have hit record numbers. The number of catastrophic hurricanes and tornadoes has dwindled the last couple of decades. The oceans have not risen appreciably other than the normal waxing and waning of ice melt and evaporation cycles. If you try to google it, the first few pages will be pro global warming but when you drill down to the more reputable “scientific” sites it says no global warming. Also droughts, cold snaps, and weather extremes are the rule all throughout recorded history. There are records clear back to the 1400’s verifying this fact. One has to dig for this data because the political and globalists agenda has big-tech, the leftist media, et al working at sequestering real facts as the “Brown Shirts” did for Hitler. Most folks don’t even go past the first page and these hyena Globalists at google know this.
Lastly, look up the sun-spot cycle which is an eleven year cycle. The weather patterns on earth are affected profoundly by this cycle.
They try to explain it away with all kinds of mental gymnastics but it doesn’t pass the smell test. Funny one never hears of this, but then again suppression of reality by ideologues is commonplace.
P.S. the so-called doomed Great Barrier Reef is thriving and growing.
That is a commonly held opinion. However, Willis Eschenbach has said that he has explored this thoroughly and has not found a correlation. He has a standing challenge to prove him wrong. Can you provide any evidence to show that he is wrong?
Surely everyone knows that acid is hotter than alkali?
Sorry, folks. No data in the article, and the original publication is paywalled. The abstract does not hold out hope that the article offers any significant data but deals more with speculative processes.
For the record: Ocean waters are not acid, that is they are pH >7, 8.1 – 8.2 on average. Any change in pH that is > 7 is “change in alkalinity,” not “acidification”. E.g. would you call a change from pH = 8.1 to 8.2 “decrease in acidification”? No, me neither. So why would you call a change from 8.2 to 8.1 “ocean acidification”? It ain’t acid, folks. The ocean is alkaline. You say, “It’s moving toward being acid, so we can call it acidification.” OK. Then this glass of water sitting in the sun has gone from 72° to 87°, so I can say, “It’s increasingly boiling.” No? Well, same thing.
There was a guy on the radio that used to say, “Words mean things!”
But ‘acidic ‘ sounds scary and it is that not good science which is important to them. To be fair they are following normal practices in ‘climate science
And the creatures of the sea are used to huge variations in pH due to various reasons and keep on keeping on.
“and a strong correlation with the increasing rate of melting ice.”
So the changing acidity ceased about 15 years ago, is that what they are saying
Current Arctic sea ice extent is above the 15 year average.
Thing is, that Arctic sea ice is NOT melting at an increasing rate. !
2007: NASA climate scientist Jay Zwally’s prediction: “The Arctic Ocean could be nearly ice-free at the end of summer by 2012, much faster than previous predictions.”
2007: BBC “Scientists in the US have presented one of the most dramatic forecasts yet for the disappearance of Arctic sea ice ” “Their latest modelling indicates that northern polar waters could be ice-free in summers within just 5-6 years.” Professor Wieslaw Maslowski from the Department of Oceanography of the US Navy predicted an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the summer of 2013.
2008: University of Manitoba professor David Barber prophesied: “We’re actually projecting this year that the North Pole may be free of ice for the first time [in history]. This is a very dramatic change in the High Arctic climate system.”
2009: Al Gore predicted the North Polar Ice Cap could be completely ice free within the next five to seven years.
Gore made his prediction at COP15 Copenhagen which ran from Dec 7 – Dec 18, 2009, where he repeatedly referenced “state-of-the-art” computer modeling to suggest that the north polar ice cap may lose all of its ice by 2014.
2012: Head of the Polar Ocean Physics Group at the University of Cambridge (UK), Professor Peter Wadhams, foretold of a complete collapse of the Arctic ice sheet by 2015-2016
And On and On and On…
4 times quicker than the rest of the ocean 4 X 0 = 0
Studying (if that is what they actually did) a geologic process from 1994 to 2020 is only a popcorn fart in time to a real geologist. This phony “acidification” claim totally ignores the prior earth history of much stronger warm periods, which got us to where we are today.
The authors of this dross don’t explain why there was no mass extinction event last time the Arctic was seasonally ice-free during the Holocene.
Only ice worms can live in ice.
The press and the global warming crowd deliberately suppress the fact that ANTARCTICA has had record cold, snow and ice accumulation for decades. Even the last few years, ANTARCTICA cold, snow and ice have hit record numbers. The number of catastrophic hurricanes and tornadoes has dwindled the last couple of decades. The oceans have not risen appreciably other than the normal waxing and waning of ice melt and evaporation cycles. If you try to google it, the first few pages will be pro global warming but when you drill down to the more reputable “scientific” sites it says no global warming. Also droughts, cold snaps, and weather extremes are the rule all throughout recorded history. There are records clear back to the 1400’s verifying this fact. One has to dig for this data because the political and globalists agenda has big-tech, the leftist media, et al working at sequestering real facts as the “Brown Shirts” did for Hitler. Most folks don’t even go past the first page and these hyena Globalists at google know this.
Lastly, look up the sun-spot cycle which is an eleven year cycle. The weather patterns on earth are affected profoundly by this cycle.
They try to explain it away with all kinds of mental gymnastics but it doesn’t pass the smell test. Funny one never hears of this, but then again suppression of reality by ideologues is commonplace.
P.S. the so-called doomed Great Barrier Reef is thriving and growing.
expert Wei-Jun Cai, also identified a strong correlation between the accelerated rate of melting ice in the region and the rate of ocean acidification,………..
That right there that I underlined told me this is just more climate disaster porn and not science. According to DMI both extent and volume of sea ice is higher than it has been since 2018 and still within 2 standard deviations of the 2004 to 13 mean.
Job creation
scamscheme.The authors sneakily change the scale of the Y axis for different locations to make things look really bad
From the supplementary materials, looks really scary folks:
The error bars are much larger than the “acidification”:
That by itself means nothing. If there were much more data the trends might have been meaningful. But as it is, there is a ~10% chance that the pH is actually flat or rising, and the aragonite concentration as just about as likely to be rising. In fact, they shouldn’t even be listing the purportedly negative aragonite trend, considering the fact that it’s +/- is so much higher. Data evaluation 101…
It looks like they used a anomalous year to start their graph. Eliminate that and the trend looks flat.
Their data shows a range of values. Selecting one high point as their slope start changes the overall slope. Just as using 1979 as the starting point for Arctic sea ice graphs ignore the Northern Hemisphere warming from the Little Ice Age (LIA).
It also looks like they ignore data prior to approximately 1995. One suspects that the starting datum is contrived so they can force a scary negative slope appearance.
One also notices that for some graphs they have data to 2020, while their sea ice graph stops in 2018.
As is all too common, there are no error bars shown.
Thanks for sharing. Every data point in the time series has overlapping error bars, therefore their claim is invalid. There are no statistically significant trends in any of those graphs. But then again, the AGW team has never been held to actual scientific standards, why start now.
The 1994 pH value looks like an outlier that is influencing the slope of the trend.
I am still looking for that study that says, “Great news, it’s not as bad as we thought.”
Scientists have predicted that by 2050 long after they will be in no position to be asked why they got it so wrong ! Funny how the time scales so often work in that way almost as if they knew that it gives them a free pass to ring as many alarm bells as they like without having to answer as to why !
Stil I love such claims, especially when for the vast majority of history for the Artic they have no bloody idea at all what these values were but they ‘know’ now it is worse than ever!
The can’t ‘t hold a candle to the astronomers who claim the sun will expand to fry the earth in about 1,000,000,000 years.
On the plus side – the goal post for when Armageddon happens is now 2050. I am old enough to remember the world ended in 2000.
I was wiped out with the rest of the world in 1985. I guess the 2000 end of the world was just to pick up the stragglers that refused to die in 1985.
There is proof of the mass die-offs. Look at how many people voted Democrat. You don’t get those kinds of numbers from the living.
Wouldn’t they have to find Oceanic Acidification first?
When the Arctic sea ice extent is the greatest it has been in over a dozen years, I guess you have to raise the alarm on something else. This ocean acidification is right up there with the ‘snow doesn’t smell the same’ scam from a few years ago.
And now the third La Niña event is about to bleach the Ningaloo Reef off WA. A pidgeon pair of events heinous events.
“The acidity of the water was increasing three to four times faster than ocean waters elsewhere.”
LOL! they are beyond shameless.
It’s bad enough that everywhere is warming twice as fast as everywhere else.
Now we are going to find the oceans acidifying 3 to 4 times faster everywhere as everywhere else.
The Earth just can’t catch a break with all these pesky humans around. Oh sure, we could get rid of everybody. But then who would be around to measure the pH to see if that worked?
The WEF has a few plans for that.
It’s the Arctic lake woebegone…where all the samples are above the average…
And, they don’t specify whether that was measured as pH or actual hydronium ion concentration. Sloppy!
I just don’t understand how any serious arctic researcher can ignore the cyclic nature of the AMO/PDO in discussing the changing conditions in the Arctic.
$$$
I can fully understand why the Western Arctic Ocean is acidifying so rapidly.
Can’t you?
What about you?
Well, what about the bloke you’re standing next to?
Well, what about King Canute?
Well, what about the bloke selling popcorn?
Gee you’re a thick mob!!!!
Did they discover that the ocean is still highly alkaline and that shell-building creatures aren’t going anywhere? What a pile of dog s*** research. I want every penny of funding of this trash back.
Some time a go I asked NASA via an info email about the pH scale and received back a table showing both the pH scale along with a pOH scale. Here is my interpretation which I would be happy for someone to correct.
Are you suggesting that these researchers are inadvertently using the pOH scale, and don’t realize it?