Wild claim: ‘Earth’s climate to increase by four degrees by 2084’

From the INSTITUTE OF ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES and the “images of doom make it more sciency” department comes this load of alarmism that doubles down on the imagery, rather than the science.

The study is selected as the cover article of Issue No. 8 of Advances in Atmospheric Sciences in 2018. The levels of future global warming relative to the pre-industrial period have been extensively addressed, in which 2 C and 1.5 C warming have attracted the most attention. A special report ‘Turn Down the Heat: Why a 4°C Warmer World must be Avoided’ by the World Bank in 2012 described a 4 C warmer world with significant changes in mean and extreme climates on the basis of earlier-generation climate models and emission scenarios.
CREDIT Image by Advances in Atmospheric Sciences

A collaborative research team from China has published a new analysis that shows the Earth’s climate would increase by 4 °C, compared to pre-industrial levels, before the end of 21st century.

To understand the severity of this, consider the Paris Agreement (https://unfccc.int/process/the-paris-agreement/what-is-the-paris-agreement) of the United Nations. It’s a global effort to prevent an increase of 2°C. Nearly every country on the planet–the United States is the only country to withdraw–has agreed to work to prevent the catastrophic effects of two degrees of warming.

The researchers published their analysis projecting a doubling of that increase in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00376-018-7160-4 ) on May 18, 2018.

“A great many record-breaking heat events, heavy floods, and extreme droughts would occur if global warming crosses the 4 °C level, with respect to the preindustrial period,” said Dabang Jiang, a senior researcher at the Institute of Atmospheric Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. “The temperature increase would cause severe threats to ecosystems, human systems, and associated societies and economies.”

In the analysis, Jiang and his team used the parameters of scenario in which there was no mitigation of rising greenhouse gas emissions. They compared 39 coordinated climate model experiments from the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (https://www.wcrp-climate.org/wgcm-cmip), which develops and reviews climate models to ensure the most accurate climate simulations possible.

They found that most of the models projected an increase of 4°C as early as 2064 and as late as 2095 in the 21st century, with 2084 appearing as the median year.

This increase translates to more annual and seasonal warming over land than over the ocean, with significant warming in the Arctic. The variability of temperature throughout one year would be lower in the tropics and higher in polar regions, while precipitation would most likely increase in the Arctic and in the Pacific. These are the same effects that would occur under 1.5°C or 2°C increases, but more severe.

“Such comparisons between the three levels of global warming imply that global and regional climate will undergo greater changes if higher levels of global warming are crossed in the 21st century,” wrote Jiang.

The researchers continue to investigate the changes associated with 4°C of global warming in extreme climates.

“Our ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive picture of the mean and extreme climate changes associated with higher levels of global warming based on state-of-the art climate models, which is of high interest to the decision-makers and the public,” said Jiang.

###

Meanwhile, China (and much of the world) continues to build coal power plants at a frenetic pace. I’ll believe China’s crisis-mongering science when they act like there’s a crisis.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

69 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chris Hoff
May 23, 2018 1:38 pm

If I was the leader of a national government and wanted my industries to have a competitive advantage over other countries, I would push global warming hysteria. Get all the other national governments to agree with punitive industrial emissions curbs and only pretend to do the same in my own country, instead subsidize my industries.

May 23, 2018 1:54 pm

“They compared 39 coordinated climate model experiments from the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project.”
Coordinated climate models are so much more reliable that just ordinary computer models and a lot easier to control and manipulate that observations and real unhomogenised data.

May 23, 2018 7:20 pm

2084? I’ll be 134. I’ll be very surprised if I am in a climate that’s only four degrees warmer than now!

May 24, 2018 12:50 am

Trademark infringement by the Chinese… again.comment image

James Bull
May 24, 2018 1:27 am

The Chinese aren’t stupid the more they show how bad the global warming (or whatever it’s called this week) is the more Western industry will be closed down and production moved to China. So they will be making and supplying everything we need so we won’t be able to do anything when they move in on Taiwan, Japan and anywhere else they want to.
James Bull

May 24, 2018 3:19 am

comment image

ResourceGuy
May 24, 2018 6:36 am

The new Moore’s Law states that the number of scare stories will double every two years and every doubling of the scare temp rise there will be associated with promotions and tenure.

John
May 24, 2018 7:32 am

What does “Earth’s climate to increase by four degrees by 2084” mean really? Average global temperature is just a mathematical number and does not exist in the real world!
Does it mean that the average U.S. average temperature
of 11.6 degree C will become 15.6 degree C? But Singapore’s average temperature has been 26.6 degree C for hundreds of years, that’s 15 degree C higher than the U.S. And Singaporeans are still striving! Anybody?

June 3, 2018 4:24 am

Why everybody accepts “pre-industrial levels” without question? Have you noticed that whenever “pre-industrial levels” is invoked, you never see a number mentioned? Who knows what is “pre-industrial levels”? Why use a baseline that is unknowable?