Gregory Wrightstone: exposing the mass extinction lie

Reposted from Fabius Maximus Website

Larry Kummer, Editor Climate change 24 May 2019

Summary: The latest chapter of the climate campaign consists of warnings about a coming mass extinction of species. Here is a stunning analysis of these claims by Gregory Wrightstone. This made a big impact at Wednesday’s House hearings. I doubt you will see this in the news (it does not fit the narrative).

the-sixth-extinction

The mass extinction lie exposed: life is thriving

By Gregory Wrightstone at his website, 13 May 2019.
Posted with his generous permission.

One million species will become extinct in the not-too-distant future and we are to blame. That is the conclusion of a new study by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). The Summary for Policymakers (SPM) was issued on May 6th {the full report will be issued “later this year} and warns that “human actions threaten more species with global extinction now than ever before” and that “around 1 million species already face extinction, many within decades, unless action is taken to reduce the intensity of drivers of biodiversity loss.”

It also asserted that we have seen increasing dangers over the last several decades, stating “the threat of extinction is also accelerating: in the best-studied taxonomic groups, most of the total extinction risk to species is estimated to have arisen in the past 40 years.” The global rate of species extinction claimed “is already tens to hundreds of times higher than it has been, on average, over the last 10 million years.”

The release of the report spawned a media frenzy that uncritically accepted the study’s contention that we will see more than 20,000 species per year bite the dust in the not too distant future. PBS called it the “current mass extinction,” and the New Yorker’s headline read “Climate Change and the New Age of Extinction.

The only chart in the SPM that supported the claim of increasing extinctions is shown here (bdlow). The graph covers 500-years and appears to present a frightening increase in extinctions and extinction rate.

Species extinction since 1500

This chart and the accompanying “analysis” are a case study of how those who promote the notion of man-made catastrophic warming manipulate data and facts to spread the most fear, alarm, and disinformation.

First, note that the title of the graph itself (Cumulative % of Species Driven Extinct) is confusing even to scientists used to interpreting such data. More importantly, the data were lumped together by century rather than shorter time frames, which, as we shall see accentuates the supposed increase in extinctions.

The base data were derived from the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) Red List, which catalogues every known species that has gone the way of the dodo and the [passenger] carrier pigeon. Review of the full data set reveals a much different view of extinction and what has been happening recently.

Below, all 529 species available from the Red List with a known extinction date are shown below in Figure 2 by decade of extinction. This chart reveals quite a different story than that advanced by the new report. Instead of a steady increase in the number and rate of extinctions we find that extinctions peaked in the late 1800s and the early 20th century, followed by a significant decline that continues today. It is thought that this extinction peak coincides with introduction of non-native species, primarily on islands (including Australia).

Species extinction by decade

A closer review of the most recent information dating back to 1870 reveals that, instead of a frightening increase, extinctions are actually in a significant decline.

What is apparent is that the trend of extinctions is declining rather than increasing, just the opposite of what the new report claims. Also, according to the IPBES report, we can expect 25,000 to 30,000 extinctions per year, yet the average over the last 40 years is about 2 species annually. That means the rate would have to multiply by 12,500 to 15,000 to reach the dizzying heights predicted. Nothing on the horizon is likely to achieve even a small fraction of that.

Graph of Species Extinctions by Decade, from the Red List

This new extinction study is just the latest example of misuse and abuse of the scientific process designed to sow fear of an impending climate apocalypse. The fear and alarm over purported man-made catastrophes are needed to frighten the population into gladly accepting harmful and economically crippling proposals such as the Green New Deal.

Rather than an Earth spiraling into a series of climate catastrophes that threaten the planet’s life, we find that our planet and its estimated 8 million species are doing just fine, thank you.

Postscript: In an incredibly ironic twist that poses a difficult conundrum for those who are intent on saving the planet from our carbon dioxide excesses, the new study reports that the number one cause of predicted extinctions is habitat loss. Yet their solution is to pave over vast stretches of land for industrial scale solar factories and to construct immense wind factories that will cover forests and grasslands, killing the endangered birds and other species they claim to want to save.

————————————-
Editor’s afterword

Wrightstone notes one of the most important aspects of the new report: that they released the Summary for Policymakers alone, orchestrating a media barrage before releasing the supporting information. Considering its vast claims and their weak basis in the peer-reviewed literature, this should arouse our suspicions. People should not decide about such a vital issue before experts have reviewed the full report.

For more about the data and papers about modern extinction rates, see About the mass extinctions supposedly occurring now.

See the pdf of Wrightstone’s testimony at the May 22 hearing of the House Natural Resources Committee about the new Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Also see his article about the hearings and Dr. Curry’s analysis. My favorite quote from the hearing was made by Patrick Moore (pdf of testimony).

“The IBPES claims there are 8 million species. Yet only 1.8 million species have been identified and named. Thus the IBPES believes there are 6.2 million unidentified and unnamed species. …This is highly unprofessional.”

Gregory Whitestone

About the author

“Gregory Wrightstone is a geologist with more than 35 years of experience researching and studying various aspects of the Earth’s processes. He earned a bachelor’s degree from Waynesburg University and a master’s from West Virginia University, both in the field of geology. {Many climate scientists began in geology, some climate science programs are in the geology departments.}

“He has written and presented extensively on many aspects of geology including how paleogeography and paleoclimate control geologic processes. His findings have allowed him to speak at many venues around the world including Ireland, England, China and most recently India.”  {From his website.}

See his website and his Twitter feed. He has an app, Inconvenient Facts, based on his book (see below), available for both Apple and Android.

For More Information

Ideas! For some shopping ideas, see my recommended books and films at Amazon.

If you liked this post, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter. For more information see The keys to understanding climate change and these posts about climate propaganda. The good news is that the very bad news is wrong.

  1. Frogs and butterflies, important players in the climate wars.
  2. Let’s defend the oceans, before it’s too late.
  3. The oceans are dying. See their condition on World Oceans Day!
  4. Are 30 thousand species going extinct every year?
  5. Warning: dying insect populations threaten our future – A real threat overshadowed by the climate hysteria.
  6. About the mass extinctions supposedly occurring now.
  7. Important: The Extinction Rebellion’s hysteria vs. climate science.
About Wrightstone’s iconoclastic book
Inconvenient Facts: The science that Al Gore doesn't want you to know
Available at Amazon. Inconvenient Facts: The science that Al Gore doesn’t want you to know.

From the publisher …

“You have been inundated with reports from media, governments, think tanks and ‘experts’ saying that our climate is changing for the worse and it is our fault. Increases in droughts, heat waves, tornadoes and poison ivy – to name a few – are all blamed on our ‘sins of emissions’ from burning fossil fuels and increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Yet, you don’t quite buy into this human-caused climate apocalypse. You aren’t sure about the details because you don’t have all the facts and likely aren’t a scientist. Inconvenient Facts was specifically created for you. Writing in plain English and providing easily understood charts and figures, Gregory Wrightstone presents the science to assess the basis of the threatened Thermageddon.

“The book’s 60 ‘inconvenient facts’ come from government sources, peer-reviewed literature or scholarly works, set forth in a way that is lucid and entertaining. The information likely will challenge your current understanding of many apocalyptic predictions about our ever dynamic climate.

“You will learn that the planet is improving, not in spite of increasing CO2 and rising temperature, but because of it. The very framework of the climate-catastrophe argument will be confronted with scientific fact. Arm yourself with the truth.”

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
3.5 4 votes
Article Rating
195 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
stock77
May 27, 2019 5:58 pm

The main cause of pressure on the biosphere is habitat loss due to conversion of land to agriculture and grazing. As agriculture productivity continues to rise, this will allow more and more land to be returned to nature. Last century, increasing yields were overwhelmed by a human population that quadrupled, and wanted to eat more and more meat which is requires even more inputs. But rising yields have allowed total farmland to remain steady around the world for last few decades, while substantial land in North America and Europe have been taken out of production. In this century, if yields continue to rise at a modest 1-2% per year, we will be able to move even more land back to nature. The extinction pressure was at its peak 30 years ago and has already peaked.
I disagree that there is some land area issue with solar and wind. Solar panels generate 100 watts per meter square, a square km is 100 megawatts, an terawatt of solar would take up 10,000 square km, a grid 100 km on a side, that would provide enough power for the US. Plenty of room in the Earth’s deserts. Wind power is even less of a land issue, you can put wind farms on grazing lands or other marginal lands and it has no real consequence to land use below.

Greg
May 27, 2019 6:23 pm

[MODS]

See the pdf of Wrightstone’s testimony

This links to “Malcom’s” testimony, not Wrightstone’s testimony. In fact Wrightstone did not even appear at the hearing !

Presumably this should link to Moreno’s testimony, where he refers to Wrightstone’s work.
https://naturalresources.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Morano%20Testimony%20WOW%20Ov%20Hrg%2005.22.19.pdf

This may reflect an earlier error by Larry Hamlin, but the Maximus site does not currently contain this error.

Ronald Bruce
May 27, 2019 6:24 pm

Another hockey stick graph as useless as the last one and it will disappear even quicker.

Ronald Bruce
May 27, 2019 6:26 pm

Another useless hockey stick graph as useless as the last one and it will disappear even quicker.

Greg
May 27, 2019 7:29 pm

Wrightstone may look a bit more credible on species and extinction thereof if he did not confuse Colomba livia ( homing pidgoens used as carrier pidgeons ) and the passenger pidgeon.

It was the passenger pidgeon which went extinct.

In fact carrier pidgeon is a ‘job’ like guide dog, not species. The species is Colomba livia and is doing fine.

Reply to  Greg
May 28, 2019 5:49 pm

Greg,

Thanks for catching that. I’ll mention this to him.

Those of us doing this gig on the side do not have access to the proofing resources of the establishment – who are paid for it. A certain level of errors are inevitable. The best we can do is limit them to minor details.

These take incredible amounts of time and effort to produce – mostly thanklessly.

Dave Fair
Reply to  Larry Kummer
May 28, 2019 6:01 pm

Yet the establishment continue to produce peer-reviewed, demonstrably false reports. Santer instantly comes to mind.

Gregory Wrightstone
Reply to  Larry Kummer
May 29, 2019 4:53 am

Arrrrgggghhhh… Yes that was an error. Don’t know how I didn’t catch that. Passenger pigeon is extinct.

tom0mason
May 27, 2019 10:12 pm

A small and incomplete list of extinctions that were wrong …
https://wryheat.wordpress.com/2017/09/12/thought-to-be-extinct-when-science-is-wrong/

An
May 27, 2019 11:36 pm

It was a cataclysm which caused the mass-extinction.

tom0mason
May 28, 2019 12:32 am

Extinction averted on Lundy Island (in the UK)

The seabird population on Lundy has tripled in just 15 years thanks to the eradication of the island’s rats. The rocky island off Devon in the Bristol Channel has seen a dramatic increase in the the bird population. The RSPB said the population of seabirds on Lundy has tripled to 21,000 birds, with the Manx shearwater population growing from 297 pairs to 5,504 and puffins increasing from just 13 birds to 375.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/lundy-seabird-population-triples-in-15-years-following-eradication-of-rats/ar-AABZVPz
and
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/05/28/seabird-numbers-soar-15-year-rspb-conservation-project-kill/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So by removing the rat population from the island then the bird population recovers. How much difference would this make if all invasive (and often foreign) species were eradicated from all location where humans introduced them?

~~~~~~~~~~
Still the glories of Lundy Island can’t probably last.
Maybe it’s a good time to put a few industrial wind generators on the island, after all it’s often very windy there.

Reply to  tom0mason
May 28, 2019 6:01 am

Tom,

Thanks for mentioning that – putting some good news in this thread.

Lundy Island is a success story of this global program to fight invasive species. Many islands have similar programs. Over time these might have large effects. Here is a paper about their potential.

“Globally important islands where eradicating invasive mammals will benefit highly threatened vertebrates”

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0212128

tty
Reply to  tom0mason
May 28, 2019 12:53 pm

Rat eradication has been done on a large scale on islands around New Zealand (and around Mauritius) with great success. However eradicating invasive species also has risks. Eradicating cats for example can result in a rat explosion that does more damage than the cats did.
The Australians have even managed to eradicate both cats, rats and rabbits from Macquarie island which is impressive considering how large and rugged the island is. The rabbits don’t predate birds, but they had quite literally eaten the island bare. I’ve seen it since I visited the island just as the eradication started.

Khellstr
May 28, 2019 1:34 am

Where I can find source data for graph “All Extinct specises” ?

2000’s seems bit low.

Editor
Reply to  Khellstr
May 28, 2019 3:52 am

Its not ALL the 2000s, its 2000-2009. As far as I can tell, you need to look at each year at the IUCN site.

This site gives the changes in status for every year, but only from 2006-2009 (to cover the decade of Wrightstone’s chart). There are ZERO net extinctions 2006-2009 (look in Tables 7). I count 4 that moved from Extinct to non-extinct, and 4 that went the other way.

Remember, these are DOCUMENTED extinctions only, using the IUCN criteria.

If you can find earlier years, let us know.

https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/summary-statistics#Summary%20Tables

Ian Wright
May 28, 2019 3:21 am

Gregory,
As a geologist I am also horrified at how our profession, as well as the larger scientific one, is allowing its integrity to be rolled over by political manipulation. Until recently I have been pretty passive about this as I was sure that the whole climate alarmism would blow over soon as just another fad, but I am now truly concerned at the state we are now in. I feel it is the responsibility of all us scientists to strongly voice our concerns as these political waves are creating real har to us as a global society.

As an independent contractor, I work across many industrial sectors and as such do not get holtered by employee pressures to tow the line so I can freely voice my opinion but it is those individuals that cannot due to these pressures that need to find a way of expressing themselves.
Keep up the great work

May 28, 2019 6:34 am

This incident – Wrightstone’s rebuttal to the mass extinction hysteria – shows key aspects of our perilous situation.

As yet not a single journalist has contacted Wrightstone to follow-up his work presented at the House hearing. It is a blackout of information that would ruin the narrative. If they thought his work could be easily disproven, they would cite some experts who did so. That would be an easy way to discredit skeptics. But they can’t, so they don’t.

More broadly, all severe weather has become extreme weather, becoming evidence of climate change, which is evidence of AGW, which proves the threat of CAGW. Q.E.D.

Today pouring facts on alarmists’ fictions is necessary, but seems futile. The people affected by alarmists’ stories probably won’t see rebuttals – and won’t believe what they see.

John Mathon
May 28, 2019 1:34 pm

There are 39 million estimated species on the Earth. What is the natural extinction rate? What is the natural species creation rate?

In order to determine if there is any abnormal extinction going on we’d need to understand this.

We aren’t sure how many species really exist. The above is just an estimate. We’ve actually only documented 1 million or so species. These are guesses just as the data in all the charts are guesses.

Frequently when a species has been called extinct it turns out some years later they find it hasn’t.

Like a lot of data we just don’t have the information to make conclusions. It points out how little we actually know about our planet, life, the history of it.

Certainly we should be cautious and the fact there is declining known extinction is a good sign that we are actually paying attention.

Surely we need to know more so calling it a ball or a strike now is impossible.

All we know is that no matter what we do nature changes and nothing stays the same. How much we have to do with the change and whether that change is good or bad is unknown.

Phil Sydor
May 28, 2019 1:50 pm

Couldn’t see where and how Mr Wrightstone obtained the data for the graphs of extinct species.
http://www.iucnredlist.org/ web site quoted does not show this data – where and how was the data obtained please?
Many thanks

Gregory Wrightstone
Reply to  Phil Sydor
May 28, 2019 1:53 pm

IUCN site has a search function at the bottom of the page under extinct species. You can get two charts, one by taxonomy, the other by extinction date.

Phil Sydor
Reply to  Gregory Wrightstone
May 28, 2019 11:58 pm

Thanks for your reply Gregory – unfortunately there is no “extinct species” link listed at the bottom of the iucnredlist.org page that I could see. I tried the search box at the top and entered “extinct species” and no (zero) information is found. I also tried other links at the bottom of the page that could be related with no success. I then wondered whether iucnredlist.org had removed the extinct species link, so went to web.archive.org and searched through older site versions but could not see any links to “extinct species”. Also tried the site https://www.iucn.org/ site and searched for “extinct species” with no success.
Would you be able to direct me to the exact url you used for your graphs please?
Many thanks.

Gregory Wrightstone
Reply to  Phil Sydor
May 29, 2019 4:57 am

AT the very bottom is a series of endangerment classes, it is very difficult to scroll the whole way to the right to get to the extinct link. Here is the url. Good luck. https://www.iucnredlist.org/search?redListCategory=ex

Louis Hunt
May 28, 2019 6:35 pm

“The IBPES claims there are 8 million species. Yet only 1.8 million species have been identified and named. Thus the IBPES believes there are 6.2 million unidentified and unnamed species.”

So that’s the game. When no one can find the 6.2 million unidentified and unnamed species, the claim will be that they recently went extinct because of climate change and that it’s worse than we thought!

May 30, 2019 2:40 am

Sorry first comment was by mistake. This is the one I meant to post.

I think you’re throwing the baby out with the bathwater with this argument. Wildlife is in fact in grave danger of extinction not least because of the wind farms. Deforestation’s another threat. Most who support wind farms also support the forests, while those who oppose wind farms also support all the other forms of destruction.

Both are wrong incidentally. All destruction is bad and wildlife is caught up in the middle of all this politics.