Study: Global wind speed dropping, wind farms victim of “atmospheric stilling”

Widespread decrease in wind energy resources found over the Northern Hemisphere

 

Widespread decrease in surface winds is found over the Northern Hemisphere. Wind energy resources are in rapid decline in many places. Study finds atmospheric stilling is a widespread and potentially global phenomenon.

 

From the INSTITUTE OF ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

Asia’s biggest wind farm, the Dabancheng wind farm in China’s Xinjiang province. CREDIT Gang Huang

As climate change is becoming more and more a matter of concern, efforts on mitigation are being undertaken by the world community. Developing clean and renewable energy is a major component of those efforts for its significant contribution to reducing carbon emission to the atmosphere compared with fossil fuel. In 2016, renewable energy contributes more than 19% to the global final energy consumption. Of all the renewable energy sources, the wind is one of the key players in terms of installed electricity generating capacity, only exceeded by hydropower.

Wind energy is a natural resource characterized by instability. Previous studies mainly focus on the assessment of wind energy reserves, but it’s not clear how the wind energy evolves over time.

A new study focusing on the change in wind energy resources and models’ simulation ability over the Northern Hemisphere by the collaboration of IAP researchers–Ph.D. candidate Qun Tian, Professor Gang Huang, Associate Professor Kaiming Hu, and Purdue University researcher–Professor Dev Niyogi was recently published. It reveals a widespread decline in wind energy resources over the Northern Hemisphere. Using station observation data, the study finds that approximately 30%, 50% and 80% of the stations lost over 30% of the wind power potential since 1979 in North America, Europe, and Asia, respectively. The study also reveals that global climate models (GCM) cannot replicate the long-term changes on wind energy, indicating wind energy projections based on GCM simulations should be used with careful consideration to the model performance.

“Our study is one of the first comprehensive assessments of the GCM-based winds against surface observations over multiple continents. We found that the decline of wind energy is a widespread and potential global phenomenon. In addition, the finding that the climate models have a notable deficiency in simulating wind energy is an important conclusion that needs further attention.”, said Tian, the lead author of the paper.

###

The paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S036054421832231X?via%3Dihub

Preprint here: http://www.escience.cn/system/file?fileId=102783

Observed and global climate model based changes in wind power potential over the Northern Hemisphere during 1979–2016

Abstract

Using an observed dataset, we study the changes of surface wind speeds from 1979 to 2016 over the Northern Hemisphere and their impacts on wind power potential. The results show that surface wind speeds were decreasing in the past four decades over most regions in the Northern Hemisphere, including North America, Europe and Asia. In conjunction with decreasing surface wind speeds, the wind power potential at the typical height of a commercial wind turbine was also declining over the past decades for most regions in the Northern Hemisphere. Approximately 30%, 50% and 80% of the stations lost over 30% of the wind power potential since 1979 in North America, Europe and Asia, respectively. In addition, the evaluation of climate models shows their relatively poor ability to simulate long-term temporal trends of surface winds, indicating the need for enhancing the process that can improve the reliability of climate models for wind energy assessments.

Excerpts from the paper:

Figure 2. Percentile wind speed trend. Evolution, as a function of year,
of annual percentile for observed surface wind speeds. 5th, 10th – 90th in 10
percentile increment and 95th percentile are shown. The domain considered
for a)North America, b)Europe, c)Asia, while
d)Global considers all the sites available in the dataset.

 

The results show that a reduction in wind power potential occurs in most of the areas (Figure 3), as deduced from analysis of section 3.1. There are 59 out of 214 (27.6%) stations in North America that have lost over 30 percent of their wind power potential since 1979 (Figure 4). Stations located in Wisconsin, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, Virginia and Maine in the United States are among those which appear experienced notable impact.

Remarkable alterations occur in Asia, where 65.0% of the stations show more than a 30 percent decrease with 50.5% with more than a 50 percent decrease (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Frequency distribution of cumulative changes in wind
power potential. Cumulative changes in the wind power potential from
1979 to 2016.

The results from analysis of observational surface wind speeds reemphasize that atmospheric stilling is a widespread and potentially global phenomenon. Among three continents included in this study, the decline in Asia is much sharper compared to North America and Europe. In terms of wind speed percentiles, strong winds decline faster than weak winds in Asia and Europe, while in North America, weak winds exceed strong winds in decline ratio.

Consistent with the decrease of surface wind speeds, the wind power potential was also decreasing in most regions of the Northern Hemisphere in the past decades. Around one third of the stations in North America, have experienced a huge decrease (over 30 percent) in wind power potential while over half of the stations in Europe and around four- fifths in Asia have the same magnitude of decrease.

For China, the country with the largest installed wind energy capacity, regions which have a considerable decrease are mainly regions with abundant wind energy resources and where a number of gigantic commercial wind farms were built. Changes in all four seasons are of the similar magnitude despite of the large differences in their mean states. For Asia and North America, the sharpest decrease appears along with the largest mean wind power potential. However, this is not the case for Europe, where the sharpest decrease in wind power potential appears in the autumn, while the largest mean value occurs in the winter.

The pattern of climatological wind speeds in CMIP5 simulations is also not consistent with the observations compared to the surface temperature simulation [62]. Thus the CMIP5 simulations of the changes in surface wind speeds should be used with considerable caution and likely not reliable.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
151 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
matt
December 5, 2018 3:25 pm

Seriously now help me understand please. Why not put a wind turbine on the roof of every electric car. A neat state of the art turbine would not look too bad. It would not impede the car much would it? A small price to pay for a battery always fully charged.

Michael Jankowski
Reply to  matt
December 5, 2018 5:42 pm

I doubt anyone here can take that question seriously. Surely you jest.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Michael Jankowski
December 5, 2018 6:06 pm

Don’t call him Shirley.

Michael S. Kelly, LS, BSA, Ret.
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
December 7, 2018 3:00 pm

You beat me to it!

NZ Willy
December 5, 2018 3:38 pm

Wow, so that’s going to be their excuse for the dismal failings of wind power: “global warming has stilled the winds”, ROTFL. But wait, wasn’t global warming supposed to make winds stronger and more Gore-ible?

Eric the Halibut
December 5, 2018 3:52 pm

Does this mean wind should lose its classification as a renewable? Further, since climate scientists describe any change as a trend, does this imply that the supply of wind power is going to be exhausted long before fossil fuels?

Keith Rowe
December 5, 2018 3:57 pm

Perhaps this has something to do with the warming we are having. Stilling not cycling up as much cold water strengthening the thermocline and a warmer world, like what has been happening. Perhaps it’s not all CO2? Maybe it’s why the warming was happening before CO2 became more abundant.

Kramer
December 5, 2018 4:31 pm

Maybe the Warmists are realizing that wind isn’t going to provide us with useful power and .. – .. science!

Pop Piasa
December 5, 2018 4:40 pm

At least until cooling is “a matter of concern”…

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Pop Piasa
December 5, 2018 4:45 pm

(misplaced comment – disregard)

Allen63
December 5, 2018 4:53 pm

I remember reading years ago on this site — stated simplistically: As Earth temperature rises it will not be evenly distributed. Hot will remain hot but not much hotter while cold will heat up. I.e. Farther North long term average temperatures rise faster than Equator — near North Pole most warming of all. Night long term average temperatures rise faster than day (as is shown by the historical plots on government site). So there will be less atmospheric energy differential across latitudes and less energy differential from day to night. Less atmospheric energy differential means less wind.

Global Warming Net result: Lower wind speeds on average. Less wind damage. And, less wind power.

So, I’m not surprised.

u.k.(us)
December 5, 2018 5:33 pm

Witch winds are stilling ? , the East or West ?.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  u.k.(us)
December 5, 2018 5:53 pm

The West. The one with the Green tint. When they ride in, you know there’s gonna be trouble.

Michael Jankowski
December 5, 2018 5:43 pm

“… The study also reveals that global climate models (GCM) cannot replicate the long-term changes on wind energy, indicating wind energy projections based on GCM simulations should be used with careful consideration to the model performance…”

They can’t get regional temps right. Can’t get precipitation right. Can’t get wind energy right. Can’t get much of anything right. But they reasonably track global temperature anomaly with the proper tuning. Lots of errors adding up to a “correct” answer is BS, but it is still bought and sold.

Michael Jankowski
December 5, 2018 5:49 pm

(1) How long until “climate change” is blamed for wind stilling?
(2) How long until we are told that despite the decreases in wind speed for all of these percentiles, the top 1% extreme winds are/will increase due to climate change?

December 5, 2018 6:45 pm

I used to know a bloke who was a hydrologist in CSIRO. He showed me some data once which showed that 4000 years ago in the central Australian desert the prevailing winds were in a different direction from now. Based on dune orientation. So even during this interglacial things can be quite different. I doubt humans had anything to do with it.

Philip Schaeffer
December 5, 2018 6:55 pm

Here is the link to the source of the press release text in the article:

http://english.iap.cas.cn/RE/201812/t20181204_201819.html

Ryan Welch
December 5, 2018 7:58 pm

Would the pause in global temperature rise affect wind speed? It seems logical that it would as the system reaches equilibrium. The reduction of major hurricanes making landfall since 2005 seems likely to be tied to the ‘pause’ also.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/08/26/peak-tropical-storm-year-2005-all-downhill-from-there/

JohnB
December 5, 2018 9:12 pm

I’m sorry but it is blog posts like this that not only ignore but positively in crease the possible reduction of another possible rare resource. Unremarked and unresearched the depletion of this resource could have dire consequences for our civilisation and our planet.

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I’m talking about “Levity”. The copious use of large amounts of levity in this thread demonstrates the complete disregard denizens here have for the squandering of a precious and possibly rare resource. We have no idea just how much levity is available, or whether or not it is renewable so this constant use of levity on frivolous topics really needs to stop.

People need to stop and think before indulging in unrestrained levity. I mean, what would happen if the levity ran out half way through a sentence? Disaster. We need to control our use of levity until far more research is done into this vital resource. We need to know how much is available and where it comes from. should we ration and control the use of levity?

Take heed and take care people, it could be worse than we think.

[The mods wonder: “Levity. Or bacon. .mod]

Dodgy Geezer
Reply to  JohnB
December 6, 2018 1:06 am

This issue has already been addressed by three researchers in the UK during the 1950s.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBkZGHmw19s

You will need to listen for about half an hour, but you will learn how the British managed to address the shortage of a precious and possibly rare resource, and stop their boots exploding….

Geoff Sherrington
Reply to  JohnB
December 6, 2018 2:03 am

Oh Dear! What can the matter be?
Seven old ladies got lost in the Levity.
They were there from Sunday to Saturday-
Nobody knew they were there.

Robert of Ottawa
December 5, 2018 10:21 pm

The pattern of climatological wind speeds in CMIP5 simulations is also not consistent with the observations compared to the surface temperature simulation

In other words, CMIP5 models don’t work.

Gosh! Climate varies unpredictably! Of course, we could say that the poorly understand planetary atmospheric system is still poorly understood.

4TimesAYear
December 5, 2018 11:16 pm

If they had proof, like an increase in the time it takes for the planet to complete a rotation, I might believe them, but that hasn’t changed. If winds have slowed in one area, they’ve picked up in another. Works kind of like the cold. If we have a mild winter, someone else is getting plastered. Our planet is very, very well balanced.

Flight Level
December 6, 2018 12:44 am

Every day commercial liners provide more than 150’000 “weather reports” by automated ACARS messages.
Aircraft instruments are not metrological. A wet probe can cool the reading, therefore most outside temperature sensors are calibrated to overstate the actual temperature.

The quality/quantity of data is pretty much fleet dependent.
Windspeed/direction derived from maneuvering A/C is highly unreliable.

Who uses such data and for what exact purpose is quite unclear to me, however my opinion is that they are not reliable for +/- 1/10 th or even +/- 1 C temperature models.

Which can be a trap for those seeking sense in 1/100th C resolution based political actions.

And no, there is no change of winds at altitude, we get the same bumpy rides as our predecessors did though we can now better avoid nasty spots.

Puzzles me how low altitude can be so much affected when above it’s business as usual.

Is there a boundary layer?

Dodgy Geezer
December 6, 2018 12:52 am

…Around one third of the stations in North America, have experienced a huge decrease (over 30 percent) in wind power potential …

What does this mean?

Having followed up all the links, I am no wiser about precisely what they are measuring or how. I strongly suspect that this is just an excuse for the fact that wind power energy is going to be considerably less than promised. Probably because of that nasty CO2…

Flight Level
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer
December 6, 2018 1:00 am

To me it’s just a sore excuse for the initially overstated potential of windmills.

Or, but this is a calculation that I can’t perform, be simply due to extracting that much energy from the (local) system. Which is what windmills do. They generate electricity by converting airspeed to work.

Josh Peterson
December 6, 2018 5:39 am

The overall energy content of the atmosphere, combining kinetic and heat components, would, I suspect, provide more useful information for understanding the system than modeling temperature or wind speed as presumably independent variables.

December 6, 2018 7:32 am

If we are taking millions of megawatts out of the wind with windmills, how much is that affecting the wind patterns? Of course some will see this as a ridiculous assertion, but the energy converted to electricity is coming from somewhere. It has to affect the wind patterns as well.

Steve O
December 6, 2018 12:23 pm

If the wind really has declined this much over this relatively short period of time, I would expect to see significant climate effects, as the wind plays a major role is redistributing heat around the globe.

It’s important enough to start taking satellite measurements to allow better coverage and accuracy.

December 6, 2018 2:04 pm

Hmmm…
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/could-offshore-wind-farms-actually-sap-rain-from-hurricanes-180970448/
So, according to their reasoning, one of the “solutions” to caGW might be causing it’s own demise?

Michael Jankowski
Reply to  Gunga Din
December 6, 2018 3:40 pm

So windfarms kill hurricanes…but all of the pavement and buildings has a minimal effect on anything according to warmistas.

TomRude
December 6, 2018 5:44 pm

That’s when wind mills building sites do not start forest fires…
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/parry-sound-wildfire-wind-farm-1.4930354

Ghandi
December 7, 2018 6:30 am

Whenever you take power out of the natural wind patterns (by turning wind into electricity) you are going to have an effect. It has been noted that there is a “wind shadow” that reduces the force of winds behind wind turbines, which is obviously caused by “stealing” the wind power through the generation of electricity. This is simple physics. So the proliferation of wind farms is just going to make the reduced wind scenario worse. We have met the wind thief and it is us.

Reply to  Ghandi
December 7, 2018 7:19 pm

“So the proliferation of wind farms is just going to make the reduced wind scenario worse. ”
But…but…isn’t that what they want? No change whatsoever?
(I guess not. No Headlines in that.)

Pamela Gray
December 7, 2018 8:39 am

Climate models no good at predic…scenarios? Say it isn’t so! I am crushed!