Radiocarbon dating from a prehistoric cemetery in Northern Russia reveals human stress caused by a global cooling event 8,200 years ago Early hunter gatherers developed more complex social systems and, unusually, a large cemetery when faced by climate
UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD
CREDIT: PAVEL TARASOV
University of Oxford news release
16:00 (GMT), Thursday 27 January 2022
Climate change in the Early Holocene
- Radiocarbon dating from a prehistoric cemetery in Northern Russia reveals human stress caused by a global cooling event 8,200 years ago
- Early hunter gatherers developed more complex social systems and, unusually, a large cemetery when faced by climate change
New insight into how our early ancestors dealt with major shifts in climate is revealed in research, published today [27 Jan] in Nature Ecology & Evolution, by an international team, led by Professor Rick Schulting from Oxford University’s School of Archaeology.
It reveals, new radiocarbon dates show the large Early Holocene cemetery of Yuzhniy Oleniy Ostrov, at Lake Onega, some 500 miles north of Moscow, previously thought to have been in use for many centuries, was, in fact, used for only one to two centuries. Moreover, this seems to be in response to a period of climate stress.
The team believes the creation of the cemetery reveals a social response to the stresses caused by regional resource depression. At a time of climate change, Lake Onega, as the second largest lake in Europe, had its own ecologically resilient microclimate. This would have attracted game, including elk, to its shores while the lake itself would have provided a productive fishery. Because of the fall in temperature, many of the region’s shallower lakes could have been susceptible to the well-known phenomenon of winter fish kills, caused by depleted oxygen levels under the ice.
The creation of the cemetery at the site would have helped define group membership for what would have been previously dispersed bands of hunter-gatherers – mitigating potential conflict over access to the lake’s resources.
But when the climate improved, the team found, the cemetery largely went out of use, as the people presumably returned to a more mobile way of life and the lake became less central.
The behavioural changes – to what could be seen as a more ‘complex’ social system, with abundant grave offerings – were situation-dependent. But they suggest the presence of important decision makers and, say the team, the findings also imply that early hunting and gathering communities were highly flexible and resilient.
The results have implications for understanding the context for the emergence and dissolution of socioeconomic inequality and territoriality under conditions of socio-ecological stress.
Radiocarbon dating of the human remains and associated animal remains at the site reveals that the main use of the cemetery spanned between 100-300 years, centring on ca. 8250 to 8,000 BP. This coincides remarkably closely with the 8.2 ka dramatic cooling event, so this site could provide evidence for how these humans responded to a climate-driven environmental change.
The Holocene (the current geological epoch which began approximately 11,700 years before present) has been relatively stable in comparison to current events. But there are a number of climate fluctuations recorded in the Greenland ice cores. The best known of these is the 8,200 years ago cooling event, the largest climatic downturn in the Holocene, lasting lasted one to two centuries. But there is little evidence that the hunter-gatherers, who occupied most of Europe at this time, were much affected, and if they were, in what specific ways.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
In the rest of Europe there were large expansions of village settlements, In Serbia with the late Lepenski Vir phase (6300–6000 BC), in Bulgaria, near the isle of Wight England with wheat growing and a boatyard, and an early Harappan expansion in the Indus.
A strong positive North Atlantic Oscillation would have led too the cooling in northern Russia and in Greenland, along with a colder AMO and a La Nina regime. But with generally milder winters and good summers in the mid latitude land regions.
Proxies show strong trade winds through the period.
Around 3450 years later through 2700-2400 BC was the next coldest period in Greenland (GISP2), that saw city building take off worldwide. 3450 years after that in the 700’s AD was the next coldest period in Greenland, and had the warmest northern European summer temperatures of the Medieval Warm period (Esper 2014).
They were high solar periods, occurring at the same pitch as grand solar minima series, every 863 (+/-20) years, with 3453 years being every fourth series. Greenland is warmer during the grand solar minima because of negative NAO regimes, during an interglacial.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Greenland_Gisp2_Temperature.svg
OK, the climate cooled back then; no disagreement about that.
And they determined the cemetery was in use for about 200 years; fine.
But the rest of the article is pure conjecture, imagination, if not total BS.
The authors, nor anybody else, do not have the slightest bit of evidence why the cemetery was abandoned and why, the postulated-local-settlement, up and moved on.
Maybe they moved on for reasons other then climate change; maybe another tribe/clan of people forced them to move away; nobody knows. Or maybe it was climate change.
And large clans / tribes have routinely moved , say in N.America, for reasons having nothing at all to do with changes in climate.
The total bullshit one reads in papers dealing with climate change is simply astounding.
Big cemeteries are usually associated with more people. That is why there are bigger cemeteries in cities. If things got tougher, why are there more people?
How did fish get into the 100s of thousands of lakes just decades (?)after the glaciers left.
But when the climate improved
Exactly how did it do so? Did it happen to get WARMER?
Now we wait for the “breaking research” showing that this 8200 year ago cooling was caused by falling CO2 (while oddly not wiping out plants),
3 … 2 … 1 …
Codswallop, buckets of it. Sheer speculation nothing more.
How did they find time to build a cemetery if the climate was changing? Surely they would have been too busy protesting or praying to the weather gods?
There was no photography in the early Holocene. I call BS click-bait on the photo. Probably some one LARPing.