This is when I want to get one of those creme pies and face plant it on That Guy. That, or hose him down with cold water on a cold day. What a JERK!!!!!
Are Witch Burnings next??? Seriously, this kind of delusional crap is where the real danger lies.
The right wing offshoot of the German Communist Party. The expression “National Socialism” was invented by Joe Stalin to describe the socialism ocuring in Russia Following the failure of socialism to take off Internationally as required by the dialectic.
Sorry, they were calling themselves socialists long before Stalin got into the act.
Regardless, despite everything you want to believe, their economic programs were 100% socialist. As to killing undesirables, socialists all over the world have done that as soon as they get enough power.
The name Nazi is an abbreviation of ” The National Socialist Workers party of Germany “.[ In German socialist is spelt with a Z ].
Here is a copy of their 1930s election manifesto showing they were totally socialist and were clearly left wing as defined by the post revolutionary French ,[ right versus left ] government . https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/haken32.htm
But after operation ” Barberossa ” , Stalin ordered all of his followers to call them ” Right Wingers ”
Which is why lots of other socialists now call them right wingers .
No. The partij faithful never called themselves ‘nazi’. They called themselves national socialists. Wir sind sozialisten, Said Goebbels. The term Nazi was invented by the press and is derived from the name Ignatius, which was, said the journalists, was what many of them were called. Ignatius was a common name in southern Germany where the party had its roots.
But the fictitious distinction between right and left was indeed invented by Stalin, who realised darn well that his and Hitlers ideology were two sides of the same coin. Hitler’s version of totalitarianism simply was the competition. One of the first things H did after his power grab was to invite the remaining communists to join his NSDAP.
For a manifesto, see the Nazi Party’s “25 Points,” which are undeniably Socialist. Hitler’s objection to Communism was primarily because Marx was a Jew. He rather admired Stalin privately, and vice versa.
Been subscribed to Mark Dice’s YouTube channel for over two years now. Saw this episode abouit a week ago when he posted it. Got my “Liberalism – Find a Cure” T-shirt from his merch store also. But my fav Youtube channel is LouderwithCrowder.
I (heart) Global Warming is my favorite shirt of his. HUGE positive response when I wear it.
Zig Zag Wanderer
December 18, 2021 7:07 pm
But seriously, in many ways, this proves that average people are more than happy to let other people do things that they themselves would not be prepared to do. They almost certainly wouldn’t be prepared to incarcerate someone who disagrees with them calmly, but would approve of someone else doing it.
People seem to be happy to let others in ‘authority’ dictate their moral standards, in effect. Some nefarious people are eager to take advantage of that. Critical thinkers generally don’t have that problem, but are in shorter and shorter supply as our education systems are eroded.
markl
December 18, 2021 7:27 pm
Like all selectively edited street interviews but believable. I wonder how/if any gave the correct answer?
Like all selectively edited street interviews but believable. I wonder how/if any gave the correct answer?
Anyone with half a brain knows they’re edited to highlight these answers.
To me the bigger point is that so many are willing to go along with these ideas at all. People like this exist and are very dangerous.
I wonder if Mark Dice in saying that Bill Nye is behind the initiative effort to request arresting those who are climate change deniers could get him in trouble?
Oho! I had completely forgotten about that, thanks for the reminder.
Chris Hanley
December 18, 2021 7:59 pm
OK all you climate deniers out there mere incarceration is too good for you, I’d have you all locked in a bare solitary confinement cell with only a huge screen for company showing this video at top volume 24 hours-a-day until you confess to your fossil fuel industry backing and recant.
The only way to prove our fealty to SCIENCE is to jail anyone who disagrees with us on the interpretation of relevant data. Anyone who says otherwise is a dangerous racist Nazi capitalist (for these people the last one of those is the worst).
This is depressing. People are truly stupid. On the other hand, if Mark was petitioning to have the climate alarmists arrested, he’d probably get the same people to sign that. Which is equally depressing. The sheeple are easily led. But that’s not sufficient reason to abandon hope or give up. Not for me, anyway.
Now we can see why they want to protect the vaccinated from the un-vaccinated.
In Austria they are seriously talking of fining, arresting and imprisoning the un-vaccinated. Following close behind in intent is Germany, that long standing bastion of human rights.
The vaccine pass is clear and present in a number of countries, restricting where the un-vaccinated can go. Therefor if the people classified as vaccinated refuse one “booster” they become un-vaccinated.
And people are surprised by the head post. It is already occurring in a parallel constructed emergency – Covid virus and Covid vaccination. In this case it is the vaccinated helping to facilitate it without any science to support the vaccination, or that un-vaccinated are a risk. With no consideration for the rights of those that wish not to take the jab.
Let me remind you all that just recently the FDA applied to have the Pfizer trial data impounded for 55 years, then went back and got a extra 20 year extension. At the end of the trials they vaccinated the control group to remove the opportunity for harm analysis medium and long term.
I would suggest that people take the top post seriously. The momentum is there.
Very funny in a strange unbelievable way. I loved the oldsters throw away piece of pure genius, His answer “don’t have children” was probably a very deep belief of how to deal with climate alarmism, i.e. tell them to stop breeding
I think it would be better to have this case heard by a judge only, no jury.
Judges are good at determining what is, and what is not, evidence, and that’s just what is needed to debunk the climate change claims of the alarmists.
The judge will quickly discover that what is presented as evidence of Human-cause Climate Change is actually unsubstantiated speculation and assumptions and assertions. All of it.
I would love to talk to a judge about what is considered evidence by the climate change alarmists. With an unbiased judge, it would be like taking candy from a baby to show that alarmists have no real evidence to back up their claims.
Unfortunately there are too many activist judges on the bench. While judges are good at determining what is, and what is not, evidence, activist judges are good at ignoring evidence that runs counter to their activist viewpoint and also good at counting as evidence anything that supports their activist viewpoint regardless of whether it actually is evidence or not.
“I would love to talk…With an unbiased judge”
Good luck on being assigned one in any particular case.
Olen
December 19, 2021 7:15 am
If Dice had added, we will be checking on you, how many would sign.
John Endicott
December 22, 2021 9:16 am
How Mark Dice keeps a straight face when doing these I’ll never know.
This reminds me of the Penn and Teller bit about banning DHMO (DihydrogenMonoxide).
Lethal chemical.
Lethal chemical!
Can be if you inhale too deeply 😅
This is when I want to get one of those creme pies and face plant it on That Guy. That, or hose him down with cold water on a cold day. What a JERK!!!!!
Are Witch Burnings next??? Seriously, this kind of delusional crap is where the real danger lies.
Well, it IS a far stronger green house gas than CO2.
“Those that can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities”-Voltaire.
Who are the Nazis, again?
Good one!
The right wing offshoot of the German Communist Party. The expression “National Socialism” was invented by Joe Stalin to describe the socialism ocuring in Russia Following the failure of socialism to take off Internationally as required by the dialectic.
Right wing. Hmmmm.
Sorry, they were calling themselves socialists long before Stalin got into the act.
Regardless, despite everything you want to believe, their economic programs were 100% socialist. As to killing undesirables, socialists all over the world have done that as soon as they get enough power.
The term Nazi actually means, National Socialist German Worker’s Party.
The name Nazi is an abbreviation of ” The National Socialist Workers party of Germany “.[ In German socialist is spelt with a Z ].
Here is a copy of their 1930s election manifesto showing they were totally socialist and were clearly left wing as defined by the post revolutionary French ,[ right versus left ] government .
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/haken32.htm
But after operation ” Barberossa ” , Stalin ordered all of his followers to call them ” Right Wingers ”
Which is why lots of other socialists now call them right wingers .
No. The partij faithful never called themselves ‘nazi’. They called themselves national socialists. Wir sind sozialisten, Said Goebbels. The term Nazi was invented by the press and is derived from the name Ignatius, which was, said the journalists, was what many of them were called. Ignatius was a common name in southern Germany where the party had its roots.
But the fictitious distinction between right and left was indeed invented by Stalin, who realised darn well that his and Hitlers ideology were two sides of the same coin. Hitler’s version of totalitarianism simply was the competition. One of the first things H did after his power grab was to invite the remaining communists to join his NSDAP.
One of my favourite go to’s when some idiot says Hitler wasn’t a socialist.
However, be cautious as it’s not a ‘manifesto’, it was leaflets distributed by Goebbels on two occasions throughout Germany.
For a manifesto, see the Nazi Party’s “25 Points,” which are undeniably Socialist. Hitler’s objection to Communism was primarily because Marx was a Jew. He rather admired Stalin privately, and vice versa.
Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
Sozialistische begins with an S not a Z.
I call ’em NZCs.
The Nazis are the people who created this climate change movement cult.
Been subscribed to Mark Dice’s YouTube channel for over two years now. Saw this episode abouit a week ago when he posted it. Got my “Liberalism – Find a Cure” T-shirt from his merch store also. But my fav Youtube channel is LouderwithCrowder.
I (heart) Global Warming is my favorite shirt of his. HUGE positive response when I wear it.
But seriously, in many ways, this proves that average people are more than happy to let other people do things that they themselves would not be prepared to do. They almost certainly wouldn’t be prepared to incarcerate someone who disagrees with them calmly, but would approve of someone else doing it.
People seem to be happy to let others in ‘authority’ dictate their moral standards, in effect. Some nefarious people are eager to take advantage of that. Critical thinkers generally don’t have that problem, but are in shorter and shorter supply as our education systems are eroded.
Like all selectively edited street interviews but believable. I wonder how/if any gave the correct answer?
Like all selectively edited street interviews but believable. I wonder how/if any gave the correct answer?
Anyone with half a brain knows they’re edited to highlight these answers.
To me the bigger point is that so many are willing to go along with these ideas at all. People like this exist and are very dangerous.
I wonder if Mark Dice in saying that Bill Nye is behind the initiative effort to request arresting those who are climate change deniers could get him in trouble?
Why?
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/14/bill-nye-open-criminal-charges-jail-time-climate-c/
Oho! I had completely forgotten about that, thanks for the reminder.
OK all you climate deniers out there mere incarceration is too good for you, I’d have you all locked in a bare solitary confinement cell with only a huge screen for company showing this video at top volume 24 hours-a-day until you confess to your fossil fuel industry backing and recant.
It would make a change from Ludwig van’s 5th.
That was funny!
Been there done that.
What?
“The they”
Itsa new kinda pronoun thingy. #436 of the genderless pronouns, I think…
From Heidegger’s “Das Man”. Best translates to “one” or “people”.
Thanks for ‘Man’splaining that to us.
So is Thomas Mann more of a man because of the extra ‘n’?
See Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
The only way to prove our fealty to SCIENCE is to jail anyone who disagrees with us on the interpretation of relevant data. Anyone who says otherwise is a dangerous racist Nazi capitalist (for these people the last one of those is the worst).
Settled.
This is depressing. People are truly stupid. On the other hand, if Mark was petitioning to have the climate alarmists arrested, he’d probably get the same people to sign that. Which is equally depressing. The sheeple are easily led. But that’s not sufficient reason to abandon hope or give up. Not for me, anyway.
They must be allowed to speak. Then roundly mocked.
They have been saying that the un-vaccinated are the ones dying of covid in UK. Seems it is the other way around with the most heavily vaxxed taking the highest toll, at a higher percentage of the percentage “vaccinated”.
https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/18/triple-vaccinated-account-4-in-5-covid-deaths/
Then they did an accurate count of how many were actually vaccinated, much lower than they were stating.
https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/17/23-million-not-vaccinated-in-england/
Now we can see why they want to protect the vaccinated from the un-vaccinated.
In Austria they are seriously talking of fining, arresting and imprisoning the un-vaccinated. Following close behind in intent is Germany, that long standing bastion of human rights.
The vaccine pass is clear and present in a number of countries, restricting where the un-vaccinated can go. Therefor if the people classified as vaccinated refuse one “booster” they become un-vaccinated.
And people are surprised by the head post. It is already occurring in a parallel constructed emergency – Covid virus and Covid vaccination. In this case it is the vaccinated helping to facilitate it without any science to support the vaccination, or that un-vaccinated are a risk. With no consideration for the rights of those that wish not to take the jab.
Let me remind you all that just recently the FDA applied to have the Pfizer trial data impounded for 55 years, then went back and got a extra 20 year extension. At the end of the trials they vaccinated the control group to remove the opportunity for harm analysis medium and long term.
I would suggest that people take the top post seriously. The momentum is there.
An appropriate article.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/12/orwell_was_right_control_the_language_control_the_world.html
More totalitarian ambitions of Dr Fauci and cohorts..
https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/18/nih-directors-fauci-and-collins-target-the-great-barrington-declaration/
Two good sites for keeping track of Covid with some very good data emerging.
https://dailyexpose.uk/
https://dailyexpose.uk/
Very funny in a strange unbelievable way. I loved the oldsters throw away piece of pure genius, His answer “don’t have children” was probably a very deep belief of how to deal with climate alarmism, i.e. tell them to stop breeding
I tell them to stop breathing, right now!
And people wonder how this country has gotten so screwed up and strayed so far from the values and convictions which made it great.
time to torch the blasphemers! Oh, no, wait- that would result in carbon pollution!
As an experiment, he should do one on “arresting Alarmists”. If anyone should get arrested, it is them.
Wouldn’t a court trial with a jury be a winnable case and wouldn’t this help end this nonsense?
I think it would be better to have this case heard by a judge only, no jury.
Judges are good at determining what is, and what is not, evidence, and that’s just what is needed to debunk the climate change claims of the alarmists.
The judge will quickly discover that what is presented as evidence of Human-cause Climate Change is actually unsubstantiated speculation and assumptions and assertions. All of it.
I would love to talk to a judge about what is considered evidence by the climate change alarmists. With an unbiased judge, it would be like taking candy from a baby to show that alarmists have no real evidence to back up their claims.
Unfortunately there are too many activist judges on the bench. While judges are good at determining what is, and what is not, evidence, activist judges are good at ignoring evidence that runs counter to their activist viewpoint and also good at counting as evidence anything that supports their activist viewpoint regardless of whether it actually is evidence or not.
“I would love to talk…With an unbiased judge”
Good luck on being assigned one in any particular case.
If Dice had added, we will be checking on you, how many would sign.
How Mark Dice keeps a straight face when doing these I’ll never know.