Quit Fearmongering, San Francisco Chronicle, Climate Change Isn’t Coming for Cabernet

From ClimateREALISM

By H. Sterling Burnett

The San Francisco Chronicle posted an article claiming that climate change is harming Cabernet production, specifically in California. This is false. The climate hasn’t appreciably changed for the worse in California amid modest warming. Wildfires are not outside of their historical norm and droughts haven’t become more frequent or severe. Data show fluctuations in Cabernet production across the decades, but no sustained downward trend correlating to global warming or carbon dioxide emissions. In fact, the highest production years for cabernet grape tonnage have all occurred during twenty-first century, supposedly the hottest years on record.

In the story, “Climate change is coming for Cabernet. Here’s how one Napa winery is getting ready,” staff writer, Jess Lander, writes:

In 2019, the greatest threat to California wine was climate change. It felt like a reckoning was coming, especially to Napa Valley, where the future of its crown jewel grape, Cabernet Sauvignon . . ..

Then, suddenly, winemakers stopped talking so much about climate change.

COVID-19 hit in 2020, forcing wineries to close to visitors and find new ways to reach customers. (Remember virtual tastings?) A few months later, more than 30 Napa Valley wineries were damaged or destroyed in devastating wildfires, and smoke from the disasters nearly wiped out an entire vintage. Starting in late 2022, California wine began to feel the effects of an unprecedented downturn in the wine industry. Ever since, California wineries have been in survival mode, battling a litany of challenges, including declining sales and tourism; a major grape oversupply; competition from alternative alcoholic beverages, like seltzers and ready-to-drink cocktails; tariffs and the loss of the Canadian export market; and growing anti-alcohol sentiment among Americans.

In truth, there is no evidence that climate change has ever posed a threat to California or Napa Valley Cabernet production.

Neither drought nor wildfire in California are outside of their normal frequency or severity. Since European colonization of America and migration to California, severe droughts were recorded in 1841, 1864, 1895, 1924, 1928–1935, 1947–1950, 1959–1961, 1976–1977, 1986–1992, 2007–2009, and 2011–2017,2020–2022 and 2024-25. Many of those droughts occurred long before human greenhouse gas emissions rose significantly, when the Earth was cooler. Indeed, historic droughts in California were much more lengthy and severe. Even with the recent droughts, the past two centuries have been relatively wet when compared to California’s historic drought patterns, as seen in the graphic below.

Dozens of Climate Realism posts provide data and reference peer-reviewed studies showing wildfire frequency and severity in California are well below historic norms, even with a small uptick in recent years due to shifts in land management and increasing urban expansion into areas historically prone to wildfires, hereherehere, and here, for instance.

If drought and wildfires haven’t become more common or severe as the climate has undergone a modest change, then that change can’t be behind any Cabernet grape production losses. Even more telling is the fact that Cabernet production is, contrary to what is implied by Lander’s San Francisco Chronicle story, doing well amid modest climate change.

Interestingly, in 2019, seven years ago, CBS News warned “Climate change is coming for your Cabernet,” almost the same title as the San Francisco Chronicle story. Yet just four years later, data from the Wine Institute show that California’s Cabernet production was the state’s second highest on record, with the record being set just the year before CBS bemoaned Cabernet’s supposed fate. Indeed, despite some vineyards closing, resulting in acreage taken out of production and modest warming, no year’s production since 2010 has been lower than any year’s production before then. No year after 2000 experienced Cabernet crushed grape tonnage lower than any year before then. As the graphic below shows, with fits and starts due to normal agricultural ups and downs, California’s Cabernet production has increased dramatically. California’s all-time record for Cabernet production was set in 2018, with 2023 being the second highest production year on record.

Nor, despite the San Francisco Chronicle’s warnings of a climate change induced Cabernet apocalypse, does the industry seem to believe Cabernet production is doomed due to climate change or any other factor, like reduced wine consumption or rising costs amidst falling prices. In fact, ReNub writes concerning the future market for conditions for Cabernet, “[c]abernet Sauvignon Market is expected to reach US$ 789.98 Million by 2034 from US$ 362.23 Million in 2025, with a CAGR [compound annual growth rate] of 9.05% from 2026 to 2034.” (See the image)

Cabernet may face some serious headwinds, but they have nothing to do with climate change. As mentioned, but downplayed in Lander’s article, trade issues, a decline in alcohol consumption among younger demographics, and higher input costs, are among the factors squeezing vintner’s profits. In France, as discussed at Climate Realism here and here, they have a solution, blame climate change for wine’s woes, while pouring excess wine down the drain rather than put it on the market. The problem is a glut of wine suppressing prices, not a surfeit.

The article, “Climate change is coming for Cabernet. Here’s how one Napa winery is getting ready,” is a disservice to the San Francisco Chronicle’s readers, misrepresenting the true state of Cabernet production and its prospects in an attempt to advance the false narrative that climate change is dooming the world, one product, crop, or industry at a time.

H. Sterling Burnett

H. Sterling Burnett

H. Sterling Burnett, Ph.D., is the Director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy and the managing editor of Environment & Climate News. In addition to directing The Heartland Institute’s Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy, Burnett puts Environment & Climate News together, is the editor of Heartland’s Climate Change Weekly email, and the host of the Environment & Climate News Podcast.

5 10 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
31 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bryan A
May 6, 2026 6:07 am

The picture needs alterations.
Cabernet (Sauvignon) is a purple grape and Red Wine.

Tom Halla
Reply to  Bryan A
May 6, 2026 6:16 am

Unripe grapes are green.

Reply to  Tom Halla
May 6, 2026 7:40 am

Yeah, but the wine in the glass in the above article’s lead-in photo is clearly NOT red, the color characteristic of Cabernet (Sauvignon) wine.

Walter Sobchak
Reply to  Tom Halla
May 6, 2026 9:36 am

The grapes in the picture look to be very ripe. Note the brown spots. And the glass of wine in the picture is white.

Reply to  Bryan A
May 6, 2026 7:20 am

It is surprisingly difficult to find a good and authentic photo that includes both the ripened Cabernet Sauvignon grapes on the vine and a glass of the namesake wine.

comment image

Bryan A
Reply to  pflashgordon
May 6, 2026 10:12 am

Must be Merlot! Can’t be Cab…

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Bryan A
May 7, 2026 4:42 am

Ive picked in Clare Valley Merlot are damn SMALL almost currant sized deep deep purple gems not a lot per bunch either , ( the wines the ONLY one I will drink James Barry 1992 vintage was superb))and a bastard to pick on low bush vines! the pic whites would be a sauv Blanc? or riesling etc sure NOT a red at that size theyre ripe or close to and theyd be VERY purple . wines grapes are the one item workers learn NOT to try n eat 😉 in one mouthful

Sparta Nova 4
May 6, 2026 6:10 am

“Ever since, California wineries have been in survival mode, battling a litany of challenges, including … ; a major grape oversupply; “

And here I though climate change was a negative impact on the grape supply.

What did I miss?

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
May 6, 2026 7:45 am

“What did I miss?”

The admissions (with supporting scientific data) from both NASA and NOAA that both increasing atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and global warming—the two not necessarily related—have resulted in an overall “greening” (i.e., global increase in vegetative cover) of Earth’s surface.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ToldYouSo
May 6, 2026 10:17 am

I should have included a /s.

Bryan A
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
May 6, 2026 10:15 am

I always thought Wine Grapes loved warmer weather (brings up the Brix) and longer growing conditions (increases flavor).

SxyxS
Reply to  Bryan A
May 6, 2026 11:14 am

I can only imagine how evil climate change is when it only targets specific grapes.

Or maybe this article was released to target hippster upper class snobs,
otherwise climate change would be destroying Merlot instead of the expensive napa valley cabernet.

The only threat for Wine in Californiamaybe the crazy use of water for Pistachios and Resnicks water monopol.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Bryan A
May 7, 2026 4:43 am

yes a cool summers a real worry for brix and if wet also moulds ..though a Botrytis isnt a bad drop either

strativarius
May 6, 2026 6:41 am

Wine is heavily taxed here – as you’d probably expect in Airstrip 1.  

Back in 1979 my newly acquired father-in-law, who lived in Treviso near Venice, took me to the local agricultural market warehouse to buy some [Merlot] wine. He took a number of 5 litre plastic containers, I was intrigued by that. 

At the huge warehouse he went over to a petrol pump and promptly filled up the containers and it didn’t take long. It was something like 10p a litre, practically giving it away.

Climate change isn’t coming for the wine, the chancellor is coming for our money.

strativarius
May 6, 2026 6:56 am

Story tip – Real Socialism looking after the poor and vulnerable in these times of high energy prices…

Ed Miliband backs secret court hearings to give energy firms warrants to break into homes

“remove the threat of forced prepayment meters for households unable to pay their energy bills”,

Curious George
May 6, 2026 7:33 am

The end is nigh. We are all lost. (Climate business as usual)

May 6, 2026 7:36 am

As for the title of the above article, I’ll drink to that!

strativarius
Reply to  ToldYouSo
May 6, 2026 7:39 am

Depending on your time zone, some of us already have.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  strativarius
May 6, 2026 12:55 pm

Teetotaler to wineo: “What time is it?” Wineo: “It’s – hic – wine-o-clock! Hic!

Reply to  ToldYouSo
May 6, 2026 1:56 pm

Last night, had a nice porterhouse steak, mushrooms, veg etc…

.. washed down with half a bottle of Barossa (South Australia) Shiraz.

Life is tough down here. 😉

May 6, 2026 8:00 am

Jess Lander CV watch: BS in Journalism, Photography, and Publishing.

Reply to  worsethanfailure
May 6, 2026 1:27 pm

“BS” is certainly the most apt monitor for college “degrees” these days.

Bruce Cobb
May 6, 2026 8:20 am

Well, I don’t know why the Climate Caterwaulers would be so concerned about wine. We all know that their drink of choice is Koolade – of a particular type of course, which is cranked out in huge volumes by the Climate Industrial Complex. And when they want the really good, industrial strength Koolade, they have to go to the original source, from the likes of Mann, Gore, and others. Talk about a racket!

derbrix
May 6, 2026 8:33 am

I lived in northern California, east of San Francisco from 1986 to 1994 and well remember the drought happening then. Water restrictions and everything so dry, also during that time the Berkeley hills caught fire from the overgrown eucalyptus.

Reply to  derbrix
May 6, 2026 9:08 am

Since that tree species is so flammable- and they’ve been planted in many CA areas- seems like a good time to cut them all down and plant a native species.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
May 7, 2026 1:22 am

Never happen in California. They call them “heritage” trees based on diameter. It’s because Eucalyptus are so large they protect them, not age. Same thing happens with redwoods.

Reply to  doonman
May 7, 2026 4:07 am

Sure, they’re nice to look at but if they’re fire prone and not a native species- then it’s crazy to keep them. Or, at least remove those that are more likely to be a problem if a fire starts. Here in Wokeachusetts, on state forest land, many nice stands of Norway Spruce that were planted several decades ago, were clearcut- solely because they are not native, despite being fine trees. I argued against that but of course they wouldn’t listen to me as I’ve been their biggest critic for half a century.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  doonman
May 7, 2026 4:50 am

if theyre 70 or more yrs old then theyre usually above the immediate fire zone its the scrubby ones are a real problem and we have a protected species here called prickly acacia its like needles they say birds like it? well not as many birdies as rabbits n foxes UNDER them and they will light up like a bomb while green ! oldtimers called it Kerosine bush for good reason, a fire that would slow or maybe burn out with that stuff under trees ? we lost 15kn roadside near my town solely because of the acacia setting the high tops of gums alight . if theyd not been there? it would have been a grassfire not a serious issue

Walter Sobchak
May 6, 2026 9:34 am

The “greatest threat to California wine” is not the weather. It is the insane rapacity of the State government. if the wealth tax proposal is approved by voters this November, expect many of the vineyard owners to up sticks.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  Walter Sobchak
May 6, 2026 3:03 pm

or maybe, the greatest threat is the San Andreas fault slipping; but then there will be less Californians to drink anything, let alone snooty wine.

2hotel9
May 8, 2026 3:47 am

Well, to be honest anything that gets rid of crappy wines is a positive! Far too many pisspoor winemakers running around Cali as it is. And to be clear, I know several very good winemakers here in western PA, and they don’t vote Democrat. Connection? It ain’t the climate.