The island’s demise was a human and Little Ice Age tragedy, not “ecological suicide”
Guest essay Dennis Avery
In a recent New York Times column, Nicholas Kristof misleads us about the awful history of Easter Island (2,300 miles west of Chile), whose vegetation disappeared in the cold drought of the Little Ice Age. In doing so, he blinds modern society to the abrupt, icy climate challenge that lies in our own future.
Kristof repeats the archaeological myth that Easter Island’s natives committed “ecological suicide,” by cutting down all their palm trees. They supposedly used the logs as rollers to move their famous huge statues. Afterward, they could no longer build canoes to catch the fish that were their key protein source. Worse, he says, clearing the trees resulted in so much soil erosion that most of the population starved and/or killed each other in famine-driven desperation.
This myth disguises the impacts of the Little Ice Age on Easter, and ignores the inevitable reality that our coming generations could relatively soon face another icy age that will harshly test our technologies. The cold centuries may even make man-made global warming look positively attractive!
Easter Islanders never cut their palm trees at all! According to their cultural legends, when the Polynesians’ canoes reached Easter about 1000 AD, the island was covered in grasses. There were only a few palms. Modern pollen studies confirm this, showing that the island did have palm trees in the ancient past – but most died in the cold droughts of the Dark Ages (600–950 AD). The few surviving palms died during the Little Ice Age after the Polynesians colonized the island. The last palm died about 1650.
Kristof seems not to understand the killing power of the cold, chaotic, carbon dioxide-starved climate in those “little ice ages.”
The islanders wouldn’t have used palm logs for canoes in any case. The Polynesians knew palm logs are far too heavy. Canoes need to skim on top of the waves, even when carrying heavy loads. The Polynesians made their canoes out of sewn planks from the much-lighter toromiro trees, whose seedlings they’d brought with them from the Marquesas Islands to the west.
Soil erosion? The Easter Islanders didn’t need to clear trees from their land to grow their crops of taro, yams and sweet potatoes. They planted the tubers between the stumps of smaller trees cut for occasional house-building. The cut trees re-grew from their living stumps; their root systems remained alive and continued to protect the soil. In fact, the islanders’ agricultural techniques protected soil even more effectively than mainland farms did until the advent of modern no-till farming.
No fish to eat? A U.S. Navy lieutenant, who visited Easter in 1886, shortly after the Little Ice Age ended, reported that the natives ate huge amounts of seafood! Most of the fish were caught from small inshore canoes, with rockfish a favorite. The natives also speared dolphins in the shallows, after confusing the animals’ famed “sonar” by clapping rocks together. Crayfish and eels abounded in the shoreline’s rocky crevices, and flying fish flung themselves onto the beaches. Turtles and shellfish were plentiful.
Nor did the islanders kill each other off in hunger wars – although the sweet potato crops were scanty and population numbers dropped during those chilly Little Ice Age droughts.
What did happen to the Easter population? The truth is a sickening look at exploitation of some of the most vulnerable people on earth by some of the most powerful of the day. Peruvian slave-raiders took most of the men to Peru in the 1800s, to dig shiploads of seabird dung (guano) from offshore islands to fertilize Europe’s fields. Terrible conditions, overwork and European diseases killed most of the kidnapped slaves.
Peruvian citizens’ outrage over their mistreatment eventually forced the authorities to return the few who had survived. Unfortunately, the survivors carried smallpox back to Easter. Only a few natives lived through the ensuing epidemic. Later, well-meaning missionaries brought tuberculosis.
The final disaster was Peru’s leasing of the island’s grasslands to absentee landlords for sheep-grazing. The sheep destroyed the last of the toromiro trees, while the surviving natives were (unbelievably) penned behind barbed wire – until 1960 – when worldwide condemnation finally intervened.
Kristof, who may have gotten his Easter Island myths from Jared Diamond’s misguided book Collapse, demeans the sustainable traditions of the South Pacific’s Polynesian settlers. Their insightful tradition was not to use up a resource more rapidly than they could see it restoring itself.
Mother Nature, not the Polynesians, destroyed the trees. She did it over and over: in the Iron Age Cooling, during the cold Dark Ages and then again amid the Little Ice Age. Nor was Mother Nature being “careless.” She was responding to the age-old commands of the sun, the gravitational fields of the four biggest planets, and the other powerful natural forces that have always governed Earth’s climate.
Those same planetary patterns also govern our future, whether we like it or not. Another “icy age” will inevitably replace our current and relatively supportive climate warmth and stability. That probably (hopefully) won’t arrive for another several centuries. Our current warming period is only 150 years old; the shortest Dansgaard-Oeschger warm phase on record was the Medieval, which lasted 350 years.
The Easter Islanders were technologically capable enough (if barely) to sustain their society through Nature’s climate cycles. Elsewhere, nomads from the Black Sea region survived the Last Glacial Maximum (in temperatures below -40 degrees Celsius/Fahrenheit) by inventing mammoth-skin tents to survive the cold as they followed migrating mammoths. Those huge furry beasts were themselves forced to move frequently as the Ice Age turned the grass into less-nourishing tundra.
Our ancestors also made the most important discovery in all human history farming, only about 10,000 years ago. Farming finally allowed humans to become more than scattered hunting bands, carrying their babies and scant possessions on their backs. They could support larger populations, create languages, build temples, cities and trading ships, and launch industries that made copper, bronze and then iron.
Collective learning has now gotten us to the point where we create resources rather than just finding them. Think nitrogen fertilizer, which is taken from the air that’s 78% nitrogen, and then returned to the sky through natural processes. Think computer chips and fiber optic cables made from sand.
We are no longer doomed to thrive, only to collapse again. Our challenge today is not to retreat into a harsh and uncertain dependence on Mother Nature and her deadly “ice age” betrayals. Rather, we can and must prepare for the next “icy age” we know is coming – by continuing our collective learning, using a matured wisdom, and not turning our backs on the fossil fuel, nuclear and other reliable, affordable energy sources that have made our industries, health, innovations and living standards possible.
Mr. Kristof’s mythology would lead us back into ignorance, not forward.
Dennis Avery co-authored the New York Times best-seller Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years with astrophysicist Fred Singer. His forthcoming book is titled Climates of Collapse: the Deadly “Little Ice Ages.” This article is based on those carefully researched treatises.
Some interesting stories about Easter Island from a geological perspective can be found here:
http://www.robertschoch.com/
Dr Schoch (pronounced “shock”) and his wife were married there and she is one of the few who are trying to translate and preserve what is left of the rongorongo petroglyphs.
Interesting post – kind of rings a bell 🛎 , like I’ve seen something like it before somewhere. O I remember, this was the article that I posted in “submit story” a couple of weeks ago, and which was ignored. Glad it didn’t go entirely to waste 🙂 Here it is:
Easter Island: New research falsifies the myth of “ecocide”
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170710161438.htm
Easter Island and the fate of its inhabitants has become, in today’s ecopuritannical culture, a cautionary tale about how us humans left to our own devices, without appropriate moral oversight, tend to destroy our own environment to our own harm. However new research, employing the scientific method correctly, has overturned this interpretation of Easter Island history.
Easter Island has become a powerful myth and morality tale of our time as it seemed to encapsulate on a single small island the self-destructive plight of the modern human race as a whole. Are not humans a plague on planet earth? – as we are endlessly endocrined in innumerable dystopian scifi movies. Left to ourselves, do we not simply consume resources with no thought of tomorrow? Eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we die?
The main ingredients of the myth of Easter Island are:
1. The islanders cut down all the trees on their island until there weren’t any left to cut down;
2. The islanders originally fished from wooden canoes, until the trees were gone; then there were no more canoes and no more dish to eat.
3. Once they were treeless and canoeless and thus fishless (due to being clueless), they came to depend on farmed crops on land;
4. The feckless islanders then showed the same destructive abandon with arable farming, cultivating the same plots year after year and draining the soil of nutrients, leading eventually to the erosion and loss of the topsoil itself;
5. In plaintive and vainglorious celebration of their exulted status of eco-villains for all time, they crafted out of rock the famous “Easter Island Heads”, statues looking out to sea from the island’s coast in forlorn hope of rescue from enlightened environmental activists, for eco-missionaries to come to their island to rescue then from themselves.
The new research by Catrine Jarman et al. of the Binghampton University, New York, falsifies all of the above assumptions about “exocide” on Easter Island.
The linked ScienceDaily report above (for once) eloquently summarises their findings so I wont repeat them all here. In short, it is clear that the harvesting of trees was done in an intelligent, sustainable way, and thus they did not run out of wood for canoes since the diet of the Rapa Nui people continued to contain seafood protein. Fishing and land farming continued in parallel. Furthermore, the island’s inhabitants evidently fertilized the soil with mined rocks, so that over many generations it did not become nutrient depleted.
Maybe the giant head statues were crafted as a creative activity accompanying the mining of rocks to use as soil fertilizer? Just a speculation. They must have scraped the rocks to obtain spreadable fertilizer – why not craft statues at the same time?
To quote researcher Carl Lipo:
“The Rapa Nui people were, not surprisingly, smart about how they used their resources,” he said. “And all the misunderstanding comes from our preconceptions about what subsistence should look like, basically European farmers thinking, ‘Well, what should a farm look like?’ And it didn’t look like what they thought, so they assumed something bad had happened, when in fact it was a perfectly smart thing to do. It continues to support the new narrative that we’ve been finding for the past ten years.”
[Please note – the placement of commas is very important in the meaning of the first sentence by Lipo. Moving the commas could lead to misquotation that would reverse the sentence’s meaning.]
When did building temples to imaginary gods ever benefit delusional humans?
Right now, the most profitable purveyor of delusion in the U.S. is engaged in selling worthless mortar boards.
Plausible essay.
TKS
Ironically Easter islanders lived way “closer to the nature” than we. If they had modern technology and fossil fuels they would have certainly lived longer.
Shoulda built windmills instead, or wait, maybe they should have slain the dictator that approved the planning. Too late now.
@ATheoK- Here ya go …
http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-historic-famines-caused-cannibalism.php
Imaginative claims due to active imagination … See Floating-City-Island.blogspot.com
Sandy, Minister of Future
Thank you, Mr. Avery, for a fact-based time-line and explanation of what really happened in the history of Easter Island. There have been a lot of fictional visions of Easter island available from the Greenies and Warmistas that never rang true.
@ATheoK- Here’s what i said- 1. Who will be affected? Everyone will feel some effect; if not from higher food prices and lack of selection, then one of the deep cold winters. 2. Who will starve? Basicly the poor and some in large cities where food delivery trucks get hijacked and downtown groceries stay empty shelved. 3. Who will get eaten? Records from past great famines say the young, old, and sick are vulnerable.
Your comment- Complete puffery on the other imaginative claims.
Puffery- relying on exaggerations, opinions, and superlatives, with little or no credible evidence to support its vague claims.
Please point out the exaggerations and superlatives. Supply trucks were often hijacked during the Kosovo conflict. As to opinions, i am talking about the future; you knew that, right?
You said- Apparently Sandy is not minister of any future, just fantasy.
Every future is somebody’s fantasy. If they are creative, heh.
Sandy, Minister of Future
They obviously should have killed and fed the slave traders to the fish…then they would maybe still been able to survive. I always wonder how a handful of Spanish Conquistadors were able to conquer the Aztecs in Mexico, which they then conquered the Maya further south and the Inca in South America. Perhaps the new world Civilizations had already begun to disintegrate internally and were ripe for destruction that included tribal enemies of these Empires that no longer wanted to be slaves themselves or worse, wind up being a human sacrifice in the warped ‘religion’ of these Empires. Of course the Spanish were not much better. And it is still a problem to this day. Sort of like the new religion of CAGW that also demands Sacrifice.
Any consideration of the Spanish v. the Aztecs in Mexico without mentioning smallpox is like the old line “Other than that, Mrs Lincoln, how was the play?”. Most of the advantage the Spanish had was due to prior exposure to the Afro-Eurasian disease environment.
I probably had ancestors on both sides of that fight, and it was mostly disease, not culture or technology.
Yes Tom, I totally agree that disease, especially smallpox in those early days was the significant hammer that sealed the history forever. Undoubtedly. But I think it was a perfect Trifecta of disease, cultural decline and technological disadvantage that allowed Colonialism to completely take the new world by storm. It is important we get this story right for future generations, so as we don’t blame the Easter Islanders for their own demise as has been the case in some main stream media over the decades.
@ATheok- I wish you long life and happiness. I have turned off my comment feed.
I have been blessed / cursed with an overactive imagination. Unlike beaurocrats or politicians, who have none, heh. It could even be classified as Narrative Disorder, where one spins stories to connect seemingly unrelated facts. Its better than watching TV, heh.
Sandy, Minister of Future
Part of modern environmental mythology is that the earth was delivered to man in perfect condition, but man abused and ruined the earth and in doing so brought about his own demise. Seems like I’ve heard that story somewhere else.
“The cold centuries may even make man-made global warming look positively attractive!”
I’ll bet they still find a way to blame the cold climate “disruption” on man-made global warming.
The Dutch my have got it right first time.
http://hoaxes.org/af_database/permalink/easter_island_statue_washes_ashore
The trees didn’t die out in cold periods, just like polar bears don’t go extinct and die out during warm periods. Their survival and evolution over tens of thousands of years showed they were adapted to the local climate, but not for log rolling.
I did a write up on my blog for kids about “extinct” animals that are not really extinct. In virtually every case, as soon as the animals were rediscovered, the animals were in immediate danger of extinction because WE KNEW ABOUT THEM NOW. Somehow, if humans even know about things, they magically destroy them. So -called science lives with the magical thinking that humans control everything, even down to if we know about something, we must be affecting it and destroying it. It’s sad science has degraded to this low level. It’s magical thinking at its best.
So with practically no trees for rollers, how did they move the massive stone statues around?
Genuine question.
Answered above.
They walked them.
The cold centuries may even make man-made global warming look positively attractive!
BAGW (B for beneficial) make it look attractive right now.
It does not seem plausible for climate fluctuations such as the LIA to have any significant effect on a tropical location like Easter Island. Where’s the evidence?
Millennia of drought in lake sediments.
An excellent science-based account of Rapa Nui: https://www.amazon.com/Statues-that-Walked-Unraveling-Mystery/dp/1619020203/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1523210206&sr=8-1&keywords=the+statues+that+walked
Hint: Rats and Europeans
Easter Island: Here’s my take. The island started out to be a reeducation/prison camp. They learned how to become stone masons. Did their time, learn a skill and return to society.
Some thoughts about Easter Island…
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2013.00003/full
A question that needs further work [as is always the case]
Thanks for the link, references in which provide conclusive proof that the Easter Island palms were not brought there by people.
Pollen researchers found that the most abundant tree in Rapa Nui’s ancient forest was the now extinct palm. The bottom strata of their 37,000 year-old sediment column were packed with its pollen.
No way did South Americans colonize the most remote place on earth over 37,000 years ago, for the good reason that there were probably not any people on South America then, and if there were, they weren’t seafarers. Coastal navigators, at best. Nor did they practice agriculture, let alone arboreal horticulture.
In the past 15,000 years or so, people did most likely spread along the Pacific coast of the Americans from Beringia, but not more than 20,000 years before then.
Gravity, space and the climate, major players without man.
More NY Times Easter Island mythology: “Easter Island is eroding as South Pacific sea levels rise”, by Nicholas Casey and Josh Haner of the New York Times. It took about two minutes for me to go online to the Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (psmsl.org), which includes all the world’s tide gauge records, to find out about Easter Island. Early in the Easter Island tide gauge record (1974), average sea level was 7061 millimeters. In 2016, the last year of record, sea level had fallen to 7028 mm, or a negative 1.3 inches in 42 years. Easter Island’s tide gauge records sea levels for 32 years, twenty of which are higher than the 2016 sea level.
Two other South Seas islands were mentioned in the article as being in jeopardy because of sea level rise, so I also checked tide gauge records for the Marshall Islands (Kwajalein) and Kiribati (Kanton Island). Sea level increased 1.2 inches at Kwajalein since 1947 (68 years) but fell 1.6 inches at Kiribati since 1976. Not much to fear, is there?
It seems even a slightly competent reporter would have done as I have: check the facts. In this case the facts would have put this entire article to a merciful end, but it now has eternal life (won’t be retracted) as “fake news.” Isn’t that the name of news founded on error?
The job of post-modern reporters isn’t to “report” but to regurgitate whatever meme is the meme du jour of globalist socialism.