
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
NYT have just noticed that not all climate activists are PC hippies, though they still seem blind to the possibility that some of their own political fellow travellers could be bad.
White Supremacy Goes Green
Why is the Far Right Suddenly Paying Attention to climate change?
By Beth Gardiner
As an environmental journalist, I’ve been covering the frightening acceleration of climate change for more than a decade. As a person who believes in the tenets of liberal democracy, I’ve watched the rise of white-supremacist, anti-immigrant and nationalistic ideologies with similar dread over the past few years.
But I always thought of those two trends “looming ecological dangers and the gathering strength of the far right” as unrelated, parallel crises in a turbulent time. Only recently have I begun to understand that they are deeply interconnected, an ugly pairing of forces drawing power from each other.
From France to Washington to New Zealand, angry voices on the hard right nationalists, populists and others beyond conventional conservatism are picking up old environmental tropes and adapting them to a moment charged with fears for the future. In doing so, they are giving potent new framing to a set of issues more typically associated with the left. Often, they emphasize what they see as the deep ties between a nation’s land and its people to exclude those they believe do not belong. Some twist scientific terms such as invasive species foreign plants or animals that spread unchecked in a new ecosystem to target immigrants and racial and ethnic minorities. And here’s what really frightens me: This dynamic is likely to intensify as climate change creates new stresses that could pit nations and groups against one another.
Although the pressures of a warming planet are new, the deployment of environmental language for racist, nativist and nationalistic ends has a long, dark history. Before environmentalism became a mainstream and progressive cause in the 1970s, many American conservationists were also white supremacists, who argued that those they saw as outsiders threatened the nation’s landscape or lacked the values to care for it properly. Such thinking was common in Europe, too. The Nazis embraced notions of a symbiotic connection between the German homeland and its people.
…
Read more (paywalled): https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/28/opinion/far-right-climate-change.html
Gee, who could have seen this coming?
Greens, traditional hippy greens, thought that by creating a fake climate crisis people they would recruit more people to their cause.
But this isn’t what is happening. Frightened believers are turning to whoever is closest, whoever offers the most immediate relief from their fear.
For many of the fearful, traditional greens, with their discredited hippy era economic and social ideas and their dismal multi-decade track record of political failure are not a credible source of comfort. Dangerous demagogues on both the left and the right are starting to displace traditional greens from a political stage they thought would be theirs.
I give NYT reporter Beth Gardiner half marks for this one. She might have noticed that dangerous right wing extremists are starting to hijack the climate movement, but she still seems blind to the crazies in her own political camp.
Is the far-right actually weaponizing climate change?
I see no reference to actual facts in Beth Gardiner’s left-leaning opus, only claims and opinions, backed by virtue signaling.
Journalism is descending to new depths of degradation.
“Is the far-right actually weaponizing climate change?”
No. I don’t know where this originated but there’s no evidence for it. Of course, I don’t keep up too much with the “far-right”, nor does anyone else.
The “far-right” is a very small minority in the United States. In Europe, everyone to the right of a communist is decribed as “far-right” by the far-left,
Marine Le Pen, French “far right”, is essentially aligned on the French Communist Party of the 80ties.
She wants to re-nationalize industries. Worked so well under state control (not).
Looks like the ‘far right’ is really far left and this is the next scene of their production.
If you go far enough west, you’ll find you’ve arrived in the east.
Too far right and you end up on the left.
An airplane can’t be flown from either wing, proper flight is only possible when the pilot is located in the center.
Benign government is rooted in centrism. The press would do well to recognize that also.
Rabid diversitists, including color supremacists, are pure as Green, as Black, as White, as Yellow, as Brown, and sometimes for other low information attributes altogether. In the best case, they want to be left alone. In the worst case, they want to force redistribute or retributive change.
“This dynamic is likely to intensify as [the politics of the false emergency of] climate change creates new stresses that could pit nations and groups against one another.
Now the statement is more accurate.
Sigh.
Okay NYT, pay attention.
Nationalism – a love of the country you are a citizen of and pride in your nation’s achievements.
Nationalising – a Left form of government where the elite decide that private industry cannot be trusted to do the ‘right thing’ for the country and that everything would be better if only they were in charge.
So waving your nation’s flag is pride in your nation.
Wanting to nationalise healthcare is socialism.
Is Beth Gardiner a pseudonym for Jussie Smollett? Were these KKK-ers running around in sheets on a cold night in Chicago? Just asking…