American Geophysical Union
WASHINGTON–In only 25 years, ocean melting has caused ice thinning to spread across West Antarctica so rapidly that a quarter of its glacier ice is now affected, according to a new study.
Scientists at the Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling (CPOM), based at the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom, have combined 25 years of European Space Agency satellite altimeter measurements and a model of Antarctica’s regional climate to track changes in snow and ice cover across the continent.
A new study in the AGU journal Geophysical Research Letters finds Antarctica’s ice sheet has thinned by up to 122 meters in places, with the most rapid changes occurring in West Antarctica where ocean melting has triggered glacier imbalance.
This means the affected glaciers are unstable as they are losing more mass through melting and iceberg calving than they are gaining through snowfall.
The research team found the pattern of glacier thinning has not been static over time. Since 1992, the thinning has spread across 24 percent of West Antarctica and over the majority of its largest ice streams – the Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers – which are now losing ice five times faster than they were at the start of the survey.
The study used over 800 million measurements of the Antarctic ice sheet height recorded by the ERS-1, ERS-2, Envisat, and CryoSat-2 satellite altimeter missions between 1992 and 2017 and simulations of snowfall over the same period produced by the RACMO regional climate model.
Together, these measurements allow changes in the ice sheet height to be separated into those due to weather patterns, such as less snowfall, and those due to longer term changes in climate, such as increasing ocean temperatures that eat away ice.
“In parts of Antarctica, the ice sheet has thinned by extraordinary amounts, and so we set out to show how much was due to changes in climate and how much was due to weather,” said Andy Shepherd, a polar scientist at the University of Leeds, director of CPOM and lead author of the new study.
To do this, the team compared the measured surface height change to the simulated changes in snowfall, and where the discrepancy was greater they attributed its origin to glacier imbalance.
They found that fluctuations in snowfall tend to drive small changes in height over large areas for a few years at a time, but the most pronounced changes in ice thickness are signals of glacier imbalance that have persisted for decades.
“Knowing how much snow has fallen has really helped us to detect the underlying change in glacier ice within the satellite record,” Shepherd said. “We can see clearly now that a wave of thinning has spread rapidly across some of Antarctica’s most vulnerable glaciers, and their losses are driving up sea levels around the planet.
Altogether, ice losses from East and West Antarctica have contributed 4.6 millimeters to global sea level rise since 1992, according to the study.
“This is an important demonstration of how satellite missions can help us to understand how our planet is changing,” said Marcus Engdahl, an Earth observation scientist at the European Space Agency and co-author of the new study. “The polar regions are hostile environments and are extremely difficult to access from the ground. Because of this, the view from space is an essential tool for tracking the effects of climate change.”
###
Founded in 1919, AGU is a not-for-profit scientific society dedicated to advancing Earth and space science for the benefit of humanity. We support 60,000 members, who reside in 135 countries, as well as our broader community, through high-quality scholarly publications, dynamic meetings, our dedication to science policy and science communications, and our commitment to building a diverse and inclusive workforce, as well as many other innovative programs. AGU is home to the award-winning news publication Eos, the Thriving Earth Exchange, where scientists and community leaders work together to tackle local issues, and a headquarters building that represents Washington, D.C.’s first net zero energy commercial renovation. We are celebrating our Centennial in 2019. #AGU100
The University of Leeds is one of the largest higher education institutions in the UK, with more than 38,000 students from more than 150 different countries, and a member of the Russell Group of research-intensive universities. The University plays a significant role in the Turing, Rosalind Franklin and Royce Institutes. http://www.leeds.ac.uk
Notes for Journalists
This paper is freely available through June 30. Journalists and public information officers (PIOs) can download a PDF copy of the article by clicking on this link:
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2019GL082182
Multimedia accompanying this press release can be downloaded at the following link:
https://aguorg.sharepoint.com/:f:/s/newsroom/Ev-FolVlRCRDsTHyaiAYaWgB4WEqqohtr7J7qBCHuivzSA?e=ae7GbI
Journalists and PIOs may also request a copy of the final paper by emailing Lauren Lipuma at llipuma@agu.org. Please provide your name, the name of your publication, and your phone number.
Neither this paper nor this press release is under embargo.
Paper Title
“Trends in Antarctic Ice Sheet Elevation and Mass”
Authors
Andrew Shepherd: Centre of Polar Observation and Modeling, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, United Kingdom;
Lin Gilbert: Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Department of Space & Climate Physics, University College London, United Kingdom;
Alan S. Muir: Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Department of Space & Climate Physics, University College London, UK; and Centre for Polar Observation and Modeling, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom;
Hannes Konrad, Malcolm McMillan, Thomas Slater, Kate H. Briggs, Aud V. Sundal, Anna E. Hogg: Centre of Polar Observation and Modeling, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, United Kingdom;
Marcus Engdahl: ESA-ESRIN, Rome, Italy.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Ignore the HOT volcanos and plume behind the curtain…err, under West Antarctica’s ice.
The NASA actually found that the Antarctic is gaining ice mass and contributes to a decrease of the sea level.
Another pathetic BS from EurekAlert.
Not only NASA, a paper by Frezzotti et al 2011 also found Antarctica was gaining ice using actual ground measurements.
https://www.the-cryosphere.net/7/303/2013/tc-7-303-2013.pdf
“The temporal and spatial variability of the
SMB over the previous 800 yr indicates that SMB changes
over most of Antarctica are statistically negligible and do not
exhibit an overall clear trend. This result is in accordance
with the results presented by Monaghan et al. (2006), which
demonstrate statistically insignificant changes in the SMB
over the past 50 yr.”
Note Figure 5. shows Antarctica currently has above average ice compared to the last 800 years.
Actual ground measurements vs. “estimates” corrected to get the “right” answer. Any real scientists would have calibrated the satellite data against these real measurements. Yeah, right.
“To do this, the team compared the measured surface height change to the simulated changes in snowfall, and where the discrepancy was greater they attributed its origin to glacier imbalance.”
Oh wow, the stupid, it’s getting worse that we thought.
I couldn’t find where they validated the simulated snowfall to the actual snowfall. How can they assume that the simulated snowfall accurately followed the real thing?
“and their losses are driving up sea levels around the planet.”
Show me one NOAA global network tidal gauge data set that supports this.
Statements like this, prove the how fraudulent these people are.
“Modelling” and “simulated”….GIGO. All complete BS to justify further grants. Time is running out for this lunatic pseudo-science….
“Study finds 24% of West Antarctic ice is now unstable”
“The research team found the pattern of glacier thinning has not been static over time. Since 1992, the thinning has spread across 24 percent of West Antarctica…”
=======
Since when does thinning = unstable?
Since 1992 there has been a pattern of hair thinning on the top of my head, but I seem to be gaining hair in other places. I know a few people that had all their hair fall out in clumps in about a year… now that is what I consider unstable.
So, what’s happening to ice in the other 76% of WA? Absolutely no change? Or 52% unchanged (“stable”) and 24% thickening (unsta… no it can’t be that so it would have to be un-unchanged).
“… the thinning has spread…” OMG it’s contagious, like a virus! Scientists measure stuff, do calculations, write up their results. Whereas people with agendas use this kind of phrasing.
As for the 4.6mm SLR in 27 years… my toenails grow 40 times faster. So I’ve made a mental note to avoid any oceans when my toenails grow faster than I can walk up a beach with a 2.5% slope. Or maybe 3% to include some allowance for Greenland.
Agreed, H. R.
I come up with 1.16 hours.
Basically studying a miniscule portion of continuity.
e.g. studying 1.16 hours of sleep, breakfast, work, lunch, dinner, evening rest and recuperation i.e. drink and quiet, etc. Then declaring the study finds extraordinary events.
West Antarctica is the second largest land ice mass in the world (only East Antarctica has more ice), and it contributed 4.6 mm of sea level rise since 1992, or an average of 0.17 mm per year. Over 100 years, at this rate the sea level would rise 1.7 cm, or about 0.67 inch. Do we really need to worry about this?
Well, the latest trolls on the board seem to.
Of course, they also believe AOC was ‘just joking’ about her 12 year doomsday.
Yes,
It’ just so warm down there in Antarctica …
https://earth.nullschool.net/#2019/05/17/2100Z/wind/surface/level/overlay=temp/orthographic=-100.83,-77.41,408
Models and simulations? How does this tripe get published?
I don’t see any mention of how much ocean warming is being talked about.
A brief scan of a couple articles suggests that the warming might be in the range of measuring instruments’ accuracy, as I’m understanding the information, which makes me wonder why the article does not define numerically exactly how much warming is being discussed.
One article I skimmed mentioned thousanDTHS of a degree over years.
Somehow, I think there’s more to it than just this bit of warming. And I also wonder whether ARGO can really measure temps to thousanDTHS of a degree, and what does this really mean, if they can? Couldn’t there be a thousanDTH of a degree difference in water temps over a very short distance? [I don’t know] What exactly would a thousanDTH of a degree difference be a measure of?
Needless to say, either through ignorance or not understanding, I am not convinced that “warmer” ocean water alone is the cause of this melting.
I need more info.
You’ve only got to look at the actual paper and table 1 and figure 2A to see just how localised the mass losses are. And based on the last 25 years, its 3/4 of an inch of sea level rise per century from Antarctica. There go the beachfront property prices.
I did the first ascent of Mt. Foster on Smith Island in 1996. We anchored at Deception Island only to find the surrounding water nearly scalding hot. We jumped into the “hot tub” for a much needed bath. Par-broiled prawn drifted past, and we peeled and ate them as we sipped our wine.
This sounded unbelievable so I decided to check Deception Island
“Deception Island exhibits some wildly varying microclimates. Near volcanic areas, the air can be as hot as 40 °C (104 °F), and water temperature can reach 70 °C (158 °F).” This is something that I never imagined in the Antarctic.
I have been looking into the problem of liquid water in the Antarctic, I have read that it only can be found for a few brief weeks in the summer in certain microclimatic areas like the McMurdo Dry Valleys. Also we read that flowing streams can even be a few miles long, but these might be hard to find on a continent larger than the contiguous United States. Now reading this article which estimates that the melting has raised ocean levels significantly, a simple calculation of this would indicate that you would need a river the size of the Mississippi to suddenly appear in the Antarctic, probably a satellite might be able to see this?
ctm, where do you fixate that “sea level rise”.