Irrefutable NASA data: global fires down by 25 percent

Using satellite technology, NASA determined that between 2003 and 2019, global fires have dropped by roughly 25 percent. This makes the “climate change is worsening wildfires” argument completely moot.

From NASA Earth Observatory

The control of fire is a goal that may well be as old as humanity, but the systematic monitoring of fire on a global scale is a much newer capability.

In the 1910s, the U.S. Forest Service began building fire lookout towers on mountain peaks in order to detect distant fires. A few decades later, fire-spotting airplanes flew onto the scene. Then in the early 1980s, satellites began to map fires over large areas from the vantage point of space.

Over time, researchers have built a rich and textured record of Earth’s fire activity and are now able to analyze decadal trends. “The pace of discovery has increased dramatically during the satellite era,” said James Randerson, a scientist at the University of California, Irvine. “Having high-quality, daily observations of fires available on a global scale has been critical.”

The animation above shows the locations of actively burning fires on a monthly basis for nearly two decades. The maps are based on observations from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Terra satellite. The colors are based on a count of the number (not size) of fires observed within a 1,000-square-kilometer area. White pixels show the high end of the count—as many as 30 fires in a 1,000-square-kilometer area per day. Orange pixels show as many as 10 fires, while red areas show as few as 1 fire per day.

December 1, 2014 – August 31, 2015

The sequence highlights the rhythms—both natural and human-caused—in global fire activity. Bands of fire sweep across Eurasia, North America, and Southeast Asia as farmers clear and maintain fields in April and May. Summer brings new activity in boreal and temperate forests in North America and Eurasia due to lighting-triggered fires burning in remote areas. In the tropical forests of South America and equatorial Asia, fires flare up in August, September, and October as people make use of the dry season to clear rainforest and savanna, as well as stop trees and shrubs from encroaching on already cleared land. Few months pass in Australia without large numbers of fires burning somewhere on the continent’s vast grasslands, savannas, and tropical forests.

But it is Africa that is truly the fire continent. On an average day in August, the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometers (MODIS) on NASA’s Aqua and Terra satellites detect 10,000 actively burning fires around the world—and 70 percent them happen in Africa. Huge numbers of blazes spring up in the northern part of continent in December and January. A half year later, the burning has shifted south. Indeed, global fire emissions typically peak in August and September, coinciding with the main fire seasons of the Southern Hemisphere, particularly Africa. (High activity in temperate and boreal forests in the Northern Hemisphere in the summer also contribute.)

August 29, 2018JPEG

The second animation underscores how much fire activity shifts seasonally by highlighting burning activity during December 2014, April 2015, and August 2015. The satellite image above shows smoke rising from the savanna of northern Zambia on August 29, 2018, around the time global emissions reach their maximum.

Though Africa dominates in the sheer number of fires, fires seasons there are pretty consistent from year-to-year. The most variable fire seasons happen elsewhere, such as the tropical forests of South America and equatorial Asia. In these areas, the severity of fire season is often linked to cycles of El Niño and La Niña. The buildup of warm water in the eastern Pacific during an El Niño changes atmospheric patterns and reduces rainfall over many rainforests, allowing them to burn more easily and widely.https://www.youtube.com/embed/69N494UIlS8?flag=1&enablejsapi=1&html5=1&origin=https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Despite the vast quantities of carbon released by fires in savannas, grasslands, and boreal forests, research shows that fires in these biomes do not generally add carbon to the atmosphere in the long term. The regrowth of vegetation or the creation of charcoal typically recaptures all of the carbon within months or years. However, when fires permanently remove trees or burn through peat (a carbon-rich fuel that can take centuries to form), little carbon is recaptured and the atmosphere sees a net increase in CO2.

That is why outbreaks of fire in countries with large amounts of peat, such as Indonesia, have an outsized effect on global climate. Fires in equatorial Asia account for just 0.6 percent of global burned area, yet the region accounts for 8 percent of carbon emissions and 23 percent of methane emissions. On October, 25, 2015, the Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera aboard the DSCOVR satellite acquired an image (below) of heavy smoke over Indonesia; El Niño was particularly active at the time.

October 15, 2015

One of the most interesting things researchers have discovered since MODIS began collecting measurements, noted Randerson, is a decrease in the total number of square kilometers burned each year. Between 2003 and 2019, that number has dropped by roughly 25 percent.

As populations have increased in fire-prone regions of Africa, South America, and Central Asia, grasslands and savannas have become more developed and converted into farmland. As a result, long-standing habits of burning grasslands (to clear shrubs and land for cattle or other reasons) have decreased, explained NASA Goddard Space Flight scientist Niels Andela. And instead of using fire, people increasingly use machines to clear crops.

“There are really two separate trends,” said Randerson. “Even as the global burned area number has declined because of what is happening in savannas, we are seeing a significant increase in the intensity and reach of fires in the western United States because of climate change.”

2003 – 2015

When researchers began using satellites to study the world’s fires in the 1980s, they were just sorting out the basics of how to detect fires from space. Now after mining MODIS data for nearly two decades, scientists are looking ahead to other satellites and technologies that they hope will advance the study of fire in the coming years.

A series of follow-on sensors called the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) on the Suomi NPP and NOAA-20 satellites now make near-real time observations of emissions that are even more accurate than those from MODIS because of improved fire detections along the edge of the edges of images, noted Andela.

Meanwhile, the launch of satellites with higher-resolution sensors is also helping. “The Landsat 8 and Sentinel satellites, in particular, are contributing to a revolution in our ability to measure the burned area of small grassland and forest fires,” said Randerson. “And we are going to need additional detection capabilities in the coming years to track increasingly destructive mega fires during all times of day and night.”

References & Resources

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 1 vote
Article Rating
135 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CoRev
September 16, 2020 10:02 am

https://www.nps.gov/articles/wildfire-causes-and-evaluation.htm
“Humans and Wildfire

Nearly 85 percent* of wildland fires in the United States are caused by humans. Human-caused fires result from campfires left unattended, the burning of debris, equipment use and malfunctions, negligently discarded cigarettes, and intentional acts of arson.”

*Source: 2000-2017 data based on Wildland Fire Management Information (WFMI) and U.S. Forest Service Research Data Archive

Reply to  CoRev
September 17, 2020 12:24 am

Ah ha! Officials running the show love to blame arson, when in fact once a firestorm starts, it spreads & grows to a firestorm system – first it superheats the region, it makes it windier, the fire’s updraft dries out the soil. Then lightning & embers from the pyro firestorm systems spread the fires.

September 16, 2020 10:08 am

“noted Randerson, is a decrease in the total number of square kilometers burned each year. Between 2003 and 2019, that number has dropped by roughly 25 percent.”

….So number of km² burnt down 25%…… great….but….

“we are seeing a significant increase in the intensity and reach of fires in the western United States because of climate change.”

….So climate change affecting USA but Africa not so much……… ok..

…..and the decrease in worldwide burning, also climate change?…… no…..thought not.

…but the USFA says the number of fires are down 2.5% (2009-2018)…….

https://www.usfa.fema.gov/data/statistics/

…..so just to be clear there’s not so many, but when there is a fire they’re hotter and spread further….. and it’s climate change that does that…..ok

Reply to  Climate believer
September 17, 2020 12:32 am

Yes there are now less fires when looking at frequency – these less frequent fires are much much more intense because fuel loads are much much higher. The recent fires in the Snowy Mountains burnt fuel loads of around 200-400 tonnes per hectare. Fuel over 7.5 t/ha burning in extreme conditions is unstoppable. About 100 years ago, there were lots of low intensity fires that kept down fuel loads so there were more fires with only rare problem fires. These more frequent fires were low intensity small fires that could be controlled.

Enginer01
September 16, 2020 10:40 am

“Less fire is good.” Really?
one, it may represent destruction of wildlands and forests.
two, it may represent suppression of natural, brush-clearing fires. Making fewer fires more devastating.
I came across a reference, stupid but thoughtful, on https://usawatchdog.com that gave a biased view of geo-engineering. It led me to this conclusion:
Anti-logging and fire-suppression by tree-huggers is, in it’s own way, GeoEngineering.

Steven Miller
September 16, 2020 12:10 pm

My uncle is a retired forester. When he was going to school they still taught common sense and scientifically backed management techniques that hasd been used for decades. I remember just 30 years ago driving back from hang gliding on the Oregon Coast and traveling through the coastal range in the middle of the night there were fires burning on both sides of the highway, and no one to be seen for miles. We stopped at a rural gas station/store and asked them about it there. They said that it was nothing to worry about it was forest management to keep things safe during the next fire season.

Jl
September 16, 2020 12:17 pm

It’s the intensity game. When more hurricanes didn’t materialize as the “experts” predicted, they went with “but they’re more intense”. So when the global area of wildfires went down, of course came the very predictable “but they’re more intense!”

Abolition Man
September 16, 2020 2:25 pm

Anthony,
Thank you for another interesting post!
While the alarmists run around with their hair on fire, perhaps igniting some blazes like the Pantifa and Burn, Loot, Murder rioters in the Northwest seem to be doing, it is interesting to see the positive effects of a greening planet on another facet of the climate change debate. I have to wonder if the increased CO2 levels and slight rise in temperatures we have experienced is increasing the precipitation in the Tropics, helping to decrease fires there along with the incorporation of more modern farming techniques.
One thing seems crystal clear however; the drastic reduction in timber harvesting is directly tied to the increase in Western forest fires! The law signed by Clinton that closed many national forest areas to logging and recreation is responsible for the large increase in fuel load over the last thirty plus years, and the discontinuation of the clearing of logging and forest roads has cut back on access for fire risk assessment and suppression!
Where I live, in the high desert mountains of the Southwest, forest roads are ubiquitous; perhaps because hunting is such large source of income for both the government and private land holders. That, and the summer monsoons, have kept our fires from burning completely out of control as they seem to be in Washington, Oregon and Commifornia. Of course, any rioters trying to ignite forest fires around these parts would probably meet an unhappy fate from the numerous hunting parties scouting for a trophy bull or buck right now, and would end up as food for the cougars, bears and wolves that are currently keeping a low profile!

September 16, 2020 2:38 pm

According to this study noted below global forests between 1982 and 2018 have grown versus claims of declining forests by climate alarmists. The new growth during this 35 years period has added an area of increased forests the size of Alaska and Texas combined.

https://phys.org/news/2018-08-global-forest-loss-years-offset.html

Frank Syaers
September 16, 2020 6:34 pm

For Anthony. What is the normalization (scale) based on? Most of the normalization I have seen the maximum number is set at 1. Sorry but basic stuff.

Walter Sobchak
September 16, 2020 8:57 pm

“This makes the “climate change is worsening wildfires” argument completely moot.”

No. It does not. It disproves the argument. Moot does not mean false or disproven.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/moot
1. moot (adjective)
a. open to discussion or debate; debatable; doubtful: “Whether that was the cause of their troubles is a moot point.”
b. of little or no practical value, meaning, or relevance; purely academic: “In practical terms, the issue of her application is moot because the deadline has passed.”
2. verb (used with object)
a. to present or introduce (any point, subject, project, etc.) for discussion.
b. to reduce or remove the practical significance of; make purely theoretical or academic.
3. noun
a. an assembly of the people in early England exercising political, administrative, and judicial powers.
b. an argument or discussion, especially of a hypothetical legal case.

Related note. Mute means silent. A moot point is one that is debated. A mute point would result in silence.

Steve Skinner
September 16, 2020 8:59 pm

If global warming is increasing, and global warming causes wildfires, then why are fires reduced by 25%?

September 17, 2020 3:56 am

Here’s what the elite Yale 360 web site says about fires: “The Age of Megafires: The World Hits a Climate Tipping Point”

https://e360.yale.edu/features/the-age-of-megafires-the-world-hits-a-climate-tipping-point

Robert of Texas
September 17, 2020 11:22 am

It takes 40 or more years to build up enough fuel for really large hot fires. Once the areas that bad forest management practices have created are burnt off, the number, size, and damage of natural forest fires will decrease. If we are burning 4% of these areas per year, then it takes about 20 years to reduce the badly managed areas enough to see the start of a decrease.

Controlled burns performed often will keep these areas healthy and less dangerous. Communities that build to high fire-resistant standards will see a decrease in damages. Humans need to ADAPT. Come on humans, we are good at this. This is not rocket science.

Irritable Bill
September 19, 2020 10:06 pm

Don’t worry guys, Scott Morrison, the Australian PM will save us. And don’t forget to thank all those staunch Aussies who will be paying the highest power prices in the word so that China, America, India and many other countries including most of Europe (as they will default) wont have to bother….of course this is not what the conservatives voted for, we voted in the vain hope of a resumption of intelligent economic policies including building lots of coal fired power stations to power the tattered remains of our industries and homes.
We will soon lose steel manufacturing and aluminum smelting, they are basically waiting to see “Slo-Mo’s) policies before the decision is made to head for greener pastures….and the stupid bastard cant even bring himself to utter the word “coal.” I am however, not surprised.
Sick sad world, when the coming Eddy Minimum really begins to bight, I have no doubt that the massive Northern crop failures due to freezing conditions will be caused by……CO2!!!!
Because as we now all know, up is down, day is night, boys are girls, 2+2=5 and the science is in. Don’t even bother to argue with your privileged mansplaining facts, or we will stand all round you and scream.