World scientists declare climate emergency

To quote a Facebook friend of mine: Yawn.

More than 11,000 scientists endorse six steps to address climate emergency

University of Sydney

Dr Thomas Newsome in the field. Credit: Fiona Roughley/University of Sydney
Dr Thomas Newsome in the field. Credit: Fiona Roughley/University of Sydney

A global team of scientists including Dr Thomas Newsome at the University of Sydney and international colleagues has warned that “untold human suffering” is unavoidable without deep and lasting shifts in human activities that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and other factors related to climate change.

The declaration is based on scientific analysis of more than 40 years of publicly available data covering a broad range of measures, including energy use, surface temperature, population growth, land clearing, deforestation, polar ice mass, fertility rates, gross domestic product and carbon emissions.

“Scientists have a moral obligation to warn humanity of any great threat,” said Dr Newsome from the School of Life and Environment Sciences. “From the data we have, it is clear we are facing a climate emergency.”

In a paper published today in BioScience, the authors from the University of Sydney, Oregon State University, University of Cape Town and Tufts University, along with more than 11,000 scientist signatories from 153 countries, declare a climate emergency, present data showing trends as benchmarks against which to measure progress and outline six areas of action to mitigate the worst effects of a human-induced climate change.

“Despite 40 years of major global negotiations, we have generally conducted business as usual and are essentially failing to address this crisis,” said Professor William Ripple, distinguished professor of ecology in the Oregon State University College of Forestry and co-lead author of the paper. “Climate change has arrived and is accelerating faster than many scientists expected.”

Dr Newsome said that measuring global surface temperatures will continue to remain important. However, he said that a “broader set of indicators should be monitored, including human population growth, meat consumption, tree-cover loss, energy consumption, fossil-fuel subsidies and annual economic losses to extreme weather events”.

He said the indicators are intended to be useful for the public, policymakers and the business community to track progress over time.

“While things are bad, all is not hopeless. We can take steps to address the climate emergency,” Dr Newsome said.

The scientists point to six areas in which humanity should take immediate steps to slow down the effects of a warming planet:

  1. Energy. Implement massive conservation practices; replace fossil fuels with clean renewables; leave remaining stocks of fossil fuels in the ground; eliminate subsidies to fossil fuel companies; and impose carbon fees that are high enough to restrain the use of fossil fuels.
  2. Short-lived pollutants. Swiftly cut emissions of methane, hydrofluorocarbons, soot and other short-lived climate pollutants. This has the potential to reduce the short-term warming trend by more than 50 percent over the next few decades.
  3. Nature. Restrain massive land clearing. Restore and protect ecosystems such as forests, grasslands and mangroves, which would greatly contribute to the sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide, a key greenhouse gas.
  4. Food. Eat mostly plants and consume fewer animal products. This dietary shift would significantly reduce emissions of methane and other greenhouse gases and free up agricultural lands for growing human food rather than livestock feed. Reducing food waste is also critical – the scientists say at least one-third of all food produced ends up as garbage.
  5. Economy. Convert the economy’s reliance on carbon fuels to address human dependence on the biosphere. Shift goals away from the growth of gross domestic product and the pursuit of affluence. Curtail the extraction of materials and exploitation of ecosystems to maintain long-term biosphere sustainability.
  6. Population. Stabilise global population, which is increasing by more than 200,000 people a day, using approaches that ensure social and economic justice.

The paper states: “Mitigating and adapting to climate change means transforming the ways we govern, manage, eat, and fulfil material and energy requirements.

“We are encouraged by a recent global surge of concern – governments adopting new policies; schoolchildren striking; lawsuits proceeding; and grassroots citizen movements demanding change.

“As scientists, we urge widespread use of the vital signs and hope the graphical indicators will better allow policymakers and the public to understand the magnitude of the crisis, realign priorities and track progress.”

The graphs illustrate how climate-change indicators and factors have changed over the past 40 years, since scientists from 50 nations met at the First World Climate Conference in Geneva in 1979.

In the ensuing decades, multiple other global assemblies have agreed that urgent action is necessary, but greenhouse gas emissions are still rapidly rising. Other ominous signs from human activities include sustained increases in per-capita meat production, global tree cover loss and number of airline passengers.

There are also some encouraging signs – including decreases in global birth rates and decelerated forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon and increases in wind and solar power – but even those are tinged with worry.

The decline in birth rates has slowed over the last 20 years, for example, and the pace of Amazon forest loss may be starting to increase again.

“Global surface temperature, ocean heat content, extreme weather and its costs, sea level, ocean acidity and land area are all rising,” Professor Ripple said.

“Ice is rapidly disappearing as shown by declining trends in minimum summer Arctic sea ice, Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and glacier thickness. All of these rapid changes highlight the urgent need for action.”

###

Joining Dr Newsome and Professor Ripple are co-lead author Dr Christopher Wolf, a postdoctoral scholar in the Oregon State University College of Forestry; Dr Phoebe Barnard of the Biological Conservation Institute and the University of Cape Town; and Emeritus Professor William Moomaw of Tufts University.

MULTIMEDIA

VIDEO explainer of the climate emergency declaration.
Available in 16:9 and square ratios, with or without subtitles.
Download at this link.

PHOTOGRAPHS of Dr Thomas Newsome and PDF of research at this link.

From EurekAlert!

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
268 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ed Zuiderwijk
November 6, 2019 4:04 am

11000 gullibles aspiring to be the laughing stock of the decade.

ResourceGuy
November 6, 2019 4:10 am

Such pledge card enthusiasm of scientists existed in Germany for starting and supporting WW1.

November 6, 2019 4:10 am

“untold human suffering” – maybe because it’s cold in NH north ?

Donald Boughton
November 6, 2019 4:13 am

How many climate scientists truly worthy of the designation are there alive and working on climate in the world? I would be surprised if the number is more than a few hundred.

November 6, 2019 4:15 am

“Scientists have a moral obligation … to stop subsidized and hence unfair competition against circus clowns.”

The Union of Concerned Clowns.

Flight Level
November 6, 2019 4:15 am

Ah, the hand that feeds ! Good doggy, show me a trick now !

It’s mind boggling how much we could spare on tenures without loosing on progress. So far 11’000 and counting.

Harry Newman
November 6, 2019 4:17 am

Pathetic attempt at an analytical paper with no substantiation, but what can you expect from a religious diatribe. Supported by the usual culprits … Ehrlich! For goodness sake. Same old rubbish and they try and justify it all in term of “their” superior morality. The bottom line is that it is all a rehash of the demented elitist eugenics that runs all the way back to Malthus. Taking a page out of the WOKE playbook, it would seem that de-platforming them would be appropriate and sweet, and it would save the poor suffering taxpayer a mint.

Walter Sobchak
November 6, 2019 4:20 am

Warmunsim, the last socially acceptable form of racism. item 6. There are too many brown babies. Why am I the only one who calls them out on this?

ozspeaksup
November 6, 2019 4:29 am

maybe we could put the 11k signatories on the Mars wanna be list?
just a thought

fatherup
November 6, 2019 4:29 am

That’s a hell of a lot of parasites relying on the working class to pay their salaries, what exactly do they bring to the table apart from doom and gloom/

DocSiders
November 6, 2019 4:29 am

Nothing but propaganda.

The Climate Alarm Industry has INVENTED a problem too big to fix without 1.) a massive nuclear power build (around 25,000 Gigawatt Nuclear Plants)…or 2.) too expensive => $500/month/family forever for Renewables (see cost trajectory in Germany’s failed plans).

They won’t consider Nuclear, and Renewables would destroy economies…WHICH WILL kill millions to billions of souls.

Meanwhile, the Climate keeps getting milder and better and Climate related fatalities continue to drop like a rock.

See Chile recently if you think the world’s population is going to go quietly into the night from this fraud.

Editor
November 6, 2019 4:34 am

A global team of scientists including Dr Thomas Newsome at the University of Sydney and international colleagues has warned that “untold human suffering” is unavoidable without deep and lasting shifts in human activities…

So… “untold human suffering” at some point in the future is unavoidable without “untold human suffering” right now?

Reply to  David Middleton
November 6, 2019 4:36 am

Dr. Thomas Newsome isn’t a scientist… He’s an ecologist… A fake science.

https://thomasnewsome.com/about-me/

Tom in Florida
November 6, 2019 4:37 am

Where have I heard this before?:

November 6, 2019 4:40 am

Climate emergency, ha! It was below zero last night. It was below zero for 4th November (Guy Fawkes night) back in the 70s when I was a kid.

It isnt even getting much warmer, let alone an emergency!

These people must think we are stupid if they think we cant see through their lies.

Anyway, clearly yet another lame attempt to push agenda21 on us.

Sara
Reply to  Matthew Sykes
November 6, 2019 5:07 pm

It’s going to be 22F tonight in my AO. That means that if I want a frozen turkey in time for Thanksgiving, I only need to go for a walk in the woods. There will likely be plenty of frozen turkeys available in the grassy areas, or maybe standing on logs, staring into space, frozen solid. Poor turkeys!!!

Paul
November 6, 2019 4:44 am

I was interested in their “proof” of a climate emergency, so looked at their charts for it. One of the charts caught my eye, their trend in Greenland ice mass loss. The chart showed a trend of 260 gigatons of net ice mass loss per year over the years from about 2000 to 2012. I remembered this very topic being discussed in a post on WUWT a month or so ago. I went looking for how many gigatons of ice there was on Greenland. Surprisingly, doing a simple search for “total gigatons of ice in Greenland” turned up numerous sites describing annual ice loss, but no numbers. I had to look for “total area of Greenland” and “average ice thickness.” So 2.166 million sq. km of area and 1.5 km of average depth. So roughly 3.25 million gigatons of ice. So at the rate of 260 gigatons a year, it would take about 12,500 years to melt. This is one piece of their evidence for a “climate emergency.” I couldn’t be bothered to check the other charts, but wouldn’t be surprised to find similar silliness.

Oakwood
Reply to  Paul
November 6, 2019 5:23 am

They ‘discovered’ a simple way to make graphs look scarey: Create a highly exagerated vertical scale , and limit the horizontal scale to the period that best suits the story you want to tell. Some might call that propaganda

Reply to  Paul
November 6, 2019 5:46 am

+ 10 🙂

mikewaite
Reply to  Paul
November 6, 2019 8:50 am

There is an open access 2013 paper by Machguth et al that calulates the contribution to sealevel rise by 2098 from Greenland’s 90,000 sqkm of ice cap and glaciers, using several global climate models:
-The future sea-level rise contribution of Greenland’s glaciers and ice caps-
Environ. Res. Lett. 8 (2013) 025005 ,doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025005
Online at stacks.iop.org/ERL/8/025005
From their abstract:
-“The mass loss of all GICs by 2098 is calculated to be 2016+/- 129 Gt (HIRHAM5
forcing), 2584 +/- 109 Gt (RACMO2) and 3907 +/-108 Gt (MAR). This corresponds to a total
contribution to sea-level rise of 5:8+/- 0:4, 7:4 +/- 0:3 and 11:2 +/- 0:3 mm, respectively.
Sensitivity experiments suggest that mass loss could be higher by 20–30% if a strong lowering
of the surface albedo were to take place in the future. It is shown that the sea-level rise
contribution from the north-easterly regions of Greenland is reduced by increasing
precipitation while mass loss in the southern half of Greenland is dominated by steadily
decreasing summer mass balances. In addition we observe glaciers in the north-eastern part of
Greenland changing their characteristics towards greater activity and mass turnover.”-

Does not suggest that we should all be in climate panic mode, but it is a 6yr old paper .

Michael Ozanne
November 6, 2019 5:01 am

“University of Cape Town”

well there’s a credible institution….

Reply to  Michael Ozanne
November 6, 2019 6:22 am

+10 🙁

KcTaz
Reply to  Michael Ozanne
November 6, 2019 11:54 am

If they are serious about decolonizing, they should immediately close their hospitals and clinics which all use western medical science and refuse all foreign aid and stop trading with Western nations.
After that, they should eliminate electricity, electrical lighting and refuse to use buildings built using western science and start from scratch using only African science from now on. Simple.

Kenan Meyer
November 6, 2019 5:04 am

The list looks a bit dubious to me. A lot don’t mention even their discipline. Upon a quick look I also found a pensioner, a critical care specialist, an IT engineer,a linguist, a sociologist, a professor of Control systems and automation, a General Practioner, a specialist in Global Mental Health and on and on.
I really wonder how this list has been produced.

11.000 scientists!? Are you kidding me?

Justin Burch
November 6, 2019 5:05 am

CBC had an interesting factoid about this. Apparently when the same group issued their petition two years ago the number of participating scientists including Mickey Mouse and Dumbledore was 16,000. The people who wrote the petition made certain to state that the sign up period was shorter this year than previous years, hence the 31% drop in participants.

Mark
November 6, 2019 5:10 am

They are in a hurry because of the extremely cold winter this year. They know people are going to figure out their tricks and false alarm of CO2 led global warming. Hence they are very scared and really in a hurry before the actual winter(DJF) arrives.

November 6, 2019 5:13 am

I would have expected a little bit of serious critic on the article, that is flawed on many aspects. Yawn! does not qualify as such.

Reply to  Javier
November 6, 2019 1:25 pm

The list of signatories is no longer available to view if you actually go to the website……hmmmm ….I wonder why.

Mike
November 6, 2019 5:14 am

“Mitigating and adapting to climate change means transforming the ways we govern, manage, eat, and fulfil material and energy requirements.

In other words: TOTALITARIANISM

tim maguire
November 6, 2019 5:19 am

As described, this isn’t a scientific document, it is a political document. File it with the other activist demands.

The real shame is that the climate is changing and we need to be nimble to address the environments we find ourselves in as time marches on. Crap like this just gets in the way of dealing with the problems we will actually face.

Oakwood
November 6, 2019 5:20 am

Ironic. On the video he says we must imporve human health and welbeing and control population growth. Well, the principal reason the population is so high and growing is because of our massive success at improving human health and wellbeing – to greater levels than ever before in human history. It’s because we found better ways to stop people (especially infants) from dying, not because we selfishly have more babies.

Dave Ward
November 6, 2019 5:24 am

I’m not the slightest bit concerned about the climate “Emergency” these loons are promoting. I am, however, extremely worried about the drastic measures they are demanding, and especially the governments who appear to believe them. I’m not the first to admit, in comments, that I wish I was 20 years older…

Gerald Machnee
November 6, 2019 5:28 am

**“Ice is rapidly disappearing as shown by declining trends in minimum summer Arctic sea ice, Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and glacier thickness. All of these rapid changes highlight the urgent need for action.”**

Another lie.
The Arctic ice summer minimum has not changed in the last 10 years.