A comprehensive multi-year project challenges previous findings
Norwegian University of Science and Technology

A three-year, comprehensive study of the effects of ocean acidification challenges previous reports that a more acidic ocean will negatively affect coral reef fish behaviour.
The study, conducted by an international coalition led by scientists from Australia and Norway, showed that coral reef fish exposed to CO2 at levels expected by the end of the century did not change their activity levels or ability to avoid predators.
“Contrary to previous studies, we have demonstrated that end-of-century CO2 levels have a negligible impact on the behaviour and sensory systems of coral reef fish,” said Timothy Clark, the lead author of the study and an associate professor at Deakin University in Australia.
Although this is good news on its own, ocean acidification and global warming remain a major problem for coral reefs, the researchers said. Ocean acidification is a problem for creatures that rely on calcium carbonate to make shells and skeletons, such as coral reef organisms, while higher ocean temperatures lead to coral bleaching and death.
CO2 levels skyrocketing
One of the many jobs the ocean does for humankind is to soak up a percentage of carbon dioxide released from burning fossil fuels.
A study led by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) from March 2019 showed that the world’s oceans absorbed 34 billion metric tons of carbon from the burning of fossil fuels from 1994 to 2007–amounting to about 31 per cent of all carbon dioxide released to the atmosphere.
Researchers believe that by the end of the century, the oceans could absorb so much more CO2 that carbon dioxide levels will be higher than what most marine species have experienced in the past 30 million years.
Tried to replicate previous studies
Nevertheless, because fish have regulatory systems that allow them to cope with changing water acidity, most fish physiologists assumed that they will able to handle the increased acidity — until half-a-dozen highly publicized reports showed that fish, especially coral reef fish, were dramatically affected by increased CO2 — to the point where they would swim towards predators, rather than away from them.
Despite our new results, coral reefs and their fish communities remain in grave danger because of increasing atmospheric CO2.
“The reports described effects across a range of life stages, including altered smell, hearing, vision, activity levels, boldness, anxiety and susceptibility to predation,” said Fredrik Jutfelt, an associate professor at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and one of the authors on the paper.
However, the reports describing these negative effects also had substantial inconsistencies, even though the studies relied on similar methods to test for results.
So Clark and Jutfelt and their colleagues decided to see if they could replicate the results by conducting their own carefully documented research.
But their results were exactly the opposite. They found normal behaviour in the species of fish they looked at.
Matched species, life stages and more
“Unexpected scientific results always spark interest from other scientists, but before too much trust is placed in the findings, the effects need to be repeated by other research teams. This independent replication is an important part of science,” says Jutfelt.
He said the research team wanted to respond to the need, internationally, for issues of global importance to be studied in a way that other researchers can replicate results.
That’s why they designed their multi-year study to match the species, life stages and location and seasons of the earlier studies that showed such catastrophic effects, Jutfelt said.
The researchers were also very careful to document their experiments with videos, and also have made their raw data and analysis available so that other researchers could see exactly what they had done, said Josefin Sundin, the last author on the paper and a researcher at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
“As far as possible, we used automated tracking software to analyse the videos from our experiments, to minimize observer bias, and we also made our raw data and analysis code available to other researchers”, she said.
Their findings were consistent and clear — that coral reef fish behavior wasn’t changed by ocean acidification.
Although this finding may offer a small glimmer of hope for coral reef fishes, climate change continues to present an enormous and serious problem, the researchers aid.
“While our new work suggests ocean acidification may not cause population declines because of behavioural disturbances in coral reef fishes, climate change is currently destroying the reef habitat through coral bleaching during heat waves,” Clark said. “So, despite our new results, coral reefs and their fish communities remain in grave danger because of increasing atmospheric CO2“.
###
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The message of this work was not this or that, but the investigators inability to replicate the earlier hysterical findings.
Clearly some “scientists” cooked up the data. I believe retractions will and should follow.
So they are saying this is by no means a problem for the fish that they are studying, but they take someone else’s word that it’s still a problem for shellfish somehow? Very slight change forecast gotta be a problem?
Um??? Repeat an experiment to verify the results? What do these people think they are – scientists??? LOL
I am glad SOMEONE actually gets suspicious at wild claims. Apparently this group actually took a science class in High School.
And I wish they would stop calling this Ocean Acidification which implies the Oceans will become acidic.
A different post
Thanks
We know that in the past, atmospheric CO2 levels and global temperatures were much higher than they are now. Yet marine life thrived during those periods, including corals. All the hand waving about coral bleaching and ocean “acidification” seems to ignore that fact.
Something that is never addressed with ocean pH research is the serpentinization process of fresh basalt as it reacts with ocean water. The process is alkaline. I’ve only read one paper which looked at this process. Considering that the mid ocean ridges runs around 37,000 miles (60 K kilometers), this has a significant pH effect on ocean pH levels.
Black smokers and other subsea vents affect ocean pH levels too. Unfortunately, we know so little about the ocean bottom to obtain a good handle on quantity of these chemical factories.
There was an era when great — sea-wide — thousand-foot thick deposits of calcium carbonate (chalk) were deposited on shall sea floors. Whenever I see the limestone cliffs of Missouri or Kansas, or the jaw-dropping deposits in Texas (more dolomite than chalk or lime), when I see the aireal pictures of the Dover Cliffs (100% chalk) that go on, and on and on…
You know what I do.
I calculate.
Using estimates that might be total crâhp, or perhaps not all that far from what other scientists might agree with.
It is rather sobering how much CO₂ is ‘sunk’ in those dolomite, chalk and limestone deposits, worldwide.
MILLIONS of times more than all the CO₂ released by mankind.
That is sobering.
Because it had to be atmospheric when it was deposited.
Not all at once, as undoubtedly it took millions of years, many tens of millions. But given Science has tracked down the CO₂ mass-balance of the atmosphere going back well over 500,000,000 years, and shown great-long-periods of extraordinarily elevated CO₂, it is clear indeed that the oceans and plants and animals of Earth have thrived under markedly and starkly different conditions than today.
That said, I also think it is unwise for us to continue to belch CO₂ to the atmosphere at INCREASING rates.
We should be shooting for a near future, say by 2100 AD, where CO₂-to-atmosphere per year drops to ⅓ to ¼ per annum of today. And we should start this rather sooner than later.
But that’s me, being both a scientist and a non-scientist at the same time.
⋅-⋅-⋅ Just saying, ⋅-⋅-⋅
⋅-=≡ GoatGuy ✓ ≡=-⋅
One small aquarium is not enough upon which to draw global conclusions, but here is a tiny microcosm of a reef kept in doors (by me : ) ) that has a normal pH of 7.9 -8.0 which is WAY lower than what is predicted in the worst case scenarios. My corals, anemones, and fish all grow like crazy at a pH of 7.9 and a temp of 80. Huhh? Go figure? Might that possibly be true for wild coral reefs as well? Golly, I wonder . . .
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2019225
This study shows Peter Ridd has been justified in his claims of faulty science at JCU.
Do you know what articles they attempted to replicate? I no longer have access credentials 🙁
Jit, w/r/t your lack of access credentials, see:
https://judithcurry.com/2018/11/27/special-report-on-sea-level-rise/#comment-884990
If that link does not take you directly to my comment, then Ctrl-F or ⌘-F and search the page for “sci-hub”.
See Peter Ridd’s opinion and discussion here
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2020/01/10/peter-ridd-scientific-misconduct-at-james-cook-university-confirms-my-worst-fears/
“Contrary to previous studies, we have demonstrated that end-of-century CO2 levels have a negligible impact on the behaviour and sensory systems of coral reef fish,” said Timothy Clark, the lead author of the study and an associate professor at Deakin University in Australia.
Although this is good news on its own,
– what about end-of-century CO2 levels’ impact on the behaviour and sensory systems of Koalas and Kangaroos.
– OTOH, how often can the Norwegian students use this practical experiences at home.
Next 3 years Fredrik Jutfelt, an associate professor at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and one of the authors on the paper, will replicate that study with end-of-century CO₂ levels’ impact on the behaviour and sensory systems of reindeer and polarbaers.
Supported by teams of Norwegian and Australian students.
And all the time Norwegian and Australian Universities can control the Great Barrier Reef from the canteen on the Great Barrier Reef live cam:
https://www.google.com/search?q=great+barrier+reef+live+cam&oq=Great+Barrier+reef+live&aqs=chrome.
By the way – for 2 screens University Canteens:
Here’s the Polar Bear life cam –
https://www.google.com/search?q=polar+bears+live+camera&oq=polarbaers+live+ca&aqs=chrome.