CLAIM: Climate has shifted the axis of the Earth

AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION

Research News

IMAGE
IMAGE: MELTING OF GLACIERS IN ALASKA, GREENLAND, THE SOUTHERN ANDES, ANTARCTICA, THE CAUCASUS AND THE MIDDLE EAST ACCELERATED IN THE MID-90S, BECOMING THE MAIN DRIVER PUSHING EARTH’S POLES INTO A SUDDEN… view more CREDIT: CREDIT: DENG ET AL (2021) GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS/AGU

WASHINGTON– Glacial melting due to global warming is likely the cause of a shift in the movement of the poles that occurred in the 1990s.

The locations of the North and South poles aren’t static, unchanging spots on our planet. The axis Earth spins around–or more specifically the surface that invisible line emerges from–is always moving due to processes scientists don’t completely understand. The way water is distributed on Earth’s surface is one factor that drives the drift.

Melting glaciers redistributed enough water to cause the direction of polar wander to turn and accelerate eastward during the mid-1990s, according to a new study in Geophysical Research Letters, AGU’s journal for high-impact, short-format reports with immediate implications spanning all Earth and space sciences.

“The faster ice melting under global warming was the most likely cause of the directional change of the polar drift in the 1990s,” said Shanshan Deng, a researcher at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and an author of the new study.

The Earth spins around an axis kind of like a top, explains Vincent Humphrey, a climate scientist at the University of Zurich who was not involved in this research. If the weight of a top is moved around, the spinning top would start to lean and wobble as its rotational axis changes. The same thing happens to the Earth as weight is shifted from one area to the other.

Researchers have been able to determine the causes of polar drifts starting from 2002 based on data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), a joint mission by NASA and the German Aerospace Center, launched with twin satellites that year and a follow up mission in 2018. The mission gathered information on how mass is distributed around the planet by measuring uneven changes in gravity at different points.

Previous studies released on the GRACE mission data revealed some of the reasons for later changes in direction. For example, research has determined more recent movements of the North Pole away from Canada and toward Russia to be caused by factors like molten iron in the Earth’s outer core. Other shifts were caused in part by what’s called the terrestrial water storage change, the process by which all the water on land–including frozen water in glaciers and groundwater stored under our continents–is being lost through melting and groundwater pumping.

The authors of the new study believed that this water loss on land contributed to the shifts in the polar drift in the past two decades by changing the way mass is distributed around the world. In particular, they wanted to see if it could also explain changes that occurred in the mid-1990s.

In 1995, the direction of polar drift shifted from southward to eastward. The average speed of drift from 1995 to 2020 also increased about 17 times from the average speed recorded from 1981 to 1995.

Now researchers have found a way to wind modern pole tracking analysis backward in time to learn why this drift occurred. The new research calculates the total land water loss in the 1990s before the GRACE mission started.

“The findings offer a clue for studying past climate-driven polar motion,” said Suxia Liu, a hydrologist at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the corresponding author of the new study. “The goal of this project, funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China is to explore the relationship between the water and polar motion.”

Water loss and polar drift

Using data on glacier loss and estimations of ground water pumping, Liu and her colleagues calculated how the water stored on land changed. They found that the contributions of water loss from the polar regions is the main driver of polar drift, with contributions from water loss in nonpolar regions. Together, all this water loss explained the eastward change in polar drift.

“I think it brings an interesting piece of evidence to this question,” said Humphrey. “It tells you how strong this mass change is–it’s so big that it can change the axis of the Earth.”

Humphrey said the change to the Earth’s axis isn’t large enough that it would affect daily life. It could change the length of day we experience, but only by milliseconds.

The faster ice melting couldn’t entirely explain the shift, Deng said. While they didn’t analyze this specifically, she speculated that the slight gap might be due to activities involving land water storage in non-polar regions, such as unsustainable groundwater pumping for agriculture.

Humphrey said this evidence reveals how much direct human activity can have an impact on changes to the mass of water on land. Their analysis revealed large changes in water mass in areas like California, northern Texas, the region around Beijing and northern India, for example–all areas that have been pumping large amounts of groundwater for agricultural use.

“The ground water contribution is also an important one,” Humphrey said. “Here you have a local water management problem that is picked up by this type of analysis.”

Liu said the research has larger implications for our understanding of land water storage earlier in the 20th century. Researchers have 176 years of data on polar drift. By using some of the methods highlighted by her and her colleagues, it could be possible to use those changes in direction and speed to estimate how much land water was lost in past years.

###

AGU supports 130,000 enthusiasts to experts worldwide in Earth and space sciences. Through broad and inclusive partnerships, we advance discovery and solution science that accelerate knowledge and create solutions that are ethical, unbiased and respectful of communities and their values. Our programs include serving as a scholarly publisher, convening virtual and in-person events and providing career support. We live our values in everything we do, such as our net zero energy renovated building in Washington, D.C. and our Ethics and Equity Center, which fosters a diverse and inclusive geoscience community to ensure responsible conduct.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
1.6 22 votes
Article Rating
162 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
fred250
April 24, 2021 9:53 pm

One wonders where the “poles” were in the MWP and most of the earlier parts of the Holocene…

… when there was often ZERO Arctic sea ice, and glaciers were way smaller than now, if they even existed at all.

Rudi
April 24, 2021 10:08 pm

Or is it the shift in the magnetic field that is the main cause of climate change wich in turn shifts the axis. The main assumption, that anything on earth would be of static nature without humans is extremely rediculous.

H. D. Hoese
April 24, 2021 10:47 pm

I thought that sea level was influenced by pole (Chandler) tides, millimeters at least, not vice-versa. At least that is what I recall that this book said. Lisitzin, E. 1974. Sea-level Changes. Elsevier Oceanographic Series. 8. Opps last century. AGU has a net zero energy building and a Ethics and Equity Center and in their advertisement got the words equity, diversity and inclusive in the same paragraph. Their science and solutions are admittedly ethical, unbiased and respectful, nothing about pre-Anthropocene science.

Bjarne Bisballe
April 24, 2021 10:52 pm

Tropic of Cancercomment image

Greg
April 24, 2021 11:06 pm

live our values in everything we do, such as our net zero energy renovated building in Washington, D.C. and our Ethics and Equity Center, which fosters a diverse and inclusive geoscience community to ensure responsible conduct.

Clearly those in control of the AGU now see it primarily as a political platform rather than a professional body for objective science.

April 24, 2021 11:32 pm

Pure non sense.

April 25, 2021 12:21 am

The South Pole has been tracked over time:comment image
Most of the movement that you can see from those flags next to a geological survey marker marching off into the distance is from the ice cap movement. The 3.28 mm/yr movement mentioned in the [<a href=”https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/262911.php”>View More</a>] link to the Eurekalert article is probably below the resolution of the screenshot image.

Here’s the page where that video screenshot comes from: <a href=”https://uwm.edu/science-bag/category/all-videos/page/2/”>UWM Science Bag</a>

Reply to  Steve Case
April 25, 2021 12:23 am

I forgot to use the tools for making a link:
UWM Science Bag

Clyde Spencer
Reply to  Steve Case
April 25, 2021 10:13 am

Image insertion seems to be acting strangely today.

April 25, 2021 12:24 am

If we could get everybody to just lean over slightly, I think we could crack this.

….paging Mr Kerry..

JSMill
April 25, 2021 1:12 am
JohnA
April 25, 2021 1:15 am

Maybe this caused The Leaning Tower of Pisa,

Alastair gray
April 25, 2021 1:20 am

When polar wandering is discussed the topic is migration of the magnetic poles. This is quite considerable and measured in kilometres per year it is determined by many measurements of geomagnetic field. These people discuss the migration of the rotational pole without mentioning
1) extent of migration
2) how is this migration determined
3) uncertaintyu in this measurement
4) no mention of how this might be extrapolated into the uncharted past
All in all total nonsense of a report

April 25, 2021 1:35 am

Admittedly, I’m not any kind of a scientist, but my BS detector is off the scale!

Reply to  Derek Wood
April 25, 2021 8:41 am

The most important climate based scientific instrument, be sure to keep it calibrated and don’t leave home without it

Peter Plail
April 25, 2021 1:55 am

So presumably the axis is moving back to where it was before the ice accumulated on the glaciers.

mwhite
April 25, 2021 1:58 am

Remember “Old Pulteney Row To The Pole”
Old Pulteney Row To The Pole – Wikipedia

That was the expedition to row to the north pole where had been, but not where it was.

Magnetic_North_Pole_1840_2019_pillars.jpg (1920×1080) (esa.int)

The magnetic north pole has been heading toward Asia since the mid 1800s

Occams_Chainsaw
April 25, 2021 3:17 am

Are these clowns serious? Should Climate Science still even be considered a science? Maybe call it “Climate Scientology”?

1. Do they realize that agricultural (or ANY) use of groundwater doesn’t make the water disappear from the planet? Ditto for any ice melting? Y’know….the thing (aka the Water cycle)?

2. Do they REALLY believe that our mantle is static AND homogeneous?
Ditto for our solid ferrometallic core (No, it’s NOT a bigass pinball).
Double-ditto for our liquid ferrometallic outer core?

3. Do they realize that the Land/Water distribution is WAY WAY more unbalanced than any pissant unbalancing caused by melting ice?
i.e. the Northern-Eastern hemihemisphere (‘quadrosphere’?) contains most of the dry land b/c Russia’s hogging it all?

4. Don’t get me started on what some Climate Skientists think about MAGNETIC polar shift.

Michael Jankowski
Reply to  Occams_Chainsaw
April 25, 2021 10:44 am

On (1), it doesn’t disappear…it gets re-distributed, which changes the earth’s wobble. There is a global water balance, but not necessarily a local or even regional one. Case in point: the Ogallala Aquifer. which covers about 175,000 square miles in the middle of the US. Water has been removed over the past century faster than it can be recharged. The net loss there is a net gain somewhere else.

fretslider
April 25, 2021 3:18 am

So, we’re running out of water and Oxygen and now man is going to make the earth fall over.

There’s a pandemic of mentally unhinged climate alarmism

April 25, 2021 3:51 am

This is terrifying- we must now spend trillions to push the poles back to where they belong- where they were before the industrial age! We should all panic over this. Set up a UN commission to be in charge of fixing the problem.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 25, 2021 7:57 am

The UN International Panel on Pole Change.

Richard Page
Reply to  Tom Abbott
April 25, 2021 1:30 pm

I’m so sorry but that is extremely prejudicial to people from Poland and also to some types of dancers. Might I suggest ‘Geographical Reorientation’ as an alternative, or perhaps ‘Central Axis Recalibration’ – perhaps we should refer the matter of the name to a UN appointed committee to establish a non-racist, non-prejudicial title for the organisation first?

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Richard Page
April 26, 2021 3:55 am

I had no idea people in Poland would take offense.

In that case, I support removing “pole” and adding your suggestion of “Geographical Reorientation”.

Surely, noone can be offended at that. (Don’t bet on it, Tom)

April 25, 2021 3:53 am

This should be apparent on maps then? So maps printed in 1909 should show a different position for the geographic pole compared to now? I don’t suppose the expansion of the Atlantic and the general movement of plates along with the redirection of tidal forces on the oceans will have any noticeable effect?

Tom
April 25, 2021 4:11 am

In 1995, the direction of polar drift shifted from southward to eastward.”

The authors even seem to fail basic geography. At the North Pole, ALL directions are south. At the South Pole, all directions are north. Even if you assume their vantage point is some position away from the poles, the apparent direction of motion (n, e, w, or s) depends entirely on the actual location of their position of viewing. Since it isn’t stated, the direction they give is meaningless.

April 25, 2021 4:23 am

Even assuming the mass of water is sufficient to do this, where does the water go to change the mass balance? If I pump water from 150 ft. down, and irrigate with it, most of it will stay local, it doesn’t just disappear or go elsewhere. If it leaves the area, it’s kind of worthless to irrigate with it. The few 100 feet of displacement from under the surface to the surface just can’t cause this kind of mass shift.

Reply to  Jim Gorman
April 25, 2021 6:28 am

One suspects major errors in their assumptions of how displaced water leverages Earth’s rotation.

I can not fathom the amount of stated displaced water and that water’s physical phase change somehow affecting the spin of Earth’s thousands of miles of iron core…

Taking their claims seriously, whale, waterfowl, fish migrations or even civilization’s metal ships change the Earth’s rotational alignment. And every one of them is caused by CO₂.

Just more of AGU’s buffoons and climate goons on parade.

A cousin used a lathe to make a brass top. One that when spun, spun for a very long time before tumbling. According to AGU’s loons, a 0.01 graphic marker’s mark on the metal top would produce measurable/quantifiable spin change…

FlaDiver
April 25, 2021 4:46 am

Time to realign the dish.

Jphn
April 25, 2021 5:09 am

A little man made stream runs by my property, it has done so for hundreds of years.

However lately with the benefit of aerial digital terrain analysis, the OS maps show a flow arrow that shows the stream flowing the wrong way!

At last I have an explanation.

April 25, 2021 5:15 am

Glacial melting due to global warming is likely the cause of a shift in the movement of the poles”

AGU takes anti-science confirmation bias and alarmist religion to new levels of planet mechanics and climate silliness.

Through presumptions, assumptions, pseudo science and aberrant religious belief AGU moves science back further into Dark Ages alchemy.

Andy Ogilvie
Reply to  ATheoK
April 25, 2021 8:22 am

I think I remember this from school, a loooong time ago. If I recall correctly the Earth’s axis moves over time. The word precession is nagging away from the back of my head? WTF is wrong with these clowns?

April 25, 2021 6:15 am

The fact they think this completely uncertain and extremely short correlation of one factor that is not even one of the primary factors of polar wander (never mind the unknowns!) is an analogue for global water loss for 170 years (not even reliable data) is hilarious.

So it works like this.
*Every primary factor’s effect on polar wander in 170 years will influence their water loss results because they cant separate the unknowns and the not understoods.

The same with dark matter, every undiscovered known type of matter source is attributed to dark matter because well something had to make up for all of the stuff we haven’t found yet…

Same with climate, every event of natural variability is now attributed to humans, no matter what it is. (I remember Holthaus was excited about hurricane Patricia, then when it blew over a few garden chairs, he and they switched to it was a “weird” hurricane), so destructive or not, climate change was at play..

The fact the correlation is that short should have meant it not being accepted imo

Rusty
April 25, 2021 6:52 am

It’s actually caused by the increase in population in the northern hemisphere. More people = more mass/weight means the top is heavier and therefore it wobbles.

It’s true I modelled it. /wink