Claim: Climate Change is Speeding Up Global Ocean Currents

Deploying an Argo float. Courtesy of NOAA Corps.

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Climate scientists like Michael Mann have long predicted the slowdown of ocean currents, including the North Atlantic current which keeps Europe warm in winter, but measurements suggest that global wind speed and ocean currents are actually accelerating.

Climate change may be speeding up ocean circulation

Since the 1990s, wind speeds have picked up, making surface waters swirl faster

By Carolyn Gramling

FEBRUARY 5, 2020 AT 4:29 PM

Winds are picking up worldwide, and that is making the surface waters of the oceans swirl a bit faster, researchers report. A new analysis of the ocean’s kinetic energy, measured by thousands of floats around the world, suggests that surface ocean circulation has been accelerating since the early 1990s. 

Some of that sped-up circulation may be due to naturally recurring ocean-atmosphere patterns, such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, researchers report February 5 in Science Advances. But the acceleration is greater than can be attributed to natural variability alone — suggesting that global warming may also be playing a role, says a team led by oceanographer Shijian Hu of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Qingdao. 

Global warming has long been predicted to slow global wind speeds, called “global stilling.” That’s because the poles are warming faster than the equatorial region, and a smaller temperature gradient between the two zones might be expected to result in weaker winds (SN: 3/16/18). But recent studies, such as a report published November 2019 in Nature Climate Change, suggest that wind speeds around the world have actually been speeding up, at least since about 2010. 

The new study suggests that winds have actually been picking up over the oceans for several decades, leading to the faster-swirling surface waters especially in the tropics. The study used data collected by over 3,000 Argo floats, which measure temperature, salinity and speeds of currents down to about 2,000 meters, in oceans around the world. Then, the team combined these data with a variety of climate simulations to calculate the change in kinetic energy —energy from the wind motion that gets transferred to the water — in that upper part of the ocean.

Read more: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/climate-change-speeding-up-ocean-circulation

The abstract of the study;

Deep-reaching acceleration of global mean ocean circulation over the past two decades

Shijian Hu, Janet Sprintall, Cong Guan, Michael J. McPhaden, Fan Wang, Dunxin Hu and Wenju Cai

Ocean circulation redistributes Earth’s energy and water masses and influences global climate. Under historical greenhouse warming, regional ocean currents show diverse tendencies, but whether there is an emerging trend of the global mean ocean circulation system is not yet clear. Here, we show a statistically significant increasing trend in the globally integrated oceanic kinetic energy since the early 1990s, indicating a substantial acceleration of global mean ocean circulation. The increasing trend in kinetic energy is particularly prominent in the global tropical oceans, reaching depths of thousands of meters. The deep-reaching acceleration of the ocean circulation is mainly induced by a planetary intensification of surface winds since the early 1990s. Although possibly influenced by wind changes associated with the onset of a negative Pacific decadal oscillation since the late 1990s, the recent acceleration is far larger than that associated with natural variability, suggesting that it is principally part of a long-term trend.

Read more: https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/6/eaax7727

What does Michael Mann have to say about the impact of global warming on ocean currents? This article is from five years ago, but the science is settled, right?

Global Warming Is Slowing Ocean Currents Causing Dire Consequences, Warns Climate Expert Michael Mann

 Cole Mellino Mar. 25, 2015 09:49AM EST

Climate scientists Michael Mann and Stefan Rahmstorf announced the findings of their new study yesterday, which shows that the rapid melting of the polar ice has slowed down currents in the Atlantic Ocean, particularly since 1970. The scientists say “the slowdown in ocean currents will result in sea level rise in cities like New York and Boston, and temperature changes on both sides of the Atlantic,” reports NPR’s Jeremy Hobson. Mann, who is a professor and the director of the Earth System Science Center at Penn State University, joined Hobson yesterday on Here and Now to discuss the study and the implications of its findings.

Not only would North America and Europe experience colder temperatures, but “If those current systems shut down, then suddenly the North Atlantic [fisheries] would no longer be productive,” says Michael Mann. 

Read more: https://www.ecowatch.com/global-warming-is-slowing-ocean-currents-causing-dire-consequences-war-1882023145.html

Obviously Shijian Hu and colleagues may have gotten their calculations wrong, who can dispute the word of scientists like Mann and Rahmstorf?

On the other hand, if ocean currents are actually accelerating, and we apply Mann’s theory that global warming causes ocean currents to slow, does this mean ocean currents are accelerating because world is actually cooling? Or perhaps Mann’s theory is not reversible, warming causes a slowdown but cooling does not cause an acceleration? Or will ocean currents turn out to be an uncertain indicator subject to significant natural variation? Inquiring minds would like to know.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
88 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 8, 2020 8:51 pm

Just how much have winds ”picked up”, and has wind picked up everywhere? and how and how much does wind affect an ocean currents? If the wind changes direction – which it does several times a week here – does that mean the currents follow?
I thought these currents are brought about by temperature differentials under water just like those that cause wind.

February 8, 2020 8:59 pm

”But the acceleration is greater than can be attributed to natural variability alone — suggesting that global warming may also be playing a role”
”in Nature Climate Change, suggest that wind speeds around the world have actually been speeding up, at least since about 2010. ”

So co2 has become active in the last ten years and caused this ”acceleration” in wind speed? It ”can’t be attributed to natural variability”?
How many ppm co2 have been added in the last ten years.
What the hell are these people smoking????

February 9, 2020 12:49 am

“Global warming has long been predicted to slow global wind speeds, called “global stilling.” That’s because the poles are warming faster than the equatorial region”

Both poles?

https://tambonthongchai.com/2020/02/08/antarctica-hottest-ever/

malkom700
February 9, 2020 1:17 am

The situation today is that we are forced to do something, even if the consequences are catastrophic. Anyone who does nothing can not be mistaken.

Vuk
February 9, 2020 1:20 am

This should not be much of a surprise to at least one reader of WUWT. Here is an extract from the last December:
vukcevic December 23, 2019 at 2:12 am
Global SST appear to follow the changes in the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field with a strong inverse correlation and about 10 years delay.
http://www.vukcevic.co.uk/SST-GMF.htm

Underlying hypothesis is based on the basic laws of physics, but is it credible?
One of the basic principles of electromagnetism is that a force is required to move a conductor through magnetic field, due to the electric current induction (back EMF force), stronger the field greater the resisting force.
Saline sea water is a good electric conductor, hence, as the Earth’s magnetic field weakens the oceans’ current circulate just a bit faster moving more heat and the further towards the poles than is the case at the times of the stronger magnetic field. Ocean currents have low velocity taking few years to move large volumes of subsurface warm water for the temperature change to take full effect.

Rich Davis December 23, 2019 at 1:28 pm
As I said on an earlier thread, this is fascinating stuff. Based on the ~10-year lag, it provides the opportunity to make predictions that can be falsified. Imagine that, a falsifiable hypothesis! With the magnetic field intensity flat to slightly strengthened recently, temperatures should remain roughly flat or slightly cooler for the next decade.
For this hypothesis to be supported, ocean currents should have been flowing faster over time as magnetic field intensity has weakened. All those argo floats drifting around must be generating some data about this, no?

vukcevic December 23, 2019 at 2:49 pm
Indeed, good point, I have not looked in the Argo data, next stop.”

Link shown can be found in a number of my comments posted on the WUWT during the last couple of years while the global temperature correlation link is : http://www.vukcevic.co.uk/MTC1.gif

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Vuk
February 9, 2020 8:09 am

Thanks for that comment, Vuk.

I thought that the possible connection between ocean currents and magnetic fields was plausable back when I first heard about it. Maybe this new study will shine some light on this connection.

Vuk
Reply to  Tom Abbott
February 9, 2020 10:45 am

Thanks Tom

Rich Davis
Reply to  Vuk
February 9, 2020 4:13 pm

That was my first thought when I saw the headline! I searched for your name, and to my surprise I found my own name. Well, I hope that your credibility isn’t hurt by association with a crackpot like me! 🙂

Still fascinating stuff!

Vuk
Reply to  Rich Davis
February 10, 2020 1:24 am

I’m a member of the same club, the membership is free.

Ed Zuiderwijk
February 9, 2020 1:22 am

First they were slowing down. Now they are speeding up. But they all miss the point. The really important question is: are they turning right or left? Or up or down? Or all of those? We need to know!

Clarky of Oz
February 9, 2020 3:23 am

Acceleration is a wonderfully descriptive and flexible term. it can be both positive or negative. To say an object is accelerating means it is either speeding up, slowing down or simply changing direction.

https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/1DKin/Lesson-1/Acceleration
“Accelerating objects are changing their velocity – either the magnitude or the direction of the velocity. Acceleration is the rate at which they change their velocity. Acceleration is a vector quantity; that is, it has a direction associated with it. The direction of the acceleration depends upon which direction the object is moving and whether it is speeding up or slowing down.”

Matt G
February 9, 2020 4:12 am

The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) has been found to have strengthened over the recent decades and this caused a faster flow of ocean surface water that is able to delivery more energy to the surface and atmosphere quicker. It’s the main reason with the AMO that the Arctic ice has declined with warmer water reaching the Arctic ocean quicker.

Speeding up ocean currents are actually causing warming climate because it also changes the distribution of cloud albedo around them. Like with ENSO when the surface ocean speeds up clouds formation reduces as in La Nina. In both cases cloud albedo decreases increasing shortwave radiation penetrating the ocean, resulting in increased energy storage.

The claim that ocean currents have speeded up is nothing new, but highlights further evidence using Argo floats that is most likely correct.

This articles claim that ocean currents are speeding up due to climate change then becomes pseudoscience because not only does it contradicts previous claims by the alarmist scientists. They pick any new findings or observations and blame it on global warming/climate change. That is not using scientific method and just continues the charlatan behaviour that maintains global warming/climate change phenomenon. They are claiming the mouse in the room shakes it while ignoring the elephant standing in the corner.

The oceans control the atmosphere’s energy and as usual this has been spun around like political spin.

Carl Friis-Hansen
February 9, 2020 5:15 am

I think Eric Worrall’s last paragraph says it al.
Last year the wind industry were angry because the global average wind speed had fallen – so what is it?

February 9, 2020 5:55 am

Wikipedia
A shutdown or slowdown of the thermohaline circulation is a hypothesized effect of global warming on a major ocean circulation. A 2015 study suggested that the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) has weakened by 15-20% in 200 years.

Questios
Q1 if ocean currents are speeding up dies this mean they are getting back to where they were previously?
Q2 If slowing ocean currents and speeding up ocean currents are both going to kill us, how can we maintain a constant velocity?
Q3 Isn’t the whole theory that predicted slowing ocean currents now scrap?

Matt G
Reply to  Ben Vorlich
February 9, 2020 9:56 am

1) Based on computer model.

That 2015 study with one of the authors being “Michael”E.”Mann was based on computer model stimulating past climate and the AMOC so basically a guess (garbage with observations). It was not based on observations that showed current speeds slightly increasing.

2) The AMOC is based on slowing currents becomes negative cold AMO phase and faster currents positive warm AMO phase. Maintaining a constant velocity helps keep the climate stable and past history shows this can change often. The positioning during past history changes much more and has the largest effect on climate.

3) No, but not likely anytime very soon. When it does in future estimated to be about 14 years time, when the next cold AMO phase likely resumes.

Bob Cherba
February 9, 2020 7:21 am

‘Seems to be I’ve read in the past several years that wind turbines were reducing wind speeds, which makes sense. The warmists might now think that all those wind turbine propellers are speeding up the wind. Fits in with the rest of their “science.”

RB
February 9, 2020 7:45 am

Since currents and winds are increasing, rather than decreasing as the climate warming “experts” swore would happen under global warming, we are obviously undergoing the opposite of global warming. Changing the definition of global warming doesn’t change the fact that the world is not behaving the way the “experts” said it would.

Michael Jankowski
February 9, 2020 10:35 am

Wonder if Mann got his panties in a wad with the peer reviewers who accepted a manuscript that debunked a past paper of his.

Kramer
February 9, 2020 12:46 pm

Ha, I just read today on Tom Nelson’s twitter account that climate change might cause the jet stream to speed up. I recall the ‘settled science’ reporting that it might cause it to slow down.

Adrian
February 16, 2020 12:01 pm

The globe is in fact cooling down due to the solar minimums, meny poeple find it hard to accept due to politcal reasons.

Adrian
February 16, 2020 1:02 pm

Globe is in fact cooling. That is the reason of the speeding up. Sea ice is now at its 11 year highs. https://www.severe-weather.eu/global-weather/arctic-sea-ice-extent-largest-february-fa/

Globel warming cycle has ended 10 to 15 years ago.

Globel cooling is now setting in.

All because of the solar minimums.
CO2 has a negligable effects

In the next 5 years the barent sea would of completely closed up of sea ice in March, very power storms will cross the UK in early winter

Similar to the 1600s

Watch this space!

S