NYT: ‘The World Wants Air-Conditioning. That Could Warm the World’
More than crickets and fireflies, more than baseball and cookouts, perhaps nothing signals the arrival of summer in the United States like the soft familiar whir of air-conditioning.
But there is growing concern that as other countries adopt America’s love of air-conditioners, the electricity used to power them will overburden electrical grids and increase planet-warming emissions.
The number of air-conditioners worldwide is predicted to soar from 1.6 billion units today to 5.6 billion units by midcentury, according to a report issued Tuesday by the International Energy Agency. If left unchecked, by 2050 air-conditioners would use as much electricity as China does for all activities today.
Greenhouse gas emissions released by coal and natural gas plants when generating electricity to power those air-conditioners would nearly double, from 1.25 billion tons in 2016 to 2.28 billion tons in 2050, the report says. Those emissions would contribute to global warming, which could further heighten the demand for air-conditioning.
Right now air-conditioning is concentrated in a handful of countries, mainly in the United States and Japan, and increasingly in China.
While 90 percent of American households have air-conditioning, “When we look in fact at the hot countries in the world, in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, where about 2.8 billion people live, only about 8 percent of the population owns an air-conditioner,” said Fatih Birol, executive director of the energy agency.
As incomes in those countries rise, however, more people are installing air-conditioners in their homes. The energy agency predicts much of the growth in air-conditioning will occur in India, China and Indonesia.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/15/climate/air-conditioning.html
I think they have the wrong idea about what will cause the warming:

Here’s the IEA report:
Air conditioning use emerges as one of the key drivers of global electricity-demand growth
The growing use of air conditioners in homes and offices around the world will be one of the top drivers of global electricity demand over the next three decades, according to new analysis by the International Energy Agency that stresses the urgent need for policy action to improve cooling efficiency.
A new IEA report – “The Future of Cooling” – shows that without new efficiency standards the world will be facing a “cold crunch” from the growth in cooling demand in coming decades.
Global energy demand from air conditioners is expected to triple by 2050, requiring new electricity capacity the equivalent to the combined electricity capacity of the United States, the EU and Japan today. The global stock of air conditioners in buildings will grow to 5.6 billion by 2050, up from 1.6 billion today – which amounts to 10 new ACs sold every second for the next 30 years, according to the report.
Using air conditioners and electric fans to stay cool already accounts for about a fifth of the total electricity used in buildings around the world – or 10% of all global electricity consumption today. But as incomes and living standards improve in many developing countries, the growth in AC demand in hotter regions is set to soar. AC use is expected to be the second-largest source of global electricity demand growth after the industry sector, and the strongest driver for buildings by 2050.
Supplying power to these ACs comes with large costs and environmental implications. One crucial factor is that the efficiency of these new ACs can vary widely. For example, ACs sold in Japan and the European Union are typically 25% more efficient than those sold in the United States and China. Efficiency improvements could cut the energy growth from AC demand in half through mandatory energy performance standards.
“Growing electricity demand for air conditioning is one of the most critical blind spots in today’s energy debate,” said Dr Fatih Birol, the Executive Director of the IEA. “With rising incomes, air conditioner ownership will skyrocket, especially in the emerging world. While this will bring extra comfort and improve daily lives, it is essential that efficiency performance for ACs be prioritized. Standards for the bulk of these new ACs are much lower than where they should be.”
The report identifies key policy actions. In an Efficient Cooling Scenario, which is compatible with the goals of the Paris Agreement, the IEA finds that through stringent minimum energy performance standards and other measures such as labelling, the average energy efficiency of the stock of ACs worldwide could more than double between now and 2050. This would greatly reduce the need to build new electricity infrastructure to meet rising demand.
Making cooling more efficient would also yield multiple benefits, making it more affordable, more secure, and more sustainable, and saving as much as USD 2.9 trillion in investment, fuel and operating costs.
The rise in cooling demand will be particularly important in the hotter regions of the world.
Today, less than a third of global households own an air conditioner. In countries such as the United States and Japan, more than 90% of households have air conditioning, compared to just 8% of the 2.8 billion people living in the hottest parts of the world.
The issue is particularly sensitive in the fastest-growing nations, with the biggest increase happening in hot countries like India – where the share of AC in peak electricity load could reach 45% in 2050, up from 10% today without action. This will require large investments in new power plants to meet peak power demand at night, which cannot be met with solar PV technology.
“Setting higher efficiency standards for cooling is one of the easiest steps governments can take to reduce the need for new power plants, and allow them at the same time to cut emissions and reduce costs,” said Dr Birol.
“The Future of Cooling” is the second IEA report that focuses on “blind spots” of the global energy system, following the “The Future of Trucks,” which was released in July 2017. The next one in this series – “The Future of Petro-Chemicals” – will examine ways to build a more sustainable petrochemical industry. It will be released in September.
And why are new power plants bad? They release CO2 (shudder!!!) and promote large flows of redistribution money to benefit the rent seekers.
Refrigerants in the EU now have to have low “Global Warming Potential”. This adds to cost and (I suspect) reduces potential efficiency: https://www.racplus.com/home/the-future-of-hfcs-are-they-a-viable-alternative/8600052.article.
So we want to up efficiency to reduce “global warming”, but we restrict the materials we can use because they are believed to increase “global warming”??? To quote CS Lewis “castrate, and bid the geldings be fruitful”
Turn off your air conditioners and die of heatstroke. Save the planet for the next generation, just not yours.
Surely every school kid has heard of the Carnot cycle ?
Thanks NYT for that “insight”.
Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere may be happy. (Source unknown).
somehow not found in the devil’s dictionary
http://www.online-literature.com/bierce/devilsdictionary/16/
however, you find
PAIN, n. An uncomfortable frame of mind that may have a physical basis in something that is being done to the body, or may be purely mental, caused by the good fortune of another.
It is by H. L. Mencken
Tom
Obliged.
Well heating makes cooling, and now cooling make heating…
Reminds me of the great social observer and philosopher Marx when he said —
― Groucho Marx
One thing that struck me last time I was in China is that practically every apartment in the cities have an A/C nowadays. Mounting brackets are apparently standard, but not the A/C unit which is bought separately, with somewhat odd visual effect since there seems to be a near infinite number of different models.
It should be added that essentially all of China has hot to very hot summers. Northern China, as an extra, also has very cold winters. Harbin for example has summer temperatures like Boston and winter temperatures like Fairbanks.
tty : THIS has to be a GOOD THING !
The better the living conditions for the average person the more he appreciates the
government and the more stable China is ! The more that each individual has to LOSE
then the less willing he is to RISK IT ! So prosperity , peace and stability are linked and
SHOULD BE HEARTILY ENCOURAGED by all of us !
Who doesn’t want ” a better standard of living” ?
And as their standard of living lifts, the whole human race benefits ! Less poverty, more’markets ,
more international travel ( tourism ) leading to more contact and better understanding , and so on !
The BENEFITS are practically endless !
SO…….HOORAY for air conditioning !
And the “extra heat”……..perhaps that can be utilised in the next POSTING admonishing
my pathetic flippant contribution ! That’s fine with me……I like the heat !
but I also appreciate the cool !
I was told that it was important for Western nations to give $100 billion to poor nations for climate change. Yet, such new wealth is sure to lead to increased spending in those countries, leading to more emissions.
Gosh, I’m beginning to think this is all just a hustle.
AC must to some degree increase the urban heat island effect, and it does strike me as odd that power consumption goes up in Australia the most in summer -when you think about it, generating waste heat at both the coal plant and the consumers house end at the peak of the warm period seems kinda crazy..
Well, that was and has remained my thinking ever since I first saw a kerosene fridge as a kid, researched how they worked, and discovered the ammonia absorption refrigeration cycle. Since then it’s been a bit of a dream for me to hope one day I could either make or buy a unit that could sit atop my house and when the heat of summer hits, the thing could be used to both cool the house below and draw water from the atmosphere from the Perth sea ‘breeze’ (gale force wind)
with an all-iron construction (galvanized on the outside for longevity) and containing only water, ammonia and a little bit of hydrogen – and no moving parts – coupled to a small solar cell driving a fan to shift the ‘cold ‘around (you know what I mean) and the control circuitry available to us today .. who wouldn’t love zero-cost air conditioning ?
So many old technologies are getting kick starts – 1890’s photovoltaics, 1900’s electric cars .. while things like ammonia absorption refrigeration and stirling engines have been largely overlooked when again with modern regulatory electronics and lithium batteries they really should be getting more of a go in the world.
And yes, I’m well aware of the risks associated with ammonia, but the 100+ year old Icyball refrigerator and the old kero fridges I’ve collected still function fine without anyone having suffered any ill across the centuries of operation they represent.. my car(s) AC’s I had filled with butane have not spontaneously combusted despite the shrill claims by the mainstream AC installers dire warnings, and even some of the more scientifically literate greenies are starting to click that the lower pressures required and lower power consumption with these ‘obsolete’ (but highly efficiency hydrocarbon refrigerants) makes them far more desirable than the “modern” alternatives.
There has an horrific autocar accident where officially the fuel (diesel) took fire because of a “rare event” where the tank was pierced and hit a hot object… but a lot of the French people have another ideation (the A/C broke and took fire).
And nobody trust the French transport safety authority anymore, after many bizarre stories where they gave the apparence of caring more about the interest of State owned corporations than the truth.
Since the greatest PR mistake in green messaging is attacking personal space and households, the headline photo should not be large scale AC systems. It should be room or house AC systems to make it hit consumers directly. Green-funded politicos can then be faced with some hard choices for a change in messaging during campaigns.
Pointing out the three dollar bill: more electrical demand will overburden existing electrical grids. Yes… gradually demand will rise, and every competent electric company will upsize lines, install feeders, provision generators and scale capacity to match demand.
Sheesh.
The bottom line today is that 20% of America’s eletricity goes directly to refrigeration. HVAC refrigeration, domestic refrigeration, and a whole lot to commercial HVAC and big box refrigeration.
And that is not a trend which will stop. Soon, or at all.
Thing is, in the modern world, refrigeration is a civilization-critical resource.
On the scale of medical care itself.
• Refrigeration keeps foodstuffs cold enough to suppress most foodborne pathogens.
• Refrigeration preserves serums, vaccines, injectable meds, blood plasma, whole blood…
• Refrigeration keeps people literally alive, in climes far too hot for nominal living
• Refrigeration is crucial for allowing The Internet to work. At all.
• Refrigeration optimizes worker productivity on factory floors
So yes, saying that “there’s a worrying trend that the Third World will be markedly increasing its power generation to cover refrigeration” is essentially the same as “The Third World is moving up. Economically, Technologically and Energy-wise”.
GoatGuy
YEP !
REFRIGERATION even keeps things WARM ENOUGH to eat at THE POLES !
Can’t do without it anywhere !
“Pointing out the three dollar bill: more electrical demand will overburden existing electrical grids. Yes… gradually demand will rise, and every competent electric company will upsize lines, install feeders, provision generators and scale capacity to match demand”
Not it scaling capacity requires building new power plants. Green regulations make it nearly impossible to bring a new reliable energy plants (coal, gas, nuke, etc) online.
I don’t need an air cooler.
Regards
Agust
Iceland
I do.
Cheers!
Mike
Deep in the heart of East Texas USA
Ban anything that improves the human condition.
just go straight to the point and ban humans. /sarc
The Commie pope is against air conditioning for everyone but himself.
What a hypocrite!
Matthew 7:5 – Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.
I’m considering installing an AC unit at home to keep the place cool enough for my wife to cope and function with the effects of her MS which get worse when it is hot. We have used a small portable unit for several years now but it is quite noisy and has to sit in the middle of the room to get the best effect with the heat exhaust pipe fed into the fireplace.
I have seen the benefits for my wife and will be looking for the unit that meets her needs the best and if it means a bit more CO2 in the atmosphere that’s all to the good.
James Bull
This is where the Greenies have a problem. On the one hand they deplore the cutting down of rain forrest etc. Their complaints are mainly related to conversion to palm oil plantations but also it is a source of timber for building.
Every where in Asia now there is massive residential construction going on. It is all in concrete so the buildings are effectively heat sinks –so they all NEED air conditioners. Being made out of concrete saves the trees traditionally used for construction. So The Greenies cannot have it both ways.
To show the effect on energy demand just have look at electricity consumption growth for any SEA country over the past 15+ years –exponential growth.
Eg. Singapore , Malaysia & Thailand
https://www.google.co.nz/search?source=hp&ei=jxUBW9uwG8Sr0QTFirK4Aw&q=electricity+consumption+malaysia&oq=electricity+consumption+Malaysia&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0j0i22i30k1l9.1316.13841.0.16294.33.26.0.6.6.0.332.5721.2-21j2.23.0….0…1c.1.64.psy-ab..4.29.5743.0..35i39k1j0i131i67k1j0i131k1j0i67k1.0.stDnfAkVLpI
Lived in Central America and currently in the Philippines. With aircon, mosquitos stay away. This is an important health benefit where dengue, zika and malaria exist.