Friday Cheerfulness

From Josh

www.cartoonsbyjosh.com

4.9 40 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 8, 2021 2:02 pm

Thanks Josh…another good one!

October 8, 2021 2:15 pm

Good one. Reminds me of the shirt I recently bought, which says “I love CO2” which I wear when I give local weather & climate talks.

GeologyJim
Reply to  John Shewchuk
October 8, 2021 7:55 pm

Plants love CO2
Animals love Plants
All life loves CO2
Can’t live without it!

Only dead things hate CO2

Alan the Brit
Reply to  GeologyJim
October 9, 2021 12:11 am

Nicely put, Sir!!! 😉

Pop Piasa
Reply to  GeologyJim
October 9, 2021 1:46 pm

Ironically, dead things become CO2 quite easily.

October 8, 2021 2:21 pm

Clintel proposes a new way to analyze climate data
In his lengthy video presentation, CLINTEL President Guus Berkhout proposes creation of a new analytical facility — the Laboratory of Climate Imaging, Int. — to look at climate data in a new way. He calls it “Climate Imaging”, but it is not about pictures. It is a combination of data mapping, transformation and visualization. He also uses the additive Int to make clear that LCI is not an Intergovernmental, but an International organization.

Last edited 13 days ago by Krishna Gans
Nudge
October 8, 2021 2:31 pm

Where can I get the T-shirt?

ATheoK
October 8, 2021 2:37 pm

That’s not funny… That is whole heartedly righteous!

Another one hit out of the park Josh!! Thank you!

2hotel9
October 8, 2021 2:38 pm

Need to make these as stickers, then get kids to stick them up all over the place. Make it a “rebel against authority” thing.

John Hedinger
October 8, 2021 3:16 pm

Invisible to the human eye while beautiful at the same time.

Tricksey that CO2 molecule!

Ron Long
Reply to  John Hedinger
October 8, 2021 6:03 pm

Only invisible to regular human eyes, but remember, Greta, the Doom Princess, can see CO2. When she said that her parents might have considered that something was wrong.

Alan the Brit
Reply to  Ron Long
October 9, 2021 12:17 am

Can anybody tell me, does that little misguided doom-mongering dwarf actually ever smile, can’t say I’ve ever seen a picture of her doing so, except perhaps when the cheques come rolling in??? 😉

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Alan the Brit
October 9, 2021 2:18 pm

What do you suppose her cut is after Mommy and Daddy take theirs? This is after all a trafficked child we’re talking about here.

Climate porn, but still porn.

Last edited 12 days ago by Pop Piasa
Gunga Din
October 8, 2021 3:46 pm

I suppose the caption, “Feed Me, Seymour!” probably wouldn’t have communicated as well. 😎

Sara
October 8, 2021 4:10 pm

I have a photo I shot some time back of a grackle looking at me like a really grumpy mommy, as if to say “Where have my food insects gone? My kids are HUNGRY!!!!” or maybe “What did you do, Human???”

…. or some such thing.

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Sara
October 8, 2021 6:41 pm

Your bird feeder is empty !
😉

Herbert
October 8, 2021 5:06 pm

“A brief digression on carbon dioxide:it is not a pollutant.
Calling it a pollutant runs the risk of trivialising the toxic effects of true pollutants. Carbon dioxide is not toxic.
It is a product of human metabolism and we exhale it at more than 100 times higher concentration than is found in the atmosphere.
In the reverse cycle, plants absorb carbon dioxide to use as the feedstock for photosynthesis.
Carbon dioxide is a fundamental part of our lifestyle, but it also happens to be a greenhouse gas.”-
Dr. Alan Finkel, Eighth Chief Scientist of Australia in “Getting to Zero”, Quarterly Essay,Issue 81, April, 2021.
And its effect as a greenhouse gas?
To be continued…..

October 8, 2021 8:04 pm

Have we noticed that hurricanes have recently stayed away from the USA and mostly stayed out to sea? CO2 is getting so thick over the USA tropical storms can’t penetrate it. CO2 displaces so much H2O, and convection is so reduced, that it can no longer support tropical storms near the USA.

Coeur de Lion
October 8, 2021 11:34 pm

Molecules – a pity there are so few of them.

Pamela Matlack-Klein
October 9, 2021 2:04 am

Remember when it was all the rage to talk to our houseplants? Proponents truly believed their plants responded to their pep talks with stronger growth and more bloom. Well, duh! Of course the plants responded, they were being bathed in lots of lovely CO2 and sucked it in to produce better growth.

Mike Lowe
Reply to  Pamela Matlack-Klein
October 9, 2021 3:16 am

Prince Charles still talks o his plants and trees – quite mad, of course, and soon to rule over us. Not surprising that he believes in Global Warming and follows Saint Greta!

Pamela Matlack-Klein
Reply to  Mike Lowe
October 9, 2021 10:28 am

Alas he probably believes that the plants are simply responding to his posh accent and has no idea that it his exhaled CO2 that is making his plants happy. As long as his mum is still kicking there is always the chance he will kick the bucket first. BUT is William an improvement over Charles?

Oldseadog
Reply to  Pamela Matlack-Klein
October 10, 2021 12:57 pm

No.

Pamela Matlack-Klein
Reply to  Oldseadog
October 10, 2021 3:16 pm

Alas, I was afraid of that.

shorhorn
October 9, 2021 1:54 pm

Nature’s wonder molecule!

Pop Piasa
October 9, 2021 1:58 pm

Josh, I think your text might better have been “Don’t kill the plants” as the 3rd rock we inhabit doesn’t care if plants on land attrit for a (geologically) short while or not. You’d have to remove the water to make this a dead planet.

Oldseadog
Reply to  Pop Piasa
October 10, 2021 1:00 pm

If there was no CO2 there would be no plants so it would be dead.

%d bloggers like this: