Time Magazine Climate Anarchy

Roger Caiazza

Based on the Time Magazine opinion piece, “What Comes After the Coming Climate Anarchy?”, we may have reached a point where no facts have to be included in a climate fear porn editorial.  This is just a short introduction to the piece and the author.  I encourage you to read it yourself.

The author is Parag Khanna who Time describes as a founder of Future Map and author of the new book MOVE: The Forces Uprooting UsAccording to Khanna’s long bio, he is a “leading global strategy advisor, world traveler, and best-selling author”. He is Founder & CEO of Climate Alpha, an AI-powered analytics platform that forecasts asset values because “the next real estate boom will be in climate resilient regions”.   He also is Founder & Managing Partner of FutureMap, a data and scenario based strategic advisory firm that “navigates the dynamics of globalization”.  Dr. Khanna “holds a PhD in international relations from the London School of Economics, and Bachelors and Masters degrees from the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University”.  A quick look at the School of Foreign Service Georgetown core curriculum offers no suggestion of any scientific requirements that could provide a basis for Dr. Khanna’s climate beliefs.

The opinion piece starts out with correlation causation fallacy endemic to the scientifically illiterate and climate innumerate crisis mongers.  He notes that in 2021, “global carbon dioxide emissions reached 36.3 billion tons, the highest volume ever recorded” and that this year “the number of international refugees will cross 30 million, also the highest figure ever”. Then he explains the basis for his climate anarchy belief: “As sea levels and temperatures rise and geopolitical tensions flare, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that humanity is veering towards systemic breakdown”.

This is just a windup to:

Today it’s fashionable to speak of civilizational collapse. The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) states that just a 1.5 degree Celsius rise will prove devastating to the world’s food systems by 2025. Meanwhile, the most recent IPCC report warns that we must reverse emissions by 2025 or face an irreversible accelerating breakdown in critical ecosystems, and that even if the Paris agreement goals are implemented, a 2.4 degree Celsius rise is all but inevitable. In other words, the “worst case” RCP 8.5 scenario used in many climate models is actually a baseline. The large but banal numbers you read—$2 trillion in annual economic damage, 10-15% lower global GDP, etc.—are themselves likely massively understated. The climate bill just passed by the Senate is barely a consolation prize in this drama: a welcome measure, but also too little to bring rains back to drought-stricken regions in America or worldwide.

Then there is this:

Let’s assume that we are indeed hurtling towards the worst-case scenario by 2050: Hundreds of millions of people perish in heatwaves and forest fires, earthquakes and tsunamis, droughts and floods, state failures and protracted wars. Henry Gee, editor of the magazine Nature, wrote in an essay in Scientific American in late 2021 that even absent the hazards of climate change and nuclear war, humankind was heading towards extinction due to declining genetic variety and sperm quality.

He goes on to predict that even in the most plausibly dire scenarios billions of people will survive.  He says that current population stands at eight billion but claims as a result of these dire scenarios “the world population would likely still stand at 6 billion people by 2050”.  As you read on this opinion piece is simply an infomercial for Climate Alpha and FutureMap.  He believes that climate migrations will be necessary for the survivors.  His future vision is pockets of reliable agricultural output and relative climate resilience that may become havens for climate refugees.

He concludes:

What these surviving societies and communities will have in common is that they are able to unwind the complexity that has felled our predecessors. They rely less on far-flung global supply chains by locally growing their own food, generating energy from renewable resources, and utilizing additive manufacturing. A combination of prepping and nomadism, high-tech and simple, are the ingredients for species-level survival.

These demographic, geographic, and technological shifts are evidence that we are already doing things differently now rather than waiting for an inevitable “collapse” or mass extinction event. They also suggest the embrace of a new model of civilization that is both more mobile and more sustainable than our present sedentary and industrial one. The collapse of civilizations is a feature of history, but Civilization with a big ‘C’ carries on, absorbing useful technologies and values from the past before it is buried. Today’s innovations will be tomorrow’s platforms. Indeed, the faster we embrace these artifacts of our next Civilization, the more likely we are to avoid the collapse of our present one. Humanity will come together again—whether or not it falls apart first.

Comments

In my opinion there are several major flaws in his arguments.  Apparently, his projections are based on the RCP 8.5 scenario because he thinks it is “actually a baseline”.  Roger Pielke, Jr. has noted that the misuse of RCP8.5 is pervasive.  Larry Kummer writing at Climate Etc. explains that it is a useful worst-case scenario, but not “business as usual”.  For crying out loud even the BBC understands that the scenario is “exceedingly unlikely”.  Relying on that scenario invalidates his projections.

Khanna’s worst-case scenario statement “Hundreds of millions of people perish in heatwaves and forest fires, earthquakes and tsunamis, droughts and floods, state failures and protracted wars” is absurd.  He has to address the many examples that show that weather-related impacts have been going down as global temperatures have increased such as those described by Willis Eschenbach in “Where Is The “Climate Emergency?”.   The theme of his opinion is climate anarchy so why are earthquakes and tsunamis included?  I concede that his flawed climate projections could stress states and prolong wars but I am not convinced that climate is a major driver.

Finally, his argument that climate is a major driver is contradicted by his dependence on the Sustainable Development Index, a “ranking of countries that meet their people’s needs with low per capita resource consumption”.  He states that the best performers are “Costa Rica, Albania, Georgia, and other less populated countries around middle-income status”.  The fact that Costa Rica is in a tropical region and thus much warmer than mid-latitude Albania and Georgia suggests that warm climates are not a limiting factor for sustainable development.

Khanna may be a leading global strategy advisor, world traveler, and best-selling author but his lack of understanding of the uncertainties associated with climate change are evident in this editorial.  Not unlike many of those advocates for climate change action, upon close review it appears that following the money is his motivation.

—————————————————————————————————————————————

Roger Caiazza blogs on New York energy and environmental issues at Pragmatic Environmentalist of New York.  This represents his opinion and not the opinion of any of his previous employers or any other company with which he has been associated. 

4.7 21 votes
Article Rating
82 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TEWS_Pilot
August 17, 2022 10:06 am

Credit Steve Milloy: Another corrupt and incompetent “science” advisor in the JoeBama criminal regime gets outed….
Jane Lubchenco, White House Climate Science Overseer, Sanctioned And Barred By The National Academy of Sciences
https://www.infowars.com/posts/white-house-climate-science-overseer-sanctioned-and-barred-by-the-national-academy-of-sciences/

comment image
comment image

MarkW
Reply to  TEWS_Pilot
August 17, 2022 10:22 am

When you get too bad for even NAS, you have gotten really bad.

garboard
Reply to  TEWS_Pilot
August 17, 2022 11:27 am

like peter gleick , danielle dixson , richard attenborough, and others who have been caught openly lying this will get zero attention by the mainstream media . they even made a movie / tv show making phil jones into a brave hero for helping mikey mann with his fabricated hockey stick study

Vuk
Reply to  garboard
August 17, 2022 12:54 pm

“Supersonic travel could be about to take wing as American Airlines has put in an order for 60 aircraft capable of flying at 1.7 times the speed of sound.”
None of the above mentioned ‘cosa nostra delusioni intelligensia’ would by flying these planes unless the turbines are powered by Tesla’s cars discarded lithium batteries fires.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Vuk
August 18, 2022 4:40 am

yeah hear the guy giving a spiel on them IF they can get CCs and IF they can work out a hydrogen engine them maybe…
like the recent we got cold fusion and ooops we cant get it again story
unicorn farts and pipedreaming

M Courtney
Reply to  garboard
August 17, 2022 11:53 pm

Sir Richard Attenborough?
You mean he faked his dinosaurs?

fretslider
August 17, 2022 10:09 am

Either you believe or… you’re an heretic

Old Man Winter
Reply to  fretslider
August 17, 2022 2:06 pm

The High Priests of Climate Change™ are ensuring True Believers™
are “shielded” from false dogma & news from vile climate heretics.
They will monitor their “dedication to the Cause” in case if they’re
tempted to backslide!

Climate Depot-
Bloomberg News Exposes Eco-Hypocrite Billionaire Bill Gates’ Involvement to Save Biden Climate Bill

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/08/the-fact-checkers-come-for-hillsdale.php

https://www.dailywire.com/news/twitter-activates-steps-to-protect-midterms-fight-misleading-narratives

KSchwab1.jpg
August 17, 2022 10:20 am

“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” — H.L. Mencken

Frank from NoVA
August 17, 2022 10:45 am

Yet another progressively-credentialed, authoritarian-loving WEF stooge.

‘BA and MA, Georgetown University; PhD, London School of Economics. Founder and Managing Partner, FutureMap Pte Ltd. Author: Move, The Future is Asian, Technocracy in America, Connectography, Hybrid Reality, How to Run the World, The Second World. WEF Young Global Leader.’

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
August 18, 2022 4:42 am

and the WEF bit seals the fact hes a stooge with an agenda for power/money/fame

Editor
August 17, 2022 10:50 am

What goes on in their small brains when they generate illusions and fantasies based on nothing concrete it sounds like some people are just mentally ill, their vivid inability to do basic critical analysis that rational brain healthy normally do is absent in these climate charlatans who are always striving to be planetary savior of an imagined chaos and doomed future of the planet.

I am completely immune to propaganda and ideology because I long ago chose to be a fully independent free-thinking person who doesn’t belong to any organization or creed which is why I can often “see” bullcrap ahead long before it shows up and that especially the media and political circles since they exist to lie and make a lot of money.

Last edited 1 month ago by Sunsettommy
Dave Fair
Reply to  Sunsettommy
August 21, 2022 5:04 pm

Tommy, your “I am completely immune to propaganda and ideology …” can lead to hubris. I assume you are a human being with the potential to have any or all of the human foibles.

I’ll just assume that was a throw-away line. In the past I joked that I used my intellect to feed my emotions, thinking it witty. As the years go by I’m less and less sure that my emotions have not and currently are not affecting my rational processes. I find I’m taking a little more time in analyzing my motives and assumptions in making important decisions. It has not kept me from making significant decisions, though.

ResourceGuy
August 17, 2022 10:53 am

The Walking Dead TV series has inspired a lot of spinoff productions with similar science creds. I guess something had the fill the void of declining popularity of reality shows.

I aspire to be a world traveler also, but not with other people’s money or climate con games.

Oldseadog
Reply to  ResourceGuy
August 17, 2022 12:01 pm

I have been a world traveller all my working life and have been paid well for a lot of it.
I don’t recognise the world that some other folk say they are are travelling in.

Richard Page
Reply to  ResourceGuy
August 17, 2022 5:11 pm

We appear to have developed an appetite for apocalypse stories – so it’s no wonder that a ‘reality based’ apocalypse drama gets attention, although it’s treated in the same way as other reality and apocalypse tv shows/films. I am surprised at the numbers of people that can’t tell the difference between fantasy and reality though. However – this, too, shall pass.

Captain climate
August 17, 2022 10:58 am

Georgetown school of foreign service (SFS) was often called “safe from science” because of its lack of a science requirement.

Walter Sobchak
August 17, 2022 11:07 am

Can I take the under with this dude?

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
August 17, 2022 11:09 am

Climate resilient regions – that would be the moon then. Appropriate enough for all the climate crisis loonies.

garboard
August 17, 2022 11:19 am

following in the paul ehrlich tradition of nonsensical predictions beloved by orthodox catastrophists

Rud Istvan
August 17, 2022 11:20 am

Pieces like this are the reason I dropped Time many years ago. About same time I dropped SciAm because it was no longer either scientific or American.

Gregory Woods
Reply to  Rud Istvan
August 17, 2022 12:33 pm

Drop the ‘i’ and you have Scam….

n.n
August 17, 2022 11:34 am

The far-left is totalitarian. The far-right is anarchist. The left-right nexus is leftist.

Richard Page
Reply to  n.n
August 17, 2022 3:23 pm

Leftist cabal pushes Globalism and climate change hysteria as a means to that end. Again, follow the money.

Last edited 1 month ago by Richard Page
griff
Reply to  Richard Page
August 18, 2022 12:36 am

The money all seems to be with fossil fuel companies and those that profit from them… then use that money to get political influence

ozspeaksup
Reply to  griff
August 18, 2022 4:45 am

ya reckon?
see rather a LOT of big green money behind a lot of dodgy brothers scams myself raking massive subsidies in at taxpayers expense. at least big oil paid its own way for the major part
and provided real jobs and real products with real outputs

MarkW
Reply to  griff
August 18, 2022 2:04 pm

Fossil fuel companies have more money than the governments of the world?

Do you ever bother actually thinking about the stuff you write?

David Anderson
August 17, 2022 11:53 am

It’s Time Magazine. What do you expect?

Doonman
August 17, 2022 12:10 pm

Time magazine is owned by tech billionaire Marc Benioff who acquired it in 2018. Benioff has a personal net worth of $6.6 billion, according to Forbes.

He joins Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos in media acquisition of the Washington Post in 2013, Laurene Powell Jobs, the businesswoman and widow of Apple founder Steve Jobs, who purchased a majority stake in Atlantic Media, the publisher of The Atlantic, in 2017 and biotech billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong who acquired the Los Angeles Times and San Diego Union-Tribune in 2018.

So it is clear that tech billionaires want to control the narratives in America.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  Doonman
August 17, 2022 1:21 pm

These moneybags will be supportive of tone deafness and fact free and context free in reporting without repercussions from advertisers. Except advertisers have also been coerced by the climate thugs.

It's all BS
Reply to  Doonman
August 17, 2022 3:02 pm

Time Magazine. Now available where all good comic books are sold

Richard Page
Reply to  It's all BS
August 17, 2022 3:21 pm

Bad comic books surely. It’s the current incarnation of the Victorian ‘penny dreadful’s’.

lee riffee
Reply to  It's all BS
August 17, 2022 3:29 pm

The only place I’ve ever seen Time Magazine is in doctors’ offices. And most offices don’t even have magazines of any kind these days, probably due to the ubiquity of cell phones.

Doonman
Reply to  lee riffee
August 17, 2022 6:51 pm

All magazines were removed from office waiting rooms because of Covid. It was supposed to be for two weeks to “flatten the curve” according to Fauci.

John Hultquist
Reply to  Doonman
August 17, 2022 9:26 pm

Correct. Take a book or newspaper along.

Call me a skeptic
Reply to  Doonman
August 18, 2022 7:58 am

Time magazine, as long as I can remember, has always tried to control the narrative. Back in the 70’s the cover story was the coming ice age. Then, as the global coolist morphed into global warmists, the cover story was sea level rise with the statue of liberty depicted with sea levels up to her armpit. Can’t see how they stay in business as they are less credible then the National Enquirer.

Michael in Dublin
August 17, 2022 12:31 pm

Albania produces all its electricity from hydro. The incomes of the people are very low and corruption in government undermines and stunts growth. It is a real shame because of its location and Mediterranean climate it should be flourishing. Climate change is not the world’s biggest problem but climate corruption is.

Vuk
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
August 17, 2022 12:43 pm

…. and Mr. Albanese the new Australian PM is leading his country in the same direction.

Redge
Reply to  Vuk
August 17, 2022 11:45 pm

With the UK leading the charge

Gary Pearse
August 17, 2022 12:46 pm

“Khanna’s worst-case scenario statement “Hundreds of millions of people perish in heatwaves and forest fires, earthquakes and tsunamis, droughts and floods, ”

Actually more than that could easily perish around the world from fallout from Western Climate Policy-Caused damage to electricity grids and their rocketing prices for power because of deliberate harm to the oil and gas industry, harm to agriculture, all initiating a cascade of secondary damage like shuttering of major industries priced out by power costs, the millions of jobs lost and inflation leading to deflation. Sri Lanka was a WEF and marxists climate science success story.

MarkW
Reply to  Gary Pearse
August 17, 2022 2:04 pm

Climate change causes earthquakes?

Doonman
Reply to  MarkW
August 17, 2022 6:52 pm

Only during earthquake weather.

auto
Reply to  Gary Pearse
August 17, 2022 3:31 pm

‘Let’s assume that we are indeed hurtling towards the worst-case scenario by 2050: Hundreds of millions of people perish in heatwaves and forest fires, earthquakes and tsunamis, droughts and floods, ” ‘
So – an assumption – for 28 years from now.
Ata rate of >50 million deaths a year, every year, as now, about 1.5 billion folk will die in that period. Many will die in heat waves [not OF heatwaves, perhaps]. Similarly tsunami [singular and plural, I thought], forest fires, earthquakes, etc.
All seems pretty limp to me – but Parag Khanna has a book to sell, as even World Travellers and Global Strategy Advisers need to pay the mortgage.

Auto

MarkW
Reply to  auto
August 18, 2022 2:08 pm

Putin is offering $16K and an honorary title to any woman who has 10 or more kids.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/putin-offers-16000-reward-honorary-title-russian-women-have-10-children

Bill Toland
Reply to  Gary Pearse
August 18, 2022 1:08 am

Climate related deaths have fallen by 99% in the last century. Fossil fuels haven’t taken a safe climate and made it dangerous, they’ve taken a dangerous climate and made it safe.

https://nypost.com/2022/04/30/deaths-in-climate-disasters-declined-99-from-a-century-ago/

Terry
August 17, 2022 12:49 pm

As Americans get further and further away from seeing global warming as a serious threat the hysteria about it gets greater and greater. Both the magazine and the writer make their living creating hysteria, at least the latter is honest and admits it. I’ve lived with the msm for 70 plus years. I’m kind of sorry to see them is such a pitiful state, but it’s their choice to go out dishonorably.

Louis Hunt
August 17, 2022 12:52 pm

‘He is Founder & CEO of Climate Alpha, an AI-powered analytics platform that forecasts asset values because “the next real estate boom will be in climate resilient regions”.’

So getting people to believe the worst-case scenario when it comes to climate change helps his company. No wonder he deals in climate fear porn. Time magazine knows this, but it suits their purpose, so they don’t care if he’s a biased fear monger using them to sell his snake oil.

Peter W
Reply to  Louis Hunt
August 17, 2022 1:19 pm

I moved from New Hampshire to Florida several years ago in order to get away from that terrible global warming up north.

Louis Hunt
Reply to  Peter W
August 17, 2022 6:10 pm

I bet Climate Alpha didn’t recommend Florida to you as a “climate resilient region.” I have to wonder if they offer a money-back guarantee to clients they send to Greenland under the promise that it will become prime real-estate in a few years when Greenland becomes the new Florida. Guarantee or not, they will go bankrupt before clients catch on and request a refund.

Mayor of Venus
Reply to  Louis Hunt
August 20, 2022 1:33 pm

And the Aleutian Islands of Alaska become “new Hawaii”. Buy an island now; plant palm trees!

August 17, 2022 1:32 pm

After checking my watch to be sure this was not an April Fools article, i will analyze these latest predictions of doom scientifically: Just this morning, after I woke up, I was thinking that this world really needs more predictions of doom, because so many children and leftists love scary stories.

(1) Every prediction of environmental doom since the 1960s has been wrong. So we are long overdue for a right prediction ! Even a broken watch is “right” twice a day.

(2) Scientists say CO2 is an evil satanic gas that causes every problem in the world, from cancer to warts. This must be true because “scientists say so”

(3) The climate will get warmer, unless it gets colder.

(4) +1.49 degrees C. is no big deal. Piece of cake
But +1.5 degrees C., which was almost reached in April 1998 and February 2016, in the peak month of two very large El Nino heat releases, will kill people by the millions,

(5) This TIME article was fear porn of the highest order. and I am amazed that Mr. Calazza, a New York energy expert, was able to read it …
without bursting our laughing.

(6) Based on my own research, the people least vulnerable to +1.5 degrees C,. will be unvaxxed Trump supporters. dwarfs and grossly overweight lesbian women of color.

Sorry, I can’t take climate fear porn seriously
This is high comedy to me.
Those leftists really know how to tell a scary story!

Last edited 1 month ago by Richard Greene
MarkW
Reply to  Richard Greene
August 17, 2022 2:07 pm

Even a broken watch is “right” twice a day.

While in college, I had a digital watch that one day decided that there were 99 minutes in an hour.

I don’t know how often that watch showed the right time, but it was a lot less than twice a day.

Tim Spence
August 17, 2022 1:33 pm

‘The next real estate boom will be in climate resilient areas’

Yeh, sure, when everywhere is twice as endangered as everywhere else?

Climate believer
August 17, 2022 2:00 pm

 “Now, in the 21st century, more than one billion will be displaced by climate change.”

… made up nonsense.

Reply to  Climate believer
August 17, 2022 3:27 pm

The quote might turn out to be correct with one change:
“Now, in the 21st century, more than one billion will be displaced by OUR POLICIES
TO COMBAT climate change.”

How can people not see the illogic of claiming extreme weather will become an existential crisis then insist that civilization rely on weather dependent energy sources?
It’s nonsense, and as Alex Epstein rightly reminds us — it’s immoral.
These ideas need to be ridiculed.

Doonman
Reply to  Climate believer
August 17, 2022 7:03 pm

By the end of the 21st century, 7 billion people will be dead. This is already a certainty and there is nothing anyone can do about it.

lee riffee
August 17, 2022 3:33 pm

IMO the only migrations that will take place are of people who are desperate to get away from countries that will have fully embraced the whole net zero nonsense….
People will be leaving destitute countries with failing power grids, dying agriculture, un-affordable energy costs and draconian bans on the sorts of products and fuels that are actually known to work.

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  lee riffee
August 18, 2022 7:25 am

“just a 1.5 degree Celsius rise will prove devastating to the world’s food systems by 2025.”

NO.
From deliberate actions to reduce fertilizer supply and and therefore crop yields .

Marc
August 17, 2022 4:00 pm

Thomas Malthus would be proud.

John
August 17, 2022 4:08 pm

Breaking: 
Court strikes down ruling that blocked Biden’s oil drilling pause
The moratorium on new oil and gas leasing in federal lands and waters was a key part of Biden’s climate plan
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2022/08/17/court-ruling-biden-oil-gas-leasing-pause/

Doonman
Reply to  John
August 17, 2022 7:11 pm

Doesn’t matter. Biden just signed new legislation that expands lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico, offshore Alaska and ties solar and wind expansion to ongoing gas and lease sale auctions.

Kemaris
August 17, 2022 4:40 pm

“They rely less on far-flung global supply chains by locally growing their own food, generating energy from renewable resources, and utilizing additive manufacturing. A combination of prepping and nomadism, high-tech and simple, are the ingredients for species-level survival.”

This is hilarious because it mimics what I’ve been saying about the goal of modern climate policy, but from a hilariously optimistic direction. Where he sees people “locally growing their own food”, I see people forced to engage in subsistence agriculture by the complete lack of fuel, fertilizer, or meaningful agricultural equipment. Where he sees people “generating energy from renewable resources”, I see a bunch of peons farming amongst the windmills that provide their “betters” with guilt-frer electricity while the peons shiver and starve in the darkness, waking before dawn to scavenge bird and bat carcasses among the windmills for as long as they last. AND KHANNA THINKS HE WILL BE ONE OF THE ELITES RATHER THAN ONE OF THE PEONS.

TonyG
Reply to  Kemaris
August 18, 2022 7:37 am

“AND KHANNA THINKS HE WILL BE ONE OF THE ELITES RATHER THAN ONE OF THE PEONS.”

They all do.

Doug
August 17, 2022 5:14 pm

It has been since 1992 when real facts were discarded. When Al Gore said we were going to die. I knew I had to oppose that poser

Doug
August 17, 2022 5:17 pm

True believers are becoming more scarce …as if it matters anyway. emperial Evidence always rules

toorightmate
August 17, 2022 8:04 pm

Another who gained his PhD from a packet of Kellog’s Corn Flakes.

Dennis
August 17, 2022 11:02 pm

Time Magazine 1970s the ice age again.

Time Magazine 1980s climate change warming.

griff
Reply to  Dennis
August 18, 2022 12:34 am

This is Time’s own statement that a so called ‘Ice Age’ cover was a hoax…

The Truth on That Doctored TIME Magazine Ice Age Cover Hoax | Time

Dave Fair
Reply to  griff
August 18, 2022 3:51 pm

So what? I was there in the 1970s, Griff, and I assure you the global cooling scare was the rage for most of that period. You don’t forget shit like that.

I was just back from combat in Vietnam where it was finally driven home to me that government is populated with self-seeking liars. When the global warming scare reared its ugly head I recognized it for the scam it was. You need to read more than revisionist history and Leftist propaganda.

Bill Toland
Reply to  griff
August 18, 2022 11:01 pm

Griff, here is a list of some of the news articles in the 1970s that warned of a coming ice age. Notice that Time magazine had three stories in different years; none of the links to Time magazine now work, presumably because they have been disappeared from the archives.

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/17032-a-compilation-of-news-articles-on-the-global-cooling-scare-of-the-1970-s-2013-03-04

Bill Toland
Reply to  Bill Toland
August 18, 2022 11:27 pm
Redge
August 17, 2022 11:41 pm

 According to Khanna’s long bio, he is a “leading global strategy advisor, world traveler, and best-selling author”. 

First I’ve heard of this self-proclaimed, self-aggrandising hypocrite

H.R.
Reply to  Redge
August 18, 2022 4:07 am

Redge: First I’ve heard of this self-proclaimed, self-aggrandising hypocrite”

You left out “and huckster looking for a ticket on the climate gravy train” Redge.

Did you accidently hit ‘Post Comment’ too soon?
😉

M Courtney
August 17, 2022 11:55 pm

leading global strategy advisor, world traveler

Those two roles imply that he’s not really worried about anthropogenic climate change.

Ed Zuiderwijk
August 18, 2022 1:12 am

A piece about a first-rate shaman and witchdoctor.

Dave Fair
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
August 18, 2022 3:57 pm

Second-rate, at best.

observa
August 18, 2022 2:40 am

Let’s assume that we are indeed hurtling towards… 

...the dooming. Obviously time to book the one way ticket to Sri Lanka for sustainable organic food under the circumstances-
Tanya Plibersek urged to block $4.5b fertiliser plant proposal amid fears for rock art – ABC News
Kindergarten level rock graffiti will bowl over feeding the current descendants any day of the week with these planet savers.

ozspeaksup
August 18, 2022 4:38 am

gee he assumes a whole lot of distopia doesnt he
and not a shred of reality
bet hes got a book on the go too

Mark BLR
August 18, 2022 5:27 am

Apparently, his projections are based on the RCP 8.5 scenario because he thinks it is “actually a baseline”.

There are two issues here.

1) The IPCC over the decades has “rewritten the dictionary” for many words and phrases. For example they can’t even agree with their “parent” bureaucracy, the UNFCCC, on what the term “climate change” means.

2) The IPCC has just updated the “baseline” pathways from the “old / CMIP5 for AR5” RCPs to the “new / CMIP6 for AR6” SSPs.

The author’s link to “the most recent IPCC report” in the TIME article is to the latest WG-II (two) contribution to the AR6 cycle … all 3676 pages of it.

From the WG-I (one) contribution to the AR6 cycle of IPCC reports (updated to the “Final / Approved” version last May), section 1.6.1.4, “The likelihood of reference scenarios, scenario uncertainty and storylines”, on page 239 :

Among the five core scenarios used most in this report, SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 are explicit ‘no-climate-policy’ scenarios (Gidden et al., 2019; Cross-Chapter Box 1.4, Table 1), assuming a carbon price of zero. These future ‘baseline’ scenarios are hence counterfactuals that include less climate policies compared to ‘business-as-usual’ scenarios – given that ‘business-as-usual’ scenarios could be understood to imply a continuation of existing climate policies. Generally, future scenarios are meant to cover a broad range of plausible futures, due for example to unforeseen discontinuities in development pathways (Raskin and Swart, 2020), or to large uncertainties in underlying long-term projections of economic drivers (Christensen et al., 2018). However, the likelihood of high emission scenarios such as RCP8.5 or SSP5-8.5 is considered low in light of recent developments in the energy sector (Hausfather and Peters, 2020a, 2020b). Studies that consider possible future emission trends in the absence of additional climate policies, such as the recent IEA 2020 World Energy Outlook ‘stated policy’ scenario (International Energy Agency, 2020), project approximately constant fossil and industrial CO2 emissions out to 2070, approximately in line with the medium RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and SSP2-4.5 scenarios (Hausfather and Peters, 2020b) and the 2030 global emission levels that are pledged as part of the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement (Section 1.2.2; (Fawcett et al., 2015; Rogelj et al., 2016; UNFCCC, 2016; IPCC, 2018).

NB : Plots of both emissions and “projected” GMST rises for SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 tend to neatly bracket RCP8.5. If both SSPs are “counterfactual”, then so is RCP8.5

According to the IPCC (WG-I) the new “worst-case” scenario, the one where only currently “written into law” pledges are kept and no additional ones are made, is either the “old” RCP4.5 or the “new” SSP2-4.5.

Technically RCP8.5 can indeed be considered as a “baseline” (or “high emission”) scenario … as long as you specify that it’s a “counterfactual” one.

Dave Fair
Reply to  Mark BLR
August 18, 2022 3:57 pm

Amazing bureaucratic doublespeak. The analyses in AR6 predominantly feature the high-end scenarios. {Forgot the exact percentage.}

Mark BLR
Reply to  Dave Fair
August 19, 2022 3:19 am

{Forgot the exact percentage.}

Roger Pielke (Junior) did the hard work of “Ctrl-f, check totals for each RCP / SSP number in each chapter, report the final sums” in a couple of articles that were copied here at WUWT.

For the WG-I (Accepted version, subject to final edits) report a year ago :
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/08/09/pielke-jr-on-ar6/

For the WG-II (Accepted version, subject to final edits) report this March :
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/03/01/pielke-jr-on-ipcc-ar6-wg2-release/

– – – – –

I have said under other articles that I think that apart from the SPM the WG-One report is actually reasonably “fair and balanced”, with a suitably “scientific” approach”.

WG-Two, on the other hand, instead of highlighting the “counterfactual” nature of the various “high emission” scenarios and only giving lip-service to the (extremely remote) possibility of forcings approaching those of RCP8.5 / SSP5-8.5 as WG-I does, sets the ground for the rest of the WG-II report (and the WG-III report) with the following passage (in the “Cross-Chapter Box CLIMATE”, on page 1-22) :

The plausibility of emissions levels as high as the emissions scenario conventionally associated with the RCP8.5 and SSP5–8.5 concentration pathways has been called into question since AR5, as has the emissions pathway feasibility of the low scenarios (Hausfather and Peters, 2020; Rose and and M. Scott, 2020). However, these views are contested (Schwalm et al., 2020, for RCP8.5), and it is important to realise that emissions scenarios and concentration pathways are not the same thing, and higher concentration pathways such as RCP8.5 could arise from lower emissions scenarios if carbon cycle feedbacks are stronger than assumed in the integrated assessment models (IAMs) used to create the standard scenarios (Booth et al., 2017). In the majority of full-complexity Earth System Models, these feedbacks are stronger than in the IAMs (Jones et al., 2013), so the RCP8.5 concentration pathway cannot be ruled out purely through consideration of the economic aspects of emissions scenarios. Nonetheless, the likelihood of a climate outcome, and the overall distribution of climate outcomes, are a function of the emissions scenario’s likelihood.

The attitude towards “traditional / historical science and scientific methods” is exemplified by FAQ1.5, “What is new in this 6th IPCC report on impacts, adaptation and vulnerability?”, on page 1-76 :

The AR6 emphases the emergent issue on social justice and different forms of knowledge. As climate change impacts and implemented responses increasingly occur, there is heightened awareness of the ways that climate responses interact with issues of justice and social progress. In this report, there is expanded attention to inequity in climate vulnerability and responses, the role of power and participation in processes of implementation, unequal and differential impacts, and climate justice. The historic focus on scientific literature has also been increasingly accompanied by attention to and incorporation of Indigenous knowledge, local knowledge, and associated scholars.

Some biases of (at least ?) some of the WG-II (chapter ?) authors breaks through the facade in the following passage from the “Multiple knowledge systems and frameworks” section of “Cross-Chapter Box INDIG: The Role of Indigenous Knowledge and Local Knowledge in Understanding and Adapting to Climate Change”, on page 18-75 :

However, these efforts have been accompanied by a recognition that ‘integration’ of Indigenous knowledge and local knowledge cannot mean that those knowledge systems are subsumed or required to be validated through typical scientific means (Gratani et al., 2011; Matsui, 2015). Such a critique of ‘validity’ can be inappropriate, unnecessary, can disrespect Indigenous Peoples’ own identities and histories, limits the advancement and sharing of these perspectives in the formal literature, and overlooks the structural drivers of oppression and endangerment that are associated with Western civilization (Ford et al., 2016). Moreover, by underutilizing Indigenous knowledge and local knowledge systems, opportunities that could otherwise facilitate effective and feasible adaptation action can be overlooked. We should also reserve space for the understanding that each cultural knowledge system, building on linguistic-cultural endemicity, is unique and inherently valuable.

I repeat, in my opinion the WG-I report is actually quite good (once you get past the SPM), it’s the WG-II and WG-III contributions that veer towards scientific insanity.

Last edited 1 month ago by Mark BLR
william Johnston
August 18, 2022 4:49 pm

He sure do like his big numbers, don’t he.

%d bloggers like this: