Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #431

The Week That Was: 2020-11-14 (November 14, 2020)
Brought to You by SEPP (www.SEPP.org)
The Science and Environmental Policy Project

Quote of the Week: “The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government.” —Thomas Jefferson (1809)

Number of the Week: 86 to 238%


By Ken Haapala, President, Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP)

Out of Date: For the past two weeks TWTW has described work by W. A. van Wijngaarden and W. Happer (W & H), on the thermal radiation of the five most abundant greenhouse gases. The most abundant greenhouse gas, water vapor, and the second most abundant, carbon dioxide, are extremely saturated. This means that with the possible exception of polar regions, it would take major increases in the concentrations of these gases in the atmosphere to have a significant impact on global temperatures. For carbon dioxide to have a significant impact on temperatures, it would require burning of more fossil fuels than are known to exist.

The findings of W & H are backed by the temperature trend findings of John Christy and Roy Spencer. The atmosphere of the globe is warming very modestly, not significantly. Further, the atmospheric “hot spot” above the tropics suggested by the climate models is not to be found. Thus, increasing greenhouse effect is not to be feared. The global climate models that produce results of significant warming are out of date. Yet, US modelers ignore the physical evidence of what is occurring in the atmosphere, thereby ignoring their obligations to the public. Modelers in other countries may have similar obligations, which are ignored as well. Consequently, all such models are out of date.

Similarly, we have studies of agriculture which show the authors do not understand recent changes in the industry. For example, the 2018 National Climate Assessment stated that the US Midwest would become too hot for corn (maize) and soybeans and that farming will move north into Canada. Yet, over the past decade the biggest US competitor in the international market for corn and soybeans, and still growing, is tropical Brazil. Technically, the assessment was supported by the US Department of Agriculture. Surely, that Department should know the biggest competitors to the US in important agriculture markets!

Last week the Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, released a news report featuring a study performed under ARPA-E, The Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy. The report draws into question whether or not the entities involved understand modern agriculture.

The study focused on C4 crops which probably evolved 30 to 35 million years ago when the atmosphere was becoming low in carbon dioxide. In addition to corn, C4 crops include millet, sorghum, and sugarcane and C4 plants include about 50% of grass species. C4 plants have a different form of photosynthesis than C3 plants, which evolved previously. C4 plants use carbon dioxide and water more efficiently than C3 plants (wheat, soybeans, rice, virtually all trees).  In nature, C4 are typically found in warm- to high-temperature areas, particularly where water is scarce.

Apparently, the ARPA-E study and the Institute review did not consider the abundant research showing that increasing CO2 allows plants to better adapt to stress, be it water, temperature, salt, etc. C3 plants become more drought resistant, reducing the natural advantage of C4 plants. More importantly, the study did not consider advances in modern agriculture, where hybrids and cultivars (a plant produced by selective breeding for cultivation) can be selected or produced for particular local conditions. As a result, the fear of warming erasing entire crops over the years is meaningless because crops can be tailored to such changes. However, the fear of cooling, freezing or cold preventing ripening, which is real, still remains.

Further, Craig Idso of CO2 Science provided links to studies demonstrating that increases in CO2 benefit corn production. Apparently, the research under the ARPA-E grant did not consider investigating the benefits of adding CO2.

As with climate studies that fail to recognize recent research of what is occurring in the atmosphere, agriculture studies that fail to recognize the modern agricultural industry are out of date. See links under Defending the Orthodoxy, Review of Recent Scientific Articles by CO2 Science (tomato seedlings), https://co2science.org/subject/a/agriculturemaize.php and http://www.co2science.org/data/plant_growth/dry/z/zeam.php


Ignorance of History: In “The Weaponization of Weather in the Phony Climate War,” Joe Bastardi of WeatherBELL Analytics states that a problem of many alarming papers is that their data does not go back more than 50 years. This ignorance of history was demonstrated by a paper in Nature and a news release by the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) Graduate University. The paper claimed warming oceans means hurricanes weaken more slowly and inflict more destruction farther inland. The study period was the last 50 years.

A quick look at the U.S. Hurricane Strikes by Decade from 1851 to 2004 posted by the National Hurricane Center shows possibly the three worst decades for hurricanes in recorded history. A ranking of the major storms (Cat 3 or above) reveals 1941 to 1950 with 10, 1931 to 1940 with 8; 1951-1960 with 8. Unfortunately, the decadal classification of these data has been discontinued, thus TWTW cannot contradict the study with one easily available table.

However, both Kenneth Richard and Paul Homewood produced information that the conclusions of the paper are not correct. Most compelling is a graph of Global Tropical Cyclone Landfalls at Hurricane strength 1970 to 2019 presented in an article by Roger Pielke and Ryan Maue in Forbes in January. This clearly indicates there has been no increase in major hurricanes hitting the US. Consequently, the evidence indicates that the conclusions of the study are wrong. See links under Challenging the Orthodoxy, Defending the Orthodoxy, Changing Weather, and https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastdec.shtml


Point of No Return: Even more outlandish, Nature published a paper claiming that: “An earth system model shows self-sustained melting of permafrost even if all man-made GHG emissions stop in 2020.” Thus, according to the paper, even if humanity stopped CO2 emissions immediately, the temperatures of the Earth will increase out of control.

The fear of melting permafrost is driven by the fear of atmospheric methane increasing, intensifying the greenhouse effect. However, there are several reasons why the fear is far-fetched. One, as shown in numerous studies, increasing permafrost melting is increasing plant growth, particularly in root mass. Thus, melting of permafrost is not releasing methane because plants are using it as fertilizer. Two, methane has a short lifetime in the atmosphere, because it is rapidly oxidized into CO2 and H2O. Both these gases are saturated, and have logarithmic, self-limiting impacts on temperatures.

Not surprisingly, the Nature paper has been retracted. Even global warming alarmists found it too much. It may prompt the public to claim that expensive reductions in CO2 emission are useless because we are all doomed anyway. Needless to say, Nature has little understanding of nature. See links under Challenging the Orthodoxy, Defending the Orthodoxy, and Lowering Standards.


Disconnect: On Judith Curry’s Climate Etc., Kenneth Fritsch has an explanation for the apparent statistical disconnection between the earlier UN CMIP5 models and the latest CMIP6 models. Frisch considers this disconnection from the standpoint of individual model climate sensitivities and Global Mean Surface Temperatures (GMST).

To TWTW, the real disconnect is the inability of climate models to describe what is occurring between atmospheric temperature trends and greenhouse gas increases. Further, seeking the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity to carbon dioxide is a false goal. One must establish an example of an equilibrium climate. Given the constant turmoil ongoing throughout history, such a climate never existed before or after man appeared. See links under Model Issues.


Censorship: Unfortunately, scientific journals have been censoring valid papers submitted to them that question the theme that carbon dioxide is causing dangerous warming. This politicized censoring has been a difficult problem since the 1990s. The flow of scientific information to the public is being highly restricted for political reasons. For these reasons, blogs and “preprints” that have not undergone official “peer review” are becoming more common. In many cases “peer review” is about the same as “approved by the censors.” For information on how such “peer review” is avoided, see link under Censorship.


Number of the Week: 86 to 238%. As reported in CO2 Science, a study by Vanaja, et al. presented data on “Harvestable grain yield of well-watered and fertilized plants grown from seeding to harvest at Hyderabad, India, out-of-doors in the field within open-top chambers made of transparent PVC sheeting having a 90% transmittance of light.” The increase in yield from an increase in CO2 concentration of 300 parts per million ranged from 86 to 238%, depending on the cultivar of corn used. The fear of CO2-caused warming eliminating corn is misplaced and corn cultivation benefits from increasing CO2. See http://www.co2science.org/data/plant_growth/dry/z/zeam.php



Free science is here and growing fast

By David Wojick, WUWT, Nov 9, 2020

Challenging the Orthodoxy — NIPCC

Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science

Idso, Carter, and Singer, Lead Authors/Editors, Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), 2013

Summary: https://www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/CCR/CCR-II/Summary-for-Policymakers.pdf

Climate Change Reconsidered II: Biological Impacts

Idso, Idso, Carter, and Singer, Lead Authors/Editors, Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), 2014

Summary: https://www.heartland.org/media-library/pdfs/CCR-IIb/Summary-for-Policymakers.pdf

Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels

By Multiple Authors, Bezdek, Idso, Legates, and Singer eds., Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, April 2019


Download with no charge:

Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming

The NIPCC Report on the Scientific Consensus

By Craig D. Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer, Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), Nov 23, 2015

Download with no charge:


Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate

S. Fred Singer, Editor, NIPCC, 2008

Global Sea-Level Rise: An Evaluation of the Data

By Craig D. Idso, David Legates, and S. Fred Singer, Heartland Policy Brief, May 20, 2019

Challenging the Orthodoxy

Dependence of Earth’s Thermal Radiation on Five Most Abundant Greenhouse Gases

By W. A. van Wijngaarden and W. Happer, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, submitted June 4, 2020


Link to prepublication version: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.03098.pdf

Facts and Theories, Updated

By Andy May, WUWT, Nov 10, 2020

Modern Climate Change Science

By Andy May, WUWT, Nov 12, 2020

[SEPP Comment; Does not include work done using HITRAN or MODTRAN.]

Climate Sensitivity Considering Urban and Natural Warming

Guest Post by Ken Gregory, P. Eng., Not a Lot of People Know That, Nov 12, 2020

What 50 Years Of Global Hurricane Landfall Data Can Teach Us About Climate Change

By Roger Pielke and Ryan Maue, Forbes, Jan 9, 2020


Wind Power Economics – Rhetoric and Reality

By Gordon Hughes, Renewable Energy Foundation, Nov 3, 2020 [H/t GWPF]


Defending the Orthodoxy

Corn and other crops are not adapted to benefit from elevated carbon dioxide levels

News Release: Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Nov 5, 2020 [H/t Bernie Kepshire]


Link to paper: Retrospective analysis of biochemical limitations to photosynthesis in 49 species: C4 crops appear still adapted to pre‐industrial atmospheric [CO2]

By Charles P. Pignon & Stephen P. Long, Plant, Cell & Environment, Aug 2, 2020


Climate change causes landfalling hurricanes to stay stronger for longer

Warming oceans means hurricanes weaken more slowly and inflict more destruction farther inland, new study shows

News Release, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) Graduate University, Nov 11, 2020


Link to paper: Slower decay of landfalling hurricanes in a warming world

By Lin Li & Pinaki Chakraborty, Nature, Nov 11, 2020


Study: Humanity “is beyond the point-of-no-return” on Climate Change

By Eric Worrall WUWT, Nov 13, 2020

Link to paper: An earth system model shows self-sustained melting of permafrost even if all man-made GHG emissions stop in 2020

By Jorgen Randers & Ulrich Goluke, Nature, Scientific Reports, Nov 12, 2020


From abstract: “To stop the self-sustained warming in ESCIMO, enormous amounts of CO2 have to be extracted from the atmosphere.”

Media reaction: What Joe Biden’s US election victory means for climate change

By Josh Gabbatiss, Carbon Brief, Nov 10, 2020

Questioning the Orthodoxy

SAR, the Turning Point

By Andy May, WUWT, Nov 9, 2020

The Conversation: “Right now, there is no federal agency tasked with developing a systemic understanding of climate change…”

By Eric Worrall, WUWT, Nov 12, 2020

[SEPP Comment: Only the 13 agencies making up the USGCRP, which do so incompetently.]

Change in US Administrations

Energy in the Executive Branch

By Steven F. Hayward, Real Clear Energy, Nov 11, 2020


The Coming Energy Shocks Under A Biden Administration

By Tilak Doshi, Forbes, Nov 11, 2020


Biden administration expected to emphasize climate science over lunar exploration at NASA

By Jeff Foust, Space News, Nov 9, 2020

Biden’s climate plan could reduce global warming by about 0.1°C

By Marco Tedesco, Earth Institute at Columbia University, Phys.org, Nov 12, 2020 [H/t Bernie Kepshire]


Problems in the Orthodoxy

Who turned out the lights?

By John Robson, Climate Discussion Nexus, Nov 11, 2020

China’s Coal Power Rising Again

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Nov 11, 2020

France relights coal power plants to keep the lights on

By Staff, Europe1, Via GWPF, Nov 13, 2020

Science, Policy, and Evidence

Will we learn from Oregon’s wildfire history and avoid the clearly predictable coming firestorms?

By Bob Zybach, Commentator, Statesman Journal, Nov 6, 2020


Review of Recent Scientific Articles by CO2 Science

Projecting Mid- and Late-century Spring Potato Yields in South Korea

Kim, Y.-U. and Lee, B.-W. 2020. Earlier planting offsets the adverse effect of global warming on spring potato in South Korea. Science of the Total Environment 742: 140667, doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140667. Nov 13, 2020


The Interactive Effects of CO2 and Salt Stress on Tomato Seedlings

Zhang, Y., Yao, Q., Shi, Y., Li, X., Hou, L., Xing, G. and Ahammed, J. 2020. Elevated CO2 improves antioxidant capacity, ion homeostasis, and polyamine metabolism in tomato seedlings under Ca(NO3)2-induced salt stress. Scientia Horticulturae 273: 109644, doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109644. Nov 11, 2020


“Salt stress is a serious challenge to the growth and yield of crops in many parts of the world. Writing as background for their work, Zhang et al. (2020) note that soil salinization often leads to physiological and metabolic impairments, including ‘mineral nutrient deficiency, damage to photosynthetic organs, reductions of photosynthetic efficiency, inhibition in plant growth and development, and ultimately yield decline.’ On the other hand, CO2 enrichment has been shown to lead to numerous physiological and metabolic benefits that improve plant growth and yield. Consequently, it is likely that rising CO2 will help alleviate the negative effects of salt stress on plants in the years and decades to come.”

Further Evidence the CO2 Fertilization Effect is Presently Enhancing Global Vegetative Productivity

Ueyama, M., Ichii, K., Kobayashi, H., Kumagai, T., Beringer, J., Merbold, L., Euskirchen, E.S., Hirano, T., Marchesini, L.B., Baldocchi, D., Saitoh, T.M., Mizoguchi, Y., Ono, K., Kim, J., Varlagin, A., Kang, M., Shimizu, T., Kosugi, Y., Bret-Harte, M.S., Machimura, T., Matsuura, Y., Ohta, T., Takagi, K., Takanashi, S. and Yasuda, Y. 2020. Inferring CO2 fertilization effect based on global monitoring land-atmosphere exchange with a theoretical model. Environmental Research Letters 15: 084009, doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab79e5. Nov 9, 2020


Models v. Observations

Out of thin air… and back into it again

By John Robson, Climate Discussion Nexus, Nov 11, 2020

“Recently however, in this theory, anthropogenic greenhouse gas accumulation is expected to have thrown the balance off by a whopping 0.1 Watt per square meter, leading to a tiny amount of warming of the atmosphere and oceans. But as noted, our best satellites can’t measure the energy flows more precisely than plus or minus 4 watts per square meter. So how do they know when the signal is lost in the noise?”

Models Issues:

Disconnect in the relationship between GMST and ECS

By Kenneth Fritsch, Climate Etc., Nov 11, 2020

Changing Weather

Study On Hurricanes In Journal ‘Nature’ Plagued By “Massive Error”, Expert Says. Cyclones Not Getting Worse

By P Gosselin, No Tricks Zone, Nov 13, 2020

Latest Alarmist Hurricane Study Easily Debunked

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Nov 12, 2020

“This paper is typical of so many climate change papers nowadays. Researchers, fed with massive grants, decide what they are going to find, and then massage the data to get the right conclusions.”

The Big Dry Ten Years On

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Nov 13, 2020

[SEPP Comment: Exposing examples of torturing data.]

Storm Approaches With High Winds South of Seattle and Heavy Snow in the Mountains

By Cliff Mass, Weather Blog, Nov 11, 2020


[SEPP Comment: Brings up some of the challenges in weather forecasting.]

Changing Climate

New Study: Western North America Was Much Warmer And Drier With Peak Wildfire Rates When CO2 Was 265ppm

By Kenneth Richard, No Tricks Zone, Nov 12, 2020

Link to paper: Great Basin Paleoclimate and Aridity Linked to Arctic Warming and Tropical Pacific Sea Surface Temperatures

By Matthew Scott Lachniet, et al. Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology, June 2020


Changing Seas

Ocean Chill Increases Oct. 2020

By Ron Clutz, Science Matters, Nov 11, 2020

“The best context for understanding decadal temperature changes comes from the world’s sea surface temperatures (SST), for several reasons:

•           The ocean covers 71% of the globe and drives average temperatures;

•           SSTs have a constant water content, (unlike air temperatures), so give a better reading of heat content variations;

•           A major El Nino was the dominant climate feature in recent years.”

“HadSST3 is distinguished from other SST products because HadCRU (Hadley Climatic Research Unit) does not engage in SST interpolation, i.e. infilling estimated anomalies into grid cells lacking sufficient sampling in a given month.”

Live coral

By John Robson, Climate Discussion Nexus, Nov 11, 2020


[SEPP Comment: It was dead last week!]

NASA Watches Sea Level Rise from Space, and its Centers’ Windows

By Lara Streiff for GSFC News, Greenbelt MD (SPX) Nov 11, 2020


Changing Cryosphere – Land / Sea Ice

2 More Studies Affirm Nothing Unusual Or Unprecedented Is Occurring In Polar Climates Today

By Kenneth Richard, No Tricks Zone, Nov 9, 2020


Link to one study: Lateglacial and Holocene palaeoenvironments on Bolshevik Island (Severnaya Zemlya), Russian High Arctic

By Anna A. Cherezova, et al. Boreas, An Internal Journal of Quaternary Research, Jan 24, 2020


Atmospheric rivers help create massive holes in Antarctic sea ice

By Staff Writers, New Brunswick NJ (SPX), Nov 12, 2020


Link to paper: On the crucial role of atmospheric rivers in the two major Weddell Polynya events in 1973 and 2017 in Antarctica

By Diana Francis, et al. Science Advances, Nov 11, 2020


Giant berg on collision course with South Georgia

By Staff Writers, Paris (ESA), Nov 11, 2020


Shorefast ice formation and the fall feeding season for polar bears

By Susan Crockford, Polar Bear Science, Nov 11, 2020


Changing Earth

How ancient dust from the sea floor helps to explain climate history

A research team led by geoscientists of the University of Oldenburg, Germany, analyzed sediment cores from the South Pacific

News Release, University of Oldenburg, Nov 9, 2020


Agriculture Issues & Fear of Famine

Food emissions could push Earth past global warming limits

By Kelly MacNamara, Paris (AFP) ,Nov 6, 2020


Lowering Standards

What Fatih Birol Forgot To Tell You

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Nov 11, 2020


[SEPP Comment: Further exposing the misleading numbers from the International Energy Agency (EIA).]

‘Unstoppable’ global warming claim withdrawn by Scientific Reports journal

By Staff, The Times, Via GWPF, Nov 13, 2020


Communicating Better to the Public – Make things up.

West Side story

By John Robson, Climate Discussion Nexus, Nov 11, 2020


[SEPP Comment: Defying watery predictions.]

World is running out of time on climate, experts warn

In wake of Covid, leading figures call for bold green measures to boost economy

By Fiona Harvey, The Guardian, Nov 9, 2020


Arctic circle

By John Robson, Climate Discussion Nexus, Nov 11, 2020


Communicating Better to the Public – Protest

Remembrance Day Warning: From climate hysteria to justifying green wars

By Staff, GWPF & Journal of Military Ethics, Nov 11, 2020


Questioning European Green

The contradictions of Green policies to limit CO2 emissions

By Ed Hoskins, edmhdotme, Accessed, Nov 12, 2020 [H/t WUWT]


“Wherever the Biomass is sourced, remotely for example from Africa, North America, Indonesia, etc. the environmental damage that the industry causes is virtually irreparable even in the medium term.”

“The recent Michael Moore film made a telling point, that there is only enough forest timber in the whole USA to power its supply grid for a single year:  and after that the forests are gone.  Whereas Gas and other Fossil fuel reserves will still be available for the longer-term.”

“An excellent way to undermine Western economies is to render their power generation unreliable and expensive.  That objective of Green thinking is progressively being achieved by policy throughout the Western world.”

Blackout alert from National Grid as Britain sails close to wind

By Staff, The Times, Nov 9, 2020


Questioning Green Elsewhere

The Guardian: Joe Biden’s $1.7 Trillion Investment Could Reduce Global Warming by 0.1C

By Eric Worrall, WUWT, Nov 8, 2020


World Ignores Green Recovery–Prefers To Avoid Devastating Recession Instead

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Nov 11, 2020


“There is a very simple reason why governments outside of Europe are not going for a green recovery. It is no more than a sham, which will see trillions of dollars tipped down the drain, accompanied by the collapse of traditional economies.”

[SEPP Comment: Government spending money to replace a solid functioning electrical system with an erratic one damages productivity and prosperity. It is similar to replacing earth movers with humans using shovels.]

So now can we build back better?

By John Robson, Climate Discussion Nexus, Nov 11, 2020


“In what direction? If only we knew.”

The True Cost Of The Global Energy Transition

By Irina Slav, Oil Price.com, Nov 9, 2020


Green Jobs

Boris Johnson seeks advice on how to create 2 million green jobs

By Staff, Bloomberg, Via GWPF, Nov 12, 2020


Funding Issues

HKMA Joins New Alliance On Green Financing As US$29 Trillion In Opportunities Expected Over Next Decade

Alliance for Green Commercial Banks will help lenders address unmet green financing needs, HKMA says About US$18 trillion in green and climate-related financing opportunities are expected in the next decade in Asia

By Staff, South China Morning Post, Nov 9, 2020


The Political Games Continue

Labor’s climate crisis escalates down under

By Staff, Financial Review, Via GWPF, Nov 10, 2020


Put More Money into Renewable Energy or We’ll Report You to Joe Biden?

By Eric Worrall, WUWT, Nov 9, 2020


Cap-and-Trade and Carbon Taxes

Trump’s FERC Pushes Carbon Taxes–and Gets Caught (consumerism, anyone?)

By Martin Rodriguez and Clint Woods, Master Resource, Nov 12, 2020


Subsidies and Mandates Forever

Green lobby up in arms as France plans to tear up solar subsidy contracts

By Staff, GWPF & Financial Times, Nov 13, 2020


Energy Issues – Non-US

Estimating the actual costs of converting to renewable energy sources

By Bob Yirka, Tech Xplore, Nov 11, 2020 [H/t Bernie Kepshire]


Link to paper: A systematic review of the costs and impacts of integrating variable renewables into power grids

By Philip J. Heptonstall & Robert J. K. Gross, Nature Energy, Nov 2, 2020


From abstract: “Data are scarce at high penetrations, but show that the range widens.”

GWPF welcomes delay to UK energy white paper

“Astronomical Net Zero costs no longer affordable”

Press Release, GWPF, Nov 12, 2020


Britain yet to choose between carbon tax or emissions trading post-Brexit

By Staff, The Economic Times, Nov 13, 2020


Brexit Poker: EU threatens Britain with energy blockade

By Staff, GWPF & Bloomberg, Nov 12, 2020


Energy Issues – Australia

AFR: Ignoring Climate Activist Campaigns is No Longer an Option for Australian Business

By Eric Worrall, WUWT, Nov 11, 2020

Energy Issues — US

EIA: US CO2 Emissions From Electricity Generation Down to 1980’s Levels… Frac On!

By David Middleton, WUWT, Nov 11, 2020


Link to report: U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissions fell in 2019, mainly in electric generation

By Kevin Nakolan, et al, EIA, Nov 10, 2020


Return of King Coal?

Steel! Meet the Metallurgical Coal Producers Association

By Robert Bradley Jr., Master Resource, Nov 10, 2020


Nuclear Energy and Fears

Fusion Soon, Maybe

By Donn Dears, Power For USA, Nov 14, 2020


Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Solar and Wind

UK wind subsidy shift raises repowering hopes

By Neil Ford, Reuters, Nov 12, 2020


“From next year, UK onshore wind developers will be able to bid for government subsidies, ending a five-year moratorium on price support. Under government plans, onshore wind and solar will compete for contracts for difference (CfDs), boosting the business case for greenfield and repowering projects.”

Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Energy — Other

Wiltshire Council To Waste £484m On Zero Carbon Plan

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Nov 10, 2020


“However, it is the improvement of existing homes which sticks out like a sore thumb. According to the council website, the council owns over 5,000 properties. So expenditure of £289m, which works out at a mind boggling £57,800 apiece. Energy Performance Rating B is not even particularly high anyway – typically a condensing boiler, triple glazing, cavity and loft insulation gets a B rating.”

“If we apply this cost of £57,800 to the nation’s housing stock of 27m, we get a total cost of £1.56 trillion!”

Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Energy — Storage

Utility-Scale Battery Costs “Fall” to $625/kWh

By David Middleton, WUWT, Nov 10, 2020


Link to report: Utility-scale battery storage costs decreased nearly 70% between 2015 and 2018

By Sara Hoff, Alexander Mey, et al. EIA, Oct 23, 2020


[SEPP Comment: In July, US peak demand reaches about 660 million kWh.]


Electricity Storage Systems Still Woefully Lack, Indefinitely Hampering The German Green Energy Dream

The pitfalls of planned economies…

Power shortages, power surpluses, seas of milk and mountains of butter

By Reinhard Storz (Translated/ edited by P. Gosselin), No Tricks Zone, Nov 10, 2020


Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Vehicles

Tory MPs call on Shapps to Stop the war on the motorist

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Nov 10, 2020

California Dreaming

Record Heat In California Claims Not Supported By Data

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Nov 9, 2020


Health, Energy, and Climate

Climate Change Poses Biggest Threat To UK Health–NHS Chief

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Nov 8, 2020


Other News that May Be of Interest

Noosa River Mouth, 1973 & Yesterday

By Jennifer Marohasy, Her Blog, Nov 10, 2020


“When we really care about something, we should think about first understanding it. That means we might need to take some time out, to watch and listen and even read. Of course, a best way to learn is to hear different perspectives and then to go see, to trust our own eyes and capacity to reason.”

Steam Fog Season

By Cliff Mass, Weather Blog, Nov 7, 2020


Virgin’s Hyperloop carries passengers for the first time

By Staff Writers, Los Angeles (AFP), Nov 9, 2020



Friday Funny BONUS: Funniest Things Blamed on Climate Change?

Posted by Anthony Watts, WUWT, Nov 13, 2020


Michael Kuperberg Fired from National Climate Assessment Post

By Eric Worrall, WUWT, Nov 10, 2020


Link to full article: Trump Administration Removes Scientist in Charge of Assessing Climate Change

Michael Kuperberg was told he would no longer oversee the National Climate Assessment. The job is expected to go to a climate-change skeptic, according to people familiar with the changes.

By Christopher Flavelle, Lisa Friedman and Coral Davenport, NYT, Nov 9, 2020


“A biased or diminished climate assessment would have wide-ranging implications.”

“And, ultimately, it could weaken what is known as the “endangerment finding,” a 2009 scientific finding by the Environmental Protection Agency that said carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions pose a threat to human health and therefore are subject to government regulation. Undercutting that finding could make it more difficult to fight climate change under the terms of the Clean Air Act.”

[SEPP Comment: The last National Climate Assessment was a joke.]

Jumping the shark

By John Robson, Climate Discussion Nexus, Nov 11, 2020


New Video : Biden’s Nature Trick

By Tony Heller, His Blog, Nov 11, 2020


Newly discovered primate in Myanmar ‘already facing extinction’

By Marlowe Hood, Paris (AFP), Nov 11, 2020


[SEPP Comment: Previously, the “newly discovered” had huge recent populations?]

Russian Navy Shoots Bear – BBC Expresses Outrage!

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Nov 9, 2020



Biden’s Plan to Shift Energy Policy Faces Headwinds

President-elect faces competing pressure from unions, environmentalists, energy industry and Congress

By Timothy Puko, WUWT, Nov 10, 2020


TWTW Summary: The journalist writes:

“Energy and climate policy will be among President-elect Joe Biden’s top priorities when he steps into the Oval Office next year, but it could also prove one of his toughest challenges.

“President Trump has been a champion of traditional energy industries such as coal and oil. Mr. Biden wants to supercharge a transition to cleaner energy sources and has said reversing several Trump administration rollbacks of regulations aimed at combating climate change is a ‘Day 1’ priority.

“Mr. Biden’s presidential authority gives him the power to move quickly. He can order the U.S. back into the Paris climate accord, end a dispute with California on its tougher tailpipe-emission rules and work with it on a national standard, and slow or halt oil leasing on federal lands. He has promised to do all of these things.

“‘President-elect Biden looks forward to implementing his plans to tackle climate change while creating millions of good-paying, union jobs—which not only earned unprecedented support from climate activists, environmental justice leaders, and labor leaders, but also helped deliver a historic victory,’ Biden spokesman Matt Hill said Monday.

“Mr. Biden’s biggest ambitions, however, will require help. He has proposed a $2 trillion overhaul for energy and transportation infrastructure as a way to address both climate change and the coronavirus pandemic’s economic downturn. That would need support from Congress, and lobbyists and analysts expect Republicans will block many of his requests if they maintain Senate control.”

After a brief discussion of what may happen if the Republicans retain control of the Senate, the reporter continues:

“Lobbyists and analysts expect more modest, compromised plans. If a divided Congress does pass an economic stimulus package to help people through the pandemic, it is much less likely to be laden with energy and climate projects than if Democrats had commanding control of Congress, they said.

“Concerned by Republican success in many down-ballot races, Congressional Democrats are pushing the Biden team to take more moderate positions and avoid policies that might seem punitive toward the oil industry, according to a person familiar with the talks. They will, however, make a big push on energy-infrastructure spending, believing Republicans will be loath to vote against it.

“‘Realistically, to get something that is really game changing, we need to get some legislation,’ said former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who represented Nevada as a Democrat. ‘All the eyes of the country are going to be on the Republicans in the Senate.’

“Before inauguration, lobbyists and environmentalists are watching for early signals about Mr. Biden’s direction on climate—how moderate or radical he might turn—through his appointments to his transition team and eventually to federal agencies.

“Some expect Mr. Biden may devote a White House role to overseeing climate policy across his administration. And some advisers, including former Democratic presidential rival Tom Steyer, are pushing to ensure every cabinet secretary gives priority to measures to slow climate change.

“Mr. Biden’s campaign has already signaled it wants to avoid having former ‘leaders at fossil fuel…companies’ serve on his transition team. But several energy experts from Mr. Biden’s inner circle and the Obama administration have ties to the industry, including Amos Hochstein, a former executive at the gas exporter Tellurian Inc., and former Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, a board member at utility Southern Co.

“It is a minefield Mr. Biden tried to navigate with nuance while on the campaign trail. He has promised a transition away from oil, saying it benefits the economy for the U.S. to become a leader in clean-energy businesses and to try avoiding the worst of climate change. But he also has said that transition shouldn’t happen so quickly that it risks further decimating a workforce now in the middle of a pandemic-fueled slump.

“That stance is in part shaped by unions, which he courted to recapture battleground states such as Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin where working-class voters scared by past environmental policies had drifted toward Republicans and Mr. Trump. Those unions are likely to remain a central force as the Biden administration and its energy policies take shape.

“The Biden transition team’s webpage, published late last week, makes climate one of four priorities and calls its response ‘The Biden-Harris plan to create union jobs by tackling the climate crisis.’

“It is that attention to those workers and their jobs that brought those very states—and, with them, the presidency—back to Democrats, said Lonnie Stephenson, a Biden climate adviser and international president of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

“‘We do have an administration that we believe will listen to our concerns,’ Mr. Stephenson said. ‘The fossil fuel industry has done a lot to ensure a greener environment as well. Sometimes they don’t get credit for what they have done.’

“Unions and environmentalists are two important constituencies for Mr. Biden, but the two groups are often at odds.

“Environmental groups have long sought to block pipelines as a way to limit the impact of the oil industry on climate change. Unions support them as a source of jobs and have pressured the Biden team not to stand in their way.

“Mr. Biden’s campaign has already said that he would revoke a permit for the operation of Keystone XL, a long-delayed pipeline that would bring oil from Canada to the Midwest. The Dakota Access crude pipeline also is at risk with a key federal permit in legal limbo.

“Court cases are also pending on the country’s primary rules for controlling the greenhouse-gas emissions that cause climate change, creating the potential for more influential decisions from the president-elect.

“The Obama administration was the first to set national limits on those emissions from power plants, cars and trucks, and oil and gas producers, but the Trump administration eased or eliminated all of them. All those Trump rollbacks are still in limbo under legal challenge from Democrat-led states and environmental groups.

“Analysts and legal experts expect a Biden administration would have its lawyers ask the courts to halt those cases and give it time to reconsider those rules.

“His campaign has said the priorities for his first day as president would be to revive some of these rules and set even more stringent requirements—namely on methane-emissions limits for the oil-and-gas industry, and fuel-economy standards for new cars and trucks.

“Many businesses and institutional investors have swung hard in recent years to support efforts to address climate change with low-emissions energy. Those private-sector investments trends are likely to continue anyway, but can grow stronger with a president who doesn’t oppose them, environmentalists and executives said.

“‘Investors are always looking for signals,’ said Michael Polsky, founder and chief executive of Invenergy LLC, which develops and operates clean-energy projects. ‘The certainty is always better.’”

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Carl Friis-Hansen
November 16, 2020 2:41 am

Since September, France has relighted four coal-fired power plants to offset the shutdown of the Fessenheim nuclear power plant and the lack of wind.

As the article says, 14 more perfectly working nuclear plants to close and be substituted with coal and gas fired power plants.

I suppose France can still pump money out of the people to serve the Green global de-industrialization. “Back to the USSR” – Sorry Beatles.
The good thing though is that it may improve the CO2 contribution a fraction of a part per million.

Reply to  Carl Friis-Hansen
November 16, 2020 5:40 am

Fessenheim was France’s oldest reactor.

It was located in an area prone to seismic activity and was at risk of flooding.

Among several safety failures over the years, cracks were found in a reactor cover and internal flooding in 2014 forced an emergency shutdown. Fessenheim’s safety was reviewed in light of the meltdown at Fukushima in Japan in 2011 and the accident intensified the campaign to shut it down.

Last year Fessenheim – which was opened in 1977 – was one of six reactors which EDF acknowledged had manufacturing problems, while maintaining they were all fit for use.

So this wasn’t a perfectly working reactor and was surely time expired?

William Astley
Reply to  griff
November 16, 2020 3:42 pm

In reply to:

French options/forced change

“I suppose France can still pump money out of the people to serve the Green global de-industrialization. “Back to the USSR” – Sorry Beatles. The good thing though is that it may improve the CO2 contribution a fraction of a part per million.”


Reality Vs Griff’s Fake Climate Change Issue

When countries have a real problem…. When a country absolutely must cut expenditures and cut stupid wasteful programs to avoid economic collapse.

The first to go are very, very, expensive ‘programs’ that kill jobs and delivery zero immediate benefits and that do not significantly reduce CO2 emission if honest all in calcs are done.

The Left and the Fake media, have been hiding a country ending problem which countries like France are pretending does not exist.

All of the heavily indebted countries are going to be forced to abandon the Quixotic cause “Fighting Climate Change’.

Covid has created, an instance, cannot be avoided economic crisis.

It is a fact, that France the country (does not matter what party is running France the country) is spending much, much more now then France the country was spending prior to the covid release….

Tourism makes up 18% of France’s GDP.

France is now, accumulating a year of debt in a month, rather than a year. France has just become exactly like a new company that is burning all of the cash… France cannot continue to borrow, without consequences.

Ditto all of the democratic countries, including US.

The Left declared covid to be a crisis, which enabled the idiots to create magic money and waste the magic money without thought. And the idiots have not even acknowledged that their country is lost if immediate changes are not made.

November 16, 2020 2:49 am

The censorship applied to AGW is also being applied to SARS-COV-2/CoViD19 papers.

Joseph Zorzin
November 16, 2020 3:35 am

“Wherever the Biomass is sourced, remotely for example from Africa, North America, Indonesia, etc. the environmental damage that the industry causes is virtually irreparable even in the medium term.”

NONSENSE. Why don’t you talk to the forestry industry to find out the TRUTH????

“The recent Michael Moore film made a telling point, that there is only enough forest timber in the whole USA to power its supply grid for a single year: and after that the forests are gone. Whereas Gas and other Fossil fuel reserves will still be available for the longer-term.”

NOBODY in the forestry industry proposes that biomass will mean we can stop burning fossil fuels – NOBODY. Get it? It’s not about replacing fossil fuels- it’s about getting rid of “junk wood” that we must get rid of to better mange the forests. OF COURSE even if the biomass industry was developed to its potential- it would be a drop in the bucket compared to fossil fuels. And, virtually all forestry people LOVE fossil fuels- forestry couldn’t exist without lots of fossil fuels. I sure get fed up with hearing anti biomass comments in this forum from people who don’t bother to find the TRUTH by talking to forestry people- instead of watching a bogus film by the commy Michael Moore.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 16, 2020 4:24 am

You did not refute the quote you started with. If anything, you validate the quote.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 16, 2020 4:53 am

Hey Joseph, nobody, but NOBODY here is attacking the forestry industry. Get it? Moron.

Joseph Zorzin
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
November 17, 2020 8:17 am

A biomass industry is a MAJOR COMPONENT of forestry, moron!

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 16, 2020 5:22 am

No, we have no deforestation in several countries in f.e. eastern Europe 😀

What you tell anout USA may be right, but elsewhete it’s completely different, as often shown here.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 16, 2020 5:35 am

Importing US wood pellets to the UK is neither green nor renewable and should be stopped: I hope all Watts readers will join Greenpeace and all UK green organisations in campaigning against it

Reply to  griff
November 16, 2020 7:09 am

No NGOs necessary

Reply to  griff
November 16, 2020 10:49 pm

I think everyone except those in the climate science think it is stupid that the ruling was ever made.

Joseph Zorzin
Reply to  griff
November 17, 2020 8:19 am

“Importing US wood pellets to the UK is neither green nor renewable…”
Try proving that! You can’t.

Kevin kilty
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 16, 2020 7:45 am

I tend to agree with you on this topic, Joe. Out west here when journalists write a story about fires and forect management they rarely interview a forestry expert, but rather head toward the wildlfe management professor or an environmentalist. I wish people could see what forests have become under the present management plans. In some places they don’t look terrible, but in others they are a disaster. In southern Wyoming and northern Colorado some of the wilderness areas were so thick with downed and dead trees they were unusable by anyone. Then they caught fire in suspiciously convenient locations, under suspicious circumstances, during an unusually windy late summer and burned half million acres. The fires were difficult to control because of the downed trees and wind. However, I took a drive through the Mullen fire area ten days ago, and was amazed at the job the firefighters did to keep property safe.

I agree with you that a smart forest management program could provide a small, but sustainable input to power production while making the forests healthier. Just my opinion…

November 16, 2020 5:01 am

Regarding the future allegations regarding corn production…

Part of the trouble, as with so much research is that the researchers have very limited knowledge regarding the claims they make.

“Similarly, we have studies of agriculture which show the authors do not understand recent changes in the industry. For example, the 2018 National Climate Assessment stated that the US Midwest would become too hot for corn (maize) and soybeans and that farming will move north into Canada.”

That statement could only be made when people are ignorant of corn’s history.
From the original hybridization, selective breeding of mutations, through corn’s usage by peoples living in drastically different environments.

Corn initial hybridization and selection of mutations in Mexico thousands of years ago, corn has been grown by peoples at high altitude in the Andes, tropical climate of South America, Central America, Mexico and drought resistant corn varieties grown by the Anazi on the high altitude mesas, (e.g. 8,500 feet, 2,590 meters), of southwest America.

Corn’s history includes utilization as significant substantial food crops during much warmer Holocene periods. Yet these researchers cry “Doom” at the slightest beliefs or provocation.
Researchers put alarmism before science and knowledge when they make these literally religious pronouncements.

Just Jenn
November 16, 2020 5:17 am

You know what would be an interesting intellectual exercise? Take another “crisis” from the past–not a war, but something at the heart of the daily lives of people–say the horse manure crisis in NY–and run all the headlines of pro vs con about that crisis. Then compare the two to today. Or you could just replace anything with climate crisis in it with horse manure and probably achieve the same result in the headlines.

Reply to  Just Jenn
November 17, 2020 12:33 am


Y2k problem: action taken, problem averted. Ozone hole: action taken, problem averted. Whales declining: action taken, whales pretty much saved. Leaded petrol an issue… successful ban. Acid rain: action taken, problem averted.

climate change…

Splitdog Homee
November 16, 2020 5:21 am

All of this global warming information means nothing if the USA is destroyed. “STOP THE STEAL” because we require fair elections to exist.

Reply to  Splitdog Homee
November 16, 2020 5:37 am

Those would be the elections your Dept of Homeland Security called ‘the most secure election ever’?

Adding in a statement: ‘There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised. ‘While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the upmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too.’

Dan DaSilva
Reply to  griff
November 16, 2020 6:33 am

I have been using “Splitdog Homee” but this is a time to get serious.
We must investigate this election.

Timo, Not That One
Reply to  griff
November 16, 2020 6:40 am

griff- Nobody in government is compromised, so we should just accept their “statements”. Scores of witnesses to cheating must be ingnored. They are only citizens and can’t be trusted.

Reply to  Timo, Not That One
November 17, 2020 12:32 am

If your state security apparatus makes a statement, either you trust it did its job – or you have a profoundly deeper problem than a contested election result.

The second of those options is profoundly unlikely.

Bruce Cobb
November 16, 2020 7:29 am

Trump lost, so that means the Dems cheated. Logic.

Julian Flood
November 17, 2020 12:34 am

C4 plants fix C without discriminating against heavier isotopes. This leaves a light isotope signal in the atmosphere?

The spring diatom bloom only ends when the dissolved silica runs out. Diatoms use a C4-like carbon fixation process.

Agriculture has led to a great increase in dissolved silica run-off (1) (3) which ends up in the oceans. Civilisation produces large amounts of dust, mainly silica. This ends up in the oceans. (1) Diatom dominance delays the bloom of calciferous phytoplankton (1) which are the source of Di-methylsulphide cloud condensation nuclei.. This reduces low level stratocumulus cloud. (1)

The results of the above: ocean warming; an increase in the light C isotope in the atmosphere. (2)

(1) A suitable prediction for checking – Mr Bezos could usefully spend money on this.
(2) Already measured.
(3) Nitrogen fixation for agriculture is having similar large scale effects on the oceans, but the results are less obvious (1)


Verified by MonsterInsights