To quote a Facebook friend of mine: Yawn.
More than 11,000 scientists endorse six steps to address climate emergency
University of Sydney

A global team of scientists including Dr Thomas Newsome at the University of Sydney and international colleagues has warned that “untold human suffering” is unavoidable without deep and lasting shifts in human activities that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and other factors related to climate change.
The declaration is based on scientific analysis of more than 40 years of publicly available data covering a broad range of measures, including energy use, surface temperature, population growth, land clearing, deforestation, polar ice mass, fertility rates, gross domestic product and carbon emissions.
“Scientists have a moral obligation to warn humanity of any great threat,” said Dr Newsome from the School of Life and Environment Sciences. “From the data we have, it is clear we are facing a climate emergency.”
In a paper published today in BioScience, the authors from the University of Sydney, Oregon State University, University of Cape Town and Tufts University, along with more than 11,000 scientist signatories from 153 countries, declare a climate emergency, present data showing trends as benchmarks against which to measure progress and outline six areas of action to mitigate the worst effects of a human-induced climate change.
“Despite 40 years of major global negotiations, we have generally conducted business as usual and are essentially failing to address this crisis,” said Professor William Ripple, distinguished professor of ecology in the Oregon State University College of Forestry and co-lead author of the paper. “Climate change has arrived and is accelerating faster than many scientists expected.”
Dr Newsome said that measuring global surface temperatures will continue to remain important. However, he said that a “broader set of indicators should be monitored, including human population growth, meat consumption, tree-cover loss, energy consumption, fossil-fuel subsidies and annual economic losses to extreme weather events”.
He said the indicators are intended to be useful for the public, policymakers and the business community to track progress over time.
“While things are bad, all is not hopeless. We can take steps to address the climate emergency,” Dr Newsome said.
The scientists point to six areas in which humanity should take immediate steps to slow down the effects of a warming planet:
- Energy. Implement massive conservation practices; replace fossil fuels with clean renewables; leave remaining stocks of fossil fuels in the ground; eliminate subsidies to fossil fuel companies; and impose carbon fees that are high enough to restrain the use of fossil fuels.
- Short-lived pollutants. Swiftly cut emissions of methane, hydrofluorocarbons, soot and other short-lived climate pollutants. This has the potential to reduce the short-term warming trend by more than 50 percent over the next few decades.
- Nature. Restrain massive land clearing. Restore and protect ecosystems such as forests, grasslands and mangroves, which would greatly contribute to the sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide, a key greenhouse gas.
- Food. Eat mostly plants and consume fewer animal products. This dietary shift would significantly reduce emissions of methane and other greenhouse gases and free up agricultural lands for growing human food rather than livestock feed. Reducing food waste is also critical – the scientists say at least one-third of all food produced ends up as garbage.
- Economy. Convert the economy’s reliance on carbon fuels to address human dependence on the biosphere. Shift goals away from the growth of gross domestic product and the pursuit of affluence. Curtail the extraction of materials and exploitation of ecosystems to maintain long-term biosphere sustainability.
- Population. Stabilise global population, which is increasing by more than 200,000 people a day, using approaches that ensure social and economic justice.
The paper states: “Mitigating and adapting to climate change means transforming the ways we govern, manage, eat, and fulfil material and energy requirements.
“We are encouraged by a recent global surge of concern – governments adopting new policies; schoolchildren striking; lawsuits proceeding; and grassroots citizen movements demanding change.
“As scientists, we urge widespread use of the vital signs and hope the graphical indicators will better allow policymakers and the public to understand the magnitude of the crisis, realign priorities and track progress.”
The graphs illustrate how climate-change indicators and factors have changed over the past 40 years, since scientists from 50 nations met at the First World Climate Conference in Geneva in 1979.
In the ensuing decades, multiple other global assemblies have agreed that urgent action is necessary, but greenhouse gas emissions are still rapidly rising. Other ominous signs from human activities include sustained increases in per-capita meat production, global tree cover loss and number of airline passengers.
There are also some encouraging signs – including decreases in global birth rates and decelerated forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon and increases in wind and solar power – but even those are tinged with worry.
The decline in birth rates has slowed over the last 20 years, for example, and the pace of Amazon forest loss may be starting to increase again.
“Global surface temperature, ocean heat content, extreme weather and its costs, sea level, ocean acidity and land area are all rising,” Professor Ripple said.
“Ice is rapidly disappearing as shown by declining trends in minimum summer Arctic sea ice, Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and glacier thickness. All of these rapid changes highlight the urgent need for action.”
###
Joining Dr Newsome and Professor Ripple are co-lead author Dr Christopher Wolf, a postdoctoral scholar in the Oregon State University College of Forestry; Dr Phoebe Barnard of the Biological Conservation Institute and the University of Cape Town; and Emeritus Professor William Moomaw of Tufts University.
MULTIMEDIA
VIDEO explainer of the climate emergency declaration.
Available in 16:9 and square ratios, with or without subtitles.
Download at this link.
PHOTOGRAPHS of Dr Thomas Newsome and PDF of research at this link.
“THOSE who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” – Voltaire
“MUCH that passes as idealism is disguised hatred or disguised love of power.” – Bertrand Russell
“THE urge to save humanity is almost always a false-front for the urge to rule it.” – H.L. Mencken
This is what the environment looks like in nations with low GDP who can’t afford fossil fuels. This is particularly stark as it is next to a nation which does use fossil fuels.
UNEQUIVOCAL Evidence Of Industrial Wind Farms’ Horrific Toll On Wildlife →
http://bit.ly/2YU2UwS
The greatest threat to the environment is not affluence, rather, poverty.
THE border between Haiti and The Dominican Republic is a great example of this.
GUESS which country contains eco-criminals that can afford to use “dirty” fossil fuels, and which country contains nature-lovers who are dependent on natural renewable organic biomass for energy?


11,000 signatories, eh?
As some guy who was just a clerk in a patent office said once — “why 100 authors; if I were wrong then one would have been enough.”
So far —
The polar Bears are thriving.
The penguins are thriving.
The rate of extinctions has hardly varied.
The poles are still frozen.
Glaciers are still on the mountains.
Earth is greening.
Most people are living longer.
Kids are still seeing Winter snow.
But now we must all screech “Climate Emergency”!
So exactly WHERE is the problem.
Just show me where?
Where is the verified correct evidence to show that the climate changed because of human atmospheric CO2 emissions?
Exactly WHERE has the climate (not weather) changed because of humans?
IMO, increasing atmospheric CO2 has been a benefit as it helps plant life green the planet.
Hopefully atmospheric CO2 will rise to 600pmm, or above, before the solar minimum causes a severe shortening of the growing season.
World scientists declare a climate emergency
Maybe they saw the super scary PIOMAS results!!
https://tambonthongchai.com/2019/11/07/precipitous-decline-in-arctic-sea-ice-volume/
It’s April Fools Day right? What a joke!!
“leave remaining stocks of fossil fuels in the ground”
i.e. immediately abandon your car and start walking/riding. Switch off your heating/cooling now.
Discard your phone. Switch off all lights.
“curtail the extraction of materials”
i.e. No more planes, ships, trucks, TVs, concrete, plastics, high rise buildings.
Ah, life was so much better back in the 1750s.
I think Gretra tried that. It doesn’t work.
So now we’re doomed 11,000 times.
How much more doomed can we be?
Someone is freaking out about Micky Mouse.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/climate-emergency-names-1.5350570?cmp=rss
From your link..they plan on… ”•Removing signatures of individuals who are non-scientists;
•Removing signatures with no associated professional position or institution.
I wonder what will be left seeing some were hypnotists and naturopaths!?
Saw a headline in the Australian Newspaper on-line site that the petition had been “blocked” because of concerns over the signatures. The newspaper site is pay walled so no further information available.
As a scientist and science teacher who could’ve chosen to do honours under Prof Andy Pitman (about 20 years ago), I’ve known for at around 20 years that this was fraudulent science. His calling to the 3rd year Uni Atmospheric science course students who had a GPA high enough to do honours with him (including me) was;
it doesn’t matter if it’s (we’re) right or wrong – I (we) won’t be here in 100 years.
Of course the bracketed bits I’m uncertain about – but the rest is an absolute truth I will never forget because I did a science degree for the main purpose of finding out the truth and getting a job of course and this statement was like sacrilege to me – because as an extremely naïve science student I so wrongly had assumed that science was about the truth – yes they are charlatans –
Their reputations and their livelihoods are at stake – BIG TIME – it’s too late for them to come clean- and sometimes I wonder if they actually believe their own BS factor – really bad disreputable science breaks my heart
Great news for me and many others.
I have a B.Economics so I guess I am a Scientist too?
One thing I can guarantee about this “opinion piece” (Paper? Surely you joke?) is that there is still no Statistically Significant study linking CO2 to Global Warming, and that was the IPCC’s Hypothesis.
I think Gav tricked up an r value of about 0.8 but that was typical trickery!
The original namelist was deleted but you can download it here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1ITEbPzTYD8KsN1XBrUYh03b0JAQ-y1Y6
Colder weather = more disease, more illness, more deaths. More people die from cold than from heat. Mostly less well-off folks, and elderly – who can’t afford to heat their home because the price of oil went up, or no oil, and the cost of electricity went up.
During the medieval cold period from roughly 1250 – 1600, Europe had the black death, severe winters, the Roman civilization had collapsed, the Vikings left Greenland, and so on. That is where the Greens want to take us back to.
The world was warmer before that – there is plenty of evidence that citrus trees grew in the north of England, grain was grown in Greenland, Ireland had a warm climate (where did all the trees come from that turned into peat??)
We are actually still coming out of the last ice age. Bring it on.
”Dr Newsome said that measuring global surface temperatures will continue to remain important. However, he said that a “broader set of indicators should be monitored, including human population growth, meat consumption, tree-cover loss, energy consumption, fossil-fuel subsidies and annual economic losses to extreme weather events”.
Since the whole argument is premised upon dangerous warming caused by Humans, then yeah, measuring temps is the only thing that’s important. This sounds like preparation for the switch. Already we have some alarmists not aware, or deliberately forgetting about Global warming.
During the week, the PM here in Ireland made a comment that there may be some benefits to a warmer climate, like milder winters, for example. The Greenies went wild with him. Said his comments weren’t very helpful.(?) The ER protesters decided to ridicule him, by sunbathing in swimwear outside Gov. buildings.It’s bloody cold here right now. They obviously are unaware that, he was actually only repeating the claims made by warming alarmists just a few short years ago.The thing about ”Climate change” is you can never be wrong. 🙂
This is the most vacuous, biased, ill-posed climate paper I have seen. Claiming to use more and better data they use a mere 40 years to predict the world climate change. It’s and embarrassment to the Univ. of Sydney.
1. Better energy efficiency is always good. Energy is $$$Money.
There are no so-called rewables- hydro usually takes up many acres either of beautiful scenery or square miles of artificial flood plains. Solar requires large quantities of cobalt and other rare earths that are mostly mined by poor men, women, and children in awful living conditions. Wind power requires the same rare chemicals but also much larger quantities of steel, concrete , and land. That is much higher than fossil fuel burning kWh to kWh.
It makes much more sense to eliminate subsidies for wind and solar. If they aren’t economical they should not be used. Fossil fuels only get one subsidy- the permission to pay large quantities of money to aquire extraction right to various tracts of land, along with the requirement to put the landscape back together when the resource is finished.
Carbon taxes have no net effect. They simply move $$ resources from the taxpayer to the government to spend instead.
2. Soot has no long term effects. It merely concetrates where the solar energy is absorbed. Hydrofluoro carbons are extremely stable and probably should not be made.
3. Ecosystems must be managed and maintained. California is a good example of very poor ecosystem management forced by emotional appeals instead of eco-science. The loss of land in southern Louisiana is another example of poor forward thinking. The only real cure is to remove most of the levees along the Mississippi river system and allow the river silt to start rebuilding the land.
4. Cattle, sheep, goats and pigs will all harvest plants and convert them to much higher quality, more nutritious food, but grazing must be limited to areas that cannot be effectively farmed. Well-managed intercropping of tracts of land will improve the soil and increase the yields of crops without excessive requirements for synthesized fertilizers.
Reducing food waste is certainly a worthy goal- saves time, labor, and resources.
5.These goals are all mutually exclusive.
6. The global population is on track to peak around 10+/_ billion in 2100 and then start decreasing. The peak may occur earlier because we don’t know how fast and where development will occur. Over 1,5 billion people have come out of poverty in the last 15 years. When the last 1 billion in poverty in underdeveloped countries achieve an income of ~$4500 they will be out of deleterious poverty. At that point the birth rate will be falling well below the 2.12 children/women needed to sustain a population. This could happen any time in the next 20-50 years.
dv
11/09/2019 today in Australia snowy mountains https://www.ski.com.au/snowcams/australia/nsw/perisherblue/perisher-mtkosciuszko.html temp in Sydney 10 am 15c
M-I-C, H-A-E, L-M-A-N-N
Michael Mann, Michael Mann…