Japan: Back to the Fossil Fueled Future!

Guest MJaGA! by David Middleton

MjaGA = Making Japan Great Again

From the Midget Oligarch Reporting On News Service (MORONS)…

Economics
Japan Goes Into Reverse on Going Green
The country abandoned nuclear energy and is building coal plants that will spew as much CO2 as all the cars in the U.S.

By Noah Smith
February 5, 2020

Modern living standards — indoor lighting, affordable food, heat in the winter, an internet connection — require energy. And every energy source has its drawbacks. It’s easy to point out the downsides of a given energy source and call for it to be banned. But if we’re not careful about weighing costs against benefits, we’re liable to end up with something even worse.

This is becoming painfully evident in the case of Japan. In 2011, a nuclear power plant in northeast Japan’s Fukushima prefecture was damaged by a huge tsunami and had multiple meltdowns. The radioactive contamination is still being dealt with and will be a major drain on government resources for decades to come.

[…]

But total electricity consumption dipped only slightly. Where did Japan make up the difference? Fossil fuels. These went from 62% of Japan’s electricity production before the disaster to about 80% after:

Bloomberg
Figure 1. “Back to the Future”! (Bloomberg)

It gets even better…

Even worse, it looks as if this is the new normal for Japan, at least for the next decade. A government push for green energy and rising public concerns about climate change have forced the cancellation of a few coal plants in favor of renewable sources. But the country is still on track to add more than 20 coal plants in the next five years. These plants are expected to emit as much carbon as all the passenger cars in the U.S.

Bloomberg

Japan has had a lot of help from the rest of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere

Figure 2. Global coal consumption by region (million tonnes of oil equivalent per year). BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019. (Coal to remain ‘King’ in Southeast Asia)

And that help will likely carry on for decades…

Figure 3. No Green New Deal in the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. (Coal to remain ‘King’ in Southeast Asia)

The MORONS journalist actually had a rational opinion piece going, right up until the last paragraph…

So nuclear won’t be the thing that saves us from climate change; that task will fall to solar. But shuttering existing nuclear plants in the next decade would be a mistake. Despite the risks, the world isn’t ready for an abrupt transition away from nuclear. Getting rid of fossil fuels needs to be the top priority, and existing nuclear plants will remain a very important stopgap until solar really ramps up.

Bloomberg
Figure 4. Divide the solar PV and wind capacity by three to account for its feeble capacity factor and it’s clear that in 2040 the world will still likely be generating far more electricity from fossil fuels than from non-hydroelectric renewables. Under the IEA’s Stated Policies Scenario, we’ll be burning nearly three times as much natural gas and twice as much coal in 2040 that we were at the dawn of the 21st century… Excellent! (IEA Forecast: Solar to surge past coal & natural gas by 2040)

And in 2050 we will still likely be getting 2.5 times as much primary energy from fossil fuels as we will from renewables, including hydroelectric.

Figure 5. Renewables surge… But so do fossil fuels (US EIA).

The problem for people like Noah, is that there has never actually been an energy transition.

Figure 6. There has never been an energy transition.

We derive more energy from biomass now than we did when wood and whale oil were our primary energy sources. Renewables won’t be replacing anything. They’ll just be piled on top of the energy sources we were already tapping.

Figure 6. Noah Smith, Data is laughing at you.

Noah Smith

Noah Smith received his PhD in economics from the University of Michigan, graduating in 2012. His dissertation concerns expectation formation in financial markets. Noah majored in physics as an undergraduate at Stanford University, and spent three years working in Japan, where he still returns from time to time to do research.

Business Insider

Hey Noah!!!

Figure 7. Seven years of college down the drain. Might as well join the [fracking] Peace Corps.” WARNING: F-Bomb Alert!

And Noah, about that saving us from the weather thing…

Figure 8. Bwahaha!!! (EIA)
Figure 9. Bwahaha!!!

Because…

Figure 10. It’s a fossil fueled world. (2018 BP Statistical Review of World Energy).
Figure 11. Arthur Fonzarelli is living proof that short people can be cool… Unless they happen to be a midget oligarch trying to buy the presidency.
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

87 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robber
February 20, 2020 1:03 pm

Is there a municipality anywhere that is now 100% solar or wind-powered?
I know that there are some who claim to be 100% “renewable”, but they seem to be still connected to the grid for when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing.

clipe
February 20, 2020 1:20 pm

Coal consumption in ‘Total Africa’ follows the trajectory of some random country named Rhodesia

comment image?fit=700%2C507&ssl=1

clipe
Reply to  clipe
February 20, 2020 1:31 pm

Rhodesia etal

clipe
Reply to  clipe
February 20, 2020 1:48 pm

comment image

James Hein
February 20, 2020 1:36 pm

“multiple meltdowns” This of course never happened. The only radiation signatures they managed to pick up and hype were leftover traces from the Bikini Atoll tests and in some waste pools. Fukushima, like most other things, was completely overhyped. Some have been trying for decades to get nuclear plants Down Under but while those opposed know nothing about nuclear science it may never happen.

Hermar
February 21, 2020 5:01 am

I thought the Japanese wanted to create a hydrogen society and their department for new energies (NEDO) and Mitsubishi are very ambitious when it comes to LENR (low energy nuclear reaction).
Instead of using inefficient hydrolysis or coal, they could generate much more and clean energy via the new nuclear reactions (American Physical Association calls it “cold fusion”, others have named it LENR).

Johann Wundersamer
March 4, 2020 5:11 pm

In 2011, a nuclear power plant in northeast Japan’s Fukushima prefecture was damaged by a huge tsunami and had multiple meltdowns. The radioactive contamination is still being dealt with and will be a major drain on government resources for decades to come.

____________________________________

Hard to understand. Why ain’t the nuclear waste long ago disposed of in the subduction zone:

https://www.google.com/search?q=fukushima+subduction+zone&oq=Fukushima+subduction+z&aqs=chrome.

And why wasn’t the nuclear reactor simply supported to melt its way through the Earth’s crust to its nickel iron core.

____________________________________

Japan’s politics, Japan’s determination is simply overrated.

Johann Wundersamer
March 4, 2020 5:37 pm

How many people died at Fukushima?

A May 2012 United Nations committee report stated that none of the six Fukushima workers who had died since the tsunami had died from radiation exposure. According to a 2012 Yomiuri Shimbun survey, 573 deaths have been certified as “disaster-related” by 13 municipalities affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Fu…
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster casualties – Wikipedia

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster_casualties&ved=2ahUKEwi48ffclILoAhWSp4sKHY_qBdYQFjABegQIARAI&usg=AOvVaw2mE7BHbXhB51kDCIapHBwC

https://www.google.com/search?q=Fukushima+tsunami+casualties&oq=Fukushima+tsunami+casualties+&aqs=chrome.

~13000 people missed, ~18000 drowned as a result of the tsunami.

For weeks and weeks we had the burning buildings in the news – nothing to do with “nuclear”, just oxyhydrogen explosions on the top floors.

The Japanese technicians sat in shock, idling in front of the computer screens.

After a month, unemployed temporary workers were requested to clean up.

What a miserable failure.

The German Greens TODAY are still crying for the “Fukushima effect”.

Johann Wundersamer
March 4, 2020 5:55 pm

Unneeded “nuclear waste” is simply deposed with https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-huawei&sxsrf=ALeKk03BdyPOf62LQLnbEh6KcU0bNPJ8IQ%3A1583372450211&ei=olhgXsfFDOLvsAfqoKLoBA&q=nuclear+waste+castors&oq=Nuclear+wastecastors&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.

Make it a serial production, rebuild a few old freighters and sink the trash in the subduction zone.

Japanese really ain’t comprehensible, what are they waiting for – it’s their country, it’s their seas.

What further invitation are they waiting for.