From ETH Zurich and the “slow as molasses in winter” department.
Hot summers cause glaciers to melt. That not only changes the makeup of the landscape and hence the maps of Switzerland, it also affects every area of society. A new, dynamic glacier inventory makes the impact of climate change and the changing landscape visible.

The last time Swiss glaciers managed to grow at all was in 2001. Since then, the country’s 1,500 glaciers – as well as others elsewhere – have been suffering a slow but inexorable death. Until now, though, we have understood only partially how quickly they are really disappearing, and what effect that has on the landscape, people and animals. That is about to change, thanks to the Glacier Monitoring in Switzerland (GLAMOS) project. GLAMOS is working on behalf of various Swiss federal offices to put together a comprehensive inventory of the country’s glaciers – at an unprecedented level of detail.
But why bother compiling such a detailed inventory of a dying “species”? For GLAMOS geoinformatics expert and ETH employee Yvo Weidmann, the reason is obvious: “Glacial melt affects the flow rate of our rivers, which makes it a relevant factor in natural catastrophes, disaster prevention, the power supply, transportation, tourism, building sites and not least glacier research.”
Today, GLAMOS is monitoring some 100 glaciers, with a particular view to measuring fluctuations in their length and ice thickness. In future, it will gather data on the extent of some 1,500 glaciers, helping tomorrow’s researchers to track even the tiniest changes in their extent.
From maps to a digital 3D landscape model
What makes the new inventory possible is a paradigm shift at the Swiss Federal Office of Topography, or swisstopo: it has spent several years painstakingly converting its maps into a digital 3D landscape model. The earlier maps show – to put it simply – where things are, but this basic view was of no use in glacier research.
Glaciers can be covered by debris, which is relevant for glaciology. “It’s possible for a major proportion of a glacier snout to be hidden by debris, with the visible body of ice representing only part of the actual glacier,” Weidmann says. This means a purely cartographical representation of the area of visible ice comes up literally too short.

Ice fields become glaciers
In the topographical landscape model, this limitation falls away. The digital representation makes it possible to combine various layers along topographical rules. For instance, forest and bodies of water can touch but not overlap. Boulders can lie on top of ice. And liquid water – for instance glacial lakes – can be present over ice. Layers can be added or removed on the computer, producing a comprehensive model of the landscape that is fit for all possible purposes.
Now for the first time, swisstopo’s new landscape model also records glaciers according to glaciological rules. For instance, it is sometimes the case that two glaciers, located on opposite mountain flanks and with opposing directions of flow, will meet along a mountain ridge. From a cartographical viewpoint, this would be treated as a single large area of ice. But from a glaciological viewpoint, these are two “individuals” that have little in common and no effect on each other – apart from where they brush against each other on the mountain ridge.
“In future, glaciers will be given a unique number to make their history traceable,” Weidmann explains, adding, “Should a glacier with two catchments in two different valleys melt to the extent that it becomes two independent glaciers, one of them will be assigned a new number.” These inventory numbers not only make it easier to identify glaciers, they also help to document their history.
A model of unprecedented precision
By linking the inventory to glaciological computational models, researchers can show how much water each glacier will deliver and when.
The more data that flows into the model, the more precise the basis on which to make predictions. As a result, GLAMOS achieves an unprecedented level of precision. Every four to six years, swisstopo aircraft record each square metre of Switzerland. The 3D images generated are capable of showing changes in altitude across a grid of two metres by two metres to an accuracy of some 50 centimetres. If an area of gravel sediment ahead of a glacier snout sinks noticeably between two measurements, there is probably ice under it. The true proportions of the glacier below are better documented with each subsequent measurement.
A treasure trove of data
The first complete inventory of glaciers was drawn up in 1973. Later, a second inventory was reconstructed for the year 1850 based on estimates, maps and moraines. Additional surveys followed in 2000 and 2010. All these inventories were important for research, but each was produced using its own set of rules and different methods, making them barely comparable.
From 2019, Switzerland will for the first time be able to turn to a glacier inventory that will undergo dynamic further development and be completely renewed every four to six years. And the cost of the new glacier inventory is manageable because GLAMOS is drawing on existing troves of data, processing them, interlinking them and making them available in a format that a wide audience can use.
What is GLAMOS?
The Swiss Glacier Monitoring Network documents long-term fluctuations in glaciers located in the Swiss Alps. It is jointly operated by Sciences Switzerland’s Cryospheric Commission, the Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (VAW) at ETH Zurich, and the Universities of Fribourg and Zurich. Images are secured with financial support from the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment, MeteoSwiss, and the Swiss Academy of Sciences (SCNAT).
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

From Wiki I took the top 44 glaciers in Switzerland out of the total of 1500. They all have retreated since 1973 to 2016. However the total retreat has been 34.38 km over that 43 year period. That is an average of 0.8 km per year or 0.78 km per glacier . That works out to 0.278 % decrease in length per year as an average overall for the 44 glaciers. Based on that average it will take 360 years for those 44 glaciers to completely disappear. In 2013 it was found that in most of them the decrease was slowing down. Even if all 200000 glaciers in the world completely disappeared the sea level would only rise 400mm. What in the hell are we worried about?
Thank-you Alan Tomalty,
If I could I’d vote +10.
Nice to see another person understands that melting glacier ice is no big deal, and humans can easily adapted to it. Indeed ice melting in the NH is no big deal.
“In 2013 it was found that in most of them the decrease was slowing down.”
https://wgms.ch/latest-glacier-mass-balance-data/
Could you just open more clearly what does that plus/minus mm water equivalent mean in reality? Is it a thickness of a glacier?
mm water equvalent multiplied with 1.09 will give you the thickness og glacier change averaged over all of the glacier area. Keep in mind: the upper part of a glacier often gains mass the lower part is loosing, The graph shows average over all glacier areas.
clos to 22m or approx. 70 ft of ice lost.
Meaning that it will take about 100 years till the glaciers ane all melted?
Why should all Glaciers melt? In some of the glaciers in the Europena Alps they detected ice more than 7000 years old.
A considerable number of glaciers will dissapear, most will shrink. If you take average values for predictions you will end up with rather mediocre results.
The melting or disappearance of Swiss glaciers is one of the few areas where I will admit my emotions get the better of me. To me, the Alps are just not the Alps except where they have a permanent snow cap. I feel a bit like Bilbo Baggins not able to find rest until he could see the Misty Mountains again.
But of course, the agricultural peasants who lived under the threat of the advancing Alpine glaciers during the Little Ice Age had good cause to take a less romantic view. And that is indeed the problem, when global warmers take only a romantic view of what they think climate is or ought to be.
the most interesting way to check out the bossons glacier https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neFCXFdUwAU
New data just out on glacier melt in the Alps–drip, drip, drip.
This makes sense, because they’re primarily concerned with the rivers.
Is GLAMOS just GLADOS with better fashion sense?
“Glacial melt affects the flow rate of our rivers, which makes it a relevant factor in natural catastrophes, disaster prevention, the power supply, transportation, tourism, building sites and not least glacier research.”
If glaciers were growing, what would that do to the flow rate of your rivers? I think that would be much worse than melting. At least with melting, you still get flow from rainfall.
The only thing glaciers are good for is summer skiing, and even that is of questionable quality. SO really, what is the fuss?
I’ve seen stuff in the past something to the effect that indigenous peoples who live at the edge of glaciers rely on using glacial ice for water (they chip off a block or two at a time and take them back to their villages).
As I mentioned above, if glaciers were growing, that would be the end of their villages. If shrinking, they would have more fresh water from lakes and streams that form, and from regular rainfall, since they won’t know what snow is any more.
I strongly doubt that any indigenous peple are stupid enough to settle at the edge of a glacier.
Actually, glaciers aren’t any good at all for skiing. Too hard for your skis to get a bite, too rough in general.
“Since then, the country’s 1,500 glaciers – as well as others elsewhere – have been suffering a slow but inexorable death. ”
Hasn’t that been happening since the last ice age?
No they actually mostly died about 10,000 years ago, only to be resurrected about 4-5000 as the climate cooled.
Observing glaciers in “real time”
Is this the new PC equivalent of “watching paint dry”?