
Chris Allen, Queen’s University Belfast and Niall English, University College Dublin
Massive greenhouse gas reserves, frozen deep under the seabed, are alarmingly now starting to thaw. That’s according to an international team of scientists whose preliminary findings were recently reported in the Guardian. These deposits, technically called methane “gas hydrates”, are often described as “fiery ice” due to the parlour trick of burning atop a Bunsen burner what appears to be ice.
The research is not yet peer-reviewed and has been controversial, with some climate scientists saying the Guardian article makes unsupported claims. We agree that findings should be peer-reviewed before they are reported. But as experts in these exact methane hydrates, we’re more sympathetic than the climate scientists towards the idea that this a serious possibility that we need to start worrying about. So although it is controversial, let’s suppose for a moment that these latest findings are real and that methane frozen below the seabed really is being released. What does this mean?
Methane is not as common as carbon dioxide, but it also contains carbon and is a potent greenhouse gas. Many people have heard of methane being stored in Arctic permafrost, but few realise that there are also massive and much larger deposits of the gas locked beneath the seabed.
Although seabed greenhouse gas thawing has been foreseen – and feared – for some time, it was only suspected to become a serious problem by the middle of this century. If it now seems to be melting much earlier, its a signal that human indifference to the environment, and release of fossil fuel carbon, is now being effectively amplified by the disintegration of our own planet’s geological balance. https://www.youtube.com/embed/w8d38CXQoJw?wmode=transparent&start=0 ‘Fiery ice’ in action.
To put this into perspective, there is perhaps 20 times more carbon stored in these natural underground reserves than in the entire biomass of Earth combined – that is, all plants, animals and microbes. Clearly, there is at least the potential for greenhouse gas to be released from these deposits on a significant scale.
Methane entrapped in their icy jail cells of hydrates underground ought to stay there for millions of years, accumulating over the aeons. If these deposits are now rapidly thawing, we might think that basic physical parameters such as temperature and pressure are the only things that control their formation and destabilisation. If this was the case, then the problem could be easily understood, and even possibly mitigated through human intervention. However, it increasingly seems that other less predictable factors are also relevant.

One unexpected influence is the Earth’s fluctuating magnetic field which, as we discovered in a study published last year can potentially destabilise the methane deposits. There’s even the possibility that this same effect could eventually lead to mass extinction: global gas-hydrate destruction may have caused the great end-Permian extinction event which wiped out 90% of species on Earth some 250 million years ago.
Microbes may be stabilising these methane deposits
Another overlooked factor is the role of microbial life. Microbes have been with us for more than 3 billion years and are found just about everywhere on our planet, including deep beneath the seabed, in places we might otherwise think living things could not survive – let alone thrive. It seems perfectly natural then that these same microbes interact with stored hydrate reserves, perhaps even using the high-energy methane to flourish.

What if these microbes also stabilise their “food source”? Our research teams have recently shown that marine methane-using bacteria can easily produce simple proteins or “bio-molecules” that do just that. Furthermore, in laboratory experiments and computer simulations we demonstrated the accelerated formation of gas hydrates by such bio-molecules so that we can now conclude that microbes will indeed coordinate these reserves in the real-world conditions found under our seas and oceans.
The story becomes even more intriguing. We next studied the effect of both magnetic field changes and bio-molecules on the rates of methane-hydrate formation. These two factors appear to complement each other, so that microbes growing on hydrates in the presence of the Earth’s relatively weak, but changing, magnetic field could have adapted and evolved – no doubt over geological timescales – to control adeptly the massive methane-hydrate deposits that are found below the seabed and in the permafrost.
In other words: yes, microbes really may be the gatekeepers of this aspect of the Earth’s climate stability. If, and clearly it is still a big “if”, we have upset this delicate geo-microbial balancing act through global warming, then we won’t just be playing with fiery ice, we may ultimately see a world with temperature rises not seen since before the dinosaurs roamed the planet.
Chris Allen, Professor of Cross-Disciplinary Microbiology, Queen’s University Belfast and Niall English, Professor, School of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, University College Dublin
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Wonderful news. The only possible alternative to nuclear. Harvest it! My understanding is Japan is working on doing just that!
“Chris Allen, Professor of Cross-Disciplinary Microbiology, Queen’s University Belfast and Niall English, Professor, School of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, University College Dublin”
When you are a plumber, everything is a plumbing problem. When you’re an electrician, everything is an electrical problem. When you’re software engineer, everything is a software problem. You get the picture. When you’re a microbiologist, everything revolves around microbiology. It’s all about what ultimately pays the bills and funds the retirement plan for each of us.
This is just Rent Seekers trying to frame an alleged climate problem as a microbiology problem that can be studied under the climate gravy train of grant money.
Wow!! I got through half the article and said, “Send Them Billions!!!!”.
This article is all wrong. Methane should be of little concern to anyone because if quickly reacts with oxygen in the atmosphere to form a very harmless gas that is required by life on this planet, CO2. The previous interglacial period, the Eemian, was warmer than this one with higher sea levels and more ice cap melting yet there is no evidence of a huge increase in CO2 coming from underwater or permafrost methane and clearly no climate tipping point was ever crossed. There is a much larger rserve of greenhouse gas that is stored in the oceans in liquid form and is currently evaporating into the Earth’s atmosphere and nothing is being done to stop it. Molecule per molecule this greenhouse gas is a stronger IR absorber than is CO2 and there is already on average, 50 times more of this molecule in our atmosphere than is CO2. If all of this liquid greenhouse gas stored in the oceans of the world were to enter the Earth’s atmosphere the Earth’s surface would become higher than it is on Venus as would be the surface temperature of this planet. Currently nothing is being done to prevent this from happening. The greenhouse gas that I am talking about is already the primary greenhouse gas in the Earth’s atmosphere, H2O.
Not the Eemian but the PETM, an extremely warm period 55,5 million years ago lasting only 200.000 years with palm trees growing on Ellesmere Island, crocs swimming around the North Pole and CO2 levels as high as 6500 ppm. One of the possible causes is massive release of methane hydrites from the seafloor. Isotope evidence shows that the C in the CO2 is old C that had been long out of the C cycle.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleocene–Eocene_Thermal_Maximum#Methane_release See 7.6
In this times of climate hysteria you have to come up with something really BIG to secure your grant…
The increase in CO2 during the PETM may well be caused by the warming and not a cause of the warming.
Years ago an article Forbes estimated that if we could find a commercial way of extracting methane hydrates there was the potential of several thousand years of energy available. Unknown if anyone is working on this other than maybe Japan.
But think of the horrors if the Japanese puncture the bacterial screen and release the methane all at once. The Japanese could contaminate the bacteria, kill it off, and we would all cook.
Therefore this study is important … use it to stop the Japanese from even researching the use of methane hydrates. (I am pretty sure Griff/Loydo/Gfulfront/Bigoilybob will agree with me).
And China.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=China+attempting+to+revover+methane+hydrates&cvid=8ce1a280f96540cf9a3db3ec837cc654&FORM=ANAB01&PC=HCTS
“May, could, if, possibly” yawn. Inferential science!
First of all, the hydrates are natural gas, not just methane.

Then natural gas hydrates are stable according to a “zone of stability” which
is a combination of temperature/pressure.
There is a mass of natural gas hydrates off the Carolina coast which has a layer
of what appears to be the oceans bottom which is ~500 feet thick, below which
is a layer of natural gas hydrates which is a ~ 500 meters thick.
A portion of Blakes Ridge has been cored and age tested to be more than 50
million years old.
The charts that I use indicate that it has been much warmer and much colder
in that time than it is now.
The article above which seems to indicate that can determine abiotic vs biotic
hydrocarbons by isotopic ratio.
The article below indicates that this conclusion is wrong. Very large and very
expensive diamonds formed 250-410 miles deep in the earth have inclusions
of methane which, under other circumstances, would be called biotic.
https://www.geochemicalperspectivesletters.org/article1915/