Heat Wave Hysteria? The Truth Shall Set You Free

Reposted from WeatherFacts

By Chris Martz | July 20, 2019
Follow @ChrisMartzWX

We’ve made it to mid-July and we are just now having our first major heat wave of the season here in the United States.

A massive ridge of high pressure has built in over the southeast, which is dominating weather conditions almost everywhere east of the Rockies (Figure 1).¹

radsfcus_exp_new

Figure 1. NOAA NWS surface analysis for July 19, 2019.

The National Weather Service has issued Heat Advisories, Excessive Heat Watches, and Excessive Heat Warnings, from Nebraska to New Jersey as temperatures soar well into the 90s (scattered 100s are possible too) through Sunday (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Weather alerts for Friday, July 19.

When high pressure systems like this move over an area, air is pulled down towards the surface whereby it’s compressed, increasing the temperature.²

The longer the “heat dome” remains over an area, the temperature generally becomes hotter with each passing day until the high either moves away or weakens.² This is because there is little mixing of air which would otherwise prevent heat accumulation at the surface.

The large amount of sinking motion prevents low pressure systems from moving into areas dominated by high pressure while also inhibiting convection and cloud development in much of the area dominated by high pressure.² As a result, the ground becomes dry due to a lack of precipitation, which can enhance the temperature. The air can also become dry, unless water vapor is trapped underneath the “heat dome,” like it is currently. This excess water vapor in and of itself causes other issues like the heat index to soar well into the 100s.

Due to a lack of clouds, the sunlight can feel penalizing.² This buildup of heat at the surface is known as a “heat wave,” and they generally last anywhere from three to seven days, although some last longer.

Heat waves like this are typical of summer and from personal forecasting experience, they generally occur two to three times per year. This natural process used to be called “weather,” but in 2019, like everything that goes wrong, it’s climate change.

Unlike more recent weather or weather-related events, heat waves are actually not new to being blamed on global warming. However, the amount of heat wave hysteria among the public has increased significantly in recent years.

It is in this writing that I have three simple and valid points that destroy the hype on heat waves, like the current one.

Reason #1: Equal, But Opposite

While everyone is fixated on the heat wave, they ignore the unusual cold that’s nearby (Figure 3). As all weather forecasters should know, “for every action, there’s an equal and opposite reaction.” In other words, for every place that there’s warm anomalies, there are places with cool anomalies; it’s nature’s balancing act.

Figure 3. GFS 2-meter temperature anomalies for the U.S. on Friday July 19, 2019. – weathermodels.com.

Climate activists seem to ignore the fact that nature tries to find a balance. If they took note of equilibrium, they wouldn’t be fretting over this heat wave, simply because there’s  reasonably cool temperatures relative to average out west to balance it all out in the total picture.

Another thing that really annoys me with these people is that they get anxious because the weather is not “normal,” and by normal they mean climatologically “normal.”

Most people, even those who aren’t fascinated by the weather like me, understand that “normal” weather rarely happens. It’s usually one extreme or the other; hot or cold, warm or cool. These extremes for a single location for a single day end up averaging out numerically for a daily average over the course of 30 years. It’s highly unlikely that a daily temperature average of the high and low are going to stack up near the 30-year normal. It just doesn’t happen.

Figure 3 above shows the 2-meter temperature anomalies for Friday, July 19. Figure 4 below shows the same thing, but I adjusted the contrast of the image in order to separate the most extreme color differences, or in this case, the temperatures based on the color key to the right.

It’s time for a vision test.

It looks like to me that there’s pretty much an equal balance between extreme heat and extreme cold relative to average on the map (warmth dominates slightly with positive anomalies east of Hudson Bay), so nobody can reasonably make the argument that the warmth outweighs the cold.

Figure 4. GFS 2-meter temperature anomalies for the U.S. on Friday, July 19, 2019 (contrast adjusted). – weathermodels.com.




Reason #2: Some Historical Perspective


Most people are just too lazy to do a little bit of research. It’s a simple cold, hard fact. And for this, they believe everything they hear from journalists and politicians, both of which aren’t trained as scientists. This is quite dumbfounding considering we have the internet right at our fingertips.

According to the Fourth U.S. National Climate Assessment, the average duration of warm spells (heat waves) has declined from around eleven days during the 1930s to 6.5 days during the 2000s (Figure 5).³ In other words, the average duration of heat waves have declined by nearly 41% since the 1930s.

Figure 5. Warm spell duration. – U.S. Fourth National Climate Assessment.

In addition, the average maximum temperature during any given heat wave has also declined in the U.S. from 101°F in the 1930s to 99°F since the 1980s (Figure 6).³

Figure 6. Average warmest temperature each year. – U.S. Fourth National Climate Assessment.

The 1930s remains the warmest decade in U.S. history. It also had some of the hottest summers that the country has ever seen since records began.

The map below (Figure 7) shows the decade in which each U.S. state (also includes Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Washington, D.C.) initially set their current hottest temperature in the record books, and as you can see, there’s an overwhelming number that are colored dark red (almost brown), which indicate the 1930s.⁴

Figure 7. Decade in which each U.S. state and territory initially recorded its hottest temperature.

In fact, 19 (38%) of the 50 U.S. states (I realize Alaska and Hawaii weren’t states until 1959) initially recorded their (current standing) hottest temperatures in the 1930s. 22 states (44%) either set or tied their hottest temperatures in the 1930s (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Each U.S. state that set or tied its hottest temperature in the 1930s.

If we had heat like that of the 1930s (click this link to see U.S. heat extremes), people would be screaming “climate doomsday” at ten times the levels they are currently!

Reason #3: Weather ≠ Climate

With most climate activists - especially those who are not trained or degreed scientists - it’s “do as I say, not as I do.”

They get triggered if a skeptic uses a record low temperature or record snowfall as proof that global warming is a hoax, and claim “weather and climate are not the same,” or that “climate is global, weather is not,” then turn around and use a single localized heat wave as evidence of a “climate catastrophe.”

In conclusion…

Using single weather events as evidence that global warming is either a hoax or is a crisis is completely dishonest and two-faced. I have seen too many certain people do it for both reasons, and its usually to try to pass legislation.

In other words, this entire movement has become a political thing and not one about science. It’s clear as day, and if you can’t see that, then you’re on your own.

In the end, the truth shall set you free.

REFERENCES

[1] “Current Surface Maps.” National Weather Service. July 19, 2019. Accessed July 19, 2019. https://www.weather.gov/oun/sfcmaps.

[2] McLeod, Jamie. “What Causes a Heat Wave?” Farmers Almanac. Accessed July 19, 2019. https://www.farmersalmanac.com/what-causes-a-heat-wave-10912.

[3] “Chapter 6: Temperature Changes in the United States.” CSSR. 2017. Accessed July 19, 2019. https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/6/.

[4] “U.S. state temperature extremes.” Wikipedia. July 18, 2019. Accessed July 19, 2019. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._state_temperature_extremes.

Posted by Chris Martz Weather at
6:43 PM

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

137 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
john
July 21, 2019 8:45 am
john
Reply to  john
July 21, 2019 9:48 am

Fire is at Iberdrola/Avangrid wind farm

saveenergy
Reply to  john
July 22, 2019 2:51 pm

I get –
451: Unavailable due to legal reasons

We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time. For any issues, contact news@kndu.com or call 509-737-6725.

Bruce Cobb
July 21, 2019 8:46 am

How hot was it? Hot enough to bake biscuits in a car! Well, sort of – the temp inside the car only got up to 108F. Don’t try this at home! LOL.
https://news.yahoo.com/national-weather-bakes-biscuits-scorching-201037379.html

Sara
July 21, 2019 8:52 am

I only notice temps when they start to go up or down substantially. So this little heat wave started on July 5th, with a high of 82F, and ended yesterday (I hope) with a high of 94F late yesterday, and certainly not as bad as 24 years ago, when a prolonged, heavy-handed heat wave hit Chicago, sat on the city like an cranky old frog, and was the major cause in the heat-related deaths of over 700 people who lived in low-income housing and had no access to A/C.

The heat index at its highest here was 107, and that seems to get more attention than the real temperatures get, but if you’re poor and have no access to cooling, it is a significant threat to your well-being. You’re better off outdoors, on a bench in the shade of a tree.

Now things are back to “normal”, and I”m enjoying the cooler air and the rain. Looking forward to the rest of summer and fall.

It’s just weather.

Rhys Jaggar
July 21, 2019 8:54 am

I have been saying this for years and getting grief from both warmists and ice age alarmists.

But until this article the assumption had to be that ‘the truth does not sell newspapers/generate page impressions’.

Maybe an era of truth telling is about to emerge?

Michael Jankowski
July 21, 2019 8:59 am

Someone in NJ was fretting about “wait until the hottest part of the summer gets here” yesterday. I looked up the weather stats and lo-and-behold, July 21st is typically the hottest day of the year there.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Michael Jankowski
July 21, 2019 7:27 pm

Yes, we are on the downhill side of summer now. Right now is the hottest part of the year and these temperatures will continue, more or less, through the middle of August or thereabouts and then the heat of summer will break and we are headed into Fall.

Richard Patton
Reply to  Tom Abbott
July 21, 2019 10:06 pm

Stop that! I don’t need any depressing comments!

tom0mason
July 21, 2019 10:05 am

Only third rate buffoon moron (regardless if they have a doctorate or a degree they are still morons) come out with the stupid phrase “it’s the new normal”.
This is said usually to inject some hysteria into their nonsense and distract from the fact they have little evidence, knowledge, or understanding about the subject. The only ‘new normal’ is stupid phD idiots reciting the words “it’s the new normal” — CRETINS!

Bindidon
July 21, 2019 10:11 am

I very well remember people telling me from Southern France mid July 2003: “C’est comme d’habitude!”, business as usual. Some even told “Oh it can’t be worse than earlier!”.

But in August came a real heat wave across Western Europe, 50,000 most older persons died, 14,000 of them in France. Dehydration was the cause for a vast majority of them.

Thus when I read here complains about real temps being a few degrees lower than the forecast with a “Seems somewhat misleading, doesn’t it?”, I tell them:

People, just be glad that the weather forecasts are a bit too high, rather than the other way around.

Rgds
J.-P. D.

Rich Davis
Reply to  Bindidon
July 21, 2019 3:03 pm

If 50,000 people were really so stupid or so poverty-stricken to take action to adapt to a well-predicted weather event, what does that tell us about them? Or their governmental officials?

But of course nobody can name these supposed victims. They are computer model outputs of supposedly excess deaths. Pure rubbish!

Jean-Pierre Dehottay
Reply to  Rich Davis
July 21, 2019 5:20 pm

Rich Davis

1. “If 50,000 people were really so stupid or so poverty-stricken to take action to adapt to a well-predicted weather event… ”

Jesus what are you an arrogant person.

Nobody did predict such a heat wave in 2003, you genius.

2. “But of course nobody can name these supposed victims. They are computer model outputs of supposedly excess deaths. Pure rubbish!”

And here, you become really disingenuous, if not even simply disgusting.

All these people really DIED, Sir. It is verifiable, but YOU never and never would bother to investigate this fact.

The pure rubbish is on your side.

Maybe you, who are so cynical and indifferent to the helplessness of all these people, will suffer the same fate at the age of 80 or higher. Who knows?

Be sure I will not feel sorry for you then.

Rich Davis
Reply to  Jean-Pierre Dehottay
July 22, 2019 10:31 am

Oh I see jp, suddenly it went to 40 and 50,000 dropped on the spot. Is that it? All sources of water disappeared, all hospitals shut down. Government facilities closed their doors to the afflicted? Or the effect was so quick that they died trying to reach shelter? Relatives dared not leave home to attend to their elderly. This all should be recognized for the nonsense that it is.

If I believed that people with no recourse truly died from heat stress, then I would take this more seriously. The reality is that the estimate is based on the total number of people who died in the period of any and all causes. (Yes those people really died, what is it about 0.01% of the population? And what number die of old age and disease every day?) Then a model estimates how many would “normally” die in the same period. The difference is deemed to be caused by the heat. You cannot reference a list of individuals whose death certificates indicate heat stress.

The same sort of nonsense is used to claim a huge death toll from Fukushima and Chernobyl.

Do I doubt that heat stress impacted some people? No of course not. But these weather events are not caused by CO2 or any human cause. It’s sad for those impacted, but it’s nature and we need to adapt. Goverments, charities, and individuals should certainly try to help.

It is those who wish to condemn the poor to increasing energy poverty who are cynical and indifferent. Cold kills many more people than heat. When they must choose between eating and heating, does the lack or insufficiency of either not impact the poor far more than a few days of unusually warm weather?

Editor
Reply to  Rich Davis
July 22, 2019 11:30 am

Most mortality in HEAT EVENTS is displaced. That is, the mortality rate goes up over the event, but FALLS after, then increases to the average level. Over the entire period (during and after) the mortality rate is mostly unchanged.

During cold events, mortality increases during the event, then stays high for some time AFTER, giving an elevated mortality rate during and after.

Cold is the killer.

saveenergy
Reply to  Jean-Pierre Dehottay
July 22, 2019 3:10 pm

I can’t find where (that nice round) ‘50,000 early deaths’ fig originates;
but it’s suspicious that every year in UK we also get –
‘40,000 early deaths’ from Air pollution +
‘40,000 early deaths’ from heat waves +
‘40,000 early deaths’ from cold

So -120,000 premature deaths / yr …Really ???
With 533,253 deaths (all causes) registered in England and Wales in 2017,

That = 22% premature deaths…Sounds like fishy figures to me !!

DipChip
July 21, 2019 11:13 am

Can you imagine the rukus raised by the global warmers if we were to have set 50 of 92 daily record high temperatures June 1 thru 31 August any where in the world during the past 10 years.

This data is from Norfolk Nebraska official US weather station. 50 daily records during the decade of the 1930’s

To confirm my data select Norfolk Nebraska from site location and submit.

https://www.weather.gov/oax/monthly_climate_records

July 21, 2019 11:58 am

I live near Columbus Ohio.
I had switched my cable service to Spectrum which has there own local 24 hr news/weather channel. (That’s not why I switched.)
On Friday the 19th they had a blurb comparing the record highs for Columbus to the forecast highs.
Friday the 19th they said the record high was 97 set in 1957.
Saturday the 20th they said the record high was 98 set in 1957.
Sunday the 21st they said the record high was 97 set in 2011.

I checked the NWS site that covers Columbus to see what they now say. (No, I didn’t go back to my past lists.)
https://www.weather.gov/iln/climate_records_cmh#
Friday the 19th NWS says the record high was 98 set in 1930.
Saturday the 20th NWS says the record high was 101 set in 1934.
Sunday the 21st NWS says the record high was 106 set in 1939.

I sent Spectrum an email but haven’t heard back from them.

Keith S.
July 21, 2019 12:12 pm

This is a great site. This does not change the point of the article, however the official high temp for the state of Oregon is 119 which was actually reached twice in the 1890s. Perhaps your info only considers data from the 20th century.

Wiliam Haas
July 21, 2019 12:55 pm

I live in Southern California near the beach. Here it has been a relatively cool summer with highs in the seventies. In past years it usually warms up quite a bit in July but that has not happened yet. As long as we get the ocean breeze we are in good shape. I expect that we will get warmer weather in August and September and possible a period where high pressure cuts off the ocean breeze. For decades we never had any air conditioning equipment but now we have some room air conditioners that we use only a few weeks during the year when we get excessively warm humid nights. From my experience we have weather cycles but no real climate change. During heat waves, without air conditioning we close up the house during the day and then open it up during the cooler nights.

Sunny
July 21, 2019 1:06 pm

Hi, I am new to the climate scene, and wanted to ask, why the ice in iceland, and the artic is melting if it isn’t due to humanity’s love of fossil fuels…. many thanks.

Dave Fair
Reply to  Sunny
July 21, 2019 2:33 pm

Keep coming back to WUWT, Sunny, to get some reasoning behind the different global warming camps. Once you get some idea of the changing world climate in the past, you start questioning the belief that CO2 is driving our current benign climate.

Sunny
Reply to  Dave Fair
July 21, 2019 3:18 pm

To be honest I started reading up on climate change a few weeks ago, and it scared me to my very soul, I didn’t eat for almost 5 days, and didn’t leave my house, I was terrified and still am, when I see or hear anything about the climate. Even this heat wave they are saying is due to climate change. I read on this site about the jet stream and the earths weak magnetic field could be the cause. Also the solar cycle is changing so the climate could be cooler for the next 11 years?

Dave Fair
Reply to  Sunny
July 21, 2019 3:59 pm

Are you for real, Sunny? How old are you?

Mr.
Reply to  Sunny
July 21, 2019 4:14 pm

Sunny, you get peace of mind about the “climate crisis” by just sending $250 by direct deposit to to –
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
Geneva, Switzerland
(Copy: Ex-president Albert Gore)

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Sunny
July 21, 2019 7:42 pm

” I read on this site about the jet stream and the earths weak magnetic field could be the cause.”

It’s just weather, Sunny. Don’t worry about it. Heat waves happen every summer. This particular one looks like it is going to be very short-lived, so enjoy the milder weather the U.S. is going to have in the next few weeks. If you are not in the U.S., grab a flight and come on over!

Your best bet to find out what is going on with the climate is to read the discussions on this website. You will get all sides of the story and a lot more and eventually you will probably be able to separate the facts from the speculation about this thing called the Earth’s climate.

Matthew K
Reply to  Sunny
July 22, 2019 4:43 am

How do you think I feel? I’m autistic, and someone thought it would be funny to send me a link to a YT documentary stating that the ice will be gone in the next 12 years and some gibberish about a “methane-gun something I couldn’t care less what its called” firing and killing off human kind. You couldn’t eat for 5 days? Well I nearly passed out that night watching that documentary (Whose comment section was in full support of the hysteria). WUWT brought my sanity back to acceptable levels.

Reply to  Sunny
July 21, 2019 2:41 pm

Nature.
It’s happened before. It’ll happen again.

2hotel9
Reply to  Sunny
July 22, 2019 6:26 am

It melts in summer, freezes in winter. All totally normal. Climate changes constantly, humans are not causing it and can not stop it. Don’t let alarmists with a political agenda continue to lie to you, reality is out here waiting, all you have to do is accept it.

Robert
July 21, 2019 1:23 pm

Al Gore is the charismatic spokesman for the climate alarmists and does a good job as their champion. The climate sceptics do not have a charismatic champion speaking on our behalf. There are some who speak out for the sceptical side of the climate argument but none are charismatic personalities in my opinion. We need a champion for the sceptics. Someone charismatic, likeable, and believable who can carry forth an intelligent debate, someone who understands the scientific arguments to counter the pseudoscience of the alarmists. We need the climate sceptic equivalent of Anthony Robbins or Barrack Obama to get our message across. Where is this person? We need this urgently. In this age of superficiality and bullshit we need the power of an influencer.

Dave Fair
Reply to  Robert
July 21, 2019 2:28 pm

We lack one because there is no big money in it, Robert. It takes huge sums to attract the really big scammers.

Rich Davis
July 21, 2019 1:57 pm

As happened last year, there was a big brouhaha about how we would have dangerous unprecedented heat with predictions of 99F (which by the way is by no means unprecedented for New England). On Friday night, the Weather.com predictions on my iPhone showed 99F for both Sat and Sun. Actual highs were around 95F (37C predicted, 35C actual).

I continue to find it incredible that weather.com predictions never seem to be wrong on the cool side. There seems to be a systematic bias toward predicting higher than actual temperatures. The same thing happens during cold extremes. More than once I have seen them predict a low temperature that was higher than the actual high temperature.

It’s almost as if they want to exaggerate the highs and hide the lows, but of course I know that there’s no such agenda. All pure coincidence. Riiiiight.

Reply to  Rich Davis
July 21, 2019 2:50 pm

Several years ago they included the record high and low for that date on their “Local on 8’s”.
They stopped that.
Now they seem to be more interested in projecting impressions rather than fact.

Staffan Lindström
July 21, 2019 2:33 pm

WAS La Guardia warmer than Central Park yesterday July 20 DAY 37C NIGHT 28C CPK 35-27???
Mosh! Is this your “UCI” Urban Cool Island??? Greetings from MS Silja Serenade from Helsinki to Stockholm….

+,

ren
July 22, 2019 5:48 am

July 22, 2019. Lack of tropical cyclones on the oceans.
https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/

2hotel9
Reply to  ren
July 22, 2019 6:33 am

And you had to go and jinks it! ;0

ren
Reply to  2hotel9
July 22, 2019 8:41 am

Excuse me. I thought it was about the hysteria of tropical cyclones.

2hotel9
Reply to  ren
July 22, 2019 8:47 am

They can be rather hysterical.

JS
Reply to  2hotel9
July 23, 2019 9:28 am

There is a small depression in the Atlantic and slight chance of a depression developing in the Gulf, but nothing more than that.

2hotel9
Reply to  JS
July 24, 2019 5:32 am

I check the AccuWeather hurricane page each morning. It has been satisfyingly dull all season. Can only hope it remains so, August and September could get rough.

old construction worker
July 22, 2019 5:54 am

I remember temps reaching close to 100f and sometimes breaking 100f back in the late 60’s and early 70’s here in central Ohio. Then the rains would move in and cool things down.

W Browning
July 22, 2019 2:27 pm

Watch some of Tony Heller’s videos on youtube, he’s been blowing holes in this for years!

July 22, 2019 3:14 pm

I never paid much attention to it but the link above includes a “snow” column. 8 days in past July’s recorded a “T”, trace of snow. All of them after 1950. In Columbus Ohio in July.
Just an observation.

Reply to  Gunga Din
July 24, 2019 2:01 pm

It occurred to me that the “T” for a trace of snow only being after 1950 might not be what I first thought.
Where I work we report our our rainfall to the NWS. It was only in that last year or so that a “T” for a trace of rain would be accepted in their system as a reportable value.
So, to be fair, perhaps a trace of snow was not a reportable value earlier.
I don’t know but it is a possibility.

Don Lewis
July 22, 2019 11:00 pm

When you look out of the window and see rain or heat you are not seeing climate you are seeing weather. How you have experienced the last few days or decades of weather has no bearing on the question ” Is there climate change”. Many people make the same mistake on a somewhat larger scale when they observe that, for instance, widespread heatwaves is the American West in the thirties brought numerous state records for intensity or duration of heat. That still amounts to nothing but weather because worldwide temperatures in the thirties were unremarkable, even a bit on the cool side. Of course events in our neighborhoods or our nation attract a lot of notice but they just don’t compare to facts like the fact that, worldwide, last June was the hottest June in history and numerous other, similar records, world records, are being set regularly this decade. Now THAT’s some climate for you.

2hotel9
Reply to  Don Lewis
July 23, 2019 5:24 am

Except last June was not the hottest June in history, it was just average.

Verified by MonsterInsights