UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
VIDEO: THE ICE SHELF ON ANTARCTICA’S PINE ISLAND GLACIER LOST ABOUT ONE-FIFTH OF ITS AREA FROM 2017 TO 2020, MOSTLY IN THREE DRAMATIC BREAKS. THE TIMELAPSE VIDEO INCORPORATES SATELLITE IMAGES FROM… view more
CREDIT: JOUGHIN ET AL./SCIENCE ADVANCES
For decades, the ice shelf helping to hold back one of the fastest-moving glaciers in Antarctica has gradually thinned. Analysis of satellite images reveals a more dramatic process in recent years: From 2017 to 2020, large icebergs at the ice shelf’s edge broke off, and the glacier sped up.
Since floating ice shelves help to hold back the larger grounded mass of the glacier, the recent speedup due to the weakening edge could shorten the timeline for Pine Island Glacier’s eventual collapse into the sea. The study from researchers at the University of Washington and British Antarctic Survey was published June 11 in the open-access journal Science Advances.
“We may not have the luxury of waiting for slow changes on Pine Island; things could actually go much quicker than expected,” said lead author Ian Joughin, a glaciologist at the UW Applied Physics Laboratory. “The processes we’d been studying in this region were leading to an irreversible collapse, but at a fairly measured pace. Things could be much more abrupt if we lose the rest of that ice shelf.”
Pine Island Glacier contains approximately 180 trillion tons of ice — equivalent to 0.5 meters, or 1.6 feet, of global sea level rise. It is already responsible for much of Antarctica’s contribution to sea-level rise, causing about one-sixth of a millimeter of sea level rise each year, or about two-thirds of an inch per century, a rate that’s expected to increase. If it and neighboring Thwaites Glacier speed up and flow completely into the ocean, releasing their hold on the larger West Antarctic Ice Sheet, global seas could rise by several feet over the next few centuries.
These glaciers have attracted attention in recent decades as their ice shelves thinned because warmer ocean currents melted the ice’s underside. From the 1990s to 2009, Pine Island Glacier’s motion toward the sea accelerated from 2.5 kilometers per year to 4 kilometers per year (1.5 miles per year to 2.5 miles per year). The glacier’s speed then stabilized for almost a decade.
Results show that what’s happened more recently is a different process, Joughin said, related to internal forces on the glacier.
From 2017 to 2020, Pine Island’s ice shelf lost one-fifth of its area in a few dramatic breaks that were captured by the Copernicus Sentinel-1 satellites, operated by the European Space Agency on behalf of the European Union. The researchers analyzed images from January 2015 to March 2020 and found that the recent changes on the ice shelf were not caused by processes directly related to ocean melting.
“The ice shelf appears to be ripping itself apart due to the glacier’s acceleration in the past decade or two,” Joughin said.
Two points on the glacier’s surface that were analyzed in the paper sped up by 12% between 2017 and 2020. The authors used an ice flow model developed at the UW to confirm that the loss of the ice shelf caused the observed speedup.
“The recent changes in speed are not due to melt-driven thinning; instead they’re due to the loss of the outer part of the ice shelf,” Joughin said. “The glacier’s speedup is not catastrophic at this point. But if the rest of that ice shelf breaks up and goes away then this glacier could speed up quite a lot.”
It’s not clear whether the shelf will continue to crumble. Other factors, like the slope of the land below the glacier’s receding edge, will come into play, Joughin said. But the results change the timeline for when Pine Island’s ice shelf might disappear and how fast the glacier might move, boosting its contribution to rising seas.
“The loss of Pine Island’s ice shelf now looks like it possibly could occur in the next decade or two, as opposed to the melt-driven subsurface change playing out over 100 or more years,” said co-author Pierre Dutrieux, an ocean physicist at British Antarctic Survey. “So it’s a potentially much more rapid and abrupt change.”
Pine Island’s ice shelf is important because it’s helping to hold back this relatively unstable West Antarctic glacier, the way the curved buttresses on Notre Dame cathedral hold up the cathedral’s mass. Once those buttresses are removed, the slow-moving glacier can flow more quickly downward to the ocean, contributing to rising seas.
“Sediment records in front of and beneath the Pine Island ice shelf indicate that the glacier front has remained relatively stable over a few thousand years,” Dutrieux said. “Regular advance and break-ups happened at approximately the same location until 2017, and then successively worsened each year until 2020.”
###
Other co-authors are Daniel Shapero and Ben Smith at the UW; and Mark Barham at British Antarctic Survey. The study was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation, NASA and the U.K. Natural Environment Research Council.
Since NSIDC shows sea ice in Antarctica as normal for this time of year, could this possibly be something else i.e. volcanoes?
Or was that not considered?
The paper is here
I thought that the movement indicates the glacier is growing.
Quote “leading to an irreversible collapse,”
It formed so that is a pretty good indication that it isn’t irreversible.
“If it and neighboring Thwaites Glacier speed up and flow completely into the ocean, releasing their hold on the larger West Antarctic Ice Sheet, global seas could rise by several feet over the next few centuries.”
If.
and If a comet hits Earth tomorrow, who cares?
and If Cthulhu rises out of the ocean…
Back in the real world, Antarctic sea ice is in rude health:
Cold air recently broke out of Antarctica north to Australia covering half the country in snow ❄️:
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-australia-57425931
Antarctica is cooling and leading the world slowly toward glacial inception.
“Since floating ice shelves help to hold back the larger grounded mass of the glacier, . . . “
Do these clowns actually get paid for writing this nonsense? By definition, floating ice shelves are, well, floating!
They hold back nothing. They float. They move up and down with the tides. Eventually, they get pushed so far out to sea, they snap off, often close to the shore, and then – float away!
Florid comparisons to the buttresses of Gothic cathedrals, uttered by clueless journalists are symptomatic of the deranged pseudoscience foisted on the gullible masses.
Do these idiots also claim the ocean holds back a river? After all, a glacier is just a river of ice! Geez.
“It is already responsible for much of Antarctica’s contribution to sea-level rise, causing about one-sixth of a millimeter of sea level rise each year,”
Be still my beating heart. They can’t even measure SLR with that accuracy.
“It’s not clear whether the shelf will continue to crumble”.
That seems like the really important bit.
There was a Russian scientist I followed about twenty years ago that said that by about 1930 the world would be cooling and that it was all to do with the sun.
I have more faith in him than all these other wallies.
‘the ice shelf holding back the glacier’?? Wot?
There is not a shred of evidence for that hypothesis and oodles for the opposite. Just go to Switserland and admire the Aletsch glacier. It’s been up there for donkeys years and it’s moving ‘fast’.
But where is the ice shelf keeping it up? How on earth does it stay up?
A load of utter bollocks.
How does this compare with the ice loss over the period 1917-1920 and 1817-1820?
Pretty sure glas\ciers moving faster is an indication of more ice forming at the “top” end pushing the glacier. Volcanic activity beneath is just gravy.
Can someone please explain to me why less ice is a “catastrophe”?
Need sweaters for penguins.

Climate Change, nope its just nature taking care of its own as its always been and will be.
Pine Island = 180 TRILLION aka 180,000 E9 or Gt or 0.18 E6 Gt
A76 is 4,320 km^2 or 0.03% of the total ICE CAP.
Antarctica covers 14.2 E6 km^2 (NBS equivalents: 20 * Texas, 2,768 * Delaware or 163,218 * Manhattan) with an average ICE CAP thickness of 1.9 km for a volume of 2.698 E7 km^3.
Ice has a density of 9.2 E11kg/km^3.
The Antarctic ICE CAP (NOT sea ice!) contains 2.482 E19 kg of ice, 2.482 E16 tonne, 24.82 E6 Gt.
Between 2002 and 2012 the Antarctic ICE CAP supposedly “lost” about 1,200 Gt or a decrease of 0.0048%, 48 ppm, per decade.
At that rate the ICE CAP will be all gone in 206,850 years.
I don’t plan on waiting around.
You?
Every year the SEA ICE swings from around 3E6 km^2 during summer to 14E6 km^2 (doubling the polar coverage) during winter.
Thwaites glacier is 192,000 km^2 or about 1.3% of the ice cap.
Yawn!!!!!
Version 1.0 061221
“So, 100 Gt of cryo melt would raise sea level 2.77 E-4m, .277 mm.”
190,000/100 * .277 = 498.6 mm or .498 m.
Reference:
Ice Sheets and Sea Level Rise
By: Claire L. Parkinson, Oceans and Ice Branch, Code 971, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
Greenbelt MD 20771 e-mail: clairep@neptune.gsfc.nasa.gov
From: The PUMAS Collection http://pumas.jpl.nasa.gov
Icebergs around Antarctica can melt gradually even into late summer, brilliantly cooling the ocean surface in the area.
It is not uncommon for glaciers to exhibit surging, or abrupt changes in their speed. The reasons are usually not evident. This surging may destabilize the shelf ice in front of the glacier. Thus, the calving would be a result of, and not the cause of, the acceleration.
Assuming that the ungrounded shelf ice actually has a significant ‘buttressing’ effect, which I doubt, one should extrapolate with caution. If all the floating shelf ice were to calve or melt, then the glacier would transition to a regime where the basal, bedrock-friction would dominate its movement. It should stabilize (except for transient surging) and not accelerate further.
This is interesting to glaciologists and geologists. However, one should be cautious about assigning more importance for the general public than can be verified.
Press release nonsense.
Sea ice is no longer part of the glacier and it’s breakage into icebergs is normal.
Sea ice is incapable of “hold back” glaciers.
Glacier sea ice breakage is typically where the tide affects the sea ice.
Glaciers speeding up causes are manifold. Additional ice/snow deposition rates are substantial contributors to glacier movement.
“UW Applied Physics Laboratory. “
Applied Physics is ….Engineering (Engineering Physics) by definition. Applied Chemistry is Chemical Engineering. All the branches of Physics … Electricity and Magnetism is Electrical Engineering and Electronic Engineering.
The oxymoron Rocket Science (er that would be Rocket Engineering), is historically the first brazen example of the trend that followed over decades of co-option of engineering by sciences in near stasis after its golden Age was winding down. The Space Age was a crowning development and everyone wanted a shiny piece of it. And before this stunning achievement had gone far, the electronic marvel lit up the world.
Oh yes, the phenomena underpinning these achievements were the fruit of theoretical sciences. Give us more and let’s take the world and the Universe up to the dizzying heights.
“If it and neighboring Thwaites Glacier speed up and flow completely into the ocean” – but they don’t flow. They extrude from weight above. They don’t flow to oceans. The bizarre misunderstanding means it’s written by someone that doesn’t understand even basic concepts.