Wyoming has a secret eagle-kill organization

From CFACT

By David Wojick

The organization is no secret. It is the Wyoming Golden Eagle Working Group or WY-GOEA-WG, which has a nice little website here.

They even list their 98 present members on their about page, including a lot of federal officials. What is secret is what these folks do. They have a group listserv and recently held their annual meeting, but both are for members only. They appear to have never issued a report on their activities, a study, or even a press release. No hint as to what all these people talk about. My requests for communication were all refused.

As near as I can tell, this group is focused on the business and policy side of wind turbines killing golden eagles, especially in Wyoming. Eagle killing is a big wind business activity in several important ways, and this group looks like a lot of the people involved in those activities.

Members are grouped by the outfit they work for and listed by job title, so presumably they represent their employer. There are 29 feds, or 30%, so this is to a significant degree a federal deal. There are profound eagle-kill policy issues here, so the secrecy is very concerning. This group looks like a Federal Advisory Committee whose deliberations are supposed to be public.

There are three primary wind power business and policy activities that involve the Federal Government and wind turbines killing golden eagles.

First, if a wind farm includes federal land, there will be an environmental assessment (EA) that includes such killing. The EA will be prepared by the agency owning the land, but the developer does a lot of the analytical work.

Second, all wind farms must obtain and operate under a permit to kill eagles under the Eagle Protection Act. These eagle-kill permits are issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Application and operation both involve a lot of work.

Third, in many cases, the wind farm will have to pay a substantial “compensatory mitigation” fee to utilities to try to reduce eagle deaths from electrocution on power lines.

The non-federal members appear to mostly represent consultants who do work in these three areas. There are also several major wind farm developers. That these two groups, which have clear pro-wind financial interests, are secretly engaged with federal officials is very disturbing.

There are also members from scientific organizations that may or may not have direct financial ties to federal eagle-kill activities. There are also a few members with no stated affiliation.

That the central focus is eagle-kill permitting is strongly suggested by FWS having 23 members, or just under half the Feds. The Bureau of Land Management is also up there with seven members, which brings in the EA function. So does the Wyoming Fish and Game Department with six members, as the state also looks at impact.

On the wind farm side, PacifiCorp has four members, Powder River Energy has two, and several other developers have one each.

The top consultant is West, Inc with 6 members. FWS permits sometimes require two-year operational impact studies, which West often does. Most of the consultants just have one or two members, but there are a lot of them, likely looking for new work.

It should be noted that a lot of the members operate at the national and regional levels, not just in Wyoming. It thus seems likely that the Working Group will discuss national and regional policy issues and practices. In these cases, the secrecy goes way beyond Wyoming, which is far more disturbing.

The Wyoming Golden Eagle Working Group started in 2017, following the last minute 2016 promulgation of major new eagle protection regulations. These were Obama rules, so it is no surprise that we find feds and wind interests working together behind closed doors.

This secrecy must end. Federal agencies working in secret with wind interests, while golden eagles are being killed in large numbers, is not acceptable.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.8 21 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Neil Pryke
April 28, 2026 2:06 pm

WHY..?

KevinM
Reply to  Neil Pryke
April 28, 2026 2:31 pm

Why what?

David Wojick
Reply to  Neil Pryke
April 28, 2026 3:09 pm

Why are Wind and the Feds working together? My guess is to keep the industry going. Every federal EA and EIS for a wind project to date has concluded that the Eagle killing is acceptable. These are the folks on both sides that do those studies and reach those conclusions.

Reply to  David Wojick
April 28, 2026 3:56 pm

I thought Trump would terminate wind projects. I know some are too late in the contract phase but many are not- those I hope he cancels.

David Wojick
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 28, 2026 4:39 pm

He tried. On 1/20/25 he issued his wind stopping EO that ordered all agencies to stop issuing any permits until DOI did a study. FWS dutifully stopped issuing eagle-kill permits. But the court ruled this illegal saying an agency had to do a proper rule making and have a good reason to stop. FWS simply restarted so things are back to pre-Trump for onshore wind. Offshore is a different story.

heme212
Reply to  heme212
April 28, 2026 3:07 pm

the meme. not the caption or responses.

Reply to  heme212
April 28, 2026 8:11 pm

Oil only harms birds BY ACCIDENT, they do everything they can to prevent it.

Wind turbines builders KNOW they are going to kill birds.. AND JUST DON’T CARE

Reply to  bnice2000
April 29, 2026 5:44 am

They care enough to get legal protection from the feds

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  heme212
April 29, 2026 6:31 am

Reddit?

Pure science. Excellent add to the conversation. /sarc

April 28, 2026 3:12 pm

How large?

KevinM
Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
April 28, 2026 3:42 pm

She seems happy with it?

tjwaeghe
April 28, 2026 3:49 pm

This almost reads like a satire. An eagle-killing organization?? I can’t believe the current administration would support any of this.

David Wojick
Reply to  tjwaeghe
April 28, 2026 4:45 pm

Not an organization that kills eagles. They just man the agencies and industry that deals with wind killing eagles. I doubt the Trump Admin knows about it which is why I wrote this article. However the Feds are all in the Interior Dept and Sec Burgum was Gov of a big wind state, North Dakota, so he has done little to stop Big Wind onshore. Even offshore he has been tepid at best.

Reply to  David Wojick
April 29, 2026 2:41 am

Lee Zeldin needs a heads-up.

He should treat these eagle killers like he treated that purple-haired Democrat representative in Congress the other day.

Kevin Kilty
Reply to  tjwaeghe
April 28, 2026 5:04 pm

Well, this advisory committee is too big and too filled with people whose interests are pecuniary and toward development. I have indicated the dysfunction of the wildlife agencies, environmental groups, and government officials involved in my comment above.

No project, no matter how poorly sited, has been definitely killed as yet. And if you try, the developers threaten to sue you into oblivion — two of them are on the advisory committee.

Bruce Cobb
April 28, 2026 4:36 pm

It’s a good thing those hideous bird-killing land-gobbling machines are at least helping to “save the planet”, otherwise, those birds’ deaths would be for no reason.
Oh, wait.

Kevin Kilty
April 28, 2026 4:44 pm

This large committee may not actually be an eagle-killing enterprise, but it is probably disfunctional to the point that it doesn’t work to do any good and it can be dominated by developer interests and tax consumer interests.

Wind energy is becoming very unpopular in many places. Robert Bryce manages a file of projects killed across the U.S. When it comes to wind energy Wyoming is a different sort of place for many reasons.

1) It allegedly has a good resource. The wind blows strongly at times, but not much at others. I don’t think the resource is as good as it is across the Western part of the Great Plains where the wind is more consistent. But considering push back received elsewhere, Wyoming looks like the last frontier for wind energy. Developers are working diligently to remove any roadblock to getting their share of tax subsidies.

2) Wyoming is an energy state (produces about 11% of US energy supplies) and so some people are friendly to wind development thinking it is just like other energy projects. They fail to imagine what hundreds of square miles of 700 foot-tall turbines will look like. We have already filled the Shirley Basin with wind turbines so those who have travelled through that landscape know what over development of wind looks like. Social surveys have shown a very polarized view of renewable energy among rank and file citizens.

3) Wyoming has large private land holdings often owned by wealthy people living out of state who could not care less what the projects look like, but do care a lot about lease payments. One 500 square miles project is on land owned half by a wealthy family in an adjacent state and half by state and Federal government. Very few of the big land holders private or public are opposed to wind development, but there are a few.

4) Many county and city governments feel they are hard pressed for revenue and welcome renewable energy developments. However, the revenue generated from property taxes and from the Wyoming wind energy tax are actually quite small. I’d classify revenue from the wind energy tax as pawltry — $1 per MWhr transmitted out of state.

5) Environmental groups in this state cut their teeth opposing anything that fossil fuel industries propose. In these effort they aren’t often successful, but but it has led to a Schizophrenic attitude among these groups that we must have wind energy even considering hazards to wildlife because we MUST oppose fossil fuels.

6) The groups who should try to balance local interests against development do a very poor job of doing so. Ordinances regarding renewable energy are poorly considered and poorly written. Authority is confused. If one tries to present evidence that the developer applications contain unsustainable assertions regarding flicker, noise nuisance, birds, or even other wildlife concerns — even from peer-reviewed research, the testimony is often discounted. Developer assertions are treated as fact.

I have testified under oath about two of these projects for maybe a couple of hours in total at the Industrial Siting Council whose entire purpose is to balance these concerns. The permit for one of these wind plants misstated some of my testimony, misidentified me at one point, had me stating things I hadn’t, and didn’t address what I did testify to. Sloppy work to just get the permit out the door. Someone at a state agency whose job is to identify risks to wildlife told me they are pressured to not voice concerns over wind energy.

The bottom line is, at present the people making decisions all think they are going to make big money on renewable energy, and things like CCUS, to the point that their thinking is clouded. I think it is a disaster primed to happen.

ResourceGuy
April 28, 2026 6:30 pm

This is where secrecy gets you, i.e. eagle kills for wind power and 50 percent of the world’s solar silicon supply chain made by slave labor and a very extensive coal power array. And yes the prisons housing entire ethnic groups in western China is a secret no matter how many lobbyists say there is product certification of panels. It shows that ethical and moral outrage can be bought off and smothered.

April 29, 2026 2:50 am

Occasionally, we get humans gushing over the birth of baby eagles on tv. We get to look at eagle cams showing the eagle parents sitting on the eggs and then feeding them when they hatch and watching the young eagles learn to fly.

And everything is wonderful, and then the eagles fly off and run into a windmill blade and are killed.

Environmentalists are environmentalists in name only. Allowing this destruction is inhumane.

If you tell me you are an environmentalist, the first thing I will ask you is: What are you doing about the slaughter of eagles and numerous other birds and bats? My next question would be: What the hell is wrong with you people!?

April 29, 2026 5:42 am

Dave,
Thank for shining the light on Muslim-friendly Obama specifically allowing the killing of eagles by windmills.

In Colorado is an entire, refrigerated building with carcasses of eagles. Why in hell are they being stored?